US court stops Trump’s plan for rapid deportation to third countries - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

US court stops Trump’s plan for rapid deportation to third countries

Published

on

Trump Weighs Entry Restrictions for Pregnant Foreign Visitors After Supreme Court Ruling
U.S President Donald Trump

US court stops Trump’s plan for rapid deportation to third countries

A US judge has blocked the Trump administration from quickly deporting thousands of migrants to countries other than their own without first providing them the opportunity to demonstrate that they fear being persecuted, tortured, or killed there.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a preliminary injunction, the latest setback to President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown that began on January 20.

The Boston-based judge last month temporarily banned the administration from fast-tracking deportations, hampering its ability to remove migrants who in certain circumstances have legal protections barring them from being deported back to their countries of origin.

The provisional injunction ordered on Friday will remain in force until the dispute is completed.

In court files, the administration has already stated that it will appeal Murphy’s judgement.

When deciding on challenges to government policies, federal judges frequently issue orders that apply nationally.

Stymied by such results, the Trump administration has already petitioned the United States Supreme Court to limit nationwide injunctions to merely those filing the case.

The ruling mandates the US Department of Homeland Security to provide individuals with a “meaningful opportunity” to seek legal relief from deportation before sending them to other nations.

“The Court has found it likely that these deportations have or will be wrongfully executed and that there has at least been no opportunity for Plaintiffs to demonstrate the substantial harms they might face,” wrote Murphy, an appointee of the former US president Joe Biden.

The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately reply to calls for comment.

READ ALSO:

According to Anwen Hughes of Human Rights First, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, many of those deported to third countries are refugees who have been granted protection from persecution or torture if they return to their home countries.

“The protections the court has ordered here are critical to make sure DHS does not turn around and ship them to a third country where they would face the same harms,” Hughes said.

In the fiscal year 2023, 1,769 people subject to final orders of removal were granted limited kinds of protection against return to countries where their lives or freedom would be jeopardised or where they faced the risk of torture.

In February, the US Department of Homeland Security directed immigration agents to evaluate cases of those granted such safeguards from deportation to their home countries to determine whether they may be re-detained and transported to a third country.

Immigrant rights organisations sued on behalf of a number of migrants trying to avoid deportation to newly specified locations.

Judge Murphy expressed worry that without a court order, the government may conduct deportations in violation of the Convention Against Torture.

“Even if such blanket assurances might, in some individual cases, satisfy due process, the March Guidance precludes any further review prior to removal,” he wrote. “Without meaningful review, the rights Congress has provided are little more than dead letters.”

 

US court stops Trump’s plan for rapid deportation to third countries

Loading

International

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

Published

on

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

A German palliative care doctor has been sentenced to life imprisonment after a court in Berlin found him guilty of murdering 15 patients over a three-year period, in a case prosecutors say could become one of the largest serial murder investigations involving a medical professional in Germany.

The 41-year-old physician, identified only as Johannes M. under Germany’s privacy laws, was convicted on Wednesday of killing 12 women and three men between September 2021 and July 2024 while working for a home-based palliative care service in the German capital.

The Berlin Regional Court heard that the victims, aged between 25 and 94, were all seriously ill but were not considered to be at imminent risk of death. Most of them were receiving palliative care in their homes when the killings occurred.

According to prosecutors, Johannes M. deliberately administered a lethal combination of an anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant without the knowledge or consent of the patients. The drugs caused respiratory paralysis, leading to their deaths within minutes.

READ ALSO:

Prosecutors argued that the doctor acted out of what they described as a “lust for murder” rather than compassion or any legitimate medical purpose. They also accused him of setting fire to several victims’ homes in an attempt to destroy evidence and conceal the crimes.

Investigators linked at least five suspected arson incidents to the murders, saying the fires were intended to make the deaths appear accidental.

One of the most shocking incidents presented during the trial occurred in July 2024, shortly before the doctor’s arrest. Prosecutors alleged that Johannes M. killed two patients on the same day.

According to the prosecution, he first fatally injected a 75-year-old man during a home visit in central Berlin before travelling to another district, where he allegedly killed a 76-year-old woman. Investigators said he later attempted to set fire to the woman’s apartment, but the blaze failed to destroy crucial evidence.

For much of the year-long trial, the doctor declined to testify. However, during proceedings last month, he admitted responsibility for killing 12 of the victims, telling the court that he believed he was relieving them of pain and suffering.

“Throughout it all, I thought this was the best thing for everyone,” he said, before expressing remorse and apologising to the families of the victims.

Despite the admission, prosecutors maintained that the killings were neither acts of mercy nor medically justified, insisting the victims had not consented to ending their lives and that many still had plans for the future.

In delivering its judgment, the Berlin Regional Court imposed Germany’s maximum sentence for murder and made a finding of “particularly severe guilt,” a legal classification that makes early release after the standard 15-year period highly unlikely.

The court also ordered preventive detention, allowing authorities to continue holding the doctor after completion of his prison sentence if he is still considered a danger to society. In addition, he was permanently banned from practising medicine.

Authorities believe the 15 confirmed murders may represent only a fraction of the doctor’s alleged crimes.

Investigators initially opened the case after becoming suspicious about four patient deaths before widening the inquiry. A special investigative team has since reviewed 395 patient files, exhumed several bodies and identified dozens of additional suspicious cases.

Prosecutors are now investigating 76 more deaths linked to the doctor, raising the possibility of further criminal charges if sufficient evidence is established.

If additional allegations are proven, the case could become one of the most extensive serial murder investigations in Germany’s modern history.

The trial featured emotional testimony from relatives of several victims, many of whom rejected the doctor’s claim that he was acting out of compassion.

The mother of the youngest victim, a 25-year-old woman, tearfully told the court that her daughter “never said she didn’t want to live anymore.”

Similarly, the son of a 72-year-old woman said his mother had been planning a holiday with her sister before her death, insisting she had every intention of continuing her life.

Legal experts say the verdict has renewed debate in Germany over patient safety, oversight of palliative care services and the safeguards required to protect vulnerable patients receiving treatment in their homes.

As investigations continue, prosecutors say Johannes M. has indicated a willingness to cooperate in future proceedings, while authorities remain focused on determining whether additional patients fell victim to the same pattern of crimes.

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz 

The United States has launched a fresh wave of military strikes against Iran, targeting more than 80 military sites after three commercial oil tankers were attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, dramatically escalating tensions in the Gulf and raising fresh concerns over global energy supplies.

The strikes, announced by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on Tuesday, targeted over 80 Iranian military assets, including missile launch sites, command-and-control centres, radar installations, air defence systems, drone launch facilities and more than 60 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) fast attack boats operating in the strategic waterway.

According to CENTCOM, the operation was designed to “impose heavy costs” on Iran for what Washington described as attacks on commercial vessels crewed by innocent civilians in international waters.

The military action followed separate attacks on three oil tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes through which nearly one-fifth of global oil supplies pass.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed that one tanker caught fire after an unidentified projectile struck its engine room, while two other vessels sustained damage in separate incidents but were able to continue their voyages.

Although Iran has not officially admitted responsibility for the attacks, the United States, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia have accused Tehran of orchestrating the assaults.

Qatar said one of its vessels, Al-Rekayyat, was deliberately targeted while sailing near the Strait of Hormuz, while Saudi Arabia said its crude oil tanker, Wadyan, was also struck during transit.

READ ALSO:

Iran rejected the allegations, insisting that commercial vessels failing to coordinate with Iranian maritime authorities or tampering with navigation systems risked accidents and collisions.

Hours after the US operation, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced retaliatory missile and drone strikes on what it described as 85 US military facilities in Bahrain and Kuwait.

The IRGC claimed the attacks targeted the headquarters of the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain and Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait. Independent verification of the extent of the reported attacks had not been immediately available.

Iranian state media also reported explosions in Qeshm Island, Bandar Abbas, Sirik, and other southern locations, saying several civilians were injured by flying debris following the US bombardment.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister described the US military action as a clear violation of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding signed last month, warning that Tehran would take “decisive measures” to defend its sovereignty.

The country’s Foreign Ministry also condemned Washington’s decision to revoke a temporary waiver that had allowed limited Iranian oil exports under the agreement.

According to Iranian officials, the move demonstrates the “bad faith, inconsistency and unreliability” of the US government and effectively undermines diplomatic efforts.

Before launching the strikes, the US Treasury revoked the waiver that had temporarily eased oil sanctions on Iran.

The decision restores restrictions on Iranian crude exports and significantly increases economic pressure on Tehran.

US President Donald Trump warned that Washington was prepared to carry out further military operations if Iran continued attacking commercial shipping or violated the ceasefire framework reached last month.

Despite the latest escalation, US officials said diplomatic negotiations remain open and that Washington continues to pursue a long-term agreement with Tehran.

The renewed confrontation has heightened fears of prolonged instability in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime corridor linking the Persian Gulf with global markets.

Any sustained disruption to shipping through the waterway could significantly affect global energy supplies and drive up international oil prices.

Oil markets reacted immediately to the latest developments, with crude prices climbing as investors weighed the risk of further attacks and possible disruptions to one of the world’s most important oil transit routes.

The latest exchange of military action represents one of the most serious confrontations between the United States and Iran since the two countries signed a 14-point memorandum aimed at extending a ceasefire and reducing hostilities across the region.

While both sides continue to insist that diplomatic channels remain open, the latest escalation has cast fresh doubt over the future of the agreement and renewed fears of a wider regional conflict.

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Drone attack hits tanker in Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

Iran Shuts Strait of Hormuz, Threatens to Target All Ships After New US Strikes

Drone attack hits tanker in Strait of Hormuz

A commercial tanker was reportedly hit in a drone attack while transiting the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday, sparking fresh concerns over security in one of the world’s most strategic shipping lanes.

According to initial reports, the vessel allegedly came under attack after passing through the waterway without obtaining the required permission from Iranian authorities. However, the claim has not been independently verified.

Details of the incident, including the identity of the tanker, the extent of the damage and whether there were casualties among the crew, were not immediately available as of the time of filing this report.

READ ALSO:

No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, while authorities have yet to issue an official statement on the circumstances surrounding the incident.

The Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran and Oman, is a critical global maritime corridor through which a substantial share of the world’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas exports is transported.

The latest incident is expected to heighten concerns among global shipping operators and energy markets, with analysts warning that any disruption along the route could have significant implications for international trade and oil prices.

Authorities are expected to launch an investigation as more information emerges.

Drone attack hits tanker in Strait of Hormuz

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending