2027: Sanwo-Olu's Aide Accuses Atiku of Using Subsidy to Turn Nigerians Against Tinubu - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

2027: Sanwo-Olu’s Aide Accuses Atiku of Using Subsidy to Turn Nigerians Against Tinubu

Published

2 months ago

on

2027: Sanwo-Olu's Aide Accuses Atiku of Using Subsidy to Turn Nigerians Against Tinubu
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar

2027: Sanwo-Olu’s Aide Accuses Atiku of Using Subsidy to Turn Nigerians Against Tinubu

Jubril Gawat, Senior Special Assistant on New Media to Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, has accused former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar of attempting to weaponise the fuel subsidy debate to turn Nigerians against President Bola Tinubu, as the political war of words over the controversial policy intensifies ahead of the 2027 elections. Gawat said this while reacting to Atiku’s promise to restore petrol subsidy if elected president in the 2027 general election. The presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) had last week pledged to restore the subsidy, arguing that its removal had not translated into improved living conditions for Nigerians. Atiku said although he initially did not oppose the decision to remove the subsidy, developments since its removal had changed his position.

“I initially did not oppose the removal of the fuel subsidy. But now that it has been removed, where is the money?” Atiku asked. He also promised to recover funds allegedly stolen from the subsidy scheme, saying his administration would prosecute those responsible for the diversion of public funds. “If I win the presidential election, I will restore the subsidy. And anyone who stole Nigeria’s subsidy funds must return the money,” he said.

Reacting to the pledge, Gawat described the return of subsidy as a major setback to initiatives established following its removal, including the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND). “For me, away from other very important issues, bringing back subsidy to knock off a solid initiative like NELFUND is already a big negative to any right thinking person,” Gawat said on X on Tuesday. He argued that the subsidy debate should no longer be part of the country’s policy discussions, suggesting that Atiku’s position was politically motivated. “I also believe the issue of subsidy should not even be on any form of discussion table anymore, the person that brought it believes he can use it to rile up the people against Mr President, same person shockingly commended Mr President in a series of tweets when subsidy was removed,” he said. Atiku had also argued that funds previously spent on subsidising petrol could have been channelled into critical sectors including healthcare, education, security and youth empowerment. “Now it has been removed. Where is the money? If the funds were used to improve healthcare, education, insecurity, security and youth empowerment, things would have been better,” he said.

READ ALSO:

The Tinubu administration has maintained that the subsidy removal was a “difficult but necessary decision” that has created fiscal space for the three tiers of government. According to the Federal Ministry of Finance, the subsidy savings have mobilised N15.827 trillion for the Federation between June 2023 and December 2025. Of this amount, states received approximately N9.17 trillion in additional allocations and local governments received about N6.66 trillion. Net FAAC distribution rose from N10.846 trillion in 2023 to N21.897 trillion in 2025, representing a 102% increase. The government has also pointed to the NELFUND initiative as one of the tangible benefits of the subsidy removal. According to the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, the reform scorecard showed that about N6.47 trillion had been spent additionally on strategic infrastructure, while more than N400 billion had been committed to social investment programmes, including NELFUND and CREDICORP. Idris warned against calls to restore petrol subsidy, asking whether the country could afford to choose petrol subsidy over programmes such as student loans and consumer credit for young people. He noted that Nigeria spent about $10 billion on petrol subsidies in 2022, at a time when oil production and government revenues were declining. “A reinstatement of the subsidy could also reduce funding available for roads, railways, electricity and security, while limiting government’s ability to invest in healthcare, education and social protection,” Idris said.

Atiku has intensified his criticism of the Tinubu administration’s handling of the subsidy removal, describing it as “one of the biggest economic frauds sold to Nigerians.” In a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the former vice-president made several key arguments against the current policy. Atiku argued that while the Tinubu administration claims to have abolished subsidy, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited’s (NNPCL) audited accounts tell a different story. He cited that NNPCL recorded approximately N4.84 trillion as “energy-security expenses” in 2023 and about N7.13 trillion in 2024. Atiku contended that these figures represent a continued government intervention in petrol pricing, merely renamed to avoid political backlash. “Nigerians do not eat semantics. Whether government calls it subsidy, under-recovery, shortfall or energy security, public resources were being used to bridge a gap between economic cost and the price at which petrol was sold. You cannot abolish subsidy at the podium and resurrect it in the accounts under an alias,” he said.

READ ALSO:

Atiku has also accused the administration of applying a double standard, granting fiscal incentives to petroleum investors while denying relief to struggling households. He cited the Deep Offshore Oil and Gas Projects Incentives framework, under which qualifying petroleum developments can receive production tax credits beginning at $3 and $4.50 per barrel. “Tinubu stood at Eagle Square and declared that subsidy was gone. This is the fraud at the heart of Tinubunomics. That is not reform; it is an upside-down economy. You cannot subsidise capital and criminalise relief for citizens. That is not economic reform. It is classic economic apartheid,” he said.

Paul Ibe, an aide to Atiku, has said the former vice-president would restore petrol subsidy if elected president in 2027, but phase out the intervention after the economy improves. Ibe said the proposed measure would be temporary and designed to give Nigerians and businesses room to recover, stimulate economic activity and improve productivity. “We are not returning to Egypt. We are not going back to the old regime that was opaque,” Ibe said. He explained that crude oil would be supplied to local refiners at a discounted price, enabling them to produce petrol and diesel at lower costs, which would eventually translate into lower pump prices for consumers. He criticised the Tinubu administration for removing petrol subsidy alongside other major economic reforms without, in his view, allowing the economy sufficient time to adjust. “No surgeon, no doctor would carry out two or more serious major surgeries, one after the other. They would do one, allow the patient to recuperate, and then undertake the second, or the third,” Ibe said.

The Presidency has also responded to Atiku’s criticisms, with Special Adviser on Media and Public Communications Sunday Dare describing Atiku’s stance as an act of “political apostasy.” Dare accused the former vice-president of flip-flopping on the issue, pointing out that Atiku had advocated for subsidy removal during the 2023 presidential campaign. “To watch a self-styled statesman, who less than four years ago cast himself as an uncompromising apostle of market-driven reform, scramble to promise the reintroduction of petrol subsidies is nothing short of political apostasy,” Dare said.

Dr. Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, Accord Party presidential candidate, also directed his criticism at Atiku, challenging the ADC candidate over his new position on subsidy removal. Hashim described Atiku as one of the earliest major political advocates of subsidy removal during the Fourth Republic, arguing that his current position required an explanation. “Atiku’s recant on subsidy removal without an apology is dishonesty. If you change your position because circumstances or evidence have changed, tell Nigerians why you changed,” Hashim said. However, Hashim, who has consistently opposed subsidy removal, argued that a targeted and transparent subsidy should be restored to protect citizens and productive sectors from severe economic shocks.

With the 2027 general election approximately five months away, the subsidy debate has become a defining issue. Atiku’s camp has framed his proposal as a central plank of the Atiku Economic Recovery Plan, positioning him as a champion of the poor against what they describe as Tinubu’s “brutally savage capitalism.” Meanwhile, the Tinubu administration and the APC have warned that reversing the reforms without a credible alternative could undermine investor confidence, worsen fiscal pressures, and jeopardise the economic gains being pursued by the administration.

2027: Sanwo-Olu’s Aide Accuses Atiku of Using Subsidy to Turn Nigerians Against Tinubu

Loading

Related Topics:
Advertisement

Politics

‘You Copied My Idea Poorly, Like a Dull Student’ – Atiku Fires at Tinubu Over Petrol Discount

Published

4 hours ago

on

October 10, 2026

By

‘You Copied My Idea Poorly, Like a Dull Student’ – Atiku Fires at Tinubu Over Petrol Discount
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar and President Bola Tinubu
‘You Copied My Idea Poorly, Like a Dull Student’ – Atiku Fires at Tinubu Over Petrol Discount

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has accused President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of poorly copying his proposed petrol production subsidy plan, arguing that the Federal Government’s 30-day fuel discount offers only temporary relief from rising petrol prices.

Atiku, the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), said the administration had borrowed his idea but failed to adopt the broader measures he believes could sustainably reduce fuel costs and ease the burden on Nigerians.

Lambasting the President, Atiku likened him to a student who copied another person’s examination answer without understanding it.

“Bola, you have borrowed the idea but missed the lesson. You had a production subsidy and reduced it to a 30-day gesture,” he said.

He added: “You copied my production subsidy proposal. There is nothing wrong with that. You stripped away the part that makes it work and handed Nigerians a 30-day discount. Where is the rest of the answer, Bola?”

Atiku maintained that his production subsidy proposal was designed to support locally refined petroleum products and reduce costs for households, transport operators and businesses. He questioned what would happen when the temporary discount expires, warning that Nigerians could remain exposed to high transportation costs, rising food prices and increased business expenses.

READ ALSO:

The dispute follows the Federal Government’s introduction of a temporary petrol discount through Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC) retail outlets. The measure was announced to cushion consumers against rising fuel prices amid elevated international crude oil costs.

NNPC said the discount would run until October 31, 2026, although the initiative was not presented as a uniform pump-price reduction across the country.

The Tinubu administration has rejected claims that the measure represents a return to the former petrol subsidy regime, which ended in May 2023. Finance Minister and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, described the initiative as a temporary intervention rather than a restoration of the previous system of government-funded subsidies.

The Presidency has explained that the arrangement involves a retail discount, with a seller reducing or foregoing part of its margin for a specified period. This differs from the former subsidy system, under which public funds covered part of the cost of petrol.

The government has maintained that it remains committed to market-based petroleum pricing. It had also challenged Atiku to explain the legal, fiscal and practical framework for his proposed production subsidy, citing provisions of the Petroleum Industry Act 2021 and Nigeria’s petroleum-pricing regulations.

Atiku’s criticism has renewed debate over whether a targeted production subsidy could provide more lasting relief than a temporary retail discount, and how such a policy would be funded without recreating the fiscal pressures associated with the former subsidy regime.

The dispute comes as political alignments intensify ahead of the 2027 general election, with Atiku using the issue to challenge the administration’s economic policies while the government defends its approach to fuel pricing.

 

‘You Copied My Idea Poorly, Like a Dull Student’ – Atiku Fires at Tinubu Over Petrol Discount

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Keyamo Mocks Atiku Over Tinubu’s Presidency, Says Ex-VP Needs Mental Health Support

Published

4 hours ago

on

October 10, 2026

By

Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo and former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar
Keyamo Mocks Atiku Over Tinubu’s Presidency, Says Ex-VP Needs Mental Health Support

Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, has launched a verbal attack on former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, accusing him of bitterness over President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s emergence as Nigeria’s leader and suggesting that the opposition politician needs mental health support.

Keyamo made the remarks on Friday, October 9, 2026, in response to Atiku’s criticism of the Federal Government’s proposed 30-day petrol price discount, which the former vice-president described as an inadequate response to the economic hardship facing Nigerians.

The minister alleged that Atiku’s repeated criticism of Tinubu reflected personal disappointment over his failure to become president after several attempts.

In a post on his verified X account, Keyamo described Atiku as a “pained and very bitter fellow” and argued that the former vice-president had struggled to accept Tinubu’s political success.

Keyamo also used the expression “agitated depression” to characterise Atiku’s alleged emotional state and urged people close to the former vice-president to offer him support.

However, the minister did not provide medical evidence to support his comments about Atiku’s mental health. His remarks were political allegations and should not be interpreted as a medical diagnosis.

Keyamo Compares Atiku’s Presidential Ambition With Tinubu’s Victory

In his response, Keyamo compared the political journeys of Tinubu and Atiku, recalling their respective positions during the administration of former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

At the time, Tinubu was governor of Lagos State, while Atiku served as vice-president.

Keyamo argued that although Atiku had pursued the presidency through several election cycles, Tinubu eventually won the office in the 2023 presidential election.

The minister attributed Tinubu’s emergence to political strategy, circumstances and what he described as divine intervention.

He also cited Ecclesiastes 9:11 from the Bible to argue that success does not always depend on strength or ability, but can also be influenced by timing and circumstances.

Keyamo urged Atiku’s associates not to encourage what he described as unproductive attacks on the President.

“We should all pity Atiku Abubakar rather than goad him on,” he wrote.

READ ALSO:

He further suggested that the former vice-president’s approach to political criticism could affect his support ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Atiku Faults Tinubu’s 30-Day Petrol Discount

The exchange followed Atiku’s criticism of the Federal Government’s proposed 30-day petrol price discount, which he argued would offer only temporary relief without resolving the deeper problems affecting households and businesses.

The former vice-president questioned the sustainability of the initiative, particularly what would happen when the 30-day period expired.

He argued that Nigerians needed durable measures to address high transportation costs, rising food prices and the broader cost-of-living crisis rather than a short-term intervention.

Atiku also called for attention to the underlying factors responsible for high petrol prices and the economic pressure experienced by citizens.

His criticism reflects the wider debate over the impact of the Tinubu administration’s economic reforms, particularly the removal of the petrol subsidy and its consequences for household purchasing power.

Supporters of the administration have defended its policies, while opposition figures have continued to question whether the measures have delivered sufficient relief to Nigerians.

Political Exchange Intensifies Ahead of 2027 Elections

The confrontation between Keyamo and Atiku comes as political parties and aspirants prepare for the next general elections.

Atiku, who is seeking the presidency under the African Democratic Congress (ADC), has continued to criticise the administration’s economic policies.

Keyamo, a prominent supporter of Tinubu, has defended the President and challenged opposition figures over their assessments of the government’s performance.

The latest exchange illustrates how disagreements over economic policy are increasingly accompanied by personal attacks among political figures.

While politicians are entitled to criticise government policies and challenge their opponents, claims about an individual’s mental health should not be presented as established facts without credible medical evidence.

With petrol prices, inflation, transportation costs and the cost of living remaining important public concerns, the effectiveness of the Federal Government’s economic interventions is likely to remain a major issue in political debate ahead of the 2027 elections.

 

Keyamo Mocks Atiku Over Tinubu’s Presidency, Says Ex-VP Needs Mental Health Support

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Lunatic Can’t Preside Over Nigeria’: Wike Fires Back at Amaechi

Published

5 hours ago

on

October 10, 2026

By

‘Lunatic Can’t Preside Over Nigeria’: Wike Fires Back at Amaechi
‘Lunatic Can’t Preside Over Nigeria’: Wike Fires Back at Amaechi

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has launched a fresh verbal attack on former Rivers State governor Rotimi Amaechi, describing him as a “lunatic” and questioning his suitability to govern Nigeria following his remarks about supporters of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Wike also warned that Amaechi could face difficulties campaigning in Rivers State if he continued to describe people intending to vote for Tinubu in the 2027 presidential election as thieves and mentally unstable.

The FCT minister made the remarks on Friday, October 9, 2026, while speaking with journalists in Abuja after meeting chairpersons of the six area councils in the Federal Capital Territory.

The confrontation followed Amaechi’s reported remarks during a political engagement in Edo State, where he criticised Tinubu’s supporters and said that only “thieves and mad people” would vote for the President.

Reacting, Wike accused the former governor of insulting Nigerians because of their political preferences, insisting that voters should be free to support any candidate without being subjected to personal attacks.

“A lunatic cannot preside over the affairs of this country! A known armed robber cannot!” Wike said.

He also challenged Amaechi’s description of Tinubu’s supporters as thieves, asking whether the remark was intended to include him and other Nigerians who support the President.

Wike further launched personal attacks against Amaechi, questioning his record in public office and urging journalists to investigate projects and financial transactions undertaken during his eight-year administration as Rivers State governor between 2007 and 2015.

Wike Threatens Opposition to Amaechi’s Rivers Campaign

The FCT minister warned that Amaechi could encounter resistance if he attempted to campaign in Rivers State while continuing to attack Tinubu’s supporters.

READ ALSO:

“If he continues along this line, it will be difficult for him to campaign in Rivers State. We will make it difficult for him,” Wike said.

He argued that politicians seeking public office should present their policies and programmes instead of insulting citizens who support rival candidates.

Wike also called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to address what he described as offensive political campaign language.

He maintained that electoral campaigns should focus on issues affecting Nigerians, including economic conditions, security, infrastructure and public accountability, rather than personal insults.

The minister’s comments came amid preparations by political parties and aspirants for the 2027 general elections, with disagreements over Tinubu’s administration and the opposition’s political strategy becoming increasingly prominent.

Wike Questions Amaechi’s Record as Rivers Governor

Beyond the exchange over Tinubu’s supporters, Wike raised questions about projects and financial transactions associated with Amaechi’s tenure as Rivers governor.

He alleged that $39 million was paid for the Justice Karibi-Whyte Hospital project without the hospital being completed.

Wike also questioned a $10 million fumigation contract awarded to a Cuban company for mosquito control, arguing that the expenditure required further scrutiny.

He cited the ₦68 billion Port Harcourt monorail project, which he described as abandoned, and alleged that $308 million generated from the sale of state-owned gas turbines had been misappropriated.

The minister challenged journalists to investigate the allegations and demand explanations from the former governor.

Wike also referred to a judicial panel of inquiry and claimed that Amaechi had been indicted and subsequently lost an appeal at the Supreme Court.

However, the allegations concerning the projects, public funds and legal proceedings should be assessed against the relevant official records, inquiry findings and court judgments. Wike’s statements alone do not establish that wrongdoing occurred.

Political Tensions Rise Ahead of 2027 Elections

The latest exchange adds to the longstanding political rivalry between Wike and Amaechi, two former governors of Rivers State whose political differences have continued to attract national attention.

Their disagreement also reflects the wider contest over Tinubu’s leadership and the positions being taken by opposition figures ahead of the 2027 elections.

Amaechi, a member of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), has been critical of Tinubu, while Wike has continued to defend the President’s supporters against what he considers unfair political attacks.

The dispute has renewed questions about the tone of political debate in Nigeria and whether public figures can challenge opponents without disparaging voters who hold different views.

While politicians have the right to criticise candidates and their records, calls for accountability are best supported by verifiable evidence and specific policy arguments.

The response from Amaechi and any subsequent reaction from INEC could provide further context to the dispute as political activities intensify ahead of the next general election.

‘Lunatic Can’t Preside Over Nigeria’: Wike Fires Back at Amaechi

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending