Politics
Osun Poll: Oyetola, Adeleke tender final written addresses as tribunal reserves judgement
The Osun Election Petitions Tribunal on Friday adjourned for judgment,the petition filed by former Gov Gboyega Oyetola, challenging the victory of Sen. Ademola Adeleke of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the July 16 governorship election.
The Chairman of the three-man panel,Justice Tertsea Kume, reserved the judgment for a later day to be communicated to parties in the matter after the petitioner and respondents had adopted their final written addresses in Osogbo, the capital.
Oyetola and the All Progressives Congress (APC) had on Aug. 5, submitted a petition before the tribunal in Osogbo.
Oyetola and APC were challenging the election results from 749 polling units across 10 local government areas of the state for various alleged electoral malpractice, especially over-voting.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had declared Adeleke as the winner of the governorship election, having polled 403, 271 votes against 375,027 polled by Oyetola.
Earlier, Counsel to APC, Mr Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) in his final written address,said all documents and processes were filed and submitted on Jan. 8.
READ ALSO:
- Immigration begins recruitment for artisans, doctors, pharmacists [APPLY]
- Iran executes British-Iranian national Akbari
- Troops rescue 30 kidnapped victims, neutralise terrorists in Nassarawa
Fagbemi adopted all submitted written documents and objections on point of law and also argued all objections earlier filed by the respondents, asking the court to accede to all his submissions and requests.
Fagbemi cited sections 51 (2) and 47(2) of the Electoral Act on cancellation of polling units where numbers of votes exceeded the numbers of registered and accredited voters .
Also,Mr Akin Olujimi, SAN,counsel to Oyetola, said the testimonial tendered by Gov. Adeleke did not show that he attended Muslim Grammar School in Ede.
Olujimi dismissed the claime by the repondents that Gov. Adeleke was eligible to contest election and he submitted that the testimonial that Adeleke tendered was fake because it was obtained in 1988 from Osun State, while Osun was actually created in 1991.
According to him,the respondent should have pleaded that the mistake was a typographical issue but which they never did.
Olujimi said all the documents tendered by the respondent’s counsel had no connection with each other, with no probative value.
INEC Counsel,Prof. Paul Ananaba, SAN, in his own submissions, tendered to the court his final written addresses dated Dec. 30, 2022 and filed same date, with replies on points of law dated Jan. 9 and filed Jan.11 respectively.
Ananaba adopted all documents submitted as his final written address, saying the duty of INEC was to certify that the respondent,Adeleke,was qualified to contest the governorship election which they did .
He said: “The petitioners complained of over- voting and infractions by picking 749 polling units to contend with from 1750 polling units, according to the first respondent witnessed (RW1).
“If deduction of 1750 units was carried out from the total 3763 units in the state,the second respondent will still emerge as winner with over 20,000 votes.”
Mr Onyechi Ikpeazu, Counsel to Gov. Ademola Adeleke, also adopted all the tendered documents filed as its final written address and urged the tribunal to dismiss the petitioners application against his client.
Ikpeazu said that the argument against Adeleke’s certificates and eligibility to contest the governorship election had been addressed by the Court of Appeal.
On the issue of over-voting claim, Ikpeazu told the court that certified true copies of documents of accreditation was done through the BVAS machines adding that BVAS was the primary source of accreditation.
He further argued that extraction from INEC data base was not same as extraction from the BVAS machines .
Ikpeazu said that petitioners agents did not contest the results of any polling units on the day of election, despite that they also signed the results which were authentic .
“The entries in form EC8A tallied with figures on the forms as being contended by the petitioners.
“You can not determine over voting proper without the application of the BVAS machines,” he said.
Counsel to PDP,Mr Alex Iziyon, SAN, also adopted all written documents filed and submitted on point of laws.
Iziyon said the issue of forgery of certificate as contended by the petitioners had been cleared in the judgment of the Court of Appeal and had no value.
![]()
Politics
2027 Presidency: Atiku Asked Me to Make Obi His Running Mate — Babachir Lawal
2027 Presidency: Atiku Asked Me to Make Obi His Running Mate — Babachir Lawal
Former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has disclosed that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar once sent him to persuade Peter Obi to accept the vice-presidential slot on the African Democratic Congress (ADC) platform ahead of the 2027 presidential election.
Lawal made the disclosure during an interview with Diaspora Digital Media, while recounting the negotiations among opposition figures before the coalition eventually fractured.
According to the former SGF, Atiku wanted Obi to return to the political arrangement and become his running mate under the ADC.
Lawal said Atiku’s proposal was not limited to a conventional president-vice-president arrangement. He claimed that Atiku envisaged serving for four years and then working towards an amendment of the Constitution to introduce a single six-year presidential term, with provisions for rotational leadership.
He said Atiku specifically asked him to approach Obi because of his relationship with the former Anambra State governor.
Lawal recalled that he travelled to meet Obi despite heavy rainfall.
“They say you have influence against Peter Obi, I want Peter Obi to come back and be my vice presidential candidate,”
Lawal quoted Atiku as telling him, adding that he subsequently explained the proposal to Obi.
According to Lawal, however, Obi was not enthusiastic about the arrangement and declined to accept the proposal.
Obi previously disputed the account
The latest disclosure comes against the background of a previous statement by Obi in which he denied that he had rejected a formal vice-presidential offer from Atiku.
During an interview with Arise TV earlier in September, Obi said he did not know where the claim originated and maintained that he was not in a position where such an offer had formally been made to him and rejected.
Obi said discussions about a possible opposition alliance had moved beyond individual politicians and would have to involve the political parties themselves.
The differing accounts mean that Lawal’s latest recollection represents his account of the discussions, while Obi has publicly disputed the characterization that he received and rejected a formal VP offer.
Coalition split
The disclosure also provides another glimpse into the political negotiations that preceded the breakdown of the opposition coalition ahead of the 2027 election.
Atiku eventually emerged as the ADC’s presidential candidate, while Obi subsequently became the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC).
Lawal himself left the ADC in June after alleging that the party’s presidential primary had been manipulated in Atiku’s favour. The allegations were rejected by Atiku’s camp.
In September, Lawal joined the NDC and publicly backed the Obi-Kwankwaso ticket, further marking his movement away from the political camp led by Atiku.
The latest revelation is therefore likely to attract fresh attention to the behind-the-scenes negotiations that preceded the eventual emergence of separate presidential tickets for Atiku and Obi ahead of the 2027 election.
2027 Presidency: Atiku Asked Me to Make Obi His Running Mate — Babachir Lawal
![]()
Politics
Obi’s Debt Storm Deepens as Okonkwo Says: ‘I Was Misled’
Obi’s Debt Storm Deepens as Okonkwo Says: ‘I Was Misled’
The controversy over the financial record of former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi has taken a fresh turn after his former 2023 campaign spokesman, Kenneth Okonkwo, said he was “misled” when he previously defended the former governor against claims that his administration left debts and other financial obligations behind.
Okonkwo made the disclosure on Sunday Politics, a programme on Television Continental (TVC), saying he could no longer repeat some of the claims he made in Obi’s defence after considering fresh information presented by the Anambra State Government.
The development has added a new dimension to the ongoing disagreement between Obi and the Anambra State Government over loans, salary arrears and other financial obligations allegedly connected to his administration.
Recalling his position during the 2023 presidential campaign, Okonkwo said he had confidently told Nigerians that Obi left office without debts, unpaid salaries, pensions or gratuities and challenged people to verify his claims.
However, he said his position had changed after new information emerged.
“You know me, I’m a very passionate person in whatever I believe in. Let me tell you because I was misled,” Okonkwo said.
He added that he was not prepared to continue defending a position if new facts showed that his previous understanding was incorrect.
“I’m not a man that stands on my own misunderstanding. When I see the facts, I agree,” he said.
Okonkwo specifically referred to claims by the Anambra State Government that Obi’s administration obtained eight loans and that workers at the state-owned water corporation were owed salaries and arrears.
“The fact is Anambra State Government said he borrowed eight loans. The fact is that Anambra State said that at the water corporation, he was owing workers there, all the salaries, all the arrears. I cannot say the same thing that I said about Peter Obi in 2023,” he said.
The comments came against the backdrop of an escalating dispute between Obi and the Anambra State Government over the state’s debt profile.
The state government has said eight external financing facilities associated with projects undertaken during Obi’s tenure had a combined contracted value of $123.77 million, with $92.35 million outstanding as of June 30, 2026.
Obi has rejected the description of the entire $123.77 million figure as debt he left behind, arguing that the figure includes different categories of multilateral development financing. He has also cited Debt Management Office figures in arguing that Anambra’s external debt stood at about $30 million when he left office in March 2014.
Another major point of disagreement is Obi’s claim that his administration left about N2.1 billion in an ecological fund for Anambra State.
While Obi has maintained that the fund existed and was left for the state, the Anambra Government has disputed the claim and said it has no evidence of the ecological fund in the form alleged by the former governor.
The state government has also released documents relating to N363.38 million in salary arrears, which it says were inherited from the Obi administration. The issue has become part of the broader argument over whether Obi left outstanding financial obligations when he handed over power to Willie Obiano in March 2014.
Okonkwo also revisited his previous defence of Obi’s family over claims concerning an expensive wristwatch allegedly worn by a son of President Bola Tinubu.
He recalled that he had previously gone on television to defend Obi’s family and stake his reputation on the position he took at the time.
But he questioned whether he could make the same assertion today, further illustrating the extent of his stated change in position.
Explaining his approach ahead of the 2027 election, Okonkwo used courtroom language to describe the difference between his role in 2023 and his current political position.
“That’s why I said in 2023, I campaigned for them as the examination in chief. In 2027, it’s going to be a cross-examination,” he said.
Okonkwo is now a chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and spokesman for the presidential campaign council of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, the ADC’s 2027 presidential candidate. He served as a spokesman for Obi during the 2023 presidential campaign.
Obi, meanwhile, remains at the centre of the political and financial controversy, with his record as Anambra governor increasingly becoming a subject of scrutiny as the 2027 political season approaches.
The latest comments by Okonkwo are unlikely to end the dispute, as the central questions over the nature of the loans, outstanding obligations and the financial position of Anambra at the end of Obi’s tenure remain subjects of competing claims by the former governor and the state government.
Obi’s Debt Storm Deepens as Okonkwo Says: ‘I Was Misled’
![]()
Politics
Why I Can No Longer Defend Peter Obi’s Lifestyle – Okonkwo
Why I Can No Longer Defend Peter Obi’s Lifestyle – Okonkwo
ENUGU – Kenneth Okonkwo, the former spokesperson for the Labour Party (LP) Presidential Campaign Council and current chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), has officially recanted his previous public defense of the lifestyle of the 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi.
In a statement made available to journalists on Sunday, Okonkwo revealed that he has reconsidered his past remarks regarding the wealth and spending habits of Nigerian political leaders and their families.
The former Nollywood actor specifically recalled an incident during the 2023 election cycle when he publicly stated that no member of the Obi family could afford a luxury wristwatch valued at ₦135 million—a direct comparison to a watch worn by one of President Bola Tinubu’s sons.
“When Tinubu’s son wore a ₦135m watch, I said nobody from Obi’s family can ever wear such,” Okonkwo stated. “I made that statement based on the perception that the Obi family lived a modest lifestyle.”
However, Okonkwo now claims that new information has made it impossible for him to continue making such assertions. He cited the recent disclosures by the Anambra State Government regarding Obi’s tenure as governor, which alleged that the former governor left behind massive debts and unpaid salaries.
“I have reconsidered my previous remarks regarding the lifestyles of Nigerian political leaders and their families,” Okonkwo said. “Given the revelations about the debts and unpaid salaries allegedly left behind in Anambra, I cannot repeat that statement.”
The ADC spokesperson’s reversal marks a significant shift in the political landscape, as Okonkwo was one of Obi’s most vocal defenders during the 2023 general elections. His latest comments are expected to spark further debate regarding the financial transparency of political leaders and the ongoing war of words between the Obidient movement and the Anambra State Government.
Attempts to get a reaction from the Peter Obi media team were unsuccessful as of the time of filing this report.
Why I Can No Longer Defend Peter Obi’s Lifestyle – Okonkwo
![]()
-
Sports3 days agoAFCON 2027 Qualifier: Nigeria Fight Back to Beat Madagascar 2-1 in Uyo
-
metro3 days agoViral Anti-Obi Video: Lagos Police Move Against Inspector Osumah Frank
-
metro2 days ago$155m Left Behind, $750m Liabilities: Anambra Govt Opens Fresh Obi Files
-
News1 day agoFake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila Says He Never Betrayed Tinubu’s Trust
-
metro3 days agoOgun Man Arrested Over Alleged Killing of Neighbour After ‘Rough Play’ With Child
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Fayemi Denies Galadima’s Claim He Is Coordinating Opposition Group Against Tinubu
-
metro1 day agoWoman Busted With Alleged Alcohol Hidden in Water Pack at Ogun Prison
-
International1 day agoIran Claims Capture of Second US Underwater Drone in Strait of Hormuz
