How to identify Coca-Cola products with ‘artificial sweetener’ – FCCPC
The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has revealed findings from a recent investigation into Coca-Cola Nigeria and Nigerian Bottling Company, accusing the companies of engaging in misleading branding and anti-competitive practices.
In a comprehensive report, the FCCPC highlighted that many consumers are unaware of significant differences between certain Coca-Cola products. Specifically, the report pointed out that products labeled as “Original Taste” contain full sugar, while those with less sugar use artificial sweeteners.
“There is a distinct difference between these products, but Coca-Cola doesn’t want you to know,” the FCCPC stated.
According to the Mr Tunji Bello-led FCCPC, the branding issue affects four products produced by the companies with respect to two flavours, which include Coke Original and Coke Less Sugar as well as Limca Lime-Lemon flavour (2kcal) and Limca Lime-Lemon flavour (53kcal).
“Regarding the Coke variants—Original and Less Sugar—the nutritional information for both products varies significantly, and they have separate NAFDAC registration numbers,” the report noted. “However, Coca-Cola Nigeria, in its submission to the Commission, identifies them as different variations of the Cola flavor. Yet, there is minimal distinction in the packaging and advertisement of these products.”
The report elaborated on the subtle differences, noting that phrases like “ORIGINAL TASTE- LESS SUGAR” and “ZERO SUGAR” are printed in small text on the product labels, making it difficult for consumers to differentiate between the variants.
READ ALSO:
The FCCPC’s scrutiny began in June 2019 when the Commission became aware of Coca-Cola Nigeria’s shift from using regular sugar to non-nutritive sweeteners in some of its products.
On July 29, 2024, the Commission issued its Final Order to Coca-Cola and NBC, outlining several findings, including allegations of misleading trade descriptions under Section 116 of the FCCPA and unfair marketing tactics contrary to Section 124(1)(a).
The Commission, however, reserved the question of Abuse of Dominance and quantum of the penalty appropriate under the FCCPA and Administrative Penalties Regulation 2020 (APR) for further regulatory action, saying same will be imposed in due course.
Meanwhile, Coca-Cola Nigeria and its bottling partner, Nigerian Bottling Company Limited, have denied allegations from the FCCPC that their product labels are misleading.
In a statement released on August 1, 2024, the company clarified that its product labels provide clear and accessible nutrition information, fully complying with national regulations. It emphasised its commitment to transparency and consumer protection.
“Our priority is safeguarding consumer interests,” the statement said. “We are committed to working constructively with the government to address this issue. We are confident that we adhere to all regulations and look forward to resolving this matter.”
US University opens 2025 scholarships for international students Montana Technological University (Montana Tech) has opened…
200,000 repentant terrorists surrender, drop arms in North East – CDS The Chief of Defence…
Canadian university offers funded national scholarship program for 2025 Western University has announced that applications…
Israeli strikes pound central Beirut, suburbs BEIRUT: Israeli strikes pounded a densely-populated part of the Lebanese…
Robbers kill two members in shoot-out with Delta police The spokesperson for the police in Delta…
Akwa Ibom businessman abducted, driver killed, police orderly injured Gunmen kidnapped a prominent businessman, Dr. Samuel…