Minimum Wage: Judiciary workers begin strike in 12 states, Abuja - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Minimum Wage: Judiciary workers begin strike in 12 states, Abuja

Published

on

Minimum Wage: Judiciary workers begin strike in 12 states, Abuja

The Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN) in 12 states and the Federal Capital Territory have commenced immediate industrial action over the non-implementation of the N70,000 minimum wage.

This was announced in a statement dated November 30, 2024, and signed by the union’s secretary, MJ Akwashiki.

Affected states include Abia, Akwa Ibọn, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Enugu, Imo, Nasarawa, Katsina, Oyo, Sokoto, Yobe, Zamfara, and the Federal Capital Territory.

Mr Akwashiki noted that the industrial action was driven by the failure of concerned state governments to implement the national minimum of N70,000 as directed by the federal government.

READ ALSO:

Discussions on the implementation of the minimum wage have continued in many states since President Bola Tinubu signed it into law.

Lagos, Rivers, Bayelsa, Niger, Enugu, Akwa Ibom, Abia, Adamawa, Anambra, Jigawa, Gombe, Ogun, Kebbi, Ondo, Kogi among others have implemented the new wage.

Meanwhile, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) had directed workers in states that have yet to implement the new wage to embark on strike.

In a statement signed on Friday, NLC general secretary Emmanuel Ugboaja slammed some states for non-implementation of the minimum wage, tagging “is a blatant disregard for the law and the lives of millions of Nigerian workers.”

Minimum Wage: Judiciary workers begin strike in 12 states, Abuja

Loading

metro

US Intensifies Military Training for Nigerian Troops in Bauchi

Published

on

US Intensifies Military Training for Nigerian Troops in Bauchi

US Intensifies Military Training for Nigerian Troops in Bauchi

American forces have intensified military training for Nigerian troops in unmanned aircraft systems, combat casualty care, and other critical battlefield skills as part of a broader security cooperation mission aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s operational capacity against terrorism and other security threats.

The training is being conducted at Operating Location Bauchi in Bauchi State, with the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM) confirming that the exercises are designed to share military expertise, strengthen partner capacity, and build relationships between service members from both nations. According to AFRICOM, the programme covers Combat Lifesaver and Tactical Combat Casualty Care instruction, weapons familiarisation, camouflage, water treatment and testing, explosive ordnance disposal, small-unit tactics, and unmanned aircraft systems training. Captain Gabriel Feingold, a logistics officer assigned to the US Army Southern European Task Force, Africa, and operations officer at Operating Location Bauchi, explained that the training programme was developed based on areas Nigerian commanders identified as beneficial. “We bring them a list of several different training topics, and they select what they think would be most beneficial for them,” Feingold said.

READ ALSO:

Unmanned aircraft systems generated particular interest among Nigerian forces, with Sergeant Mark Murphy, an intelligence analyst assigned to the 13th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, leading approximately 10 members of the Nigerian Air Force Special Forces Regiment through the training. The session began with about 45 minutes of classroom instruction before the Nigerian personnel received hands-on training on operating the aircraft. Murphy also taught the participants techniques for employing unmanned aircraft systems and incorporating intelligence gathered through the platforms into military operations. “They were really excited with being able to get hands-on time with it,” Murphy said, adding that the Nigerian personnel expressed interest in receiving further training on the system.

Beyond technical and operational skills, the joint exercises have created opportunities for American and Nigerian service members to build relationships and improve interoperability. Feingold noted that the interactions were particularly valuable at the lower levels of both forces. “It helps build relationships between Soldiers and the partner force, especially at the lower levels,” he said. According to AFRICOM, US and Nigerian personnel also participate in basketball and volleyball when operational commitments and weather permit, providing additional opportunities to strengthen their relationship. Sergeant Murphy observed that the training made interaction easier, saying, “Now it’s a lot easier to interact with them. They come up, they say hi to me, they talk about the training that we did.”

The Bauchi training represents a continuation of the broader US-Nigeria security partnership. In July 2026, AFRICOM disclosed that the US had withdrawn most troops deployed to Nigeria for a specific counterterrorism operation, while retaining an intelligence-sharing and security cooperation arrangement with the Nigerian military. The US has approximately 200 military personnel and several MQ-9 Reaper drones at the Bauchi airbase for training, intelligence, and support functions in the fight against jihadist militants in northern Nigeria. Additional training opportunities are being developed at Operating Location Bauchi as both sides continue identifying areas where their personnel can share expertise and train together.

US Intensifies Military Training for Nigerian Troops in Bauchi

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Awujale: Fusengbuwa Ruling House sues Abiodun, kingmakers over stalled selection

Published

on

Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun

Awujale: Fusengbuwa Ruling House sues Abiodun, kingmakers over stalled selection

The Fusengbuwa Ruling House of Ijebu-Ode has taken Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun, the state government and members of the Awujale Afobaje/Kingmakers Council to court over the stalled process of selecting the next Awujale and Paramount Ruler of Ijebuland.

