Appeal Court Restores INEC Guidelines, Paves Way for 2027 General Elections - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Appeal Court Restores INEC Guidelines, Paves Way for 2027 General Elections

Published

on

Appeal Court Restores INEC Guidelines, Paves Way for 2027 General Elections

Appeal Court Restores INEC Guidelines, Paves Way for 2027 General Elections

The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja has set aside a Federal High Court judgment that nullified key timelines issued by the Independent National Electoral Commission for the 2027 general elections, restoring the electoral body’s authority to enforce its Revised Timetable and Schedule of Activities . In a unanimous decision delivered on Thursday by a three-member panel, the appellate court upheld INEC’s appeal against the May 20 judgment of Justice Mohammed Umar, ruling that the trial court failed to follow binding judicial precedents . The Court held that INEC’s Revised Timetable constitutes subsidiary legislation made pursuant to the Electoral Act 2026, and therefore carries the same force and effect as the principal legislation itself . According to the appellate court, every deadline contained in the revised schedule falls within the provisions of the Electoral Act, and the electoral commission validly exercised its statutory powers in issuing the timetable . The judgment effectively removes the legal uncertainty that had trailed preparations for the 2027 general elections after conflicting judicial decisions created concerns over the validity of the commission’s electoral calendar .

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the Youth Party, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/517/2026, challenging key provisions of INEC’s revised timetable . The party had argued that INEC lacked statutory authority to prescribe the period within which political parties must conduct their primaries for nominating candidates for the 2027 general elections . Delivering judgment on May 20, Justice Mohammed Umar agreed with the Youth Party and declared that INEC could not lawfully abridge the statutory timelines provided under the Electoral Act by prescribing earlier deadlines in its election timetable . The trial court relied on Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act, which gives political parties up to 120 days before an election to submit the personal particulars of nominated candidates, and held that INEC lacked the power to shorten that period . The Federal High Court also ruled that Section 31 of the Electoral Act permits political parties to withdraw and substitute candidates not later than 90 days before an election, making it unlawful for INEC to impose an earlier deadline . Similarly, the trial court held that Section 32 of the Electoral Act does not empower INEC to publish the final list of candidates earlier than the statutory minimum period of 60 days before an election . The court consequently invalidated INEC’s timelines for the conduct of party primaries, nomination of candidates, withdrawal and substitution of candidates, and also set aside the commission’s May 10 deadline requiring political parties to submit their membership registers and databases as a condition for participation in the 2027 general elections .

READ ALSO:

Dissatisfied with the judgment, INEC filed a nine-ground notice of appeal dated May 25, urging the appellate court to overturn the decision . The commission argued that the trial court failed to determine a jurisdictional objection it had raised before proceeding to the substantive issues, thereby denying it a fair hearing . INEC maintained that the suit filed by the Youth Party was hypothetical and academic and that the party lacked legal standing to institute and maintain the action . The commission further contended that although Section 29(1) requires political parties to submit candidate names not later than 120 days before an election, the Act equally empowers INEC to coordinate and regulate the electoral process by issuing a timetable that ensures the orderly conduct of elections . INEC also argued that enforcing the Federal High Court judgment would disrupt preparations for the 2027 general elections, submitting that “if the judgment is enforced or executed before the hearing and determination of the appeal, the entire electoral architecture and preparations for the 2027 general elections will be thrown into confusion” . According to the commission, the election timetable is an integrated programme in which every stage—from submission of membership registers and conduct of primaries to nomination of candidates, campaigns and publication of final lists—is interconnected .

The Court of Appeal agreed with INEC’s submissions, with the lead judgment prepared by Justice Adebukola Banjoko and read by Justice Okon Abang . The appellate court faulted the trial court for invalidating the administrative discretion of INEC, stating that “where INEC acts within its power, the courts cannot get involved” . The court also held that the Youth Party lacked legal standing to institute the case, as it did not explain how the guidelines affected its members in the conduct of primary elections for candidate nomination . “There was no deposition or threat that the respondent was prevented from conducting its primaries,” the court stated. “The respondent can only invoke the powers of the court where there are heavy threats to its participation in the election” . The ruling restores all timelines earlier fixed by INEC for party primaries, submission of candidates’ personal particulars, withdrawal and substitution of candidates, publication of the final list of candidates, and other pre-election activities . With the appellate court’s verdict, political parties are now expected to align with the restored timetable as they prepare for primaries, candidate nominations and other activities leading to the next general election . Unless further appealed to the Supreme Court, Thursday’s decision restores the legal foundation for INEC’s 2027 election timetable, allowing the commission to continue implementing its schedule for the forthcoming general elections without the restrictions imposed by the earlier High Court ruling .

Appeal Court Restores INEC Guidelines, Paves Way for 2027 General Elections

Loading

News

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded

Published

on

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Chairman Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has explained why some political parties and their governorship candidates were excluded from the final list for the 2027 elections, citing failure to comply with the statutory requirement to submit membership registers before conducting valid party primaries.

The commission said the decision followed a Supreme Court judgment delivered on September 24, 2026, which upheld the constitutionality of relevant provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, requiring political parties to submit their membership registers within a prescribed period.

The explanation comes amid complaints from affected political parties and candidates following the publication of INEC’s final list of governorship candidates, which omitted several prominent opposition figures.

Among those affected are Isa Ali Pantami, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate in Gombe State, and Ladi Adebutu, the party’s candidate in Ogun State.

Pantami’s name was missing despite his emergence from a court-ordered rerun of the PDP governorship primary in Gombe, while Adebutu and his running mate were also absent from the list.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, October 13, INEC National Commissioner and Chairman of its Information and Voter Education Committee, Mohammed Kudu Haruna, said the commission applied the Supreme Court’s decision when finalising the list.

The judgment arose from an appeal filed by INEC against an earlier Court of Appeal decision that had nullified Sections 77(5)–(7) of the Electoral Act, 2026.

The Supreme Court upheld the provisions, which require political parties to submit their membership registers as a prerequisite for valid party primaries.

READ ALSO:

It also upheld INEC’s timetable requiring parties to submit their registers between April 21 and May 10, 2026.

According to the commission, the apex court held that parties that failed to comply with the statutory requirements were ineligible to sponsor candidates for the elections.

INEC said it was consequently required to give effect to the judgment in accordance with Section 287(1) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, which requires compliance with decisions of superior courts.

The commission added that the final lists of presidential and National Assembly candidates had already been published on September 12, 2026, before the Supreme Court delivered its judgment.

The omissions have triggered reactions from affected political parties, with the PDP saying it was engaging INEC over the absence of its candidates in Gombe and Ogun states.

The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has also raised concerns over the omission of some of its governorship candidates, while other affected political groups have indicated their intention to pursue available remedies.

The development has heightened concerns among opposition parties as preparations continue for the February 6, 2027, governorship elections.

INEC, however, said political parties that believe their candidates were wrongly omitted from the final list have 14 days from the date of publication to notify the commission.

It fixed October 24, 2026, as the deadline for such notifications under Section 32(2) of the Electoral Act, 2026.

The commission reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, adherence to the rule of law and the credibility of the electoral process.

The next steps by affected parties will determine whether the omissions can be resolved through the commission’s notification procedure or other legal avenues available to them.

 

2027 Elections: INEC Reveals Why Pantami, Adebutu, Others Were Excluded

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Published

on

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Shell Petroleum B.V. has agreed to sell its entire interest in the Shell Nigeria Gas Group to indigenous energy company Vaaris Energy Limited, marking another major shift in the international oil giant’s business portfolio in Nigeria.

The agreement, announced on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, covers Shell’s domestic gas distribution business in the country. The financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed in the announcement.

The proposed sale will transfer Shell’s interest in the gas distribution group to Vaaris Energy, a Nigerian-owned company seeking to expand its presence in the country’s oil and gas industry.

The transaction represents another adjustment to Shell’s Nigerian operations as the company focuses on selected oil, gas and integrated energy projects.

