Senate Passes State Police Bill, Awaits Ratification by State Assemblies - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Senate Passes State Police Bill, Awaits Ratification by State Assemblies

Published

on

Senate passes Bill proposing N50,000 fine for preaching, hawking in commercial buses

Senate Passes State Police Bill, Awaits Ratification by State Assemblies

Nigeria moved closer to a decentralized policing system on Wednesday as the Senate passed the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (Alteration) (State Police) Bill, 2026, a landmark piece of legislation that could transform the country’s security architecture if it receives the required approval from state legislatures. The bill, which establishes a constitutional framework for the creation of State Police Services, is widely regarded as one of the most significant security reforms since Nigeria’s return to democratic rule in 1999.

If eventually endorsed by at least 24 State Houses of Assembly, the legislation will create a dual policing structure comprising a Federal Police Service and State Police Services, ending the long-standing monopoly of a centrally controlled police institution.

Under the proposed constitutional arrangement, states will have the authority to establish, fund and manage their own police organizations through legislation passed by their respective Houses of Assembly. However, no state police service will become operational until it satisfies nationally prescribed standards and receives certification confirming its readiness to function. Supporters of the reform argue that State Police in Nigeria will improve local intelligence gathering, strengthen community policing and enable faster responses to security threats such as kidnapping, banditry, terrorism, communal violence and other crimes that have stretched federal security agencies.

Despite granting states greater control over policing, the bill preserves substantial powers for the Federal Government. One of the most significant provisions allows the Federal Police Service to intervene in state policing operations whenever there is an actual or imminent breakdown of public order, a threat to national security, serious administrative failure or evidence that a state police organization is being used for political, ethnic, religious or sectional persecution. In such situations, the Federal Police Service may temporarily assume operational control of a state police command, subject to presidential authorization, Senate oversight and judicial review. The legislation also reserves exclusive responsibility for terrorism, cybercrime, organized crime, arms trafficking, border security and inter-state crimes for the Federal Police Service.

READ ALSO:

A major departure from the existing structure is the appointment process for State Commissioners of Police. Under the bill, governors will appoint commissioners upon the recommendation of the National Police Council and subject to confirmation by their State Houses of Assembly. Removal from office will also require legislative approval. To prevent abuse, the bill expressly prohibits governors from directing police authorities to target political opponents, associations, ethnic groups or individuals for partisan purposes. State police officers are equally barred from enforcing laws in a discriminatory manner based on political, ethnic, religious or sectional considerations.

The legislation establishes State Police Service Commissions that will oversee recruitment, promotion, discipline and personnel management within state police organizations. It also proposes a restructured National Police Council to coordinate national policing policies, set minimum standards and promote cooperation between federal and state policing institutions. Speaking during debate on the bill, Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele described the proposal as one of the most consequential constitutional reforms undertaken by the National Assembly in recent years. According to him, the legislation seeks to address the limitations of a highly centralized policing structure in tackling modern security threats.

The Senate’s consideration of the bill attracted high-profile observers, including Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun, Ondo State Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, Kaduna State Governor Uba Sani, Chief of Staff to the President Femi Gbajabiamila and several state attorneys-general. Their presence generated brief controversy as some senators opposed allowing non-members into the chamber during deliberations. The opposition was eventually resolved after Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senate Leader Bamidele reminded lawmakers that the amendment would require approval from state legislatures before becoming law. Bamidele told senators that the cooperation of state governments was essential to the success of the constitutional amendment process.

Although electronic voting devices were initially introduced for the exercise, lawmakers eventually adopted manual voting after concerns emerged that malfunctioning devices could disenfranchise some senators. The Senate subsequently conducted clause-by-clause voting through voice votes, standing votes and hand-raising procedures supervised by Senate President Akpabio. He assured lawmakers that a complete record of the proceedings would be preserved and made available for public scrutiny.

In addition to approving the State Police Bill, the Senate also passed the Police Trust Fund Bill, which is designed to strengthen funding mechanisms for policing and security operations across the country. Both bills must now secure concurrence from the House of Representatives before being transmitted to the State Houses of Assembly for ratification. For the constitutional amendment to take effect, at least two-thirds of Nigeria’s 36 state legislatures must approve it.

While the proposed reform has received support from many governors, security experts and stakeholders, concerns remain about the possibility of political interference in state-controlled police organizations. Senators Aminu Tambuwal and Enyinnaya Abaribe expressed support for the establishment of state police but emphasized the need for strong oversight mechanisms to prevent abuse. Nevertheless, the Senate’s approval represents the most significant progress in decades toward the creation of State Police in Nigeria, a reform many believe could reshape the country’s approach to security and law enforcement.

Senate Passes State Police Bill, Awaits Ratification by State Assemblies

Loading

News

Police Arrest Five Pakistani Nationals in Benue, Recover 35 Mobile Phones 

Published

on

Police Arrest Five Pakistani Nationals in Benue, Recover 35 Mobile Phones 

Police Arrest Five Pakistani Nationals in Benue, Recover 35 Mobile Phones 

The Benue State Police Command has arrested five Pakistani nationals and recovered 35 mobile phones in separate intelligence-led operations conducted in Otukpo and Ugbokolo areas of the state . According to a statement issued by the Command’s Public Relations Officer, DSP Orchia Peter Aondongu, operatives acting on credible intelligence arrested three Pakistani nationals on August 4, 2026, at Adoka Motor Park in Otukpo Local Government Area . The suspects were identified as Younas Mohammad, 36; Ahmad Nunil, 38; and Aslam Muhammad, 46. They were intercepted while attempting to board a vehicle to Adoka village . During preliminary questioning, the suspects claimed they were in Otukpo to market cosmetics and mobile gadgets. However, police noted that none of the items they claimed to be selling was found in their possession, raising questions about their activities and movements in the area .

In a separate operation on August 5, 2026, police arrested two other Pakistani nationals, Juma Sharif, 30, and Muhammed Sharif, 25, at a local hotel in Ugbokolo following credible intelligence . The two suspects reportedly told investigators they were dealers in Android phones. A search of their belongings led to the recovery of 11 Tecno Camon 50 Pro mobile phones . Further investigation and operational follow-up resulted in the recovery of an additional 23 Tecno Camon 50 Pro phones and one Infinix Hot 60 phone, bringing the total number of recovered mobile devices to 35 .

The police disclosed that the five suspects have been transferred to the State Criminal Investigation Department (SCID) in Makurdi, where discreet and comprehensive investigations are ongoing to establish the circumstances surrounding their presence, activities, and movements within the state . The Command stated that it strongly suspects the possession of the mobile phones is a decoy for clandestine activities in the rural areas of the state, noting that this is even more probable as the suspects have limited proficiency in speaking or understanding English . The Commissioner of Police, Benue State Command, CP Cletus Nwadiogbu, commended the officers involved in the operations and members of the public whose timely information contributed to the arrests . He further urged residents to remain vigilant and promptly report suspicious persons, movements or activities to the Police, pledging that the Command will continue to work with relevant stakeholders and members of the public to maintain peace and security across Benue State . The Command reassured the public that the operations form part of its proactive, intelligence-led policing strategy aimed at identifying potential security threats, preventing criminal activities, and safeguarding lives and property across the state .

Police Arrest Five Pakistani Nationals in Benue, Recover 35 Mobile Phones 

Loading

Continue Reading

News

EFCC Acted Lawfully in Freezing Osun Account – Falana

Published

on

EFCC Acted Lawfully in Freezing Osun Account – Falana
Senior Advocate of Nigeria and human rights lawyer, Femi Falana

EFCC Acted Lawfully in Freezing Osun Account – Falana

Senior Advocate of Nigeria and human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, has declared that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) did not act illegally by restricting the Osun State Government’s statutory allocation account. He cited landmark court judgments that affirm the anti-graft agency’s powers to investigate state finances, while also faulting President Bola Tinubu’s intervention on procedural grounds.

The controversy surrounding the EFCC’s decision to place a Post-No-Debit restriction on an Osun State Government account domiciled with First Bank has sparked intense debate across the country. The commission disclosed that the action was part of an ongoing investigation into the alleged fraudulent handling of approximately ₦11 billion in Ecology Funds, Intervention Funds, and Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) allocations . According to the EFCC, investigators detected what it described as “precipitate and unwarranted movement of funds” from the account to various corporate entities beginning on August 2, 2026, prompting the need for swift intervention to prevent further diversion of public resources . The commission clarified that the restriction applied to only one account and was not a blanket freeze on all state government finances, a distinction that has been largely overlooked in public discourse surrounding the matter . The EFCC’s Director of Public Affairs, Wilson Uwujaren, defended the action, stating that the commission derived its powers from Section 34 of the EFCC Act and Section 7(6) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 .

Falana made his declaration on Friday during an appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today, wading into the controversy with a clear legal opinion that sought to clarify the legal basis for the EFCC’s action. The senior lawyer stated categorically that “as far as the law is concerned, the EFCC has not acted illegally” . He explained that under Nigerian law, the commission possesses the legal authority to freeze accounts belonging to the federal government, state governments, and local governments, provided it complies with the statutory requirement to obtain a court order within the prescribed period . According to Falana, the EFCC can impose a temporary restriction on an account for up to 72 hours without judicial authorisation, after which it must secure a court order to maintain the freeze . He maintained that the commission followed this legal framework in the Osun case, noting that the EFCC had indeed approached the Federal High Court, which “intervened based on information provided by the EFCC” . This judicial intervention, he argued, validated the EFCC’s actions under the existing legal framework, and the Osun State Government had appropriately challenged the legality and validity of the court order, rather than merely questioning the timing of the action .

READ ALSO:

The legal history of the EFCC’s powers provides important context for understanding the current controversy, and Falana traced this history to demonstrate that the commission’s authority had been repeatedly affirmed by superior courts. He recalled that in 2019, the Federal High Court in Benue State had ruled that the commission lacked the authority to freeze the state government’s account and awarded N50 million in damages against the agency . However, he said the EFCC successfully appealed that decision, and in September 2022, the Court of Appeal overturned the lower court’s ruling, affirming the commission’s power to impose a Post-No-Debit restriction on a government account for up to 72 hours before obtaining a court order . “That remains the law in Nigeria today,” Falana said, emphasising that the Court of Appeal’s decision had not been overturned by any higher court and therefore remained binding on all lower courts and government agencies .

Beyond the Court of Appeal decision, Falana also referenced a 2024 Supreme Court judgment that further solidified the EFCC’s authority to investigate state finances. This judgment arose from a suit instituted by the Kogi State Government and joined by several other states, which challenged the authority of federal anti-corruption agencies to investigate state government finances . Falana stated that the apex court examined all relevant constitutional and statutory provisions and concluded that agencies including the EFCC, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), and the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) have the power to probe accounts at the federal, state, and local government levels . He added that anyone dissatisfied with the existing legal framework should seek an amendment through the National Assembly rather than questioning the EFCC’s statutory mandate . “If Nigerians—those who are concerned—want the law changed, they can go to the National Assembly. But for now, as of today, EFCC has the power to freeze the account of any state and, in not more than 72 hours, has to go to court,” he said, making it clear that the legal question had been definitively settled .

The political dimension of the controversy emerged when President Bola Tinubu directed the EFCC to approach the court to vacate the order and discontinue the restriction, citing concerns about the timing so close to the August 15 Osun State governorship election . Tinubu stated that he was “deeply embarrassed” by the timing of the action, although he acknowledged the commission acted within its statutory powers by obtaining the court order . He said preserving public confidence in the integrity and credibility of the election informed his decision, a position that drew both support and criticism from various quarters . The President’s intervention raised questions about the appropriate limits of executive authority in relation to independent anti-corruption agencies, and whether such intervention could set a dangerous precedent for future investigations .

Falana, however, faulted President Tinubu’s intervention, arguing that the President ought to have respected the statutory independence of the EFCC and acted through the Attorney-General under Section 174 of the Constitution . He stated, “In intervening in the Osun State crisis, President Tinubu ought to have respected the independent status of the EFCC and the due process of law. As far as the law is concerned, the EFCC chairman is not at the beck and call of the President” . Falana noted that the Osun State Government had already taken legal steps to challenge the freezing order before Tinubu intervened, meaning the matter should have been resolved through the judicial process rather than through a direct presidential instruction to the anti-graft agency . He suggested that Tinubu could have directed the Attorney-General to take over the case under Section 174, with a view to withdrawing the case or not opposing the motion filed by the Osun State Government to vacate the ex parte order . Despite faulting the procedure, Falana appeared to welcome the eventual move towards restoring access to the state government’s funds, quoting William Shakespeare: “All is well that ends well” , indicating his pragmatic acceptance of the resolution while still criticising the process .

Looking beyond the immediate controversy, Falana also warned against establishing a precedent under which anti-corruption agencies would be expected to suspend investigations merely because an election is approaching . He argued that such an approach could provide governments with a window to move public funds without scrutiny during election periods, warning that “we must be very careful that we don’t give a dangerous impression that when elections are 10 days away, 20 days away, 30 days away, the anti-graft agencies must turn the other eye” . This warning reflects broader concerns about the integrity of electoral processes and the need for continued oversight of public finances, particularly during periods when governments may be tempted to use state resources for political purposes . Falana’s comments underscore the delicate balance between ensuring free and fair elections and maintaining robust anti-corruption enforcement, a balance that Nigerian authorities continue to navigate in practice .

EFCC Acted Lawfully in Freezing Osun Account – Falana

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Osun election: Police pledge neutrality, warn against vote buying, violence

Published

on

Osun election: Police pledge neutrality, warn against vote buying, violence
Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Disu

Osun election: Police pledge neutrality, warn against vote buying, violence

The Nigeria Police Force has assured residents of Osun State that it will remain neutral, professional and impartial during the August 15, 2026 governorship election, warning politicians, supporters and other stakeholders against vote buying, violence and electoral offences.

Inspector-General of Police Tunji Disu gave the assurance during a meeting with civil society organisations (CSOs) led by the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) in Abuja.

Disu said the police had no political interest in the outcome of the Osun governorship election, stressing that the force’s responsibility was to provide a secure environment where eligible voters could freely exercise their constitutional rights.

He said police officers deployed for election duties had been reminded of their constitutional obligation to enforce the law impartially and protect voters, candidates, electoral officials and other participants regardless of political affiliation.

“The Nigeria Police Force remains a professional, apolitical and impartial institution. We have no candidate, no political party and no vested interest in the outcome of the election other than ensuring that the lawful choice of the people prevails,” Disu said.

The IGP said adequate police personnel and operational assets had been deployed across the state, while intelligence gathering and threat assessments had been strengthened to identify and prevent potential security threats.

According to him, the police are also working with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES) and other relevant stakeholders to ensure effective coordination before, during and after the election.

Disu specifically warned that individuals involved in vote buying, voter intimidation, ballot-box snatching, political thuggery and other electoral offences would face the full weight of the law, irrespective of their political connections or status.

READ ALSO:

He also appealed to political parties and their supporters to conduct themselves peacefully, saying no political ambition should be allowed to result in the loss of lives or disruption of the electoral process.

The police chief urged eligible voters in Osun to participate in the election without fear and encouraged residents to report suspicious activities to security personnel.

The assurance comes amid increased attention on the security situation and the neutrality of law enforcement agencies ahead of the Osun 2026 governorship election.

Civil society organisations have continued to stress the importance of security agencies maintaining neutrality, particularly in view of concerns about electoral violence, voter intimidation and vote buying.

CISLAC Executive Director Auwal Rafsanjani said civil society organisations remained committed to working with security agencies and other stakeholders to promote a peaceful, credible and violence-free election.

Yiaga Africa Executive Director Samson Itodo also described the Osun governorship election as an important test for Nigeria’s electoral institutions ahead of the 2027 general election.

Itodo stressed that the neutrality and professionalism of security agencies would be crucial to strengthening public confidence in the electoral process.

Election-monitoring organisations have similarly identified security threats and voter inducement as issues requiring close attention ahead of the poll.

Yiaga Africa has announced the deployment of 332 observers across Osun State’s 30 local government areas and the state Area Office to monitor the election and provide independent assessments of the electoral process.

The organisation has urged political parties and candidates to prioritise peaceful campaigns and respect the rights of voters, while calling on security agencies to enforce electoral laws fairly.

INEC has also been intensifying preparations for the election, including measures aimed at strengthening election security and preventing violence.

The commission has said security personnel assigned to election duties would be required to take an oath of neutrality, reinforcing expectations that officers deployed for the exercise must perform their duties without favouring any candidate or political party.

The August 15 Osun governorship election is expected to attract significant attention as one of the major electoral exercises before the 2027 general election.

With concerns over vote buying, political violence, voter inducement and security neutrality, the conduct of security personnel and the ability of law enforcement agencies to respond impartially to electoral offences will be critical to the credibility of the poll.

For voters, political parties and civil society groups, the expectation is that all stakeholders will respect the rules, reject violence and allow eligible citizens to freely determine the next governor of Osun State.

Osun election: Police pledge neutrality, warn against vote buying, violence

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending