Netanyahu Rejects Trump's Gaza Peace Plan, Insists No Israeli Withdrawal Until Hamas Is Fully Disarmed - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Netanyahu Rejects Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan, Insists No Israeli Withdrawal Until Hamas Is Fully Disarmed

Published

on

Netanyahu Calls UK 'Islamic Republic of Britain,' Sparks Outrage Over Islamophobic Remark

Netanyahu Rejects Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan, Insists No Israeli Withdrawal Until Hamas Is Fully Disarmed

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly rejected the United States’ 15-point peace plan for Gaza, declaring that Israeli forces will not withdraw from the territory until Hamas is completely disarmed. The announcement marks a significant break with President Donald Trump and his Board of Peace just months before Israel’s October 27 elections. “Israel rejects the 15-point document,” Netanyahu said at a cabinet meeting on Sunday. The Israeli military “will not carry out any withdrawal until Hamas is genuinely disarmed and will continue to thwart threats against our forces and our citizens,” he added.

The plan, announced by Trump’s Board of Peace in late July, was described by the US president as a “major milestone” towards ending the war in Gaza. The proposal includes complete disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza, phased withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territory, transition to governance by a new Palestinian administration called the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), deployment of an International Stabilisation Force to work alongside Palestinian police, and reconstruction of Gaza under the oversight of the Board of Peace. Netanyahu, however, has made clear that the sequencing is unacceptable to Israel. While the plan originally suggested Israel would begin pulling out forces in tandem with disarmament, the Board of Peace later backtracked after meeting Netanyahu, saying withdrawal would only occur after “complete” disarmament. Even this was apparently not enough for the Israeli leader.

Netanyahu insisted that Israel would only accept “genuine disarmament” of Hamas. “When I say Hamas is disarmed, that means the heavy weapons, the less heavy weapons, all the weapons,” he said. “We are talking about real disarmament, not fictitious disarmament,” Netanyahu emphasised, adding that Israel was raising its objections with the United States. “They have ideas; some of them are acceptable to us and some are not, and we know how to stand our ground on these matters,” he said.

READ ALSO:

The Israeli prime minister used the occasion to reiterate his long-standing opposition to Palestinian statehood. “As long as I am prime minister, no Palestinian state will be established—not in Gaza and not in the West Bank,” he said. He added: “Neither ‘Fatahstan’ nor ‘Hamastan’.” This broad declaration suggests that the disagreement is not just about military tactics in Gaza but also about the fundamental political framework for the future of the territories.

Despite describing Trump as “our greatest friend in the White House,” Netanyahu made clear he was willing to challenge the US president. The rejection comes after more than a week of gradually escalating criticism of the plan. Netanyahu until recently campaigned on the strength of his relationship with Trump, who since his first term has taken unprecedented steps to back Israel. However, the two leaders have diverged on key issues, including Trump’s pursuit of a ceasefire with Iran in April.

Hamas, which announced days earlier it supported the plan, has linked disarmament to Israeli actions. The group said it would only implement the disarmament deal if Israel halted strikes in Gaza and pulled its troops back to the “yellow line” as defined by the October 2025 ceasefire agreement. Bassem Naim, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, called on the United States to “pressure Netanyahu and his government to adhere to the roadmap and not obstruct the process for internal political and electoral reasons.” This highlights the fundamental impasse: Israel demands disarmament before withdrawal, while Hamas insists withdrawal must precede or accompany disarmament.

Israel has continued to carry out strikes on Gaza since agreeing to the initial ceasefire last October. The Board of Peace’s lead envoy for Gaza, Nickolay Mladenov, urged Netanyahu to stop attacks on Gaza during a meeting last week. However, Israel has steadfastly refused to do so. According to reports, Israeli forces have killed more than 1,200 Palestinians since the October ceasefire took effect, including dozens after the disarmament deal was announced. This ongoing violence has further complicated efforts to reach a lasting peace agreement.

Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving leader, is running even or trailing in some polls ahead of the October 27 elections. The Gaza plan is widely unpopular with his right-wing base and far-right members of his cabinet. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir dismissed the draft as “not acceptable” and called for a new cabinet vote to end the Gaza plan. The political pressure may explain Netanyahu’s firm rejection of US-backed proposals that could alienate his core supporters, as he seeks to maintain his coalition ahead of the critical elections.

The rejection leaves the future of Trump’s Gaza peace plan in serious doubt. The plan, which was unveiled in September 2025, was intended to provide a comprehensive framework including disarmament, Israeli withdrawal, and reconstruction. The Board of Peace has already begun establishing itself on the ground, with Mladenov appointed as High Representative for Gaza and Palestinian technocrats assembled to lead the NCAG. However, without Israeli cooperation, the plan’s implementation appears highly uncertain. The core dispute over sequencing remains unresolved: Israel demands disarmament before withdrawal, while Hamas insists withdrawal must precede or accompany disarmament. With Netanyahu facing electoral pressure and Hamas seeking assurances of an end to Israeli strikes, the path to peace remains as elusive as ever.

