MURIC Calls Proposed US Sanctions on Nigerian Muslims ‘Lopsided’

MURIC Calls Proposed US Sanctions on Nigerian Muslims ‘Lopsided’

The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has criticised a proposed US bill targeting Nigerian Muslim figures and groups, describing the move as selective, unjust, and biased.

In a statement issued on Thursday, 12 February 2026, and signed by its Founder and Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, MURIC reacted to reports that five US lawmakers had proposed sanctions — including visa bans and asset freezes — against former Kano State Governor and NNPP national leader Dr. Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, as well as Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN) and Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, among others.

MURIC argued that the proposed sanctions unfairly target Muslim individuals and organisations, while other actors involved in religious and communal conflicts in Nigeria appear to be ignored.

READ ALSO:

• Supreme Court Affirms Muslim Students’ Right to Worship at Rivers State University
• Malami’s EFCC Trials Face Procedural Delay as Judge Steps Aside
• Umahi Vows to Quit if Road Project Fails Independent Quality Test

Akintola stated that if sanctions are intended to promote justice, they must be comprehensive and impartial, noting that government officials in Southern Nigeria and leaders of Christian militia groups in North Central Nigeria should also be investigated where evidence warrants.

“We take the decision of the US Congress to sanction Muslims alone with a pinch of salt. It amounts to scapegoating and preconceived judgement,” Akintola said.

The organisation acknowledged the existence of religious extremism and violations of religious freedom in Nigeria, but stressed that these issues affect both Muslim and Christian communities. MURIC also claimed it has records of discrimination and marginalisation against Muslims, which it is prepared to present to international bodies.

MURIC accused US officials of giving more audience to Christian leaders from Nigeria while limiting engagement with Muslim representatives, invoking the legal principle of audi alteram partem — hear the other side — to call for balanced diplomatic consultations.

The group further rejected what it described as the “false designation” of Nigeria as a country perpetrating genocide against Christians, urging a broader investigation before such claims are made.

While affirming that Nigerian Muslims hold no hostility toward the United States, MURIC cautioned that biased international actions could heighten religious tensions, calling for fairness, equity, and transparency in addressing Nigeria’s security and religious challenges.

As of the time of filing this report, US authorities have not responded to MURIC’s statements.

MURIC Calls Proposed US Sanctions on Nigerian Muslims ‘Lopsided’