The suit, filed at the Ogun State High Court sitting in Ijebu-Ode, is seeking judicial orders compelling the relevant authorities to allow the succession process to resume and be completed in accordance with the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021.

The case, dated August 21, 2026, was filed by the Chairman of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House, Abdulateef Owoyemi; Deputy Chairman, Adedokun Ajidagba; and Vice Chairman, Prof Fassy Yusuf.

The defendants include Governor Abiodun; the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Oluwasina Ogungbade (SAN); the Ogun State Executive Council; Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Ganiyu Hamzat; the Secretary of Ijebu-Ode Local Government; and its chairman, Dare Alebiosu.

Nine members of the Awujale Afobaje/Kingmakers Council are also named as defendants. They are Sonny Kuku, Rasheed Adesanya, Oluwaranti Osifeso, Jimi Lawal, Abimbola Okenla, Kunle Ogunade, Agboola Alausa, Adebisi Adaran and Ayotunde Odulaja.

The legal dispute stems from the prolonged process of finding a successor to the late Awujale of Ijebuland, Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, who died on July 13, 2025, at the age of 91 after a 65-year reign.

The Fusengbuwa Ruling House maintains that the succession process was properly initiated after Ijebu-Ode Local Government notified it on December 2, 2025, that it was its turn to produce a candidate under the rotational arrangement governing the Awujale stool.

READ ALSO:

The family subsequently held its nomination meeting on January 12, 2026, which it said was within the 14-day period prescribed by Section 16 of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021.

According to the claimants, 95 princes and princesses were nominated during the exercise, with the completed list forwarded to the nine-member kingmakers’ council on January 19, 2026.

The ruling house contends that the submission of the list marked the completion of its statutory responsibility and paved the way for the kingmakers to commence the next stage of the process — selecting a preferred candidate from the nominees.

However, the claimants allege that the kingmakers were prevented from meeting less than 24 hours after receiving the nomination list.

They alleged that police officers entered the Awujale Palace after midnight on January 20, 2026, and locked the premises, thereby preventing the kingmakers from convening to continue the selection process.

The ruling house is now asking the High Court to determine whether the Ogun State Government had the legal authority to order or facilitate the alleged closure of the palace and prevent the kingmakers from carrying out their statutory responsibilities.

It also wants the court to determine whether the state government had the power under the Ogun State chieftaincy law to suspend the nomination or selection process for the Awujale stool.

The claimants further argue that the ruling house had fully complied with its legal obligation after completing its nomination exercise within the prescribed period.

They are asking the court to determine whether the kingmakers, after receiving the 95-name nomination list, became legally obligated under Sections 16(1)(e) and (f) of the law to select a candidate and forward the name to the Ogun State Executive Council.

The ruling house is also relying on Section 22 of the law in asking the court to determine whether the Executive Council is required to act on a candidate selected and presented by the kingmakers.

The claimants are seeking a declaration that they should not be compelled to reopen, repeat or recommence the nomination exercise after completing it in accordance with the prescribed procedure.

They are also asking the court to declare that the Awujale kingmakers must proceed with the selection of a candidate from the submitted list and forward the name to the appropriate government authority.

Among the reliefs sought is an order directing the kingmakers to reconvene within seven days of judgment and complete the selection process.

The ruling house is further seeking an injunction restraining the Ogun State Government and security agencies from interfering with the succession process.

It wants the court to declare the alleged locking of the Awujale Palace unlawful, ultra vires the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, and contrary to the claimants’ right to fair hearing.

The legal action follows an earlier decision by the state government to suspend the succession exercise amid concerns over security, alleged bribery and financial inducement.

The Fusengbuwa Ruling House, however, disputes the basis for those concerns and says no evidence or formal petition substantiating the allegations was presented to it.

The claimants further contend that investigations by the police and the Department of State Services (DSS) did not establish wrongdoing by the ruling house.

The dispute has already affected planned engagements between the kingmakers and prospective candidates. The selection process was halted after security authorities became involved, while aspirants were subsequently directed to appear before the DSS for screening.

The case now places the respective powers and responsibilities of the ruling house, Awujale kingmakers and Ogun State Government before the court.

Counsel for the claimants, led by Olusegun Otayemi, argued in the originating summons that the state’s chieftaincy law establishes a sequential process involving nomination, selection and approval, which should be followed once the process has been validly commenced.

The ruling house is therefore asking the court to clarify whether any government authority has the power to interrupt the statutory process after the relevant stages have been completed.

The outcome of the case could determine the future of the current Awujale succession process, including whether the 95-name nomination list remains valid and whether the kingmakers can proceed with the selection of a successor to Oba Adetona.

It could also provide judicial clarification on how the provisions of the Ogun State Obas and Chiefs Law 2021 should be applied in the appointment of the next Awujale.

The case adds a significant legal dimension to the prolonged search for a successor to one of Nigeria’s most prominent traditional rulers, as stakeholders in Ijebuland await further developments from the court.

Awujale: Fusengbuwa Ruling House sues Abiodun, kingmakers over stalled selection

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

“He Must Be Mad” — Oyedepo Slams Sheikh Jingir Over Claim Nigeria Is an Islamic Nation

Published

on

"He Must Be Mad" — Oyedepo Slams Sheikh Jingir Over Claim Nigeria Is an Islamic Nation
Bishop David Oyedepo and Sheikh Sani Yahaya Jingir

“He Must Be Mad” — Oyedepo Slams Sheikh Jingir Over Claim Nigeria Is an Islamic Nation

Living Faith Church founder rejects Islamic nation assertion as Islamic cleric denies hate speech allegations and maintains support for Muslim-Muslim ticket

Bishop David Oyedepo, founder of Living Faith Church Worldwide, has strongly rejected suggestions that Nigeria is an Islamic nation, describing anyone who holds such a view as “mad.” The cleric made the comment during his Sunday service, weighing in on the ongoing debate over Nigeria’s religious identity that has intensified ahead of the 2027 general election. “Watch Redemption Camp, watch Salvation Ministries, watch Dunamis watch various churches in Nigeria and somebody will stand and say Nigeria is an Islamic nation. Is he mad? Yes, he must be mad,” Oyedepo said. To back his position, the bishop cited the scale and visibility of major Christian churches across the country, arguing that their large congregations and nationwide activities undercut any claim that Nigeria is an Islamic state. Oyedepo further stirred attention with a cryptic prediction, declaring that “there shall be strange happenings between now and the next 12 months in Nigeria,” without elaborating on what this would entail.

Oyedepo’s comments came in response to remarks attributed to Sheikh Sani Yahaya Jingir, Chairman of Jama’atu Izalatil Bid’a Wa’ikamatis Sunnah (JIBWIS). Jingir had spoken at a mass wedding organised by the Kano State Government for 1,500 couples, where he publicly declared his support for President Bola Tinubu’s Muslim-Muslim presidential ticket ahead of the 2027 presidential race. At the event, Jingir reportedly argued that Muslims constitute the majority in Nigeria and maintained that the country belongs to Muslims. “My candidate is Bola Ahmad Bola Tinubu. The President selected a Muslim as his vice. I am one of those who called people to support the Muslim-Muslim ticket,” Jingir was quoted as saying. He further stated: “I know some non-Muslims don’t like the word Muslim-Muslim. As a Muslim who preaches Islam, if I support Muslim-Muslim, what is my offence? What have I done wrong? I don’t stop anyone who believes or supports another candidate from doing the same.”

READ ALSO:

Amid the growing backlash, Jingir has denied claims that he harbours hatred towards Christians, describing such allegations as “mere lies” and insisting that his recent comments were misunderstood. The Islamic cleric made the clarification while speaking at a one-day national symposium in Jos themed “Enhanced Political Participation and Social Justice as a Panacea for Unity and Development in Nigeria.” “A lot of people are saying I dislike Christians. I didn’t say I dislike Christians. It is a lie. My remarks were misinterpreted. Leadership in Islam is not about cheating people of different faiths. Islam teaches us to share love with people of different faiths or sects,” Jingir said. He explained that Islam promotes love, fairness and justice, regardless of religious affiliation, adding that Muslims would be held accountable for mistreating non-Muslims. The cleric further called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, state governors and other political leaders to govern with fairness and justice, regardless of religious or political differences. “I call on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu not to cheat non-Muslims and Muslims alike. I also call on you not to cheat those who are not in the same political party with you. You should lead with justice and fairness to all Nigerians,” he said.

Jingir also defended Nigerians’ right to support candidates of their choice during elections, saying, “Everyone has the right to vote for whoever he feels is okay with him to vote for during an election.” He cited his support for a Christian governorship candidate in Plateau State as evidence that his political choices were not motivated by religious hatred. “Everyone has the right to vote for whoever he feels is okay with him to vote for during an election. I have once voted for a non-Muslim as governor in Plateau State, and I voted for him against another Christian contestant, whom I felt would not do justice to all manner of people, including Muslims,” he said.

Oyedepo’s public rebuke adds another prominent religious voice to an increasingly sensitive debate over religion, political representation and national identity as political activities ahead of the 2027 elections intensify. Critics have accused Jingir of using his religious position to influence political choices and deepen religious divisions ahead of the 2027 elections. The timing of the remarks makes them particularly sensitive as Nigeria approaches the 2027 general election, with political actors already positioning themselves for what is expected to be a highly competitive electoral contest.

“He Must Be Mad” — Oyedepo Slams Sheikh Jingir Over Claim Nigeria Is an Islamic Nation

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending