Christians Still Under Attack in Nigeria, US Lawmaker Tells Trump

United States Congressman Riley Moore has said Christians in Nigeria continue to face severe violence and persecution, calling for renewed international efforts to protect religious communities one year after President Donald Trump redesignated Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC).

Moore made the remarks in a statement posted on his X account to mark the anniversary of the designation, which was announced by Trump in November 2025 over concerns about religious freedom and attacks on Christian communities.

“Christians in Nigeria, and around the world, continue to face unspeakable violence. On this anniversary, we must rededicate our efforts to defend Christians in Nigeria and anywhere they face persecution,” the US lawmaker said.

He also defended Trump’s decision to place Nigeria on the CPC list, describing it as the right move and praising efforts by Republican lawmakers and faith-based organisations to press for stronger action against religious persecution.

In his post, Moore credited Trump’s leadership, alongside work by Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee, for what he described as progress in addressing attacks on Christians in Nigeria.

He specifically praised efforts by House Appropriations Republicans to introduce conditions on US assistance to Nigeria, including requirements for the Nigerian government to demonstrate concrete steps towards protecting Christian communities.

According to the congressman, pressure from the US government and advocacy by religious organisations had begun to produce results.

He claimed that Nigeria experienced its first Christmas without a massacre of Christians in recent memory, although he acknowledged that much more needed to be done to address the security challenges.

Moore also commended the Nigerian government, saying it had shown signs of willingness to confront violence against Christian communities.

READ ALSO:

• Gunmen Abduct 100-Level Female Student, Shoot Another Person in Plateau
• Tinubu Approves SUVs for FCT Traditional Rulers, Four Buses for Youths, says Wike
• Two Europe-Bound Nigerians Excrete 200 Cocaine Wraps at Abuja Airport

His latest comments are part of an ongoing campaign by some US lawmakers to draw international attention to attacks on Christians in Nigeria and push for stronger measures against those responsible.

Nigeria’s Country of Particular Concern designation

Nigeria was first designated a Country of Particular Concern by the United States in December 2020 under Trump’s first administration over concerns about violations of religious freedom.

However, the administration of former US President Joe Biden removed Nigeria from the list in 2021, a decision that attracted criticism from some American lawmakers and religious organisations.

Trump restored the designation in November 2025 after returning to the White House, citing concerns over attacks on Christian communities, particularly in parts of northern and central Nigeria.

The CPC classification is provided under the US International Religious Freedom Act and allows Washington to consider diplomatic and policy measures, including sanctions and restrictions on certain forms of assistance, against countries identified as engaging in or tolerating particularly severe violations of religious freedom.

The renewed designation has also intensified discussions between Nigerian and American authorities over insecurity, religious freedom and the protection of vulnerable communities.

US-Nigeria disagreement over religious persecution

The Nigerian government has repeatedly rejected the characterisation of the country’s security crisis as a campaign of religious persecution targeted exclusively at Christians.

The Federal Government maintains that insecurity in Nigeria is complex and involves terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, communal violence and farmer-herder conflicts, which have affected both Christians and Muslims.

It has also pointed to ongoing security operations, cooperation with international partners and efforts to protect vulnerable communities in states including Benue, Plateau and Kaduna.

Moore’s latest statement comes amid continuing international scrutiny of Nigeria’s response to insecurity and growing pressure on the government to strengthen the protection of religious communities.

The congressman, who has previously visited Nigeria as part of a US congressional investigation into religious freedom concerns, has continued to advocate stronger American involvement in addressing the violence.

In February 2026, Moore and fellow US Congressman Chris Smith introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026, seeking a comprehensive report on US efforts to address alleged religious persecution and mass atrocities against Christians in Nigeria.

The proposed legislation reflects continuing efforts by some members of the US Congress to make religious freedom and accountability central to Washington’s engagement with Nigeria.

Britain’s Conservative Party leader, Kemi Badenoch, has rejected calls for the United Kingdom to issue a fresh formal apology for its role in the transatlantic slave trade, arguing that African kingdoms, rulers and merchants also participated in and profited from the trade.

Badenoch said it would be unfair to focus exclusively on Britain’s involvement while overlooking the role played by African authorities and traders who captured, sold and supplied enslaved people.

Her comments have reignited debate over Britain’s historical responsibility for slavery, following renewed calls for an official apology ahead of the forthcoming Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Antigua and Barbuda.

In a statement published on her X account on Saturday, October 31, the Conservative Party leader argued that slavery was a global evil involving people from different continents, insisting that Britain’s role in abolishing the transatlantic slave trade should also be recognised.

She challenged Caribbean countries demanding a formal apology from Britain to consider whether similar demands should be directed at descendants of African kingdoms, rulers and merchants who participated in capturing and selling enslaved Africans.

“If Caribbean countries are asking Britain for a formal apology for Britain’s role in the transatlantic slave trade, will they also be asking the same of the descendants of African kingdoms, rulers and merchants who captured, sold and profited from the trade?” she asked.

Badenoch also rejected demands for slavery reparations, whether through direct financial compensation or debt relief, arguing that present-day British taxpayers should not be held financially responsible for events that occurred generations ago.

She described the renewed push for an apology as a distraction from more pressing economic and security challenges facing Commonwealth countries.

READ ALSO:

• ‘My Only Hope’: Mother Mourns Son Found Beheaded in Cross River
• Umahi Disowns Peter Obi, Says South East Has No Presidential Candidate for 2027
• NDLEA Arrests Woman With 266 Rounds of Live AK-47 Ammunition on Abuja-Kaduna Expressway

According to her, the Commonwealth should concentrate on strengthening economic partnerships, improving prosperity and deepening military and security cooperation rather than repeatedly revisiting historical grievances.

Badenoch also questioned whether British leaders should continue attending Commonwealth summits if such meetings increasingly became platforms for demands for financial compensation.

She maintained that Britain had already expressed regret over its historical involvement in the slave trade, referring to comments made by former Prime Minister Tony Blair nearly two decades ago.

However, the distinction between an expression of regret and a formal state apology remains central to the current debate. The Associated Press reported that Britain has never formally apologised for its role in the transatlantic slave trade.

The debate intensified after British Prime Minister Andy Burnham indicated that his government was open to discussing a formal apology ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting scheduled to take place in Antigua and Barbuda.

In an article published in The Guardian, Burnham described the slave trade as a grave historical injustice and argued that Britain needed to confront both its involvement in human trafficking and its subsequent role in abolition.

He, however, ruled out direct financial reparations, proposing instead that Britain could work with other wealthy countries and investors to help poorer Commonwealth nations restructure their debts on more favourable terms.

Burnham also indicated that former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown would assist with the proposed debt-restructuring initiative.

The proposal received a cautious welcome from Caribbean leaders, who have long demanded acknowledgement, reparatory justice and compensation for the consequences of slavery.

The Caribbean Community, known as CARICOM, said an apology would represent an important first step but warned that an apology without meaningful reparative measures would remain incomplete.

Philip J. Pierre, Prime Minister of Saint Lucia and CARICOM chairman, welcomed Burnham’s willingness to discuss the issue but maintained that Caribbean countries were seeking a broader response.

Their demands include investment in education and healthcare, development programmes for Indigenous communities, debt cancellation, repatriation and financial compensation.

King Charles III, who is currently visiting the Caribbean, has also acknowledged the suffering and injustices associated with the region’s history of slavery, although he has not announced a formal apology or reparations.

Historically, Britain became involved in the transatlantic slave trade in the 16th century and eventually emerged as one of its largest operators. According to the Associated Press, British traders transported more than three million Africans across the Atlantic.

The British Parliament outlawed the slave trade in 1807, while slavery was abolished across most of the British Empire in 1833.

Although British abolitionists played a significant role in the campaign against slavery, Britain’s earlier participation in the trade and the economic benefits derived from it remain central to demands for historical accountability.

The disagreement between Badenoch and Burnham therefore reflects a wider debate over whether Britain’s historical acknowledgement of slavery should extend to a formal apology and what responsibilities, if any, should follow such an apology.