Court Stops Police, FRSC From Imposing Fines On Motorists Without Court Order

Court Stops Police, FRSC From Imposing Fines On Motorists Without Court Order

A Federal High Court in Abuja has restrained the Nigeria Police Force and the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) from imposing fines on motorists for alleged violations of the Third Party Motor Vehicle Insurance Act without first obtaining a valid court order.

The judgment, delivered by Justice Hauwa Joseph Yilwa, followed a suit filed by human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju, who challenged what he described as the unlawful practice of instant fines issued by law enforcement agencies on motorists accused of failing to comply with compulsory third-party insurance requirements.

In her ruling, Justice Yilwa dismissed a preliminary objection raised by the police questioning the court’s jurisdiction. The judge held that the police were properly served with court documents but failed to file any response, adding that such failure weakened their objection.

The court subsequently granted the reliefs sought by the applicant and issued an order restraining both the police and the FRSC from imposing fines directly on motorists without due judicial process.

READ ALSO:

• Nigerian Union Demands Autopsy After Member Dies in South African Police Custody
• A coup trial without precedent, By Farooq Kperogi
• Xenophobia Fears Rise in South Africa as Viral Videos Show Attacks on African Migrants

The ruling specifically prohibits the agencies from enforcing penalties or collecting fines for insurance-related offences without first approaching a competent court of law.

Legal experts say the judgment reinforces a core constitutional principle in Nigeria’s justice system—that only courts have the authority to impose penalties for offences, including traffic and insurance violations.

The decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for traffic law enforcement in Nigeria, particularly in how agencies handle compliance with motor insurance regulations. It may require enforcement bodies to adopt prosecution-based approaches rather than immediate roadside penalties.

For motorists, the ruling is seen as a significant safeguard against what has long been criticised as arbitrary or extortion-like practices during traffic stops. However, it does not remove the legal obligation to maintain valid third-party motor insurance.

The court’s decision also raises broader questions about due process in law enforcement, citizens’ rights, and the limits of administrative powers exercised by regulatory agencies.

While the ruling marks a major legal development, its enforcement will depend on compliance by the affected agencies, possible appeals, and future judicial interpretations by higher courts.

Court Stops Police, FRSC From Imposing Fines On Motorists Without Court Order