Alleged fraud: Court rejects ex-Minister Agunloye’s preliminary objection
Former Power and Steel Minister Olu Agunloye has questioned the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) legal power to prosecute him for alleged illegal activity in the $6 billion Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project.
In a notice of preliminary objection filed before a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Apo, Agunloye sought an injunction barring the EFCC from prosecuting or continuing to prosecute the seven-count indictment on which he was arraigned on January 10.
In his objection submitted through his counsel, Adeola Adedipe (SAN), the ex-minister highlighted that the charges listed in the allegation pertained to his activities as a public officer when he was said to have granted the contract without budgetary provision, consent, and cash backing.
Agunloye also claimed that another offence alleged in the charge bordered on his purported disobedience to the directives of the President and forgery of a letter, dated: May 22, 2003.
He contended that the EFCC lacks investigative and prosecutorial powers on the offences alleged in the charge, under sections 6, 7, and 46 of the EFCC Act, 2004.
Agunloye added: “These allegations do not constitute financial crimes, which can be lawfully investigated and prosecuted by the EFCC, pursuant to its powers under sections 6, 7, and 46 of the EFCC (Establishment) Act and in consonance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Nwobike v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2022) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1826) 293.
READ ALSO:
“Not having the mandatory/statutory powers to investigate the allegations against the defendant, ab initio, the purported investigation of the defendant and current prosecution of the charge by the EFCC is ultra vires its powers and thereby a nullity.”
“This is a threshold issue in which the court must first satisfy itself that there is requisite statutory powers for the EFCC to prosecute the charge and competent jurisdiction in the court to entertain same.”
The former minister also filed a separate application, seeking an order of the court to restrain the EFCC from inviting, intimidating or harassing his sureties.
He also prayed for an order to vary the conditions attached to the bail granted him on January 11, one of which required that his sureties must provide evidence of their ownership of a property worth N300 million.
In the application, he claimed that the EFCC had “repeatedly harassed, threatened, and invited his sureties for investigation,” an action he said was “actuated by bad faith, for the sureties to withdraw their suretyship and thereby create an uneven playing field in the prosecution of the case”.
At the resumed hearing in the case yesterday, Adedipe told the court about the fresh applications his client had filed.
The trial judge, Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie, held that they were not ripe for hearing.
Justice Onwuegbuzie adjourned till February 26 for the hearing of the applications.
Four varsity lecturers dismissed for sexual misconduct In a significant development, the Governing Council of…
Super Eagles seal AFCON 2025 spot, draw 1-1 against Benin Victor Osimhen’s late header helped the…
2027 PDP ticket: I defeated you in 2019, 2023, Atiku mocks Wike There’s no let-off in war…
BREAKING: Super Eagles qualify for AFCON 2025 The Super Eagles of Nigeria have secured their…
Disaster averted as bird strike hits Abuja-Lagos Air Peace flight An Abuja-Lagos flight was…
NNPC achieves 1.8mbpd crude oil production The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) and…