Mohbad: Court Dismisses Fresh Bid to Reopen Investigation Into Singer’s Death

Mohbad: Court Dismisses Fresh Bid to Reopen Investigation Into Singer’s Death

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a suit seeking to compel the Nigeria Police Force to reopen its investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of Nigerian singer Ilerioluwa Aloba, popularly known as Mohbad.

Justice James Omotosho, in a judgment delivered on Thursday, September 24, 2026, dismissed the case filed by the Registered Trustees of Break the Silence Foundation, holding that the organisation lacked the legal standing to institute the action and had failed to provide credible evidence to establish that the earlier police investigation was inadequate.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/363/2026, was filed against the Inspector-General of Police, the Nigeria Police Force and the Commissioner of Police, Lagos State Command.

The foundation had approached the court through an application for judicial review, seeking an order of mandamus compelling the police authorities to conduct a fresh investigation into Mohbad’s death.

The organisation argued that the earlier police investigation had not sufficiently examined important aspects of the case and that some people connected to the singer, including individuals reportedly among those who last saw him, had not been adequately investigated.

The foundation particularly questioned whether some of Mohbad’s relatives had been properly investigated and argued that the circumstances surrounding his death warranted a fresh probe.

The court had earlier granted the foundation leave to commence the judicial-review proceedings. The matter was later heard after the organisation presented its case and urged the court to compel the police to reopen the investigation.

However, Justice Omotosho found that the foundation had not provided the evidence required to support its central claim.

A major issue was the original police investigation report.

The judge noted that the foundation alleged that the earlier police investigation was inadequate and that certain people, including Mohbad’s wife and father, had not been investigated. But the organisation did not attach the report from that earlier investigation to demonstrate what the police had actually done.

According to the court, without the original investigation report, there was no evidence establishing whether the people identified by the foundation had been investigated or excluded from the probe.

READ ALSO:

• Appeal Court Upholds Two-Year Jail Term for Ex-UNICAL Dean Ndifon
• Ogun Man Arrested Over Alleged Killing of Neighbour After ‘Rough Play’ With Child
• Viral Anti-Obi Video: Lagos Police Move Against Inspector Osumah Frank

Justice Omotosho therefore held that the claims were speculative and based on conjecture, rather than supported by evidence. He stressed that an applicant seeking judicial relief could not succeed merely through assertions without proof.

The court consequently found that the foundation’s case failed on its evidentiary basis and was without merit.

The second major legal ground was locus standi.

In legal terms, locus standi concerns whether a person or organisation has the necessary legal standing or sufficient interest to bring a particular action before the court. Justice Omotosho held that the foundation had not established the legal basis required to sustain the suit.

The court therefore dismissed the case on both grounds — lack of locus standi and lack of merit.

The ruling is important because the court was not deciding, in this particular suit, whether every question surrounding Mohbad’s death had been conclusively answered. Rather, it was determining whether the foundation had established the legal and evidentiary basis for an order compelling the police to reopen the investigation.

The judge also criticised lawyers involved in the case for discussing pending proceedings through media interviews and social media.

Justice Omotosho warned legal practitioners against using the media to air grievances or discuss matters that were still before the court, stressing that lawyers should present their arguments through the judicial process. He further warned that the court could invoke its contempt powers if its orders were breached through such conduct.

The judgment came after the court had earlier fixed September 29, 2026, for judgment following final arguments in June. Justice Omotosho ultimately delivered the judgment five days earlier, on September 24.

The foundation had filed the case after expressing dissatisfaction with the outcome of the earlier investigation. Its counsel, Chief Tunde Falola, had argued that critical aspects of the case and possible leads were not adequately explored and that individuals reportedly among the last people to see Mohbad required further scrutiny.

Mohbad died in Lagos on September 12, 2023, at the age of 27, triggering widespread public concern and calls for an investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

He was buried shortly after his death, but his remains were later exhumed for an autopsy amid public pressure for answers. The controversy surrounding the circumstances of his death has continued through investigations, court proceedings and public debate.

The latest ruling does not amount to a judicial declaration that all factual questions surrounding Mohbad’s death have been resolved. It means that the Break the Silence Foundation failed in this particular legal action to establish the standing and evidentiary basis required to obtain an order compelling the police to conduct a fresh investigation.

The Federal High Court has therefore declined to grant the foundation’s request for a fresh police probe, leaving the organisation without the judicial order it sought in the case.

Mohbad: Court Dismisses Fresh Bid to Reopen Investigation Into Singer’s Death