Netanyahu Rejects Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan, Insists No Israeli Withdrawal Until Hamas Is Fully Disarmed

Loading

International

US Offers $20m Reward, Relocation for Information on Iran’s Nuclear Programme

Published

on

US Offers $20m Reward, Relocation for Information on Iran’s Nuclear Programme
US Offers $20m Reward, Relocation for Information on Iran’s Nuclear Programme

The United States has announced a reward of up to $20 million, alongside the possibility of relocation, for anyone who provides credible information about Iran’s nuclear programme, including its facilities, equipment and personnel.

The offer was announced by the US Department of State through its Rewards for Justice programme and publicised by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on Friday, November 6, 2026.

According to the announcement, the reward covers information about Iran’s nuclear facilities, equipment and individuals associated with the programme, including members of the scientific community.

The US is also seeking intelligence about the movement of any of the facilities, equipment or personnel connected to the programme.

The Rewards for Justice programme said the offer could provide informants with up to $20 million and the possibility of relocation, although it did not specify the exact criteria for determining the amount payable for particular information.

The initiative is part of Washington’s efforts to obtain intelligence on Iran’s nuclear activities amid continuing tensions between the two countries over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.

In explaining the decision, the US State Department referred to concerns raised by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) about Iran’s uranium enrichment activities and its compliance with international nuclear safeguards.

The department said the IAEA reported in 2025 that Iran was enriching uranium to 60 per cent purity, a level significantly higher than the enrichment required for most civilian nuclear applications and relatively close to the 90 per cent generally associated with weapons-grade uranium.

READ ALSO:

According to the US government, further enrichment of Iran’s existing stockpile could potentially produce enough material for several nuclear weapons.

Washington also accused Tehran of failing to meet its safeguards obligations to the IAEA, saying the agency had lost what it described as its “continuity of knowledge” regarding Iran’s production and inventory of important nuclear components, including centrifuges.

Centrifuges are machines used to enrich uranium by increasing the concentration of the uranium-235 isotope.

The United States maintains that Iran’s nuclear activities pose a security concern, although Tehran has consistently insisted that its nuclear programme is peaceful and intended for civilian purposes.

The Rewards for Justice programme was established in 1984 under the US government’s national security rewards initiative. It is administered by the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security and offers financial incentives for information that protects American lives and advances US national security interests.

The latest offer comes amid continuing diplomatic efforts to address the nuclear dispute and prevent further escalation of the conflict involving the United States and Iran.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that American military operations have severely damaged Iran’s nuclear capabilities. However, Washington continues to seek intelligence about the programme, including the location of facilities and the activities of individuals connected to it.

Trump said on Friday that Iran was interested in reaching an agreement with Washington, adding that discussions were ongoing.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has also indicated that his government remains interested in resolving the crisis through dialogue.

The latest $20 million offer signals that the United States is continuing to pursue intelligence on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure even as diplomatic efforts to address the dispute remain underway.

 

US Offers $20m Reward, Relocation for Information on Iran’s Nuclear Programme

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Abdul El-Sayed, Seven Other Muslims Make History In US Midterm Elections

Published

on

Abdul El-Sayed, Seven Other Muslims Make History In US Midterm Elections

 

Muslim Candidates Also Secure State Senate Seats In New York, Illinois And Georgia

 

WASHINGTON, United States — Muslim candidates have recorded significant electoral victories in the November 3, 2026, United States midterm elections, with Democrat Abdul El-Sayed making history as the first Muslim elected to the US Senate, while at least seven other Muslim candidates secured seats in the House of Representatives.

The electoral successes, which also saw Muslim politicians win state legislative positions across different parts of the country, represent a significant development in the political participation and representation of Muslim Americans.

El-Sayed’s victory in Michigan’s Senate election stands out as one of the most remarkable achievements of the elections, breaking a longstanding barrier for Muslim representation in the upper chamber of the US Congress.

The physician and former public health official defeated Republican challenger Mike Rogers in the contest, securing a seat in the Senate and making history as the first Muslim American elected to the institution.

His victory adds a new dimension to the growing influence of Muslim politicians in American public life, particularly at a time when debates over immigration, civil rights, healthcare and US foreign policy continue to shape the country’s political landscape.

Beyond El-Sayed’s historic achievement, Muslim candidates also recorded notable victories in the House of Representatives.

Among them is Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, who secured re-election in Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District.

Omar, one of the most prominent Muslim politicians in the United States, has remained a major voice in congressional debates involving immigration, healthcare, civil rights and American foreign policy.

Another incumbent, Rashida Tlaib, also retained her seat representing Michigan’s 12th Congressional District.

Tlaib, who has consistently advocated Palestinian rights and criticised US military support for Israel, remains one of the most recognisable Muslim lawmakers in the American legislature.

Democratic Congressman André Carson equally secured another term representing Indiana’s 7th Congressional District, extending his presence as one of the longest-serving Muslim members of the US Congress.

In California, Lateefah Simon won re-election in the 12th Congressional District, while Adam Hamawy secured victory in New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District.

Hamawy’s victory is particularly significant because he becomes the first Muslim to represent New Jersey in the US Congress.

Another notable winner was Darializa Avila Chevalier, who secured New York’s 13th Congressional District.

The congressional victories bring the number of Muslim candidates elected to the US House of Representatives to at least six, in addition to El-Sayed’s historic Senate victory.

Muslim women also recorded significant achievements in state legislative elections.

In New York, Aber Kawas won the State Senate’s 12th District, marking an important milestone for Palestinian-American political representation.

Similarly, Nabeela Syed secured victory in Illinois State Senate District 26, defeating Republican incumbent Darby Hills.

In Georgia, Palestinian-American politician Ruwa Romman also won the State Senate District 7 contest, further strengthening Muslim representation in the state’s political institutions.

The victories came amid a major political shift in Washington, with Democrats recording significant gains in the midterm elections, creating fresh political challenges for President Donald Trump’s Republican administration.

The elections were contested against the backdrop of intense debates over the economy, immigration, healthcare, civil liberties and America’s foreign policy, particularly its relationship with Israel and the Palestinian question.

Muslim candidates have increasingly become visible in these debates, with several advocating policies involving civil rights, humanitarian assistance, healthcare access, immigration and social justice.

Reports published after the elections indicated that at least 36 Muslim candidates had won or were leading in various federal, state and local contests, although some results remained subject to further counting and verification.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) had earlier tracked more than 160 Muslim-American candidates seeking elective positions across different levels of government.

The latest victories therefore represent another important chapter in the political participation of Muslim Americans, whose representation has continued to expand in America’s democratic institutions.

With El-Sayed’s historic Senate victory, the successes of Muslim congressional candidates and the emergence of other Muslim lawmakers in state legislatures, the 2026 midterm elections have delivered a significant boost to Muslim political representation in the United States.

 

However, unofficial election projections and results remain subject to formal certification by the relevant electoral authorities.

 

 

 

Abdul El-Sayed, Seven Other Muslims Make History In US Midterm Elections

 

 

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Musk Breaks Silence After $458M Gamble Backfires in Historic Democratic Sweep

Published

on

Elon Musk Becomes World’s First Trillionaire After SpaceX IPO Valuation Surge

Musk Breaks Silence After $458M Gamble Backfires in Historic Democratic Sweep

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Billionaire technology entrepreneur Elon Musk has broken his silence following a stunning Democratic victory in the 2026 United States midterm elections, making sarcastic remarks after spending hundreds of millions of dollars to support Republican candidates who suffered major electoral setbacks.

Musk, the world’s richest man and founder of SpaceX and Tesla, reportedly committed approximately $458 million to political groups and candidates backing Republicans in the elections, making him the biggest individual political donor in the 2026 election cycle.

However, the massive financial investment failed to prevent Democrats from securing a sweeping victory, taking control of both chambers of Congress and recording significant gains in several traditionally Republican strongholds.

Reacting to the outcome on Tuesday night, Musk took to his social media platform, X, where he appeared to make light of the electoral setback.

“Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now,” he wrote.

In another post, the billionaire added: “Guess my election-interfering space lasers didn’t work this time.”

The comments, which attracted considerable attention online, appeared to reflect his frustration with the outcome, although they were delivered in his characteristic sarcastic style.

Musk’s political investment had been directed towards strengthening Republican chances of retaining control of Congress, with substantial financial backing going to political action committees and groups supporting candidates across several states.

One of the most expensive political battles involved Texas, where Musk reportedly spent more than $200 million supporting Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton.

Despite the enormous financial backing, Democratic candidate James Talarico defeated Paxton, delivering a major blow to the Republican campaign and another setback for Musk’s political influence.

Other Republican-backed candidates also suffered significant defeats, reinforcing the scale of the Democratic resurgence.

The results have raised fresh questions about the influence of wealthy political donors in American elections, particularly whether massive campaign spending can overcome voter dissatisfaction with government policies and political leadership.

Meanwhile, Musk appeared to acknowledge the significance of the election outcome when he reacted with a brief “Interesting” to exit polling data suggesting that although Republican voters remained supportive of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, the ongoing conflict involving Iran had become a major electoral liability for the party.

The election results suggest that economic concerns, rising living costs and dissatisfaction with the Trump administration, alongside the Iran conflict, played significant roles in shaping voters’ decisions.

The Democratic victories have also created a major political challenge for Trump, whose administration is expected to face increased congressional scrutiny during the remaining two years of his presidency.

With Democrats now controlling both chambers of Congress, the party will have greater power to obstruct Republican legislative proposals, scrutinise government activities and investigate policies of the Trump administration.

For Musk, the outcome represents a significant setback after his unprecedented financial involvement in the election cycle.

Although political donations do not automatically translate into electoral victories, the results have reignited debate over the limits of billionaire influence in American democracy.

His latest comments also suggest that the billionaire may be turning his attention back to his ambitious space technology projects as the political consequences of the Democratic victory begin to unfold.

 

 

Musk Breaks Silence After $458M Gamble Backfires in Historic Democratic Sweep

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending