Emefiele demands judge’s recusal over bias claims

The objection stemmed from a statement allegedly made by the judge in open court, where he reportedly declared that the allegation of receiving bribe money had been proven against Emefiele.

The comment was allegedly made while prosecution counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, was leading a witness, Mr Adetola John, in evidence-in-chief.

READ ALSO:

• Tanker drivers threaten strike to protest incessant extortion
• Zelenskyy’s rudeness to Trump may end Ukraine-US relations
• Tinubu’s message forced some people to congratulate me on 65th birthday – El-Rufai

According to Mr Ojo, such remarks before the conclusion of the trial—and even before cross-examination of the witness had begun—indicate that the judge has already concluded Emefiele’s guilt.

He described the situation as an “accelerated sentencing” rather than an accelerated hearing.

Another senior advocate representing Emefiele, Mr. Kazeem Gbadamosi, SAN, also criticized the judge’s statement, arguing that it suggested a pre-determined conviction of the defendant before full trial proceedings had been concluded.

Following the submissions from the defence, the court adjourned the ruling on the application for recusal to February 26, 2025.

Emefiele demands judge’s recusal over bias claims