JUST IN: Iran Reimposes Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Suspends Nuclear Talks With US - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

JUST IN: Iran Reimposes Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Suspends Nuclear Talks With US

Published

on

JUST IN: Iran Reimposes Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Suspends Nuclear Talks With US

JUST IN: Iran Reimposes Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Suspends Nuclear Talks With US

Tehran announced a renewed closure of the strategic Strait of Hormuz on June 19, accusing Washington of violating a newly signed ceasefire agreement as Israeli forces continue military operations in southern Lebanon, casting doubt over a fragile diplomatic breakthrough. In a statement broadcast through maritime radio channels, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps declared that the waterway would remain shut until three key conditions are met: Israel’s complete withdrawal from Lebanon, the full lifting of the US naval blockade, and the withdrawal of American forces from the Persian Gulf and the region. The IRGC warned all commercial and private vessels to avoid the strait, stating that “any vessel that defies this directive will be targeted.” The dramatic escalation came just hours after the planned first round of US-Iran nuclear negotiations in Switzerland was cancelled, with hardline elements within Iran reportedly opposing participation until Israel withdraws from southern Lebanon. A regional source claimed that hardliners insisted on Israel’s complete withdrawal before any diplomatic engagement could proceed.

The reimposed blockade appears to stem from ambiguities in the 14-point Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding, signed electronically on June 17 by US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. The agreement committed both sides to an “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon,” while also requiring the US to “begin the removal of its naval blockade” immediately, with a full end within 30 days. This phased approach has allowed Iran to argue that the blockade has not yet been “completely” lifted. Simcha Brodsky, president of the open-source intelligence organization OSINT613, told the New York Post: “What we’re seeing is a direct result of the wording in the US-Iran MoU. The deal lifts the US blockade in phases, fully within 30 days, so the US is still in the middle of that process by design.” Brodsky added: “Iran has now linked the Israel-Lebanon conflict to that justification, effectively halting the agreement and drawing Israel into a deal it neither approved nor negotiated.” On June 18, the US Central Command had formally announced it had lifted the two-month blockade of Iranian ports. However, it remains unclear why the IRGC believes the lifting is not yet “complete.”

READ ALSO:

Despite the ceasefire provisions in the US-Iran memorandum calling for an end to all hostilities in Lebanon, Israeli forces have continued military operations against Hezbollah. Lebanese authorities reported that nearly 50 people were killed and close to 100 wounded in a wave of Israeli airstrikes across southern Lebanon and the eastern Bekaa Valley on Friday. The southern towns of Harouf and Haboush suffered the highest death tolls, with nine and seven fatalities respectively, while at least two children were reported killed. Earlier reports from the Health Ministry’s Emergency Operations Center confirmed at least 24 deaths and 33 wounded from intensive strikes across 11 towns. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted that Israeli forces “will remain in southern Lebanon for as long as security requires,” directly contradicting the memorandum’s call for an immediate end to hostilities. The Israel Defense Forces have also published a new map showing an expanded zone of occupation, with troops deployed more than 6 miles across the Lebanese border, including areas north of the Litani River. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the latest strikes, saying they undermined efforts to consolidate the ceasefire and represented a “dangerous escalation.” Lebanon’s Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri reaffirmed Lebanon’s commitment to the ceasefire agreement, provided that Israel fully complies with its terms.

US President Donald Trump responded to the developments by claiming the conflict had significantly weakened Iran’s military capabilities. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote: “The War has diminished Iran! It doesn’t, any longer, have an Air Force, a Navy, Antiaircraft Equipment, Radar, or practically anything else.” Trump dismissed criticism from Democrats over his administration’s handling of the conflict, stating: “We didn’t meet out of desperation, Iran did. They are FINISHED! We’ll play out the 60 days. They get no money, not ten cents!” He also described Iran’s signing of the memorandum as “unconditional surrender” in an interview with Axios.

Despite Iran’s announcement of a blockade, maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz showed signs of recovery following the signing of the US-Iran agreement. Data from analytics firm AXS Marine showed 25 commercial vessel crossings on June 18—the highest single-day count since mid-April and more than five times the average recorded during the first ten days of June. Four supertankers alone carried at least 8 million barrels of crude oil through the strait, with shipments headed primarily to Japan, South Korea, Pakistan, Singapore, India, and China. The French-flagged LNG tanker Mraikh transported 169,000 cubic meters of LNG from Qatar to Pakistan. However, traffic remains well below the pre-conflict level of about 120 daily crossings, and the US navy-led Joint Maritime Information Center advised vessels to avoid the Traffic Separation Scheme because of mine risks as clearance operations continue. Ship broker Braemar noted in a statement: “Risks range from the danger of mines… to that of getting stuck in the Mideast Gulf should tempers flare and Iran block Hormuz once again.”

JUST IN: Iran Reimposes Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Suspends Nuclear Talks With US

Loading

News

EFCC Recovers N140m for B4 Sail as Alleged Loan Debt Hits N2.25bn

Published

on

Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)
EFCC Recovers N140m for B4 Sail as Alleged Loan Debt Hits N2.25bn

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has returned N140 million recovered during an investigation into an alleged loan fraud to B4 Sail Limited, an investment and money-lending company in Lagos.

The funds were handed over in bank drafts on Thursday, September 17, at the EFCC’s Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 office in Ikoyi.

The Acting Zonal Director, Bawa Usman Kaltungo, presented the recovered money to representatives of B4 Sail.

How the Investigation Began

The recovery followed a petition filed by B4 Sail on April 20, 2026, concerning Jacob Oyebola Esan and companies linked to him.

According to the petition, Esan approached the company in August 2025 on behalf of Geo Fields Plc to secure a N500 million loan to support the business.

The facility reportedly carried a monthly interest rate of 15 per cent and was expected to be repaid within one month.

The EFCC said its investigation later established that Esan had obtained other loan facilities from B4 Sail, taking his total exposure to N1.065 billion.

As security for the loans, shares belonging to Esan were pledged through Calyx Securities Limited, which acted as the clearing house for the stocks. The arrangement reportedly gave B4 Sail a lien over the shares and first claim to proceeds from their sale.

However, the commission said the shares were eventually sold without B4 Sail’s knowledge.

This allegedly contributed to Esan’s failure to repay the facilities. With accrued interest, the outstanding amount subsequently rose to N2.2505 billion.

The EFCC said the N140 million recovery was being returned to the company as part of its responsibility to ensure recovered funds reach legitimate owners and victims after due process.

EFCC Recovers N140m for B4 Sail as Alleged Loan Debt Hits N2.25bn

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Soludo Pardons Native Doctor Akwa Okuko After 2-Year Jail Sentence

Published

on

Soludo Pardons Native Doctor Akwa Okuko After 2-Year Jail Sentence

Controversial Anambra native doctor Chidozie Nwangwu, widely known as Akwa Okuko Tiwara Aki, has received a pardon from Governor Chukwuma Soludo.

The governor made the announcement on Friday while visiting the Correctional Centre in Amawbia as part of an inspection of custodial facilities in the state.

Nwangwu’s release comes after the High Court in Awka sentenced him to two years in prison following his arrest by the state government.

Although the court imposed a two-year sentence, the time Nwangwu had already spent in custody was taken into account. Consequently, he was left with 11 months to complete his term.

Conditions Attached to the Court Sentence

The court had also ordered the demolition of Nwangwu’s shrine as part of the measures arising from the case.

In addition, it directed that once he completed his sentence, the native doctor should contribute to youth reorientation programmes. He was also expected to renounce Oke-ite and related charm practices and publicly speak against them.

Authorities had accused Nwangwu of involvement in fetish-related activities, including alleged preparation of charms reportedly intended for young people pursuing financial gains.

His arrest came amid the Anambra State Government’s campaign against practices it linked to criminality and fraudulent activities.

During Friday’s visit, Soludo said his pardon initiative was not solely about Nwangwu. He stressed that attention must also be given to the welfare and wellbeing of people held in correctional facilities.

The governor subsequently inspected the custodial facility at Waterside, Onitsha, as part of the exercise.

Soludo Pardons Native Doctor Akwa Okuko After 2-Year Jail Sentence

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Published

on

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Former Vice-President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar has urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to intervene in the petroleum sector and reduce petrol and diesel prices, saying rising energy costs are putting additional pressure on Nigerian households, workers, farmers and businesses.

Atiku made the call on Friday, September 18, 2026, during a press conference in Abuja, where he also criticised the Federal Government’s reliance on palliatives and raised concerns over plans to phase out electricity subsidies.

He asked President Tinubu to use the remaining months of the administration to implement measures capable of easing the cost-of-living crisis, arguing that Nigerians need policies that reduce the underlying cost of goods and services rather than temporary relief after prices have already risen.

According to Atiku, the impact of higher petrol prices has extended far beyond filling stations, affecting transportation, food distribution, farming, manufacturing, logistics and household budgets.

He argued that when petrol becomes more expensive, transport operators face higher costs, farmers spend more moving produce, traders pay more to move and stock goods, workers spend more commuting and businesses incur higher logistics and energy expenses.

Atiku said the resulting pressure ultimately reaches consumers through higher prices for food and other essential goods.

He also questioned the effectiveness of government palliatives, including food distribution and cash-transfer programmes, arguing that such interventions may provide temporary assistance but cannot replace policies that restore the purchasing power of Nigerians.

The ADC candidate said government should concentrate on lowering production and energy costs so that households and businesses can retain more of their income.

His comments came amid another round of increases in the domestic petrol price.

READ ALSO:

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery increased its petrol gantry price from ₦1,265 to ₦1,350 per litre effective September 12, 2026. The increase represented an ₦85, or 6.7 per cent, rise and was the fourth upward adjustment in the refinery’s petrol price since August 21.

The successive adjustments have also been reflected at some filling stations, with petrol selling for as much as ₦1,395 per litre at some locations in Lagos, although prices have varied between stations and marketers.

Atiku said the government should not hesitate to adopt measures capable of lowering petrol prices simply because similar proposals originated from the opposition.

He said his concern was the effect of high energy costs on Nigerians and argued that the administration should act in the public interest.

A major part of Atiku’s argument is his proposal for a production subsidy for locally refined petroleum products.

The former vice-president has said his proposal is different from the former system of subsidising imported petrol. Under his plan, government support would be targeted at the crude feedstock supplied to qualifying refineries operating in Nigeria.

Atiku said the proposed mechanism would lower the cost of crude supplied to domestic refineries, with the reduction expected to translate into lower production costs and ultimately lower petrol prices for consumers.

He has proposed that the intervention should be transparent, capped and independently verified, with only crude refined in Nigeria qualifying for the support. Imported petroleum products, according to his proposal, would not benefit from the scheme.

Atiku has also said any such intervention should have a defined financial limit, be subject to National Assembly approval and undergo independent auditing.

He maintains that the policy would encourage domestic refining, protect investments in Nigeria’s refining industry and reduce the country’s dependence on imported petroleum products.

The proposal has generated debate because the Tinubu administration ended the long-standing petrol subsidy in May 2023, with the government arguing that the policy had become financially unsustainable and placed a heavy burden on public finances.

The subsequent removal of the subsidy resulted in a sharp increase in petrol prices and contributed to higher transportation and living costs, making fuel pricing one of the major economic issues in Nigeria.

The latest debate is taking place as Nigeria’s domestic refining capacity expands, particularly through the Dangote refinery.

The refinery has become a major supplier to the Nigerian market, but its prices continue to be influenced by factors including crude oil costs, exchange rates, refining expenses, logistics and international market conditions.

Atiku’s position is that government can intervene on the production side by lowering the cost of crude supplied to domestic refineries rather than returning to a system that subsidises imported petrol.

The former vice-president has also urged the government to reduce diesel prices, which remain important to manufacturers, transport operators, small businesses and other enterprises that depend on diesel-powered generators and equipment.

READ ALSO:

He argued that lower energy costs would help reduce the cost of doing business and could eventually moderate prices paid by consumers.

Atiku also turned his attention to the electricity sector, where the Federal Government has announced plans to phase out electricity subsidies in 2027.

The government has said the reform is aimed at improving the financial sustainability of the power sector. The planned changes have nevertheless generated concerns over their possible impact on households and businesses already struggling with high operating costs.

Atiku warned that higher electricity costs could add to the burden already being carried by Nigerians.

He pointed to small enterprises such as barbers, tailors, welders and frozen-food sellers, as well as manufacturers that rely on a combination of public electricity, diesel and other alternative power sources.

He argued that government should avoid imposing additional energy costs before adequate measures are put in place to protect consumers.

The debate over fuel subsidy and electricity subsidy has therefore become part of a broader disagreement over the direction and social impact of Nigeria’s economic reforms.

Atiku has argued that the savings and additional revenues generated by subsidy reforms should translate into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ living standards.

The Federal Government, meanwhile, has maintained that the petrol subsidy removal was necessary to reduce the fiscal burden of the old system and allow resources to be redirected towards development and other government priorities.

The issue has gained renewed prominence as petrol prices rise again.

Organised labour and opposition groups have also increased pressure on the Federal Government for measures to cushion households from the impact of higher petrol prices, while calls have continued for greater support for domestic refiners.

The latest petrol price increases have revived questions about why pump prices remain high despite the availability of locally refined fuel and Nigeria’s status as a major crude oil producer.

Market participants have pointed to the cost of crude, global oil-market volatility, exchange-rate movements, distribution expenses and other factors affecting the final pump price.

Aliko Dangote has also raised concerns about differences between Nigerian petrol prices and prices in neighbouring countries, which can create incentives for cross-border fuel smuggling.

For Atiku, however, the immediate priority is to reduce the pressure on consumers.

He has urged President Tinubu to consider his proposed local refining production subsidy, lower petrol and diesel costs, address electricity affordability and adopt broader economic policies aimed at restoring Nigerians’ purchasing power.

The intervention also comes against the backdrop of the 2027 presidential election, in which Atiku is the ADC presidential candidate.

His criticism of the Tinubu administration’s economic policies is therefore part of the wider political debate over the consequences of subsidy removal, the cost of living, domestic refining and the management of Nigeria’s energy sector.

The central policy disagreement is whether government intervention should return in some form to reduce consumer prices or whether Nigeria should continue moving towards a market-driven energy pricing system while using targeted measures to protect vulnerable households.

As petrol prices remain elevated and electricity reforms continue, the debate is likely to remain a major issue for Nigerian households, businesses and policymakers.

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending