Africa
African Nations Threaten Retaliatory Action Over Xenophobic Attacks in South Africa
African Nations Threaten Retaliatory Action Over Xenophobic Attacks in South Africa
Diplomatic pressure on South Africa is intensifying as several African nations threaten retaliatory measures over renewed xenophobic attacks targeting foreign nationals, particularly Nigerians and other African migrants.
While no country has formally announced a full border closure, regional threats involving possible trade restrictions, tighter immigration controls, and coordinated diplomatic action are gaining momentum, marking what analysts describe as one of the most serious regional tensions in recent years.
The latest unrest, reported between April 27 and 29, 2026, saw protests and violent incidents in cities including Pretoria and Johannesburg, where groups accused foreign nationals of taking jobs and engaging in criminal activity. However, law enforcement data and independent studies have repeatedly shown no nationwide evidence supporting claims that migrants are responsible for significant crime levels or widespread job displacement.
In response to the growing crisis, several African countries have intensified diplomatic engagement with Pretoria. Governments including Nigeria, Ghana, Lesotho, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique have issued travel advisories and increased efforts to protect their citizens living in South Africa.
READ ALSO:
- Melaye: Obi Can’t Handle Nigeria If He Can’t Face Party Crises
- Shekarau’s Possible Return Sparks Tension in Kano APC Senatorial Race
- Senate Tightens Rules, Restricts Ex-Governors, New Entrants From Leadership Positions
The Nigeria government has begun voluntary evacuation arrangements, with officials confirming that over 130 Nigerians have registered for repatriation through its mission in South Africa. Nigerian authorities have also summoned South Africa’s diplomatic representative to formally protest the attacks and demand stronger protection for citizens and businesses.
Foreign Affairs Ministry spokesperson Kimiebi Ebienfa said the government’s immediate priority is the safety of Nigerians, adding that all diplomatic options remain on the table if the situation does not improve.
Ghana has also taken diplomatic steps, summoning South African officials after reports of harassment of its nationals, including viral footage showing intimidation of migrants in KwaZulu-Natal.
Similarly, Tanzania has reportedly adopted a tougher stance, with authorities warning of possible deportation measures against South African nationals and reviewing bilateral cooperation following continued incidents targeting African migrants.
Botswana is also considering economic countermeasures, including potential disruptions to electricity supply and border movement, in what officials describe as a response to sustained hostility toward its citizens. Leaders there have framed the issue as one of regional respect and historical solidarity.
Mozambique is likewise reviewing possible restrictions at the Ressano Garcia border, a major trade corridor whose disruption could significantly affect regional commerce between both countries.
South African authorities have condemned the violence, describing it as criminal conduct rather than government policy. President Cyril Ramaphosa has called for calm and urged communities to avoid unlawful attacks on foreign nationals.
Despite these assurances, African governments continue to press for stronger enforcement and long-term solutions, citing repeated xenophobic incidents over the past decade that have left many migrants dead or displaced.
As tensions rise, analysts say the crisis is testing regional unity and putting renewed pressure on continental mechanisms designed to ensure the free movement and protection of African citizens.
African Nations Threaten Retaliatory Action Over Xenophobic Attacks in South Africa
Africa
Nike Faces Religious Backlash as Libya’s Grand Mufti Bans Muslims From Buying, Wearing Products
Libya’s highest Islamic religious authority has issued a fatwa prohibiting Muslims from buying, selling or wearing Nike products, accusing the American sportswear company of promoting symbols associated with polytheism and supporting Israel.
The religious ruling, issued by Dar al-Ifta and approved by Libya’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Sadiq al-Gharyani, has called on Muslims to avoid the global sportswear brand, citing concerns over the origins of its name, its iconic logo and the company’s alleged links to Israel.
The decision has drawn attention to the influence of religious authorities on consumer choices and the growing calls for boycotts of international companies over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
According to reports, the ruling, identified as Fatwa No. 6697, followed an inquiry seeking clarification on whether Muslims could wear clothing bearing the Nike name and logo.
In its response, the religious authority argued that the name Nike originated from the ancient Greek goddess of victory, while the company’s famous swoosh logo was inspired by the wings of the mythological figure.
The institution maintained that displaying the brand’s name and logo amounted to promoting symbols associated with the worship of multiple gods, which it considers incompatible with Islamic teachings.
It consequently declared the purchase, sale and wearing of Nike-branded products religiously impermissible, urging Muslims to avoid the company.
Dar al-Ifta also accused Nike of supporting Israel, linking its latest position to the wider campaign encouraging Muslims to boycott companies alleged to have connections with or support for Israel.
The authority referred to an earlier position adopted by its Council for Research and Sharia Studies on November 5, 2023, which called on Muslims to boycott Western companies considered supportive of Israel during the war in Gaza.
The council had urged Muslims to avoid purchasing non-essential products from companies identified as supporting Israel, particularly luxury goods and other items considered unnecessary.
The latest ruling therefore combines religious objections to Nike’s branding with the institution’s position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
READ ALSO:
- Iran Unveils ‘We Will Kill Trump’ Billboard in Tehran Amid Rising Tensions With US
- Tinubu’s Re-election: Osun APC Leaders Reject Oyebamiji-Led Campaign Council
- Tragedy: Spanish Footballer Jesús de Miguel Dies at 30 After On-Field Collision
However, the fatwa should not be confused with a government-imposed ban on Nike products in Libya. It represents a religious ruling by Dar al-Ifta and does not, by itself, establish a legally enforceable prohibition or specify criminal penalties for consumers and retailers.
Although Dar al-Ifta wields considerable religious influence in the country, its religious opinions are distinct from government regulations.
The latest decision is also not the first time the institution has raised religious objections to the branding of an international luxury company.
Dar al-Ifta previously issued a ruling against wearing jewellery and watches bearing the four-leaf clover design associated with French luxury brand Van Cleef & Arpels.
The institution argued that the design was connected with beliefs and practices it considered inconsistent with Islamic teachings.
The latest development comes amid wider debates over religious conservatism, consumer boycotts and the influence of Islamic authorities on public life in Libya.
It also reflects the continuing international controversy surrounding companies accused by activists and campaign groups of maintaining business relationships or taking positions perceived to support Israel.
Nike, one of the world’s biggest sportswear manufacturers, is known for its footwear, clothing and sporting equipment, with its swoosh logo recognised internationally.
The implications of the fatwa for Nike’s business activities and retail market in Libya remain unclear.
Nike Faces Religious Backlash as Libya’s Grand Mufti Bans Muslims From Buying, Wearing Products
Africa
Midnight Horror : Woman Slaughters Husband, Two Children, Escapes Murder Conviction
Midnight Horror : Woman Slaughters Husband, Two Children, Escapes Murder Conviction
A Zimbabwean woman who killed her husband and two young children after reportedly struggling with severe financial hardship has been acquitted of three murder charges by the High Court in Bulawayo following psychiatric findings that she was suffering from a mental disorder when the killings occurred.
The woman, identified as 34-year-old Happiness Chimbangu, appeared before Justice Donald Ndirowei over the deaths of her husband, Edwin Chimbangu, 35, their four-year-old son, Promise, and their seven-month-old daughter, Prudence.
However, the court ruled that she could not be held criminally responsible for the killings because of her mental condition at the time of the incident.
According to details presented before the court, the tragic incident occurred in the early hours of January 30, 2025, at the family’s residence in Cowdray Park, a suburb of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
The court heard that Chimbangu had expressed suicidal thoughts the previous day, January 29, when she visited her mother’s residence at about 3pm and asked her to take care of her two children, saying she intended to end her life.
Her mother reportedly counselled her before she returned to her matrimonial home.
Concerned about her condition, her husband later contacted his mother-in-law at about 10pm, asking her to come to their residence because his wife was again displaying suicidal tendencies.
The woman’s mother subsequently arrived with a relative, while two church members, identified as Jethro Sibanda and Shepherd Ndlovu, also joined the family to counsel her.
The group reportedly spent several hours speaking with Chimbangu in an attempt to calm her down.
They eventually left shortly after midnight after believing that she had recovered and was no longer a danger to herself.
However, the situation reportedly took a devastating turn barely 10 minutes after they departed.
The court heard that at about 12.10am on January 30, Chimbangu realised that her husband and children had fallen asleep before picking up a metal digging tool, commonly described as a metal digger, inside the house.
She allegedly attacked her husband, striking him on the head and killing him instantly.
She subsequently attacked their four-year-old son, inflicting fatal injuries to his back, face and head, before turning on the seven-month-old baby girl and striking her on the face and head.
All three victims died in the attack.
The court further heard that at about 2am, Chimbangu went to her uncle and confessed that she had killed her husband and children.
Her uncle, identified as Moyo, reportedly took her to a police station and reported the incident, leading to her arrest.
Police officers who visited the residence recovered the bloodstained metal tool allegedly used in the attack.
Following her arrest, Chimbangu was referred for psychiatric evaluation at Mlondolozi High Security Prison in Bulawayo.
Medical examinations conducted by a doctor identified as Dr Chinova in February 2025, May 22, 2025, and September 30, 2025, reportedly established that she was suffering from a mental disorder.
Further court proceedings established that she had been suffering from schizoaffective disorder when she committed the offences and was mentally incapacitated to the extent that she could not be held criminally responsible for her actions.
Both the prosecution and defence reportedly agreed that she should receive a special verdict under Section 29 of Zimbabwe’s Mental Health Act.
Justice Ndirowei consequently found her not guilty of the three murder charges on account of her mental condition.
However, the ruling did not mean that she was immediately released from custody.
The judge ordered that Chimbangu remain at Mlondolozi for psychiatric treatment and continued management until she is certified mentally fit by a medical doctor.
The case has renewed attention on the importance of recognising and responding appropriately to severe mental health crises, particularly when individuals exhibit suicidal tendencies or other warning signs that could place themselves and members of their families at risk.
Midnight Horror : Woman Slaughters Husband, Two Children, Escapes Murder Conviction
Africa
21 Dead, 40 Injured as Drone Hits Market in Sudan’s Darfur Region
21 Dead, 40 Injured as Drone Hits Market in Sudan’s Darfur Region
At least 21 people have been killed and more than 40 injured in a drone strike on a market in Nyala, a city in Sudan’s western Darfur region, as fighting between the Sudanese military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) continues.
The attack occurred at about 8 p.m. on Monday, October 26, 2026, in a market in northern Nyala, according to witnesses and a medical source at Nyala Hospital. The city serves as the de facto capital of the RSF-controlled areas in western Sudan.
A medic at Nyala Hospital confirmed the death toll and said more than 40 people had been wounded. However, the medic could not determine how many of those killed or injured were RSF fighters and how many were civilians.
A resident said the market was frequented by young men, including members of the paramilitary group. The identities of the victims and the intended target of the strike had not been independently established.
READ ALSO:
- Ansaru Claims Killing of Katsina Cleric Masussuka as Police Launch Manhunt
- MURIC Accuses Police Contractor of Refusing to Rebuild Mosque at Lagos Barracks, Demands Equal Treatment
- Nigerian Navy Recruitment 2026: October 31 Deadline, Full Requirements and How to Apply
The Sudanese military has regularly carried out airstrikes on Nyala, where the RSF has established a rival administration. However, responsibility for the latest market strike had not been independently confirmed.
The attack comes amid an intensification of drone warfare in Sudan, with unmanned aircraft increasingly being used in the conflict. Reports citing United Nations figures said drone attacks killed more than 300 people and injured hundreds more during the first three weeks of October.
The conflict between Sudan’s armed forces and the RSF began in April 2023 and has triggered widespread destruction, mass displacement and severe food shortages. Millions of people have been forced from their homes, while access to healthcare and other essential services has deteriorated in many parts of the country.
The latest strike adds to concerns over the safety of civilians in areas affected by the fighting, particularly markets and other public places where armed personnel and ordinary residents may be present.
Further information about the victims, the intended target and responsibility for the Nyala attack was not immediately available.
21 Dead, 40 Injured as Drone Hits Market in Sudan’s Darfur Region
-
Sports2 days agoSuper Falcons Receive $100,000 Each as Tinubu Finally Fulfils WAFCON Pledge
-
Politics2 days agoAPC Dumps Adeleke’s Campaign Structure, Unveils Separate 168-Member Council in Osun
-
metro2 days agoThree Homeless Men Shot Dead in Midnight Attack at Lagos Bus Stop
-
metro3 days agoCourt Orders 18-Year-Old Fraudster To Pay ₦1.2m Over $800 Lottery Scam
-
metro3 days agoGunmen Intercept Family Car, Abduct Woman, Two Children, Release Husband in Abuja
-
metro3 days agoDino Melaye Challenges Tinubu to Quranic Recitation Contest After Umrah Trip
-
News3 days agoI Believe God Has Answered My Prayer, Says Tinubu After Entering Holy Ka’abah
-
metro2 days agoOyo Boxer Stabbed to Death with Broken Bottle After Street Fight in Ibadan