Bigamy: Yul Edochie denies marrying Judy Austin, says they’re skitmakers - Newstrends
Connect with us

Entertainment

Bigamy: Yul Edochie denies marrying Judy Austin, says they’re skitmakers

Published

on

Judy Austin and Yul Edochie

Bigamy: Yul Edochie denies marrying Judy Austin, says they’re skitmakers

Yul Edochie has claimed not to be married to Judith Austin, despite the two children they have had together.

He says the relationship between them is all about skitmaking, and maintains there is no legally recognised union between them.

His estranged wife May’s legal team, headed by Emeka Ugwuonye of Due Process Advocates, on Sunday, in a statement and video address, revealed that Yul, 42, made this claim in his court filing.

May filed for a divorce against her husband in August 2023, with details of the court proceedings having been kept hush.

Mr Ugwuonye said the ongoing case at the FCT High Court, Abuja, slated for a hearing on 5 March, faced an unexpected setback as the court session did not proceed, a circumstance Yul and Judy claimed credit for.

In light of this, Mr Ugwuonye, who had initially kept the case details under wraps, now finds himself obligated to unveil the unfolding developments.

Detailing the developments in the case, May’s lawyer highlighted what he considered to be the defence strategy employed by Yul and Judy.

He said they denied being married and insisted that their relationship lacked any legal statutory recognition, claiming to be skitmakers.

Denials and more denials
Citing Yul’s filing, May’s lawyer detailed how the actor denied his marriage to Judy.

He said Yul wrote, “That since the news of the birth of Star in June 2021, Gistlover, as a negative blog that thrives in fake and manipulated information for financial gains, has been negatively exploiting every movie or skit featuring me and Judy and generating social media traffic for financial gains.”

READ ALSO:

He said May’s initial petition highlighted an alleged traditional marriage ceremony between Yul and Judy on 24 April 2022 in Anambra State, as reported by Gistlover.

In response, Yul categorically denied the claim, attributing it to the Gistlover blog’s promotion of false information for financial benefit.

Yul and Judy deny the traditional marriage ceremony mentioned in May’s petition, insisting that it was a fabricated story fuelled by the blog’s penchant for fake news.

However, May’s lawyer, Mr Ugwuonye, noted that what was described as a skit-making relationship has produced two children and is about to get the third one.

Yul’s union with Judy has produced two children. In November 2021, Judy welcomed a son named Star Munachimso with Yul, and it is reported that the couple has since welcomed another child, a daughter.

According to May’s lawyer, the accused pair plans to argue that their social media content, including videos and posts, is part of a skitmaking endeavour, drawing parallels with Oga Sabinus, a popular skitmaker known for his comedic content.

Petitions and responses
Mr Ugwuonye also shared some details of the petition filed by May as well as relevant parts of the responses filed by Yul and Judith.

MAY: Petition (10)xviii.
The Respondent (Yul) left Lagos for Enugu the following day, the 21st of April, 2022, a Thursday, and on Sunday, the 24th of April, 2022, the Petitioner found out again on social media (Gistlover Blog) that the Respondent was performing traditional marriage rites with the Party Cited (Judy) in her home town in Anambra State as at when the information was posted. (The Petitioner shall rely on the publication of this suit at the trial.

YUL’S RESPONSE:
The Respondent (Yul) categorically denies paragraph 10 (xviii) of the petition and states that the Gistlover blog publication was false and fuelled by Gistlover’s enterprise in fake news and chaos. Since the news of the birth of the Respondent’s child with the Co-Respondent in June 2021, Gistlover, as a negative blog that thrives in fake and manipulated information for financial gains, has been negatively exploiting every movie or skit featuring the Respondent & Co-Respondent and generating social media traffic for financial benefits therefrom.

The Respondent hereby gives the Petitioner the strictest proof thereof.

JUDY’S RESPONSE:
9. The Co-Respondent (Judy) categorically denies paragraphs 10 (xviii) &(xix) of the petition and states that the said Gistlover blog publication was false and fuelled by gistlover’s enterprise in fake news and chaos. There was no traditional marriage ceremony between the Respondent and the Co-Respondent (Yul and Judy) on the 24th day of April 2022 or any other date. The Co-Respondent hereby gives the Petitioner the strictest proof thereof.

Bigamy
According to DPA lawyers, following Yul’s announcement of his second marriage, May had initially considered pressing a bigamy charge, which is a criminal offence of marrying someone while still legally married to another person, against Yul.

However, she was said to have decided against toeing such a legal path out of fear of seeing her husband behind bars in the event of a successful outcome of such a case.

May’s lawyer said this prompted a shift in strategy. Instead of that, May opted to file for divorce and pursue damages for adultery against Judy, Yul’s alleged extramarital partner.

May’s lawyer said she resorted to seeking legal redress in court after the death of their son.

The lawyer added that May’s refusal to grant Yul intimacy demands since he had a second marriage eventually felt compelled to involve the law due to threats and aggressive behaviour from her estranged husband.

According to the DPA family law firm, contrary to speculations circulating on social media and in certain blogging circles, May did not file a bigamy complaint against Yul.

He said: ‘‘Each time bigamy was mentioned, she asked, “Will they arrest him?” And we would say: “Most likely yes.” She would refuse to approve it. You can understand that. Despite what Yul did to her, she didn’t want him arrested.

“The only option left was for May to file for divorce and to sue Judy for damages for adultery. Even at that, she didn’t want to rush it. It took until after the death of her child and Yul’s subsequent behaviours for her to file for divorce. As I have stated earlier, once May discovered the relationship between Yul and Judy, May refused to allow Yul access to her. She refused to allow him to have any intimacy with her.’’

According to May’s legal representatives, the misinformation stems from a blogger allegedly under the influence of Judy, who was said to have happened to be her relative.

May’s legal team emphasised that the focus of the case is on divorce grounds of adultery and the damages to be claimed from the alleged adulterous partner, Judy.

Yul and Judy have reportedly denied any marital connection, asserting that their relationship was confined to skitmaking, a claim that May disputes.

But May insists they have done wrong.

“May Yul-Edochie has nothing further to prove. Yul and Judy admitted in their sworn statements that they had a child together. That is conclusive evidence of adultery, which is the basis of May’s petition. The law does not require a person to prove what the other party has admitted or conceded,’’ her lawyers said.

Bigamy: Yul Edochie denies marrying Judy Austin, says they’re skitmakers

Source: PREMIUM TIMES

Loading

Entertainment

VIDEO: Toluwanisings’ Burial: Uncle Questions Authenticity of Corpse, Alleges Family Was Sidelined

Published

on

ToluwaniSings’ Final Hours: Aide Reveals Desperate Search Across 8 Hospitals

VIDEO: Toluwanisings’ Burial: Uncle Questions Authenticity of Corpse, Alleges Family Was Sidelined

A fresh controversy has emerged over the burial of late Toluwanisings, following allegations by her maternal uncle that he was sidelined during arrangements for her burial.

 

The deceased’s uncle reportedly questioned whether the body buried was genuinely that of Toluwanisings, alleging that those responsible for the burial took her corpse away from the mortuary without involving the person he believes was supposed to authorise or sign the necessary documents.

 

In a statement expressing his concerns, the uncle said:

 

“How do we know that the corpse you buried is real when you sidelined the person who is supposed to sign? You just took the corpse away from the mortuary.

 

“When Toluwanisings wanted to get married, I was the one who signed at the court as her father’s representative. I don’t know why, but I’m calling people’s attention to this.”

 

His comments have raised questions about the circumstances surrounding the deceased’s removal from the mortuary and the extent of family involvement in the burial arrangements.

 

The uncle’s statement also suggests a dispute over who had the authority to represent the deceased’s family in matters concerning her burial.

 

However, his allegation questioning the identity of the corpse has not been independently established. It remains unclear whether the family has formally raised the matter with the relevant authorities or whether the burial arrangements complied with all applicable procedures.

 

The individuals accused of sidelining the uncle have yet to respond to the allegations.

 

VIDEO: Toluwanisings’ Burial: Uncle Questions Authenticity of Corpse, Alleges Family Was Sidelined

 

Loading

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Nasarawa Murder: Two Arrested as Police Recover Burnt Body from Dry Well

Published

on

Nasarawa Murder: Two Arrested as Police Recover Burnt Body from Dry Well
Spokesman, Nasarawa State Police Command, Ramhan Nansel

Nasarawa Murder: Two Arrested as Police Recover Burnt Body from Dry Well

The Nasarawa State Police Command has arrested two suspects over the alleged murder of a 50-year-old man whose decomposed remains were recovered from a dry well at his residence in Aku Village, Base 5, Karu Local Government Area of the state.

The victim, identified as Jude Thaddeus, popularly known as Musa, was allegedly killed inside his residence before his body was dumped in a dry well and set ablaze in an apparent attempt to conceal the crime.

The police said the suspects allegedly covered the well with blocks to prevent the discovery of the remains.

The Command’s Police Public Relations Officer, SP Ramhan Nansel, disclosed the development in a statement issued on Friday, November 6, 2026.

According to the police, the incident came to light on November 3 after a 46-year-old woman, Jennifer Alain, from Mpape, Abuja, reported her brother missing at the Aso Pada Police Division.

Alain reportedly raised the alarm after repeated attempts to contact her brother proved unsuccessful, while an unidentified person kept answering calls made to his telephone number.

Following the complaint, detectives launched an investigation that led to the arrest of a 23-year-old suspect, Yusuf Musa, who had reportedly been employed by the deceased about three months earlier to look after his domestic animals.

READ ALSO:

Preliminary investigations indicated that the victim had been missing since October 22, while the suspect allegedly took possession of his mobile phone and continued deceiving people who called by claiming that his supposed father had travelled to England.

The police further alleged that the suspect had been disposing of the deceased’s personal belongings, domestic animals and other properties under suspicious circumstances.

During interrogation, Yusuf allegedly confessed to selling some of the victim’s heavy metals and industrial engines for ₦3.4 million.

The suspect also allegedly confessed to participating in the murder and disclosed that the victim’s remains had been dumped in a dry well within his residence.

Acting on the information, detectives, working alongside environmental services personnel, visited the property and recovered the decomposed remains from the well.

The police said preliminary findings suggested that the victim was killed inside his residence before his body was taken to the well and set ablaze.

The remains were subsequently evacuated to the Medical Centre, Mararaba, where a medical doctor examined and certified the victim dead.

The police identified the two suspects currently in custody as Yusuf Musa, 23, and Victor Zamani, 32.

The Command also disclosed that investigations had established the involvement of a third suspect, who was still at large, with efforts intensified to apprehend the fleeing individual.

Meanwhile, the Commissioner of Police, CP Shetima Jauro Mohamed, has directed that the case be transferred to the State Criminal Investigation Department (SCID), Lafia, for comprehensive investigation and prosecution.

The Command assured residents that investigations were ongoing and that everyone found culpable would be brought to justice.

It also urged members of the public to remain vigilant and report suspicious movements and activities to security agencies.

Nasarawa Murder: Two Arrested as Police Recover Burnt Body from Dry Well

Loading

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kunle Afod Breaks Silence on Marriage Crisis, Cheating Allegations, Sex Toys

Published

on

Kunle Afod Breaks Silence on Marriage Crisis, Cheating Allegations, Sex Toys
Popular Nollywood actor and filmmaker, Kunle Afod and estranged wife, Desola Afod

Kunle Afod Breaks Silence on Marriage Crisis, Cheating Allegations, Sex Toys

Nollywood actor speaks on infidelity, jealousy, trust issues, says acting career leaves little time for family

Popular Nollywood actor and filmmaker, Kunle Afod, has broken his silence on his separation from his wife, Desola Afod, opening up about infidelity, jealousy, trust issues and what he described as double standards in relationships.

The Yoruba movie star made the revelations during an interview with YouTube personality Kasnasty Sugar, published on Thursday, November 5, 2026, months after reports of a crisis in his marriage became public.

Afod, who had largely kept quiet about the reported marital difficulties, identified the demanding nature of his acting career as one of the challenges affecting his family life.

Speaking about his separation, the actor explained that his professional commitments sometimes leave him and his wife with little time to attend to their home and family.

He began his remarks by apologising to women, apparently anticipating that some of his comments might generate controversy.

According to him, the entertainment industry can place enormous demands on actors, sometimes making it difficult for them to strike a balance between their careers and family responsibilities.

The actor subsequently turned his attention to infidelity, arguing that cheating should not be treated as an offence exclusive to men.

He questioned the tendency to condemn men for cheating while overlooking similar conduct by women, suggesting that both partners should be subjected to the same standards of faithfulness in marriage.

Afod also made controversial remarks about relationships between women, suggesting that some husbands could become suspicious when their wives maintain unusually close relationships with female friends.

READ ALSO:

 

 

His comments on the subject have generated interest because of the sensitive nature of trust, boundaries and fidelity in marital relationships.

The actor also stirred controversy with his observations about the use of sex toys among married couples.

He questioned what he considered a double standard whereby some women allegedly have no reservations about asking their husbands to purchase sex toys for them but might object if they discover that their husbands equally use such products.

Afod argued that the use of such devices could also raise questions about fidelity, particularly when one partner considers certain bedroom practices acceptable for themselves but unacceptable for their spouse.

He specifically questioned why a woman might request multiple sex toys while regarding her husband’s use of similar products as unacceptable.

His remarks have added another dimension to the public conversation surrounding the actor’s marital separation.

Afod and Desola’s marital crisis reportedly became public in February 2026, following claims that Desola had moved her belongings out of their matrimonial home.

The couple, who reportedly began their relationship in 2002, got married in 2005 and have children together.

Although speculation about their relationship had circulated for months, neither party had offered a detailed public account of the circumstances surrounding their separation before the actor’s recent interview.

Afod, however, did not directly accuse his estranged wife of infidelity or establish that the issues he discussed were specific incidents that occurred in their marriage.

His comments were largely framed around his observations about relationships, marital expectations and the challenges couples face.

The actor’s remarks have since drawn attention to the pressures facing celebrity marriages, particularly where demanding professional commitments compete with family responsibilities.

For Afod, whose career has spanned several years in the Yoruba movie industry, his latest comments have provided a rare glimpse into his views on marriage, fidelity and the challenges of maintaining a family while pursuing a demanding entertainment career.

Kunle Afod Breaks Silence on Marriage Crisis, Cheating Allegations, Sex Toys

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending