Ekiti Decides 2026: Oyebanji, Oluyede, Bejide Clash as 10 Parties Battle for Governorship - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

Ekiti Decides 2026: Oyebanji, Oluyede, Bejide Clash as 10 Parties Battle for Governorship

Published

on

Three main candidates for Ekiti govnorship election - Oyebanji, Oluyede and Bejide

Ekiti Decides 2026: Oyebanji, Oluyede, Bejide Clash as 10 Parties Battle for Governorship

Voters across Ekiti State are heading to the polls today, Saturday, June 20, 2026, to elect a governor who will lead the state for the next four years. Ten political parties are in the race to stop the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in today’s governorship election, in a contest poised to test political strength, governance record, and voter sentiment across the state’s 16 local government areas. The election is one of Nigeria’s seven off-cycle governorship contests and is taking place across 177 wards and 2,445 polling units, with electoral officials, security agencies, and political parties declaring their readiness for the exercise.

According to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) , 1,059,360 registered voters are expected to participate in the election. Of this number, 1,028,929 have collected their Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) , representing a collection rate of 97.1 percent. INEC has completed the distribution of sensitive and non-sensitive election materials, while ad hoc staff and electoral officers have undergone training ahead of the poll. Voting is scheduled to commence at 8:00 a.m. across all polling units. Security agencies, including the Nigeria Police Force, the Nigerian Army, and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), have deployed personnel across the state to maintain law and order throughout the electoral process.

Fourteen candidates are contesting the election on the platforms of various political parties. However, most political analysts regard the race as effectively a three-way contest between the APC, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) , and the African Democratic Congress (ADC) , with other parties having largely faded from serious contention. The full list of candidates includes: Governor Biodun Oyebanji (APC); Dr Wole Oluyede (PDP); Ambassador Dare Bejide (ADC); Opeyemi Falegan (Accord); Omotosho Matthew Olu (AA); Olajuyin Ikusayede Gbegbe Oyebanji (LP); Abegunde Ayobami Blessing (NNPP); Akande Oluwasegun Samuel (AAC); Ayodeji Ojo (ADP); Anifowose Joseph Olanrewaju (APM); Awogbemi Bidemi Olaiya (APP); Ayodele Olaniyi Olanrewaju Praise (PRP); Osinkolu Olusegun Ayodele (YPP); and Adetunji Victor Damilola (ZLP). Notably, no political party nominated a woman as its governorship candidate. Women were represented only as deputy governorship candidates, with four parties—the ADP, APC, APM, and PRP—fielding female running mates.

READ ALSO:

Governor Biodun Abayomi Oyebanji is seeking a second four-year term on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC), with his deputy, Monisade Afuye, retained as running mate. If re-elected, Oyebanji would become the first governor in Ekiti’s history to win two consecutive terms, as no incumbent has won re-election since the state elected Adeniyi Adebayo as its first governor in 1999. Oyebanji enters the poll as the clear favourite. He won the 2022 governorship election with 187,057 votes, defeating Segun Oni of the SDP and Bisi Kolawole of the PDP. His administration’s six-point Shared Prosperity Agenda, focused on education, healthcare, infrastructure, agriculture, economic growth, and social welfare, has earned broad approval among civil servants, pensioners, youths, and vulnerable groups. His re-election bid has attracted significant endorsements from across the political spectrum. All four former governors of the state—Adeniyi Adebayo, Olusegun Oni, Ayodele Fayose, and Kayode Fayemi—have thrown their support behind Oyebanji. The APC National Chairman, Nentawe Yilwatda, declared at the party’s campaign flag-off that the governor had effectively secured victory ahead of the election, stating, “Take a bow because you have won already.” The APC controls all nine National Assembly seats, all 26 seats in the State House of Assembly, all 16 local government councils, and 22 Local Council Development Areas, a structural dominance that gives Oyebanji a formidable electoral machine. Some internal party tension lingers, however, following primaries in which several incumbent lawmakers lost their tickets. Joseph Anifowose of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) has withdrawn and endorsed Oyebanji, citing the governor’s record on infrastructure and social services.

Ambassador Oluwadare Patrick Bejide, a former Secretary to the State Government and ex-Nigerian Ambassador to Canada, has positioned himself as the consensus alternative to both the APC and PDP. The ADC attracted several opposition heavyweights, including former Deputy Governor Kolapo Olusola-Eleka, former Commissioner for Information Akin Omole, and businessman Funsho Ayeni, giving it a credible profile at the top. Bejide emerged as the ADC candidate after defeating four other contestants—including former Deputy Governor Prof. Kolapo Olusola-Eleka—in the party’s primary election. Former Senate President David Mark, who now chairs the ADC, and former Osun Governor Rauf Aregbesola have both campaigned publicly for Bejide, leading the party’s grand finale campaign rally in Ado-Ekiti. ADC supporters have expressed confidence that Bejide can address pressing issues such as insecurity, kidnapping, unemployment, and the cost of university education. However, analysts say the ADC’s principal weakness is structural: it lacks the deep ward-level network that converts rally crowds into actual votes.

READ ALSO:

Dr Wole Oluyede, a medical practitioner and businessman from Ikere-Ekiti in Ekiti South Senatorial District, is flying the flag of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). His candidacy carries a regional appeal: no governor has emerged from Ekiti South since the state’s creation, and his hometown remains one of the largest voting centres in the state. Oluyede has framed his campaign around the marginalisation of the southern senatorial district, arguing that it is the turn of the South to produce the next governor. He has also criticized the incumbent administration’s performance, stating, “If Governor Biodun Oyebanji had not performed poorly despite the huge monthly allocations to the state there won’t be need for me to contest against this administration.” His running mate, Deji Ogunsakin, is expected to shore up support in Ado-Ekiti, the state capital and highest-turnout zone. The PDP remains the state’s principal opposition platform but faces internal challenges. The most damaging blow to his campaign came not from the APC but from within: former Governor Ayodele Fayose, the PDP’s most powerful voice in Ekiti, publicly endorsed Oyebanji, a defection that political analysts say has significantly deflated the PDP’s prospects. Oluyede has attempted to distance himself from godfather politics, stating that the people of the state are his real godfather.

This election carries significant historical weight. The APC now controls the Presidency, the Ekiti State Government, and all 16 local government areas. APC spokesperson Segun Dipe summed up the party’s confidence, saying, “In 2026, alignment replaces confrontation; the script has flipped.” The election is seen as a critical test of electoral preparedness, institutional resilience, and citizens’ trust in the democratic process ahead of the 2027 General Elections. The Centre for Journalism Innovation and Development (CJID) has called on all stakeholders to uphold the principles of peace, transparency, inclusivity, and electoral integrity throughout the electoral process.

Ekiti Decides 2026: Oyebanji, Oluyede, Bejide Clash as 10 Parties Battle for Governorship

Loading

Politics

ADC Crisis: Dino Melaye Blames ‘Sokoto Tsunami’ for Court Judgment Sacking David Mark, Nullifying Atiku’s Presidential Ticket

Published

on

Dino Melaye Challenges Tinubu to Quranic Recitation Contest After Umrah Trip

ADC Crisis: Dino Melaye Blames ‘Sokoto Tsunami’ for Court Judgment Sacking David Mark, Nullifying Atiku’s Presidential Ticket

 

ABUJA — Former Kogi West Senator and chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Dino Melaye, has blamed what he described as the political “Sokoto Tsunami” for the Federal High Court judgment that nullified the party’s national leadership under former Senate President David Mark and invalidated the emergence of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar as its presidential candidate.

 

Melaye, who spoke on Thursday, November 5, during the ADC presidential campaign in Kebbi State, urged party members and Nigerians to disregard the court judgment, insisting that neither Atiku nor the ADC could be stopped from pursuing their political ambitions.

 

The development followed a judgment delivered by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which declared the Mark-led caretaker committee of the opposition party illegal and invalidated decisions taken under its authority.

 

The ruling also affected the process that produced Atiku as the ADC’s presidential candidate for the 2027 general elections.

 

Reacting to the judgment, Melaye linked the legal setback to the party’s growing political influence in Sokoto State, describing the development as a reaction to what he called the ADC’s political tsunami in the state.

 

He urged supporters not to be discouraged by the ruling, declaring that the party had overcome similar challenges in the past.

 

“We want to assure Nigerians and the people of Kebbi that you should please ignore the court ruling in Abuja today; that judgment is a reaction to the political tsunami in Sokoto State. It was the tsunami that necessitated the judgment,” Melaye said.

 

The former lawmaker also questioned the timing of the court proceedings, alleging that the party received notification of the judgment late at night before it was delivered the following morning.

 

“There was no judgment notice, they sent by 11pm in the night, the judgment will be given in the morning, but they forgot that we have passed through this road many times,” he added.

 

Melaye also alleged that the ADC campaign convoy encountered an attack by security operatives while travelling to Kebbi State.

 

According to him, more than 100 policemen allegedly barricaded the campaign team, throwing stones and firing tear gas at them.

 

He maintained that those behind the alleged attack underestimated the political and security backgrounds of the party’s national chairman and presidential candidate.

 

The court judgment followed a suit instituted by former ADC Deputy National Chairman (North-East), Nafiu Bala Gombe, who challenged the legality of the process through which Mark and other party officials assumed leadership following the resignation of former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu.

 

Gombe argued that he was constitutionally entitled to assume the party’s leadership following Nwosu’s departure and asked the court to invalidate the decisions taken by the Mark-led caretaker committee.

 

In his judgment, Justice Lifu upheld the plaintiff’s case, declaring the Mark-led caretaker arrangement illegal and nullifying the decisions taken under its authority, including the presidential primary that produced Atiku.

 

The judgment has thrown the ADC’s preparations for the 2027 general elections into uncertainty, with implications for its national leadership, presidential ticket and other candidates nominated under the disputed arrangement.

 

The party, however, has rejected the ruling and indicated its intention to challenge the decision at the appellate court.

 

The latest legal setback comes amid growing political tensions within the opposition party, which has attracted prominent political figures seeking to challenge the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2027 elections.

 

Melaye’s remarks have added another dimension to the controversy, as the ADC grapples with the legal implications of the judgment and questions surrounding its political future.

 

The outcome of the anticipated legal challenge could prove decisive for the party’s leadership structure and its ability to participate effectively in the forthcoming general elections.

 

ADC Crisis: Dino Melaye Blames ‘Sokoto Tsunami’ for Court Judgment Sacking David Mark, Nullifying Atiku’s Presidential Ticket

 

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Aisha Yesufu Fires Warning At INEC After Rufai Oseni Hails Americans For Voting Out Tyranny

Published

on

Ekiti Election: Aisha Yesufu Blasts EFCC, Calls for Decriminalisation of Vote Buying

Aisha Yesufu Fires Warning At INEC After Rufai Oseni Hails Americans For Voting Out Tyranny

 

Activist Declares War On Electoral Manipulation Ahead Of 2027 General Elections

 

By Newstrends.ng Political Desk

 

ABUJA — Nigerian activist and chieftain of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), Aisha Yesufu, has issued a strong warning to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), declaring that anyone who attempts to manipulate the outcome of the 2027 general elections will face resistance.

 

Yesufu made the declaration while reacting to a comment by Arise News journalist, Rufai Oseni, who praised American voters for using their votes to reject what he described as tyranny in the recently concluded United States midterm elections.

 

Oseni, in a post on his official X account on Wednesday, November 4, wrote: “You can see how Americans voted out tyranny. No complain of INEC. INEC do better.”

 

The journalist’s observation appeared to draw attention to the role of credible electoral institutions and the power of citizens to determine political leadership through the ballot box.

 

However, his comment prompted a strong response from Yesufu, who redirected the conversation to Nigeria’s electoral system and the growing concerns surrounding the credibility of the 2027 general elections.

 

In her response, the activist challenged INEC to ensure that votes cast by Nigerians are accurately counted and reflected in the final results, warning that the commission must not stand in the way of the people’s mandate.

 

“Whether INEC like let it do better and if INEC no like, let it not do better!

 

“This election anyone that stands between what the people voted and what is counted will be counted!

 

“We are done begging for the right thing to be done.

 

“We will be doing the right thing!!!” Yesufu declared.

 

Her choice of words has attracted attention, particularly her warning that anyone who attempts to frustrate the people’s electoral mandate will face resistance.

 

The NDC chieftain’s reaction also underscores the increasing political significance of the 2027 elections, as opposition figures and civil society advocates continue to demand transparency, accountability and institutional independence in the country’s electoral process.

 

Nigeria has witnessed persistent controversies over election administration, including allegations of result manipulation, logistical challenges and disputes over the credibility of declared outcomes.

 

Consequently, the responsibility of INEC to conduct transparent, credible and peaceful elections is expected to remain a major issue as political activities intensify ahead of 2027.

 

Although Oseni’s original comment celebrated the American electorate’s ability to express its political choices through the ballot, Yesufu’s response raised a broader question about whether Nigerian voters would enjoy the same confidence that their votes would count.

 

For the activist, the 2027 elections must go beyond the mere conduct of voting exercises. The ultimate test, according to the message of her intervention, is whether the choices made by voters will be faithfully reflected in the final results.

 

Her declaration adds to the growing debate over electoral credibility and the need to protect Nigeria’s democratic process ahead of another crucial general election.

 

Aisha Yesufu Fires Warning At INEC After Rufai Oseni Hails Americans For Voting Out Tyranny

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Trouble in ADC as Momodu, South-West Leaders Raise Alarm Over Atiku Campaign

Published

on

Trouble in ADC as Momodu, South-West Leaders Raise Alarm Over Atiku Campaign
Veteran journalist and African Democratic Congress (ADC) chieftain, Dele Momodu

Trouble in ADC as Momodu, South-West Leaders Raise Alarm Over Atiku Campaign

Fresh cracks have emerged within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) over the management of the 2027 presidential campaign of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, following allegations that influential party leaders and key members of his campaign team are being sidelined.

Those reportedly affected include veteran journalist and publisher Dele Momodu, who was appointed Deputy Director-General in charge of Media and Communications of the ADC Presidential Campaign Council, as well as some South-West party leaders who have accused Atiku of relying on personal associates rather than established party structures.

The development has reportedly generated discontent within the opposition party, raising questions about internal coordination, leadership relations and the effectiveness of the campaign machinery ahead of the 2027 general election.

Momodu’s reported marginalisation has particularly exposed divisions within the campaign council’s media directorate, where disagreements over responsibilities and control of publicity activities are said to have created competing centres of influence.

When Atiku unveiled his presidential campaign council on September 24, Momodu was named Deputy Director-General in charge of Media and Communications.

Former Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Publicity Secretary, Kola Ologbondiyan, was appointed Director of Media and Publicity, while Phrank Shaibu, Atiku’s Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, was named Director of Strategic Communications.

Other members of the media team include Ladan Salihu, who oversees Branding; Moji Rhodes-Vvour, responsible for Digital and Online Media; and David Iyofor, who handles Content Development.

Kenneth Okonkwo, Keturah King and Nana Kazure were also appointed as spokespersons.

READ ALSO:

However, reports indicate that the arrangement has not translated into a coordinated media operation, with Ologbondiyan and Shaibu allegedly running separate publicity activities without adequately involving Momodu.

Sources within the campaign reportedly claimed that Momodu had been excluded from important strategy meetings, press operations and key decisions, despite his position as head of the media and communications directorate.

The disagreement is said to have created two competing camps within the media team, with Momodu reportedly on one side and Ologbondiyan and Shaibu on the other.

The latest indication of the alleged division emerged on Tuesday, November 3, when Atiku addressed a press conference in Abuja to announce the commencement of his presidential campaign.

Momodu and the ADC National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, were reportedly absent from the event, while Shaibu was said to have coordinated the media engagement.

The event was reportedly the third press conference organised by Atiku without Momodu’s presence, further fuelling speculation about the veteran journalist’s influence within the campaign structure.

Momodu, who also played a media role in Atiku’s 2023 presidential campaign under the PDP, reportedly returned to Lagos after attending the inauguration of the campaign council on October 9.

His absence from subsequent major media engagements has raised questions about whether he has been able to exercise the responsibilities attached to his appointment.

Efforts to obtain his reaction to the reported disagreements were unsuccessful, according to media reports.

Beyond the disagreements within the media directorate, Atiku is also facing complaints from some ADC leaders in the South-West, who have accused him of marginalising the party’s existing structures in the region.

Some state chairmen and governorship candidates reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with the former Vice-President’s approach to political engagements, alleging that he had been conducting activities through personal friends and loyalists while leaving recognised party officials on the sidelines.

The complaints were reportedly raised at a meeting held in Ibadan, Oyo State, on September 4, where some South-West ADC leaders approached the party’s National Secretary, Rauf Aregbesola, to seek clarification on Atiku’s relationship with the party’s regional structures.

According to reports, the aggrieved leaders insisted that the presidential candidate should channel his political activities through established party structures rather than relying mainly on personal associates.

One of the governorship candidates who reportedly attended the meeting said almost all the ADC leaders present expressed dissatisfaction with what they described as their exclusion from Atiku’s political activities.

The leaders were also said to have complained about the slow pace of campaign mobilisation in the region, attributing the situation partly to the lack of adequate engagement with party officials.

Some reportedly questioned why state party chairmen were not being sufficiently carried along in the organisation of campaign activities.

The Chairman of the ADC Local Government Chairmen in Lagos State, Adewole Ijaogbomo, also reportedly accused some individuals of taking control of Atiku’s campaign activities in the state while established party leaders were being excluded.

He urged the former Vice-President to address the situation, warning that the alleged marginalisation could undermine the party’s mobilisation efforts.

However, Atiku’s camp has rejected allegations that the presidential candidate is deliberately sidelining ADC leaders.

His Director of Strategic Communications, Phrank Shaibu, described the claims as unfounded, arguing that state campaign coordinators and their respective councils had not yet been announced or inaugurated.

According to him, it was therefore premature to accuse the presidential candidate of excluding state executives from campaign structures that had not been formally constituted.

Shaibu maintained that Atiku respects the party’s leadership, members and established structures, describing suggestions that he was conducting political activities outside the party framework as opposition conjecture.

The ADC National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, has also defended the party’s campaign arrangements, explaining that national party officers do not necessarily have to be appointed into the presidential campaign council.

Abdullahi said party officials had responsibilities beyond the presidential campaign and could support the candidate without holding positions in the campaign council.

He gave the explanation amid questions over the absence of Aregbesola and other senior party officials from the published campaign council list.

The ADC South-West leadership has also pushed back against suggestions that the reported disagreements represent a broader institutional crisis within the party.

The controversy comes as Atiku seeks to consolidate the ADC’s political structures and build a formidable opposition platform capable of challenging President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2027 presidential election.

The South-West is considered a strategically important region in the contest, particularly because of Tinubu’s political influence in the zone.

With allegations of internal divisions emerging in both the campaign’s media operations and regional political structures, the ability of Atiku and the ADC leadership to resolve grievances and establish a coordinated campaign machinery could prove crucial to their electoral ambitions.

 

Trouble in ADC as Momodu, South-West Leaders Raise Alarm Over Atiku Campaign

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending