Politics
Natasha reports Akpabio, Senate to UN, Inter-Parliamentary Union
Natasha reports Akpabio, Senate to UN, Inter-Parliamentary Union
Suspended Kogi Central senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, has headed to the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) Meeting at the United Nations in New York, seeking its intervention over her ordeal of alleged unfair treatment and injustice.
She claimed she was being victimised and that her suspension from the Senate was unlawful.
Natasha was suspended after a heated exchange with Senate President Godswill Akpabio, who she later accused of sexual harassment.
She expressed concerns over her security, claiming that there are indications she could be held against her will in New York for speaking out on the matter at the global event.
Natasha was seen in a video sobbing while presenting her case.
Her suspension from the Senate came after she accused Senate President Akpabio of sexual harassment.
The incident generated widespread debate in Nigeria, with many questioning the fairness of the disciplinary action taken against her.
Senator Natasha said, “I come with a heavy heart from Nigeria. But first, I’d like to apologise to honourable… I’m not here to bring shame to our country. I’m here to seek help for the women of Nigeria.
“Five days ago, on the 6th of March, 2025, I was suspended as a senator illegally because I submitted a petition of sexual harassment against the President of the Nigerian Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio.
“I thought that by submitting the petition, he would recuse himself and both of us would submit ourselves to the Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petition for a fair and transparent investigation, but unfortunately, I was silenced and I was suspended.
“I was suspended for six months amongst many other stringent conditions such as taking away my security, taking away all the official vehicles and other items that were handed over to me as a senator.
“My salaries will be cut off. I must not appear anywhere near the National Assembly, and for six months, I’m not to introduce or present myself as a senator locally in Nigeria or internationally.
“That means I’m here illegally, but I have no other place to go but to come here and speak to you women because this is a bigger picture.
“It depicts the crisis of women in political representation. My suspension is not just about me—it’s about the systemic exclusion of women from political leadership in Nigeria.
“This is a clear case of political victimisation, punishment for speaking out against impunity, corruption, and gender-based violence.
“The Senate’s actions are an assault on democracy. I was elected by my constituents to represent them, yet a few powerful men have unilaterally decided to silence their voices by suspending me for six months.
“My call for an open and transparent investigation into harassment allegations has been met with hostility instead of accountability.
“If a female senator can be treated this way in the full view of the world, imagine what ordinary Nigerian women go through every day in workplaces, universities.”
![]()
Politics
2027: APC Denies Withdrawing Tinubu Campaign Council List Amid Controversy
Politics
“Close Your Mouth”: Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate
Politics
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
The debate over Nigeria’s fuel subsidy removal has taken a new turn, with former Anambra State governor and 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi firmly restating his support for the policy. Speaking at the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Annual General Conference in Port Harcourt on Monday, Obi argued that mismanagement of subsidy proceeds should not be a reason to reverse the policy. Instead, he called for transparency and accountability in the use of the billions of naira saved from the reform. Obi, who now runs under the banner of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), made it clear that his opposition is not to the removal itself but to the lack of structured implementation and the failure to cushion the economic impact on ordinary Nigerians. His position puts him at odds with fellow opposition figure Atiku Abubakar, who has promised to bring back the subsidy if elected in 2027.
According to Obi, the removal of petrol subsidy was a necessary fiscal decision that his own 2023 presidential manifesto had already proposed. He maintained that keeping the subsidy would only perpetuate waste and delay critical national development. “I subscribe and I maintain that you need to remove subsidy. Mismanagement of the proceeds shouldn’t be the reason for not removing it,” Obi was quoted as saying during the panel session. He stressed that reversing the policy would be a backward step that treats the symptom rather than the disease. The real issue, he argued, is not the removal itself but the poor governance and lack of transparency that have characterised the handling of the funds generated from the policy.
READ ALSO:
- FG releases 2026/2027 Unity Schools admission list for JSS1 candidates
- LASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
- LASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
Obi expressed concern that the N16 trillion reportedly realised from the subsidy removal has not been visibly channelled into projects that improve the lives of Nigerians. He alleged that these resources are being mismanaged and, in some cases, stolen, while citizens bear the brunt of rising fuel prices, high transportation costs, and a general increase in the cost of living. “What we should have done is that when we removed the subsidy, we would have given the people alternative usage for the subsidy. What we have today is that that removal and the attendant resources being recovered is also being mismanaged and stolen,” Obi said. He argued that the government should have implemented the policy in a structured manner, with clear plans for reinvesting the savings into productive sectors such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and poverty alleviation.
To illustrate his point, Obi offered practical examples of how the funds could have been better utilised. He noted that just 5% of the N16 trillion savings—about N800 billion—would be enough to build primary healthcare centres in all 8,809 wards across Nigeria, with each facility costing an estimated N100 million. He also highlighted the acute shortage of kidney treatment facilities in the country, pointing out that Nigeria needs about 1,000 kidney centres and 5,000 dialysis machines, but currently has fewer than 200 centres and 800 machines. A kidney centre costs about N200 million, while a single dialysis machine goes for roughly N10 million. Beyond healthcare, Obi suggested that the government could have added the savings to Nigeria’s Sovereign Wealth Fund, which would have grown by an estimated $10 billion. This, he said, could generate monthly returns that could be used for national development.
The former governor also took a swipe at the luxurious lifestyle of public officials, contrasting it with the hardship faced by everyday Nigerians. “People in government have asked Nigerians to fast. Okay. They cannot be feasting when Nigerians are fasting,” Obi said. He urged the government to lead by example and ensure that the sacrifices made by citizens are matched by prudent management of public funds. According to him, the solution lies not in restoring the subsidy but in strengthening institutions, accountability, and governance to ensure that the benefits of the policy are felt by all.
Obi’s comments come at a time when the economic consequences of subsidy removal continue to dominate public discourse. While the Federal Government has defended the policy as fiscally unsustainable and necessary for long-term growth, critics have demanded greater transparency over the use of the savings, especially as inflation and living costs continue to rise. As Obi positions himself for the 2027 general elections, his messaging is increasingly centred on economic management, fiscal discipline, and the prudent use of public resources. His latest intervention reinforces his stance that Nigeria must move forward—not backward—by fixing governance failures rather than abandoning difficult but necessary reforms.
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
![]()
-
metro2 days agoLagos Police arrest five suspected telecom vandals, recover truckload of iron rods
-
Entertainment2 days agoVeteran Nollywood Actor Taiwo Hassan ‘Ogogo’ Dies at 66 After Cancer Battle
-
metro1 day agoMUSCOYS Honours Pioneering Educationist with Commendation Award
-
Politics2 days agoOpposition Unity Cracks as Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso Diverge on 2027 Strategy Against Tinubu
-
metro2 days agoLagos Moves to Tackle Housing Deficit, Inaugurates 2026 World Habitat Day Committee
-
metro9 hours agoLASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
-
metro2 days ago2027: Over 500 Northern Muslim Clerics Endorse Tinubu for Second Term
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Alfindiki tackles Atiku over Tinubu’s FBI records
