Politics
Ohanaeze tackles Dokpesi over ‘no southern candidate can win presidency’ comment
The apex Igbo socio-cultural organisation, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has described as ‘unfortunate’ the comment of the Chairman, Daar Communications Ltd, Raymond Dokpesi, who said that there is no candidate in the South East or in the entire South that can win the presidency in 2023 under the Peoples Democratic Party.
Dokpesi had, in an interview with the Daily Trust Newspaper on Saturday, October 9, 2021, stated that: “The South East cannot win the election for the PDP. That is just the truth of the matter. I don’t beat around the bush; I treat issues as they are and as I understand them. There is no candidate from the South East, even I dare say there is no candidate from the South that you put in the North today that will be able to win. It is going to be a humongous challenge.”
But Ohanaeze Ndigbo, in a statement on Tuesday signed by its National Publicity Secretary Alex Ogbonnia, titled, ‘Dokpesi Oscillates’, said the chairman of Daar Communications’ comments negated the position of the 17 southern governors that presidency should return to the South in 2023.
“Dokpesi’s assumptions are unreflective, weird and unworthy. Any person who loves Nigeria should be an advocate of power rotation, especially between the north and the South; and those our sons and daughters who lay claim to leadership should not, under any guise, give the impression that the south is a lame-duck, an electoral liability; and therefore must depend on the north to define the political trajectory of Nigeria.”
Ohanaeze regretted that as one of the leaders of the South-South People Assembly, Dokpesi should seek to promote south-south people of Nigeria with his fortune instead of playing to the gallery to appeal to his benefactors in the north.
The apex Igbo sociocultural body said it would have ignored his comment as a mundane distraction but was constrained to react to “save the gullible public from his shibboleth,” while it maintained that until there is justice in Nigeria, there can never be peace.
The statement partly reads: “Those who lament on the bleak future of Nigeria often cite the unpredictable character of our leaders.
“The Greek political philosopher, Plato, was so dissatisfied with leaders who lacked the moral strength to act according to the common good – in other words, rulers motivated by self-interest were not good leaders. Most do not realize that the forces of morality and justice constitute the transcendental cord that holds humanity in shape.
“In other words, there can never be peace in the absence of justice. Put differently, Nigeria will remain in crises until the leaders embrace justice, equity and fairness as a guiding philosophy.
“I sympathise with our southern son, Chief Dokpesi because he started as the personal assistant to Alhaji Bamaga Tukur at the Nigerian Ports Authority. Dokpesi also served under Alhaji Umaru Dikko and General Garba Wushishi. Records reveal that Alh. Bamanga Tukur paid his fees from secondary school to the post graduate level. To that extent, he owes allegiance to his benefactors and feels no compunction to profile the entire south as electoral liability.
“One can easily understand the psychological ambivalence in the Dokpesi persona. On the other hand, there is no reason for the condescension and disdain he handed over to the entire South.
Ohanaeze however, reminded Dokpesi that several educated refined patriotic northerners were allergic to the supremacist born to rule entrepreneurs which it said had created the current Nigerian dilemma.
“Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide is dismayed that Dokpesi could demonstrate this type of duplicity in a matter that is so clearly defined.
“The human spirit does not oscillate like a pendulum; East, West, North and South. The rotation of presidency between the North and the South is the truth. Two options are before the advocates of justice and progress in Nigeria; we either choose light or darkness”
Eagle Online
![]()
Politics
“Close Your Mouth”: Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate
Politics
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
The debate over Nigeria’s fuel subsidy removal has taken a new turn, with former Anambra State governor and 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi firmly restating his support for the policy. Speaking at the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Annual General Conference in Port Harcourt on Monday, Obi argued that mismanagement of subsidy proceeds should not be a reason to reverse the policy. Instead, he called for transparency and accountability in the use of the billions of naira saved from the reform. Obi, who now runs under the banner of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), made it clear that his opposition is not to the removal itself but to the lack of structured implementation and the failure to cushion the economic impact on ordinary Nigerians. His position puts him at odds with fellow opposition figure Atiku Abubakar, who has promised to bring back the subsidy if elected in 2027.
According to Obi, the removal of petrol subsidy was a necessary fiscal decision that his own 2023 presidential manifesto had already proposed. He maintained that keeping the subsidy would only perpetuate waste and delay critical national development. “I subscribe and I maintain that you need to remove subsidy. Mismanagement of the proceeds shouldn’t be the reason for not removing it,” Obi was quoted as saying during the panel session. He stressed that reversing the policy would be a backward step that treats the symptom rather than the disease. The real issue, he argued, is not the removal itself but the poor governance and lack of transparency that have characterised the handling of the funds generated from the policy.
READ ALSO:
- FG releases 2026/2027 Unity Schools admission list for JSS1 candidates
- LASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
- LASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
Obi expressed concern that the N16 trillion reportedly realised from the subsidy removal has not been visibly channelled into projects that improve the lives of Nigerians. He alleged that these resources are being mismanaged and, in some cases, stolen, while citizens bear the brunt of rising fuel prices, high transportation costs, and a general increase in the cost of living. “What we should have done is that when we removed the subsidy, we would have given the people alternative usage for the subsidy. What we have today is that that removal and the attendant resources being recovered is also being mismanaged and stolen,” Obi said. He argued that the government should have implemented the policy in a structured manner, with clear plans for reinvesting the savings into productive sectors such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and poverty alleviation.
To illustrate his point, Obi offered practical examples of how the funds could have been better utilised. He noted that just 5% of the N16 trillion savings—about N800 billion—would be enough to build primary healthcare centres in all 8,809 wards across Nigeria, with each facility costing an estimated N100 million. He also highlighted the acute shortage of kidney treatment facilities in the country, pointing out that Nigeria needs about 1,000 kidney centres and 5,000 dialysis machines, but currently has fewer than 200 centres and 800 machines. A kidney centre costs about N200 million, while a single dialysis machine goes for roughly N10 million. Beyond healthcare, Obi suggested that the government could have added the savings to Nigeria’s Sovereign Wealth Fund, which would have grown by an estimated $10 billion. This, he said, could generate monthly returns that could be used for national development.
The former governor also took a swipe at the luxurious lifestyle of public officials, contrasting it with the hardship faced by everyday Nigerians. “People in government have asked Nigerians to fast. Okay. They cannot be feasting when Nigerians are fasting,” Obi said. He urged the government to lead by example and ensure that the sacrifices made by citizens are matched by prudent management of public funds. According to him, the solution lies not in restoring the subsidy but in strengthening institutions, accountability, and governance to ensure that the benefits of the policy are felt by all.
Obi’s comments come at a time when the economic consequences of subsidy removal continue to dominate public discourse. While the Federal Government has defended the policy as fiscally unsustainable and necessary for long-term growth, critics have demanded greater transparency over the use of the savings, especially as inflation and living costs continue to rise. As Obi positions himself for the 2027 general elections, his messaging is increasingly centred on economic management, fiscal discipline, and the prudent use of public resources. His latest intervention reinforces his stance that Nigeria must move forward—not backward—by fixing governance failures rather than abandoning difficult but necessary reforms.
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
![]()
Politics
5,000 Zamfara Quran Reciters Hold Special Prayers for Tinubu/Shettima 2027 Re-election
-
metro2 days agoLagos Police arrest five suspected telecom vandals, recover truckload of iron rods
-
Entertainment2 days agoVeteran Nollywood Actor Taiwo Hassan ‘Ogogo’ Dies at 66 After Cancer Battle
-
Politics2 days agoOpposition Unity Cracks as Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso Diverge on 2027 Strategy Against Tinubu
-
metro2 days agoLagos Moves to Tackle Housing Deficit, Inaugurates 2026 World Habitat Day Committee
-
metro2 days ago2027: Over 500 Northern Muslim Clerics Endorse Tinubu for Second Term
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Wike explains why he won’t join Tinubu’s campaign council
-
metro1 day agoMUSCOYS Honours Pioneering Educationist with Commendation Award
-
Auto3 days agoCBN Governor, NADDC DG to Lead LCCI Debate on Vehicle Financing as Alternative to Fuel Subsidy
