Buhari was once chosen as Boko Haram negotiator – Jonathan

Buhari was once chosen as Boko Haram negotiator – Jonathan

Former President Goodluck Jonathan has stated that the Boko Haram terrorists previously proposed former President Muhammadu Buhari to represent them in peace talks with the federal government.

Jonathan made the announcement on Friday at the Abuja public launch of Scars, a book written by former Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Lucky Irabor (retd.).

The former president stated that his administration had formed multiple committees to explore engagement with the group, and that on one of these occasions, the terrorists nominated Buhari as their favorite negotiator.

He went on to say that based on that, he believed it would have been simple for Buhari to negotiate a surrender with the militants if he had been president, but the conflict continued.

Jonathan stated, “One of the committees we set up then, the Boko Haram, nominated Buhari to lead their team to negotiate with the government.

“So I was feeling that, oh, if they nominated Buhari to represent them and have a discussion with the government committee, then when Buhari took over, it could have been an easy way to negotiate with them, and they would have handed over their guns. But it was still there till today.”

Jonathan mentioned that the inability of Buhari to eradicate Boko Haram terrorists showed that the crisis was more complex than often portrayed.

He said, “If you conduct research and interview many people, you will only get part of the story, but never the full story of Boko Haram. I was there. Boko Haram started in 2009 when I was vice president. I took over in 2010 and spent five years battling the insurgency until I left office.

“I thought that after I left, within a reasonable time, General Buhari would wipe them out. But even today, Boko Haram is still there. The issue of Boko Haram is far more complex than it is often presented.

READ ALSO:

• Tinted permit: Court orders Police to maintain status quo
• Abuja–Kaduna commuters return with cautious hope as train service resumes
• FIFA U20 World Cup: Flying Eagles edge Saudi Arabia 3-2

“So, it’s a bit complex and not a matter of a single story. But I believe, as a nation, we have to look at the Boko Haram issue differently from the conventional approach. I believe one day we’ll overcome it. Once again, let me thank General Irabor for this, because I always appreciate people who document events clearly. That way, when we write our own accounts, we can borrow from such documentation.

“I also believe that all the military officers involved in the Boko Haram saga should provide information about what the group truly stood for.”

Jonathan also stated that the issue of Boko Haram was beyond hunger, adding that his administration employed so many strategies, but they did not work.

He said, “If it was only about hunger—because we tried different options—I don’t want to sound like I’m defending my government. That will be left for history when we document our books.

“But I believe we did our best: we set up different committees and tried various approaches during the five years I was in office. I believe the late Buhari, too, must have tried his best.

“I believe the government—luckily, with the Defence Minister here and the service chiefs represented—must adopt a slightly different approach. God willing, we will be able to resolve this crisis.”

Jonathan described the abduction of the Chibok schoolgirls in 2014 as a permanent stain on his government.

The former president also expressed hope that some rebel commanders might eventually memorialize their acts, as important actors in the Nigerian Civil War did, to shed light on the insurgency’s motivations.

He said, “It is a scar I will die with. But perhaps later, more details may become known, and that too has to do with Boko Haram.

READ ALSO:

• Flood imminent as Kainji, Jebba, other dams set to discharge excess water
• Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs pleads for mercy ahead of sentencing
• Targeted killings: US Senators push for Nigeria’s return to religious freedom watchlist

“What did they really want? Our chairman once raised the issue when he interviewed some of them, and they gave him certain perspectives. But I pray that one day, some of the Boko Haram leaders may be literate enough to document what they have done so that people will truly understand what they wanted. It is similar to the story of the Nigerian Civil War.”

Jonathan recommended the present administration pursue a carrot-and-stick strategy, emphasizing that the group’s advanced weapons indicated external assistance beyond just hunger or poverty.

He said, “The issue of carrots and the stick may be adopted, and yes, probably the needs are there, but if you look at the weapons they use, and you value the weapons, then you know that these are not hungry people.

“So, the soldiers that sometimes capture some of the weapons will see better, but the weapons they use, the ammunition they use—sometimes they even have more ammunition than our soldiers.

“Where are these guns and sophisticated weapons coming from? And you begin to see that the external hands are also involved, especially when I was president.”

Boko Haram first emerged in Borno State in the early 2000s, but it quickly became a serious security problem after its leader, Mohammed Yusuf, was slain in police custody in 2009.

The terrorist group intensified its violent assault against the Nigerian government, which included bombings, mass abductions, and attacks on military and civilian targets.

In 2012, at the height of Boko Haram’s atrocities, allegations appeared that the terrorist group had listed Buhari as one of the recognized northern elders they trusted to negotiate between themselves and the government.

However, Buhari openly rejected the offer at the time, accusing the Jonathan government of attempting to bring his name into the situation for political reasons.

Buhari was once chosen as Boko Haram negotiator – Jonathan