Shell’s latest move follows its earlier exit from onshore oil production through the sale of its interest in the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC) to the Renaissance consortium. That transaction was completed in March 2025 after receiving the necessary regulatory approvals.

However, the two transactions involve different parts of Shell’s Nigerian business. The earlier deal covered its onshore oil-producing subsidiary, while the latest agreement concerns its domestic gas distribution operations.

READ ALSO:

Following the SPDC sale, Shell retained other interests in Nigeria, including its deepwater oil and gas operations and its participation in Nigeria LNG Limited. The company also continued operating its domestic gas distribution business, which is now expected to come under Vaaris Energy’s ownership once the latest transaction is completed.

Shell said the proposed divestment aligns with its strategy of simplifying its global portfolio and concentrating investment on projects expected to deliver stronger returns.

Elohor Aiboni, Shell’s country chair in Nigeria, said the company would continue to focus on its strategic deepwater and integrated gas positions in the country.

For Vaaris Energy, the proposed acquisition offers an opportunity to strengthen its position in Nigeria’s natural gas market and expand its participation in the domestic energy value chain.

The company is a privately held Nigerian energy business with interests across the oil and gas sector. However, details of its plans for the acquired business, including any operational changes or investment commitments, were not disclosed in the announcement.

The financial value of the transaction and the precise timeline for completion were also not made public in the information available at the time of reporting.

The deal comes as Nigeria seeks to increase domestic gas utilisation, improve energy supply and attract investment into its gas infrastructure. Gas distribution plays an important role in connecting producers with industrial users and other customers that rely on natural gas for their operations.

The implications of the acquisition for Nigeria’s domestic gas market will depend on the completion of the transaction and how Vaaris Energy manages and develops the business under its ownership.

Shell’s agreement with Vaaris therefore marks another change in the ownership of a significant energy asset in Nigeria, while allowing the international company to maintain its focus on other strategic oil and gas interests in the country.

Shell Exits Nigeria’s Gas Distribution Business, Sells Stake to Vaaris Energy

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute

Published

on

Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute
Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute

A domestic dispute allegedly involving the sale of landed property and accusations of infidelity has left a couple dead in Agbarho community, Ughelli North Local Government Area of Delta State, leaving their four children without either parent.

The incident reportedly occurred on Owiri Street in Agbarho, where the man allegedly attacked and killed his wife before later dying by suicide after ingesting a poisonous substance.

According to a report published by Vanguard on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, the tragedy followed a disagreement between the couple over landed property and alleged infidelity. However, the full circumstances surrounding the confrontation have not been independently established.

A source quoted in the report said the man was reportedly angered by allegations concerning his wife’s fidelity and the sale of his landed property. The precise sequence of events leading to the couple’s deaths remains unclear.

A neighbour reportedly said the couple had experienced repeated physical confrontations before the incident, suggesting that tensions within the household may have persisted for some time. However, details of the earlier clashes and whether the authorities had previously been alerted have not been confirmed.

READ ALSO:

The deceased man’s elder brother also reportedly expressed shock over the deaths, saying he was not fully aware of what had triggered the fatal confrontation. He confirmed that the couple had four children, with the eldest said to be about 21 years old, but declined to disclose their identities.

A senior police officer at the Agbarho Division reportedly confirmed the incident, saying officers evacuated the bodies to a morgue as investigations began. The officer also indicated that no formal complaint had been lodged by the families as of the time of the report.

Attempts to obtain further comments from the Delta State Police Command’s spokesperson, SP Bright Edafe, were reportedly unsuccessful before the report was published.

The deaths have left the couple’s four children facing the loss of both parents, adding to the devastating consequences of the incident. The circumstances surrounding the reported property dispute, the allegations of infidelity and the events immediately preceding the deaths remain subject to investigation.

The tragedy highlights the potentially devastating consequences of unresolved domestic conflict. Disagreements involving marital relationships, property ownership and land sales should be addressed through peaceful dialogue, appropriate support and lawful channels. Violence is never an acceptable way to resolve such disputes.

 

Delta Tragedy: Man Allegedly Kills Wife, Dies by Suicide After Land Dispute

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending