Court restrains police from summoning Nedu Wazobia over business dispute

The order specifically restrains the Inspector-General of Police, the Assistant Inspector-General of Police at Alagbon, and their officers from summoning or detaining the applicants over a dispute with the 6th to 8th respondents: Metropolitan School of Business and Management, Mr. Victor Ariyibi-Oke, and Mrs. Tolulope Ariyibi-Oke.

Also joined in the suit are Ngozi Braide, Stephen Onihane, and Inspector Echeng Julius. Other applicants include Sarah Williams-Konha, Avalon Okpe, Ada Okpe, Barbara Okwaranobi, and Tokindrumz Pictures and Media Nigeria Ltd.

In his ruling, Justice Dipeolu ordered the police and their agents to refrain from taking further steps against the applicants pending the hearing of the substantive motion on notice for enforcement of their fundamental rights. However, the court declined a second request to compel the police to maintain the status quo on all matters relating to the disputed transaction.

READ ALSO:

• 50 bodies recovered after Katsina mosque attack, search continues
• Nigeria’s FX reserves at $41bn highest in four years
• Israel pounds Gaza City ahead of ‘intolerable’ new offensive

Through their counsel, J. Dong, the applicants argued that their business partners were using the police to intimidate them over what was essentially a civil dispute

They told the court that the matter had earlier been investigated for about nine months by the X-Squad of the AIG’s office at Alagbon in 2024, and that the investigation report cleared Nedu and his team of any criminal liability.

According to them, the police legal department also issued a formal advice confirming the case was contractual in nature and that any aggrieved party should seek redress in court.

Despite this, the applicants alleged that the 6th to 8th respondents secretly submitted a second petition to the same Alagbon office, this time to the team led by Ngozi Braide. They claimed that Braide and her team disregarded the earlier report and legal advice, placed them under caution again, and continued to harass them.

They further alleged that the police team’s conduct amounted to abuse of power, claiming that one of the respondents even assaulted their former lawyer before they engaged their present counsel.