UPDATED: Supreme Court affirms Okpebholo’s election as Edo governor - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

UPDATED: Supreme Court affirms Okpebholo’s election as Edo governor

Published

on

Edo Gov Okpebholo Orders Probe Into Benin Vegetable Market Kidnapping
Governor Monday Okpebholo

UPDATED: Supreme Court affirms Okpebholo’s election as Edo governor

The Supreme Court has affirmed the victory of Senator Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the last governorship election held in Edo State on September 21, 2024.

A five-member panel of the apex court, held in a unanimous judgment on Thursday, that the appellants – the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate in the election, Asue Ighodalo – failed to establish their case with sufficient and credible evidence as required.

The court resolved four out of the five issues, identified for determination, against the appellants.

In the lead judgment, Justice Mohammed Lawal Garba found that the Court of Appeal was right in setting aside the decision of the election tribunal to admit the bimodal voters accreditation system (BVAS) tendered by the appellants from the bar without prior consent of the respondents.

Justice Garba als found that the appellants’ allegations of non-compliance was based on the provision of Section 51(1) and (2) and Section 73(2) of the Electoral Act to which Section 137 of the Electoral Act applies on the need to call oral evidence in proof, but which they failed to do.

The judge said: “In this particular appeal, the appellants called a total of 19 witnesses, out of which only five were polling unit agents, whose testimonies were related to over voting.

“They did not testify on the issue of no prior recording of serial numbers and other particulars of the result sheets, the BVAS machines and other sensitive election materials as prescribed by the Electoral Act 2022.

“13 of the 19 witnesses called by the appellants were wards and Local Government agents, who did not witness the election at the polling units to be able to testify and or demonstrate the documents as it relates to the complaints of the appellants.

“Petitioner witness (PW) 12 who happened to be the appellants’ star witness, who was the Director of Research and Strategy of the first appellant’s campaign organisation, played no role in the voting at the polling units.

READ ALSO:

“In the circumstances, all the documents tendered before the tribunal, in respect of sundry allegations of not filling the form, of over voting, etc were documents that were dumped on the tribunal,” he said.

Justice Garba held that it is the law that to prove over voting, which was one of the allegations made by the appellants, they were required to tender voters register for the affected polling units (to show the member of registered voters), BVAS machines used in those polling units (to show the number of accredited voters) and result sheets of the said polling units in Form EC8As (to show the number of votes cast and recorded in the election).

He added that it is when these documents are tendered that the court will have the opportunity of comparing the number of votes recorded in Form EC8A, the primary source and the number of accredited voters in the BVAS matchines to ensure that those figures tally and do not exceed the number of registered voters.

The judge said the failure of the appellants to tender any of the documents mentioned above was fatal to their effort to prove allegations of over voting.

He held that in the instant case, the appellants failed to tender admissible and credible evidence in the disputed polling units to show the number of registered and accredited voters and extracts of the BVAS machines as required.

The judge held that not only did the appellants tender the BVAS machines in an unlawful manner, they failed to demonstrate it before the tribunal to establish their case.

Justice Garba said: “In this case, the BVAS machines were merely tendered from the bar, without being opened and demonstrated before the tribunal and so, they were clearly dumped on the tribunal.”

He faulted the appellants’ claim that the Form EC25B was not completed by INEC officials as required before the election.

The judge said contrary to the appellants’ claim Form EC25B did not contain columns for the filling of information about sensitive election materials before the actual election. He noted that form for such purpose was Form EC40A, which was duly filled as required.

He held that even if the appellants were able to establish their claim of non compliance in relation to the 395 polling units where they challenged the results declared by INEC, they were still required to demonstrate that the said non compliance substantially affected the entire results of the election.

Justice Garba said it was apparent that from the evidence tendered by the appellants in support of their attack of the results from the 395 polling units, the non compliance even if proves could not be said to have substantially affected the result of the election which was conducted in 4519 polling units across the state.

He added that in that regard, the appellants did not satisfactorily discharge the burden of proof as required by the law.

READ ALSO:

Justice Garab said the other allegations of exclusion and reduction of votes were also not established with credible and admissible evidence.

He held that the appeal lacked merit, dismissed it and affirmed the May 29 judgment of the Court of Appeal, which earlier upheld the judgment of the election tribunal, affirming Okpebholo’s election.

Reacting to the judgment, Ighodalo said he was not convinced that the Supreme Court did justice in its judgment in the appeal he filed.

In a statement on Thursday, Ighodalo said: “My dear people of Edo State, today, the Supreme Court has ruled.

“Though I accept the finality of its judgment, I do not and cannot pretend that what was delivered amounts to justice.

“What happened in the September 2024 Governorship Election was not a contest. It was a robbery. Coordinated. Deliberate. And now, tragically validated by the highest court in the land.

“While I will not and can not obstruct any judicial pronouncement, no matter how flawed, I must never fear to speak truth to power.

“Like you, I feel a deep sense of betrayal. Not just by those who rigged the process, but by the very institutions we trusted to protect our democracy.

“You came out in hope. You voted for competence, for progress, for prosperity. And now, we are told that your voice does not matter. That your freely given mandate can be trampled without consequence.

“I feel your pain. I share your anger. And I will never forget your courage.

“To every young person who saw in this moment the birth of a new Edo, to every elder who longed to see our state rise again, to every woman and man who prayed, campaigned, and voted, we may not have won the office, but we won something greater.

“We found one another. We discovered our collective strength. Though this painful chapter closes today, our beautiful story does not end. The struggle to reclaim the soul of our beloved state continues.

“Yes, dark days may lie ahead. The weight of this illegitimacy will, unfortunately, echo beyond the halls of the Supreme Court. I fear Edo will feel it in the absence of leadership, in the poverty of policy, and in the daily suffering of her people.

“But we are neither a fearful nor a broken people. We may be wounded. But all wounds heal.

“So let this be our vow. We will not retreat. We will not be silenced. And we will never forget.

“To those who now hold power undeserved, lead with humility. Govern with conscience. History sees what the courts may not. And one day, it will deliver its own verdict,” Ighodalo said.

Meanwhile, Okpebholo has dedicated his victory at the Supreme Court to all citizens of Edo State.

In a statement issued on Thursday by his Chief Press Secretary, Fred Itua, Okpebholo said the decision by the apex court has brought to a close all legal contestations arising from the 2024 governorship election.

Part of the statement reads: “This definitive verdict is not merely a legal triumph—it is a solemn reaffirmation of the sacred mandate freely given by the people of Edo State.

“It signals the beginning of a fresh chapter rooted in unity, inclusiveness, and accelerated development.

“His Excellency, Governor Monday Okpebholo, extends profound gratitude to the judiciary for its courage and fidelity to justice, and to the great people of Edo State for their unflinching support, patience, and faith in democracy.

“He views this moment not as a personal victory but as a shared triumph for every Edo citizen, regardless of political, ethnic, or religious affiliation.

“Governor Okpebholo renews his vow to lead with humility, compassion, and accountability. His administration remains fully committed to its developmental blueprint—prioritizing security, infrastructure, education, agriculture, healthcare, youth empowerment, and job creation.

“The focus remains clear: to deliver tangible benefits that uplift lives and restore confidence in public leadership.

“In the true spirit of statesmanship, Governor Okpebholo extends a sincere olive branch to all his opponents and members of the opposition. The elections are over; the real work of governance and healing must begin.

“He urges political leaders across party lines to rise above division and contribute constructively to the task of building a greater Edo State.

“Constructive criticism and diverse perspectives will always be welcomed, but they must be rooted in a sincere desire to see Edo thrive.

“Edo belongs to all of us. The time has come to set aside our differences, close ranks, and march forward—united in purpose, anchored in peace, and driven by a shared vision of progress.

“Let this victory ignite a new era of unity, dialogue, and impact-driven governance. Let history remember this moment as the point when Edo chose collaboration over conflict, vision over vendetta, and service over self.”

UPDATED: Supreme Court affirms Okpebholo’s election as Edo governor

Loading

News

Tinubu’s Visit: One Feared Dead, Several Injured as APC Women’s Bus Collides With Security Vehicle in Uyo

Published

on

Tinubu’s Visit: One Feared Dead, Several Injured as APC Women’s Bus Collides With Security Vehicle in Uyo

 

UYO, Akwa Ibom State – A tragic road accident involving a bus conveying supporters of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has reportedly claimed one life and left several others injured in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.

 

The accident occurred on Friday, November 6, when the bus, reportedly conveying APC women to participate in activities marking President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s visit to the state, collided with a security vehicle along Oron Road.

 

The incident happened amid heightened security arrangements for the President’s visit to Akwa Ibom, where he was scheduled to commission several projects executed by Governor Umo Eno’s administration and attend political activities.

 

According to reports, the bus, identified as belonging to the Akwa Ibom State Transport Corporation (AKTC), was conveying the women towards the reception venue when it collided with a Toyota Hilux security vehicle.

 

The impact reportedly left the bus badly damaged, triggering panic as passers-by, motorists and security personnel rushed to assist the victims.

 

A video circulating on social media showed the wreckage of the bus at the accident scene, with people gathering around the damaged vehicle as rescue efforts continued.

 

The injured victims were reportedly evacuated and taken to hospitals in Uyo for medical attention.

 

The Guardian reported that one person had died in the accident, while several others sustained injuries. However, another local media report said no death had been confirmed as of the time of its publication.

 

The exact casualty figure and the identities of the victims had yet to be officially established.

 

The accident has raised concerns about the safety of transportation arrangements for political supporters mobilised to participate in high-profile presidential events.

 

President Tinubu arrived in Akwa Ibom on Friday as part of a two-state visit to Akwa Ibom and Rivers states. His itinerary included the inauguration of major infrastructure projects and engagement with political stakeholders.

 

As of the time of filing this report, further details about the circumstances surrounding the collision and the condition of the injured victims were still emerging.

 

 

Tinubu’s Visit: One Feared Dead, Several Injured as APC Women’s Bus Collides With Security Vehicle in Uyo

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Sex Trafficking: ‘They Took Us To Native Doctor, Shaved Our Private Parts Before Leaving Edo’ – Survivor

Published

on

Sex Trafficking: ‘They Took Us To Native Doctor, Shaved Our Private Parts Before Leaving Edo’ – Survivor

 

 

 

A survivor of human trafficking, Piana Shua Kimari, has recounted how she was subjected to disturbing traditional rituals before being trafficked out of Nigeria at the age of 15.

 

Kimari, who shared her experience during a media appearance, disclosed that she and other young girls were taken to a traditional practitioner in Ekpoma, Edo State, where parts of their bodies were shaved before they were transported out of the country.

 

Recounting the frightening experience, she said the traffickers subjected them to the rituals before leaving Ekpoma.

 

“Before we left Ekpoma in Edo State, they took us to a powerful native doctor. They shaved our armpits, private parts and head hair,” she recalled.

 

Her revelation has brought renewed attention to the disturbing methods allegedly employed by human trafficking syndicates to recruit, intimidate and control vulnerable young women and girls.

 

The practice of subjecting trafficking victims to traditional oaths and rituals is a recognised method of psychological intimidation used by some trafficking networks, particularly in cases involving cross-border sexual exploitation.

 

In some instances, victims are made to believe that revealing the identities of their traffickers, escaping or refusing to repay alleged trafficking debts could expose them or their families to spiritual attacks, madness or death.

 

Such threats often leave victims traumatised and afraid to seek help, even when they have opportunities to escape.

 

Kimari further recounted how their journey took them beyond Nigeria, with movements through areas around the Seme border and towards Mali, before she fully understood the dangerous situation she had found herself in.

 

According to her account, what initially appeared to be an opportunity turned into a nightmare when she realised she had fallen into the hands of human traffickers.

 

Her experience highlights the vulnerability of young girls to trafficking networks that exploit poverty, unemployment, deception and the desire for better opportunities abroad.

 

Nigeria, particularly Edo State, has long been identified as an important source area for victims of human trafficking, with some victims recruited and transported through international routes for sexual and other forms of exploitation.

 

The survivor’s account also underscores the importance of community awareness, early intervention and effective collaboration among security agencies, anti-trafficking organisations and relevant authorities.

 

There are growing calls for stronger efforts to identify and prosecute individuals involved in trafficking networks, including recruiters, transporters and collaborators who facilitate the exploitation of vulnerable persons.

 

Beyond rescuing victims, human rights advocates have consistently stressed the need for rehabilitation, psychological support, vocational training and reintegration programmes to help survivors rebuild their lives.

 

Kimari’s testimony serves as another reminder of the dangers confronting vulnerable Nigerian girls and the need for families and communities to remain vigilant against deceptive offers of overseas employment and travel opportunities.

 

Sex Trafficking: ‘They Took Us To Native Doctor, Shaved Our Private Parts Before Leaving Edo’ – Survivor

 

Loading

Continue Reading

News

2027: Abati Takes On Keyamo Over Atiku, ADC Court Judgment, Says ‘Stop Celebrating’

Published

on

Keyamo: ₦70,000 Minimum Wage No Longer Enough as Cost of Living Soars

2027: Abati Takes On Keyamo Over Atiku, ADC Court Judgment, Says ‘Stop Celebrating’

 

 

 

ABUJA — Veteran journalist and Arise Television presenter, Dr Reuben Abati, has taken a swipe at the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, over his celebration of the Federal High Court judgment that nullified the David Mark-led leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and invalidated the emergence of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the party’s presidential candidate for the 2027 general election.

 

Abati, who spoke on Friday during Arise Television’s Morning Show, cautioned Keyamo against celebrating what he described as an unresolved legal battle, insisting that the ADC leadership and Atiku’s supporters still have the opportunity to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal.

 

“Stop celebrating, Keyamo. The matter is not over yet. They will go to the Appeal Court,” Abati declared.

 

The journalist’s intervention followed Keyamo’s reaction to Thursday’s judgment delivered by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

 

The court had ruled against the caretaker leadership of the ADC led by former Senate President David Mark, declaring its emergence illegal and setting aside decisions taken under its leadership, including the party primary that produced Atiku as its presidential candidate for the 2027 election.

 

Reacting to the judgment, Keyamo, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), had criticised opposition figures accusing the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of influencing the judiciary.

 

In a post on his official X account, the minister described as a warped argument the suggestion that whenever an opposition party loses a court case, the ruling party must be responsible.

 

Keyamo argued that the court’s decision was based on facts and evidence rather than political sentiments, insisting that the Mark-led leadership could not take control of a party without complying with its constitutional provisions.

 

However, Abati questioned the minister’s enthusiasm in celebrating a judgment that remains subject to appellate review.

 

According to the former presidential spokesman, the concerns being raised by Nigerians are not necessarily about the right of the court to determine disputes but the timing, circumstances and public reactions surrounding judgments that affect opposition parties.

 

He maintained that the legal process had not reached its conclusion, noting that the Court of Appeal could still examine several issues surrounding the judgment.

 

Abati specifically identified questions bordering on procedure, timing, technicalities and the admissibility of evidence as matters that could feature prominently in the appeal.

 

He also questioned why a serving minister whose official responsibilities have little connection with electoral politics would become one of the loudest voices celebrating a judgment that effectively knocks out an opposition presidential candidate.

 

The Arise Television presenter warned that such public celebrations could fuel suspicions about the relationship between political power and judicial decisions, even as he cautioned against jumping to conclusions about external interference in the judiciary.

 

The controversy stems from a suit instituted by Nafiu Bala Gombe, a former ADC National Deputy Chairman, who challenged the process through which Mark and other members of the caretaker leadership assumed control of the party.

 

Bala argued that he was constitutionally entitled to assume leadership following the resignation of the party’s former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu.

 

Justice Lifu subsequently ruled against the Mark-led leadership and invalidated its decisions, including the process that produced Atiku as the ADC’s presidential flagbearer.

 

The ruling has created fresh uncertainty around the opposition party’s preparations for the 2027 presidential election, particularly as Atiku had already commenced political mobilisation following his emergence as the party’s candidate.

 

Meanwhile, Atiku and the ADC have rejected the judgment and vowed to challenge it at the Court of Appeal.

 

Atiku’s camp has also indicated plans to seek appropriate legal relief, including a stay of execution where applicable, while pursuing the appeal.

 

The former vice president has described the development as an attempt to frustrate his presidential ambition, while the ADC has questioned the circumstances surrounding the judgment.

 

The emerging confrontation between Abati and Keyamo has added another dimension to the political controversy, with the 2027 presidential election gradually becoming a battleground for legal arguments, political accusations and competing interpretations of judicial decisions.

 

For now, the fate of Atiku’s ADC presidential ticket and the party’s leadership structure remains a major legal and political issue.

 

Whether the Court of Appeal will uphold or overturn Justice Lifu’s decision is expected to play a significant role in determining the next chapter of the ADC crisis and Atiku’s 2027 presidential ambition.

 

2027: Abati Takes On Keyamo Over Atiku, ADC Court Judgment, Says ‘Stop Celebrating’

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending