News

27 Pro-Wike lawmakers lose as CTC reveals court decision

27 Pro-Wike lawmakers lose as CTC reveals court decision

The Rivers State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Dagogo Iboroma, clarified that the State High Court did not declare or affirm Martin Amaewhule as the Speaker of the House of Assembly.

Additionally, the court did not recognize Amaewhule and 26 other pro-Nyesom Wike lawmakers in Rivers as members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

In a statement issued on Wednesday morning, Iboroma emphasized that the certified true copy of the court judgment supports the government’s stance. He urged media practitioners to avoid interpreting court judgments based on emotion or personal bias. Instead, he advised them to thoroughly read the judgment or seek competent legal advice before publishing any information.

Iboroma’s advice came after obtaining the certified true copy of the court judgment from Monday in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State capital. He stated, “Yesterday, I addressed the press and highlighted the misrepresentation of the High Court of Rivers State’s judgment in Suit No. DHC/20/CS/2024 across social, print, and electronic media. My position has been confirmed and vindicated by the Certified True Copy of the court order in Suit No. DHC/20/CS/2024.”

READ ALSO:

Iboroma outlined the enforceable decisions of the court, which included three specific orders:

  1. “That this suit be and is hereby dismissed/struck out for want of jurisdiction.”
  2. “That the Peoples Democratic Party be and is hereby joined as 4th defendant.”
  3. “That the claimants’ case be and is hereby dismissed for lacking in merit.”

He stressed that contrary to false claims in various media, the court did not declare Martin Amaewhule as the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, nor did it affirm Amaewhule and 26 others as members of the Assembly and the PDP. He asserted, “If it were so, it would have been included in the court orders, which I have provided for clarity.”

Iboroma expressed regret over the deliberate misrepresentation of the court ruling, noting that it misled the public. He concluded, “Any finding of fact not included in the court order is an Obiter Dictum, which has no binding force. Once again, I urge the media to refrain from interpreting any judgment without first reading the content and seeking legal advice.”

27 Pro-Wike lawmakers lose as CTC reveals court decision

Trends Admin

Recent Posts

US University opens 2025 scholarships for international students

US University opens 2025 scholarships for international students Montana Technological University (Montana Tech) has opened…

9 hours ago

200,000 repentant terrorists surrender, drop arms in North East – CDS

200,000 repentant terrorists surrender, drop arms in North East – CDS The Chief of Defence…

10 hours ago

Canadian university offers funded national scholarship program for 2025

Canadian university offers funded national scholarship program for 2025 Western University has announced that applications…

10 hours ago

Israeli strikes pound central Beirut, suburbs

Israeli strikes pound central Beirut, suburbs BEIRUT: Israeli strikes pounded a densely-populated part of the Lebanese…

10 hours ago

Robbers kill two members in shoot-out with Delta police

Robbers kill two members in shoot-out with Delta police The spokesperson for the police in Delta…

11 hours ago

Akwa Ibom businessman abducted, driver killed, police orderly injured

Akwa Ibom businessman abducted, driver killed, police orderly injured Gunmen kidnapped a prominent businessman, Dr. Samuel…

11 hours ago