CNN, MS NOW, Politico Sue Trump Over White House Access Ban - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

CNN, MS NOW, Politico Sue Trump Over White House Access Ban

Published

on

CNN, MS NOW, Politico Sue Trump Over White House Access Ban

CNN, MS NOW, Politico Sue Trump Over White House Access Ban

CNN, MS NOW and Politico have filed a federal lawsuit against the administration of US President Donald Trump, challenging the decision to revoke their journalists’ access to the White House.

The three major news organisations are asking a federal court in Washington, DC, to intervene after the Trump administration barred their reporters from the White House grounds and deactivated or confiscated their press credentials.

The organisations argue that the administration’s action violated their First Amendment press rights and the Fifth Amendment’s due process protections, alleging that their access was withdrawn because of dissatisfaction with their reporting.

The case was filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, with the media organisations seeking expedited consideration of their challenge and an order restoring their access to the White House.

The lawsuit names President Donald Trump, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, White House spokesperson Steven Cheung and Secret Service Director Sean Curran as defendants.

The legal action followed Trump’s decision to exclude the three organisations from the White House after he accused them of publishing what he described as “fake news” about his administration.

Trump has argued that journalists remain free to report on him but that the administration is not required to provide White House access to every news organisation.

The president also defended the decision on social media, where he characterised the affected outlets as a threat to national security. The reports on the lawsuit did not indicate that the administration had presented evidence publicly establishing such a threat.

The dispute escalated on Saturday, September 19, when reporters working for CNN, MS NOW and Politico were turned away from the White House complex.

Their press access was reportedly deactivated or their credentials confiscated, preventing them from covering activities inside the presidential complex in the usual manner.

The organisations subsequently warned that the White House decision raised broader questions about whether a presidential administration could deny access to journalists because of disagreement with their reporting.

READ ALSO:

In their court challenge, the outlets are expected to argue that the government cannot use access to public officials and government facilities as a means of punishing or influencing the content of news coverage.

The case comes as the Trump administration has significantly changed the way White House press access is managed.

The administration has increasingly exercised greater control over which journalists attend certain presidential events, while also expanding access for reporters from organisations it considers more favourable or less represented in traditional White House press coverage.

The latest dispute, however, concerns the removal of access from three established national news organisations at the same time.

The White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) has criticised the exclusion of the outlets and raised concerns about the implications for press access and government transparency.

Other media organisations and press-freedom groups have also expressed concern over the decision, arguing that government officials should not determine access based on whether they approve of particular news coverage.

The White House, on the other hand, has maintained that the administration has authority to determine access to the White House and has repeatedly accused some mainstream news organisations of inaccurate or unfair reporting.

The legal battle also has implications beyond the three organisations involved because federal courts have previously considered disputes between the executive branch and news organisations over access to the president.

One prominent case involved CNN reporter Jim Acosta during Trump’s first administration.

In 2018, the White House revoked Acosta’s press credentials following a confrontation during a presidential news conference. CNN challenged the decision in court, and a federal judge ordered the temporary restoration of his access.

The Trump administration has also been involved in a more recent dispute with the Associated Press.

The administration restricted AP’s access after the news agency declined to adopt Trump’s preferred terminology for the Gulf of Mexico. A federal judge later ordered the administration to restore the AP’s access in certain circumstances, although subsequent litigation resulted in distinctions between generally accessible areas and more restricted presidential events.

The current lawsuit involving CNN, MS NOW and Politico raises related but distinct questions about the government’s authority to control press access.

A central issue is expected to be whether the administration can exclude news organisations from access that is otherwise made available to members of the White House press corps because of disagreement with their reporting.

Another issue is the extent to which the First Amendment limits government decisions affecting journalists’ access, particularly when the alleged reason for exclusion is connected to the content or viewpoint of their reporting.

The media organisations are also challenging the process used to revoke their access, arguing that they were not given adequate notice or an opportunity to contest the decision before their credentials were withdrawn.

The case has already affected White House media arrangements beyond routine presidential coverage.

CNN had been scheduled to provide the television pool feed for Trump’s Monday trip to New York for the United Nations General Assembly, but the assignment was removed from the White House press schedule following the access dispute.

The White House press pool is important because participating organisations provide shared coverage, photographs, video and other material that can be used by news organisations that cannot send their own journalists to every presidential event.

The lawsuit therefore places questions of press freedom, government transparency and presidential control over media access at the centre of another federal court dispute involving the Trump administration.

For the three organisations, the immediate objective is restoration of access to the White House and the ability of their journalists to resume reporting from the presidential complex.

For the administration, the dispute involves its stated authority to determine who receives access to the White House and how that access is organised.

The court’s handling of the case could provide further guidance on the constitutional limits surrounding White House press credentials, particularly where access decisions are alleged to be connected to the content of journalists’ reporting.

Until the court rules, the competing claims remain disputed. The lawsuit itself does not establish that the administration violated the Constitution, while the White House’s allegations against the news organisations remain the administration’s stated position rather than findings by a court.

CNN, MS NOW, Politico Sue Trump Over White House Access Ban

Loading

International

Abdul El-Sayed, Seven Other Muslims Make History In US Midterm Elections

Published

on

Abdul El-Sayed, Seven Other Muslims Make History In US Midterm Elections

 

Muslim Candidates Also Secure State Senate Seats In New York, Illinois And Georgia

 

WASHINGTON, United States — Muslim candidates have recorded significant electoral victories in the November 3, 2026, United States midterm elections, with Democrat Abdul El-Sayed making history as the first Muslim elected to the US Senate, while at least seven other Muslim candidates secured seats in the House of Representatives.

The electoral successes, which also saw Muslim politicians win state legislative positions across different parts of the country, represent a significant development in the political participation and representation of Muslim Americans.

El-Sayed’s victory in Michigan’s Senate election stands out as one of the most remarkable achievements of the elections, breaking a longstanding barrier for Muslim representation in the upper chamber of the US Congress.

The physician and former public health official defeated Republican challenger Mike Rogers in the contest, securing a seat in the Senate and making history as the first Muslim American elected to the institution.

His victory adds a new dimension to the growing influence of Muslim politicians in American public life, particularly at a time when debates over immigration, civil rights, healthcare and US foreign policy continue to shape the country’s political landscape.

Beyond El-Sayed’s historic achievement, Muslim candidates also recorded notable victories in the House of Representatives.

Among them is Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, who secured re-election in Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District.

Omar, one of the most prominent Muslim politicians in the United States, has remained a major voice in congressional debates involving immigration, healthcare, civil rights and American foreign policy.

Another incumbent, Rashida Tlaib, also retained her seat representing Michigan’s 12th Congressional District.

Tlaib, who has consistently advocated Palestinian rights and criticised US military support for Israel, remains one of the most recognisable Muslim lawmakers in the American legislature.

Democratic Congressman André Carson equally secured another term representing Indiana’s 7th Congressional District, extending his presence as one of the longest-serving Muslim members of the US Congress.

In California, Lateefah Simon won re-election in the 12th Congressional District, while Adam Hamawy secured victory in New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District.

Hamawy’s victory is particularly significant because he becomes the first Muslim to represent New Jersey in the US Congress.

Another notable winner was Darializa Avila Chevalier, who secured New York’s 13th Congressional District.

The congressional victories bring the number of Muslim candidates elected to the US House of Representatives to at least six, in addition to El-Sayed’s historic Senate victory.

Muslim women also recorded significant achievements in state legislative elections.

In New York, Aber Kawas won the State Senate’s 12th District, marking an important milestone for Palestinian-American political representation.

Similarly, Nabeela Syed secured victory in Illinois State Senate District 26, defeating Republican incumbent Darby Hills.

In Georgia, Palestinian-American politician Ruwa Romman also won the State Senate District 7 contest, further strengthening Muslim representation in the state’s political institutions.

The victories came amid a major political shift in Washington, with Democrats recording significant gains in the midterm elections, creating fresh political challenges for President Donald Trump’s Republican administration.

The elections were contested against the backdrop of intense debates over the economy, immigration, healthcare, civil liberties and America’s foreign policy, particularly its relationship with Israel and the Palestinian question.

Muslim candidates have increasingly become visible in these debates, with several advocating policies involving civil rights, humanitarian assistance, healthcare access, immigration and social justice.

Reports published after the elections indicated that at least 36 Muslim candidates had won or were leading in various federal, state and local contests, although some results remained subject to further counting and verification.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) had earlier tracked more than 160 Muslim-American candidates seeking elective positions across different levels of government.

The latest victories therefore represent another important chapter in the political participation of Muslim Americans, whose representation has continued to expand in America’s democratic institutions.

With El-Sayed’s historic Senate victory, the successes of Muslim congressional candidates and the emergence of other Muslim lawmakers in state legislatures, the 2026 midterm elections have delivered a significant boost to Muslim political representation in the United States.

 

However, unofficial election projections and results remain subject to formal certification by the relevant electoral authorities.

 

 

 

Abdul El-Sayed, Seven Other Muslims Make History In US Midterm Elections

 

 

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Musk Breaks Silence After $458M Gamble Backfires in Historic Democratic Sweep

Published

on

Elon Musk Becomes World’s First Trillionaire After SpaceX IPO Valuation Surge

Musk Breaks Silence After $458M Gamble Backfires in Historic Democratic Sweep

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Billionaire technology entrepreneur Elon Musk has broken his silence following a stunning Democratic victory in the 2026 United States midterm elections, making sarcastic remarks after spending hundreds of millions of dollars to support Republican candidates who suffered major electoral setbacks.

Musk, the world’s richest man and founder of SpaceX and Tesla, reportedly committed approximately $458 million to political groups and candidates backing Republicans in the elections, making him the biggest individual political donor in the 2026 election cycle.

However, the massive financial investment failed to prevent Democrats from securing a sweeping victory, taking control of both chambers of Congress and recording significant gains in several traditionally Republican strongholds.

Reacting to the outcome on Tuesday night, Musk took to his social media platform, X, where he appeared to make light of the electoral setback.

“Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now,” he wrote.

In another post, the billionaire added: “Guess my election-interfering space lasers didn’t work this time.”

The comments, which attracted considerable attention online, appeared to reflect his frustration with the outcome, although they were delivered in his characteristic sarcastic style.

Musk’s political investment had been directed towards strengthening Republican chances of retaining control of Congress, with substantial financial backing going to political action committees and groups supporting candidates across several states.

One of the most expensive political battles involved Texas, where Musk reportedly spent more than $200 million supporting Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton.

Despite the enormous financial backing, Democratic candidate James Talarico defeated Paxton, delivering a major blow to the Republican campaign and another setback for Musk’s political influence.

Other Republican-backed candidates also suffered significant defeats, reinforcing the scale of the Democratic resurgence.

The results have raised fresh questions about the influence of wealthy political donors in American elections, particularly whether massive campaign spending can overcome voter dissatisfaction with government policies and political leadership.

Meanwhile, Musk appeared to acknowledge the significance of the election outcome when he reacted with a brief “Interesting” to exit polling data suggesting that although Republican voters remained supportive of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, the ongoing conflict involving Iran had become a major electoral liability for the party.

The election results suggest that economic concerns, rising living costs and dissatisfaction with the Trump administration, alongside the Iran conflict, played significant roles in shaping voters’ decisions.

The Democratic victories have also created a major political challenge for Trump, whose administration is expected to face increased congressional scrutiny during the remaining two years of his presidency.

With Democrats now controlling both chambers of Congress, the party will have greater power to obstruct Republican legislative proposals, scrutinise government activities and investigate policies of the Trump administration.

For Musk, the outcome represents a significant setback after his unprecedented financial involvement in the election cycle.

Although political donations do not automatically translate into electoral victories, the results have reignited debate over the limits of billionaire influence in American democracy.

His latest comments also suggest that the billionaire may be turning his attention back to his ambitious space technology projects as the political consequences of the Democratic victory begin to unfold.

 

 

Musk Breaks Silence After $458M Gamble Backfires in Historic Democratic Sweep

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Abdul El-Sayed Makes History, Defeats Republican Rival To Become First Muslim US Senator

Published

on

Abdul El-Sayed

Abdul El-Sayed Makes History, Defeats Republican Rival To Become First Muslim US Senator

 

Democrat Abdul El-Sayed has won Michigan’s closely watched United States Senate election, making history as the first Muslim to be elected to the US Senate.

 

El-Sayed defeated Republican candidate Mike Rogers in the November 3, 2026, midterm elections, according to projections by the Associated Press.

 

His victory marks a historic milestone for Muslim representation in American politics and brings an end to more than two centuries without a Muslim serving in the US Senate.

 

The election was one of the most closely watched contests in the country, as Democrats and Republicans battled for control of the Senate.

 

According to Michigan Advance, the Associated Press called the race for El-Sayed with approximately 85 per cent of the votes counted. He was leading Rogers with 51.9 per cent against 46.1 per cent.

 

The victory means El-Sayed will succeed retiring Democratic Senator Gary Peters, who did not seek re-election.

 

Born on October 31, 1984, in Rochester Hills, Michigan, El-Sayed is the son of Egyptian immigrants.

 

The 42-year-old politician built his career around public health before venturing into electoral politics.

 

He graduated from the University of Michigan in 2007, earning degrees in biology and political science. He subsequently obtained a doctorate in public health from the University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar and later earned a medical degree from Columbia University in 2014.

 

In 2015, at the age of 30, he was appointed Detroit’s health director, making him one of the youngest officials to occupy the position.

 

He later served as head of Wayne County’s health department from 2023 to 2025.

 

Although he previously contested the Michigan governorship in 2018, he lost the Democratic primary to Gretchen Whitmer.

 

His election to the Senate therefore represents a significant turning point in his political career.

 

During the campaign, El-Sayed promoted an ambitious progressive agenda, including universal healthcare, popularly known as Medicare for All.

 

He also advocated measures to address medical debt, increase taxes on billionaires, reduce corporate influence in politics and limit the role of wealthy interest groups in election financing.

 

On foreign policy, he called for an end to the war involving Iran and a reassessment of America’s relationship with Israel, particularly over the conflict in Gaza.

 

His positions attracted support from prominent progressive politicians, including Senator Bernie Sanders and Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

 

Former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Kamala Harris also campaigned in Michigan in support of his candidacy.

 

El-Sayed’s campaign was marked by controversies surrounding his Muslim faith, Egyptian heritage and criticism of Israel.

 

President Donald Trump and other Republican figures questioned his loyalty to the United States and made allegations linking him to extremist organisations.

 

El-Sayed rejected the allegations, while the Associated Press reported that there was no evidence supporting claims of terrorist links.

 

His Democratic primary opponent, Congresswoman Haley Stevens, also endorsed Republican candidate Mike Rogers shortly before election day, following disagreements over El-Sayed’s positions.

 

Despite the divisions, El-Sayed secured the Democratic Party’s support and went on to defeat Rogers in the general election.

 

El-Sayed’s election is particularly significant for Muslim representation in the United States Congress.

 

Although Muslims have previously served in the House of Representatives, including Keith Ellison, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, no Muslim has ever served in the US Senate.

 

His victory will therefore open a new chapter in the representation of Muslims in America’s highest legislative chamber.

 

He is expected to assume office in January 2027, succeeding retiring Senator Gary Peters.

 

His victory also gives progressive Democrats a prominent new figure in Washington as the party prepares for future political contests.

 

For El-Sayed, the historic achievement marks the culmination of a political journey that began with public health advocacy and has now taken him to the United States Senate.

 

Abdul El-Sayed Makes History, Defeats Republican Rival To Become First Muslim US Senator (more…)

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending