LASWA rescues 17 as passenger boat capsizes near 3rd Mainland Bridge - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

LASWA rescues 17 as passenger boat capsizes near 3rd Mainland Bridge

Published

on

Six dead, 15 rescued as Jigawa canoe accident leaves several missing

Emergency responders from the Lagos State Waterways Authority (LASWA) rescued 17 passengers whose boat capsized in the early hours of yesterday.

The rescue was confirmed through a statement issued by the agency.

The statement reads in part: ”At about 7am, on Monday, February 20, 2023, a commercial ferry named Fazma logistics, loaded with 17 passengers, left Ikorodu ferry terminal at exactly 6:45 am, en route Ebute Ero, but, unfortunately, capsized around the Third Mainland Bridge, close to Bariga Ferry Terminal”.

READ ALSO:

LASWA confirmed that all the passengers were rescued alive by first responders of the agency.

“Boat recovery operations commenced immediately, while the boat captain is being interrogated and investigation is ongoing,” the statement confirmed.

SUN

Loading

metro

Cancelled Wedding: Man Sues Ex-Fiancée’s Father Over Unpaid ₦70,000 Dowry

Published

on

Cancelled Wedding: Man Sues Ex-Fiancée’s Father Over Unpaid ₦70,000 Dowry
Cancelled Wedding: Man Sues Ex-Fiancée’s Father Over Unpaid ₦70,000 Dowry

A man in Kaduna State, Bilyaminu Idris, has dragged his former fiancée’s father, Alhassan Dayyabu, before a Sharia Court over an alleged failure to refund the outstanding ₦70,000 from a dowry paid for a marriage that was later cancelled.

Idris filed the complaint at the Sharia Court in Magajin Gari, Kaduna, seeking the recovery of the outstanding amount after waiting for five months without receiving the balance.

The complainant told the court that he had paid ₦220,000 as dowry in preparation for marrying Dayyabu’s daughter. However, the proposed marriage was subsequently cancelled.

According to Idris, Dayyabu refunded ₦150,000 but promised to pay the remaining ₦70,000 at a later date.

READ ALSO:

He alleged that the defendant repeatedly promised to settle the balance over the following five months but failed to do so.

“He kept making empty promises on paying the balance for five months but failed. I pray the court to compel him to pay me the money,” Idris told the court.

In his response, Dayyabu reportedly acknowledged owing the complainant the outstanding ₦70,000 but appealed to the court for more time to raise the money.

After hearing from both parties, the presiding judge, Malam Mu’awiyah Shehu, adjourned the case until November 26, 2026, to allow the defendant to pay the outstanding amount.

The case highlights a dispute over the recovery of dowry following the cancellation of a proposed marriage, with the court expected to revisit the matter on the adjourned date.

 

Cancelled Wedding: Man Sues Ex-Fiancée’s Father Over Unpaid ₦70,000 Dowry

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Oyo Govt Draws Battle Line With Soun, Rejects Suspension of Ogbomoso Balogun

Published

on

Dr Saka Adegbite Balogun

Oyo Govt Draws Battle Line With Soun, Rejects Suspension of Ogbomoso Balogun

The state government insists Dr Saka Adegbite Balogun remains the recognised Balogun of Ogbomosoland, citing the Chiefs Law, while the palace reportedly maintains that the chief was suspended over an oath-of-allegiance dispute.

The Oyo State Government has challenged the purported suspension of Dr Saka Adegbite Balogun as the Balogun of Ogbomosoland by the Soun of Ogbomoso, Oba Ghandi Afolabi Olaoye, insisting that the action is inconsistent with the state’s chieftaincy law.

The government reaffirmed Dr Balogun as the duly recognised holder of the traditional title and urged members of the public to disregard reports suggesting that he had been removed from office.

The position was contained in a press release dated October 23, 2026, and signed by the Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters, Hon. Ademola Ojo.

In the statement, the government said it had taken note of media reports concerning the reported action against the Balogun by the paramount ruler of Ogbomosoland.

Citing Section 26(1) of the Chiefs Law of Oyo State, Cap. 28, 2000, Ojo maintained that the authority to appoint, suspend or depose a recognised Part II chieftaincy holder rests exclusively with the state governor.

He consequently questioned the legality of the action attributed to Oba Olaoye, arguing that it was contrary to the existing legal framework regulating traditional council operations in the state.

The commissioner stated, “By virtue of the provision of CAP 28, Section 26(1) of the Chiefs Law of Oyo State (2000), the power to appoint, suspend and depose a Part II Recognised Chieftaincy holder is vested exclusively on the Executive Governor of the State.”

He described the reported action against Dr Balogun as an aberration under the law, stressing that the state government continued to recognise him as the Balogun of Ogbomosoland.

“In the light of this, Dr Saka Adegbite Balogun is the duly recognised Balogun of Ogbomosoland,” the commissioner declared.

The government therefore called on members of the public to disregard any purported removal of the chief.

The intervention has brought the disagreement over the Balogun title into sharper focus, raising questions about the respective powers of traditional rulers and the state government in the administration of recognised chieftaincy matters.

Reports preceding the government’s statement indicated that Oba Olaoye had issued an indefinite suspension order against Dr Balogun in a letter dated October 20, 2026.

The monarch reportedly based the decision on the chief’s alleged failure to sign an oath of allegiance to the throne, which the palace considers a requirement for the proper assumption and exercise of responsibilities attached to the title.

However, the state government’s position centres on the statutory authority it says governs the suspension or removal of a recognised Part II chieftaincy holder.

The Balogun’s family also reportedly faulted the palace’s action, claiming that it received the suspension letter without prior communication, a query or an opportunity for dialogue.

According to a report by Nigerian Tribune, the family, through the secretary of the Balogun Chieftaincy House, Balogun Olajire Raufu, appealed to the state government to intervene in the dispute.

The family also alleged that Dr Balogun and his entourage had been denied access to the palace on two occasions during traditional homage proceedings. These claims have not been independently established in this report.

The dispute has therefore exposed a disagreement over both the circumstances surrounding the suspension and the authority to take such action against a recognised chief.

While the Soun’s reported decision was linked to the oath-of-allegiance issue, the Oyo State Government has maintained that the status of a recognised Part II chieftaincy holder is governed by the provisions of the state’s Chiefs Law.

The government’s statement, however, did not indicate that a court had ruled on the dispute, nor did it announce any separate judicial determination of the competing positions.

For now, the state government’s position is that Dr Saka Adegbite Balogun remains the duly recognised Balogun of Ogbomosoland, despite the reported suspension by the Soun.

The palace’s reported explanation and the government’s intervention leave the dispute unresolved, with any further clarification or legal action potentially determining the next stage of the disagreement.

 

Oyo Govt Draws Battle Line With Soun, Rejects Suspension of Ogbomoso Balogun

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

IKEDC Blames National Grid for Two-Week Power Crisis in Ishaga, Oke-Ayo

Published

on

Lagos Power Outage: Ikeja Electric Blames TCN as Businesses, Homes Groan

IKEDC Blames National Grid for Two-Week Power Crisis in Ishaga, Oke-Ayo

 

Residents battle water scarcity, intense heat as electricity supply dwindles to minutes

 

Residents of Ishaga and Oke-Ayo communities in Iju-Ishaga, Lagos State, have endured about two weeks of erratic electricity supply, with the Ikeja Electric Distribution Company (IKEDC) attributing the situation to reduced power allocation from the national grid.

 

The prolonged power shortage has disrupted daily activities, leaving residents struggling to cope with the intense heat and difficulties accessing water, particularly in households that depend on electricity to pump water.

 

In response to a formal complaint by a journalist and resident of Oke-Ayo, Abdulfatai Ayobami Ibrahim, the manager of IKEDC’s Iju Undertaking said the reduction in electricity supply across the company’s network was caused by a shortfall in power allocated to it from the national grid.

 

The manager explained that electricity distribution companies could only distribute the volume of power made available to them through the transmission network, adding that any reduction at the generation or transmission stages directly affected electricity supply to consumers.

 

According to the manager, IKEDC is engaging relevant stakeholders, including the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN), to secure an improved allocation and restore normal electricity supply as soon as possible.

 

In a public notice issued by the company, IKEDC apologised for the inconvenience caused by the reduced supply hours, assuring customers that it was working with relevant stakeholders to improve power availability.

 

The company also said it remained committed to distributing the available electricity as efficiently and equitably as possible across its network, while promising to keep customers informed of significant developments.

 

However, residents of Ishaga and Oke-Ayo have continued to face the consequences of the erratic supply, which, according to Ibrahim, has become particularly distressing over the past two weeks.

 

In his complaint to the manager, Ibrahim said electricity sometimes returned for barely five to 10 minutes before going off again, while on other occasions, supply was restricted to between two and three hours in the early morning, usually between 1am and 5am.

 

He explained that the situation had become increasingly unbearable, with residents sometimes spending the entire day without electricity.

 

Giving an account of the immediate situation when he submitted the complaint, Ibrahim said the last electricity supply to his community had been in the early hours of the previous day, with power cut off shortly after 8am. He said supply had not returned since then.

 

The journalist noted that the problem extended beyond the absence of electricity, as many households relied on power to pump water for domestic use.

 

He said prolonged outages had consequently made access to water difficult for affected families, compounding the hardship associated with the prevailing heat.

 

Ibrahim expressed concern about the impact of the situation on families, children, elderly residents and other vulnerable members of the community, particularly in the absence of clear information about when electricity supply would improve.

 

Seeking clarification, he asked IKEDC to explain the cause of the persistent outages, whether they were connected to technical faults, load allocation, maintenance activities or other operational challenges.

 

He also requested details of the measures being taken to address the situation and when residents could reasonably expect an improvement in supply.

 

Responding, the manager reiterated that the current challenge was linked to reduced electricity allocation from the national grid rather than an issue the distribution company could resolve independently.

 

He explained that the electricity supply chain comprised generation, transmission and distribution, noting that distribution companies depended on the quantity of electricity supplied through the transmission network.

 

“Whenever there is a reduction in power supply from the generation or transmission level, it directly affects the quantity of electricity available for distribution to our customers,” the manager explained.

 

He added that the company was engaging relevant stakeholders to improve its allocation and ensure better electricity supply to customers.

 

IKEDC also appealed to customers to exercise patience and understanding, while expressing regret over the inconvenience caused by the development.

 

Despite the explanation, the responses did not provide a specific timeline for the restoration of improved electricity supply in Ishaga and Oke-Ayo or identify a date by which residents could expect relief.

 

Ibrahim urged the company to sustain communication with affected communities and take practical steps to ensure that available electricity was distributed in a manner that would ease the hardship being experienced by consumers.

 

He stressed that although electricity distribution could be affected by technical and operational challenges, prolonged outages without timely and adequate information often left consumers frustrated and uncertain.

 

The journalist said transparent communication between electricity distribution companies and the communities they serve was essential to building public trust and keeping consumers informed about developments affecting their daily lives.

 

The power crisis in the affected communities comes amid wider concerns over electricity availability, with IKEDC’s explanation pointing to constraints in the volume of power allocated to its network from the national grid.

 

For residents of Ishaga and Oke-Ayo, however, the immediate concern remains when electricity supply will become more stable and when households struggling with heat and water shortages will receive relief.

 

As of the time of the exchange, IKEDC had said it was engaging TCN and other relevant stakeholders to improve supply, but had not announced a definite timeline for a return to normal electricity distribution in the affected communities.

 

 

IKEDC Blames National Grid for Two-Week Power Crisis in Ishaga, Oke-Ayo

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending