Igbo Diaspora Groups Slam UK Govt Over Silence on Kanu’s Life Sentence

Igbo Diaspora Groups Slam UK Govt Over Silence on Kanu’s Life Sentence

Leading Igbo diaspora organisations have sharply criticised the United Kingdom for maintaining what they describe as “disturbing silence” over the conviction and life imprisonment of IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu by the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Kanu, a British citizen and head of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), was convicted on terrorism-related charges weeks ago and subsequently transferred to Sokoto prison, drawing outrage from diaspora groups who insist the UK has abandoned one of its nationals.

In a joint statement issued on Tuesday, the American Veterans of Igbo Descent (AVID), the Ambassadors for Self-Determination (ASD) and the Rising Sun Foundation (RSF) accused the British government of failing in its human rights obligations.

“The UK government has failed to uphold its duty to protect one of its own citizens,” AVID president Dr. Sylvester Onyia said. “A British passport holder was abducted from Kenya without legal extradition, subjected to a sham trial under a repealed law, yet London remains silent. This silence undermines the UK’s credibility as a human rights champion.”

ASD president Evans Nwankwo described Britain’s inaction as hypocritical, noting that London is vocal on abuses in Russia, Myanmar, Hong Kong and other regions. “When it is a British citizen facing unlawful detention and a life sentence, the government’s indifference becomes deafening. Silence here reads as complicity,” he stated.

READ ALSO:

• BREAKING: Tinubu Seeks Senate Approval to Deploy Nigerian Troops After Benin Coup Attempt
• Imo Police Launch Manhunt After Gunmen Kill Driver, Abduct Motorists in Ngor-Okpala
• Tinubu Accused of Using Wike to Fuel PDP Turmoil, Says Emma Ogidi

RSF director Maxwell Dede linked the UK’s posture to historic grievances, arguing that the silence reinforces perceptions of ethnic bias rooted in Britain’s role during the 1967–1970 Biafran War. “By ignoring Kanu’s case, the UK risks signalling that geopolitical interests outweigh justice for the Igbo people,” he said.

The diaspora groups demanded immediate UK intervention, including:

• A public statement condemning Kanu’s alleged rendition from Kenya
• Enforcement of the 2022 Appeal Court judgment that discharged him
• Full consular access
• A parliamentary inquiry into the UK’s handling of the case
• Possible sanctions under the UK Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations targeting Nigerian officials allegedly involved in the rendition or torture

They emphasised that IPOB is legally registered in the UK, and Kanu’s broadcasts from London fall under British free speech protections. The organisations argued that £6.5bn UK–Nigeria trade relations cannot supersede the government’s duty to protect its citizens.

“This is no longer a purely Nigerian matter,” Onyia added. “When a British citizen is abducted, tortured, tried under a repealed law and denied the benefit of a binding judgment, it becomes an international issue. The UK must act.”

The groups vowed to intensify international advocacy, engaging the United States, the United Nations, and global media to ensure monitoring of Kanu’s health and detention conditions.

“The world is watching,” Dede said. “Human rights, due process, and the protection of citizens are non-negotiable. Silence is complicity.”

Igbo Diaspora Groups Slam UK Govt Over Silence on Kanu’s Life Sentence