Politics
Court to Decide Goodluck Jonathan’s Eligibility for 2027 Presidential Race
Court to Decide Goodluck Jonathan’s Eligibility for 2027 Presidential Race
The Federal High Court in Abuja is set to hear a suit challenging the eligibility of former President Goodluck Jonathan to contest the 2027 presidential election, a development that could shape Nigeria’s political landscape ahead of the next general polls.
The case, filed under suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/2102/2025, was instituted by Abuja-based lawyer Johnmary Jideobi, who is asking the court to declare that Jonathan is constitutionally barred from seeking the office of president again.
Justice Peter Lifu fixed Friday, May 8, for hearing in the matter after ordering that hearing notices be served on all parties involved following the failure of the defendants to file responses within the required timeframe.
Jonathan was listed as the first defendant in the suit, while the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the Attorney-General of the Federation were joined as second and third defendants respectively.
The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the former president from presenting himself to any political party for nomination ahead of the 2027 election.
He also asked the court to stop INEC from accepting, processing or publishing Jonathan’s name as a candidate for the presidential poll.
READ ALSO:
- VIDEO: Sisi Alagbo Secures Endorsement Deal After Viral Threesome Video Controversy
- Lasaco Assurance Posts 81.5% Profit Surge in Q1 2026 Results
- Breakthrough Study Shows Nasal Spray Could Slow Brain Ageing
According to the originating summons, the plaintiff wants the court to determine whether, under the provisions of Sections 1(1), (2), (3) and 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution, Jonathan remains eligible “under any circumstances whatsoever” to contest for the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The suit is anchored on the interpretation of constitutional provisions relating to presidential tenure limits.
Jideobi argued that Jonathan had already exhausted the constitutionally allowed two terms after completing the tenure of late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and subsequently serving another full term following his victory in the 2011 presidential election.
An affidavit filed in support of the suit by Emmanuel Agida stated that Jonathan first took the presidential oath of office on May 6, 2010, following the death of Yar’Adua a day earlier.
The affidavit noted that recent speculation suggesting Jonathan could return to active politics and possibly contest the 2027 presidency prompted the legal action.
“That the plaintiff believes that the 1st defendant, having completed the unexpired term of late President Yar’Adua and subsequently served a full term after the 2011 election, has exhausted the constitutional limit of two tenures as president,” part of the affidavit read.
The plaintiff further contended that if Jonathan contests and wins the 2027 election, he would effectively be taking the presidential oath of office for the third time, which he argued would violate constitutional provisions governing tenure limits.
Agida stated that the suit was instituted “in the public interest, in defence of the rule of law and accentuation of the supremacy of the Constitution, and to preserve the integrity of the Nigerian constitutional order.”
The legal battle comes amid growing political speculation over Jonathan’s possible return to the presidential race. Although the former president has not officially declared interest, several political groups and supporters have continued to urge him to contest in 2027.
The case has also sparked debate among constitutional lawyers and political analysts. While some legal experts believe Jonathan may be barred from contesting again, others insist previous court interpretations suggest he was only elected once as president and may therefore remain eligible under the law.
Jonathan served as Nigeria’s president from 2010 to 2015 after succeeding Yar’Adua and later winning the 2011 presidential election before losing his re-election bid to former President Muhammadu Buhari in 2015.
The outcome of the suit is expected to have significant implications for the interpretation of Nigeria’s constitutional provisions on presidential tenure and eligibility ahead of the 2027 general election.
Court to Decide Goodluck Jonathan’s Eligibility for 2027 Presidential Race
![]()
Politics
2027: Obasanjo’s Son Joins Tinubu’s Re-Election Movement, Reveals 12-Year APC Loyalty
2027: Obasanjo’s Son Joins Tinubu’s Re-Election Movement, Reveals 12-Year APC Loyalty
By Newstrends Political Desk
ABUJA — In a significant political development ahead of Nigeria’s 2027 presidential election, Hon. Olujuwon Obasanjo, son of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, has thrown his weight behind President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s second-term ambition, joining a political mobilisation group campaigning for the President’s re-election.
The younger Obasanjo has been appointed Special Adviser on Political Affairs to the PBAT Door-to-Door Movement, an organisation established to mobilise grassroots support for Tinubu’s re-election bid.
His decision, which comes amid increasing political realignments ahead of the 2027 general elections, has attracted attention because of the political differences between his position and the widely reported opposition stance of his father towards the Tinubu administration.
Olujuwon announced his support for the President during a visit to the movement’s headquarters in Abuja on Wednesday, November 4, 2026, where he was received by the organisation’s National Coordinator, Comrade Sunday Adekanbi Asuku.
He was subsequently taken on a guided tour of the facility to familiarise himself with the movement’s organisational structure and operations.
Describing his appointment as an honour and privilege, the former president’s son commended the organisation for its grassroots mobilisation, community outreach programmes and efforts to promote the activities of the Tinubu administration.
He disclosed that he had been following the movement’s activities for some time and was impressed by its interventions across different communities.
According to him, he was prepared to contribute his experience and political knowledge towards advancing the organisation’s objectives and securing Tinubu’s re-election in 2027.
Explaining his decision to support the President, Olujuwon argued that Tinubu had started on a good note, insisting that Nigerians, particularly young people, should support the administration’s ongoing reforms to ensure continuity in governance.
He also identified salary payments, infrastructure development and investment opportunities as some of the areas where he believed the country had recorded progress.
He maintained that the achievements should be sustained, expressing confidence that continued support for Tinubu would enable the administration to consolidate its policies and deliver more dividends of democracy.
In another significant revelation, Olujuwon disclosed that he had been a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC) since 2014.
He also addressed the possibility of differing political interests within the Obasanjo family, explaining that members of his family were allowed to hold independent political views and pursue their political ambitions without hostility.
His declaration effectively underscored his decision to pursue a political path independent of his father’s political preferences.
Earlier, the National Coordinator of the PBAT Door-to-Door Movement, Sunday Adekanbi Asuku, welcomed Olujuwon into the organisation, describing him as an experienced political figure with a strong background in leadership and governance.
Asuku expressed optimism that the younger Obasanjo’s experience and understanding of political mobilisation would strengthen the movement and expand its activities across the country.
He said the organisation was delighted by Olujuwon’s decision to join, adding that his political experience would be valuable in advancing its objectives and strengthening its nationwide mobilisation efforts.
The development represents another political realignment ahead of the 2027 presidential contest, as supporters of Tinubu intensify efforts to build alliances and expand the President’s political support base.
With the former president’s son now openly backing Tinubu’s second-term ambition, attention is likely to focus on the political implications of his decision and what it signals about the growing diversity of political positions within prominent Nigerian political families.
2027: Obasanjo’s Son Joins Tinubu’s Re-Election Movement, Reveals 12-Year APC Loyalty
![]()
Politics
Appeal Court Upholds INEC’s Recognition of Wike-Backed PDP Leadership, Dismisses Turaki Faction’s Suit
Appeal Court Upholds INEC’s Recognition of Wike-Backed PDP Leadership, Dismisses Turaki Faction’s Suit
Abuja, Nigeria — The Court of Appeal in Abuja has delivered a significant judicial setback to the faction of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) led by Kabiru Tanimu Turaki, affirming the refusal of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize the group’s Interim National Working Committee. In a unanimous judgment delivered on Wednesday, a three-member panel of the appellate court dismissed the appeal marked CA/ABJ/CV/1221/2026, which was filed by Senator Adolphus Wabara and seven others. The panel, presided over by Justice Ugochukwu Anthony Ogakwu, with Justices Laja Balogun and Ruquayat Oremei Ayoola, upheld the earlier decision of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which had declined to compel INEC to recognize the Turaki-led interim leadership.
The legal battle stems from the protracted leadership crisis that has rocked Nigeria’s main opposition party. The Turaki-led Interim National Working Committee was constituted following a National Executive Committee meeting held in the wake of a Supreme Court judgment on the party’s leadership dispute. However, the Wike-backed faction, which enjoys INEC’s recognition, has consistently challenged the legitimacy of the interim committee. The appellants had approached the appellate court seeking to set aside the Federal High Court judgment delivered by Justice Salim, which refused to compel INEC to recognize the interim committee. They argued that the party’s internal mechanisms had been exhausted and that the electoral body was bound to recognize the new leadership structure.
In its ruling on Wednesday, the Court of Appeal found no merit in the appeal, upholding the lower court’s decision in its entirety. The panel held that the appellants failed to establish a legal basis for compelling INEC to recognize a leadership structure that emerged outside the established constitutional framework of the party. The judgment reinforces the position of the Wike-backed leadership, which has maintained that only a leadership recognized by the courts and the electoral commission can lawfully run the affairs of the PDP.
Reacting to the judgment, the Turaki-led faction expressed disappointment but resolved to challenge the decision at the Supreme Court. In a statement issued on Wednesday by its National Publicity Secretary, Comrade Ini Ememobong, the group said it respected the court’s decision but remained committed to pursuing what it described as justice. “We are determined to take our quest for justice anchored on truth to the apex court in the land. It is our belief that no matter how deep the truth is buried, if those seeking it are persistent in digging, it will one day resurface,” the statement read. Ememobong disclosed that the group’s lawyers had been instructed to immediately commence the process of appealing the judgment before the Supreme Court. “We have instructed our lawyers to immediately file an appeal before the Supreme Court, in the hope that justice will eventually be done,” he added.
The faction also emphasized the importance of a strong opposition party to Nigeria’s democratic development, arguing that the PDP must remain an independent political force capable of holding the ruling party accountable. “The PDP, as the main opposition party, must provide a credible alternative to the ruling party and not become its appendage. Democracy survives only when the opposition is strong enough to effectively engage the government,” the statement added.
The latest ruling is another development in the prolonged leadership crisis rocking the PDP, which has been characterized by competing claims over the control of the party’s national leadership and structures. With the 2027 general elections approaching, the party’s ability to present a united front remains a critical challenge. The Turaki faction has urged party members to remain steadfast as the legal battle moves to the Supreme Court, expressing confidence that the eventual outcome would strengthen multiparty democracy in the country. As the case heads to the apex court, the PDP’s leadership tussle continues to test the resilience of Nigeria’s judicial system and the internal democratic processes of political parties.
Appeal Court Upholds INEC’s Recognition of Wike-Backed PDP Leadership, Dismisses Turaki Faction’s Suit
![]()
Politics
Rufai, Abati Clash Over Natasha’s Cash Empowerment Programme in Kogi
Rufai, Abati Clash Over Natasha’s Cash Empowerment Programme in Kogi
Popular Arise Television presenters, Rufai Oseni and Reuben Abati, have expressed differing views over the controversial cash empowerment programme organised by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for her constituents in Kogi State.
The disagreement followed the circulation of videos showing bundles of naira notes displayed during an empowerment programme organised by the senator representing Kogi Central Senatorial District.
The initiative, which has generated widespread reactions across social media, became a subject of discussion during Arise Television’s morning programme, where the two journalists offered contrasting perspectives on the lawmaker’s decision to distribute cash rather than business equipment.
While Rufai Oseni defended the senator’s approach, Reuben Abati reportedly raised concerns about the implications of distributing large sums of physical cash under constituency empowerment programmes.
The development has reignited public debate about the effectiveness, transparency and long-term benefits of political empowerment initiatives in Nigeria.
The programme was organised as part of activities marking Akpoti-Uduaghan’s third anniversary in the 10th National Assembly on November 2, 2026.
The lawmaker subsequently explained that her decision to provide direct financial assistance was informed by experiences from previous empowerment programmes, during which some beneficiaries allegedly sold the equipment given to them.
Defending the initiative, Akpoti-Uduaghan explained that distributing cash would give beneficiaries greater freedom to address their individual business needs rather than receiving equipment they might not necessarily require.
According to her, she had previously distributed sewing machines to beneficiaries but later discovered that some recipients sold the machines to raise money for other pressing needs, including business expansion and payment of rent.
She said the experience informed her decision to adopt direct cash assistance for those who requested financial support to establish businesses or increase their existing stock.
The senator also disclosed that some beneficiaries would receive as much as ₦5 million through bank transfers.
The empowerment programme reportedly covered small-scale entrepreneurs operating in different sectors, including agriculture, tailoring, content creation and manufacturing.
Beneficiaries received grants ranging from ₦100,000 to ₦5 million, depending on their business needs and the nature of their activities.
However, the public display of bundles of cash during the exercise attracted criticism, with some Nigerians questioning whether distributing money in such a manner represents an effective approach to constituency development.
Others argued that direct financial assistance could provide immediate relief and business capital for entrepreneurs struggling with the rising cost of operating small businesses.
The disagreement between Oseni and Abati has further brought the debate into the spotlight, particularly regarding whether lawmakers should prioritise direct cash grants or provide equipment, skills acquisition opportunities and other sustainable economic interventions.
The controversy has also raised broader questions about how constituency empowerment programmes should be structured to ensure accountability, measurable impact and lasting economic benefits for beneficiaries.
Rufai, Abati Clash Over Natasha’s Cash Empowerment Programme in Kogi
![]()
-
Sports2 days agoSuper Falcons Receive $100,000 Each as Tinubu Finally Fulfils WAFCON Pledge
-
Politics2 days agoAPC Dumps Adeleke’s Campaign Structure, Unveils Separate 168-Member Council in Osun
-
metro3 days agoThree Dead, Five Rescued as Two-Storey Building Collapses in Osun
-
metro2 days agoThree Homeless Men Shot Dead in Midnight Attack at Lagos Bus Stop
-
International3 days agoBadenoch Rejects Slave Trade Apology, Says African Kingdoms Also Profited From Slavery
-
metro3 days agoCourt Orders 18-Year-Old Fraudster To Pay ₦1.2m Over $800 Lottery Scam
-
metro3 days agoContempt: Court Orders Arrest, Remands Lagos NURTW Chairman Sego, Secretary in Kirikiri
-
metro3 days agoGunmen Intercept Family Car, Abduct Woman, Two Children, Release Husband in Abuja
