Senate Reverses Controversial Standing Rules Amendment

Senate Reverses Controversial Standing Rules Amendment

The Nigerian Senate on Thursday rescinded its earlier amendments to Orders 2(2) and 3(1) of the Senate Standing Orders 2023 (as amended), restoring the previous provisions after lawmakers raised constitutional concerns over the revised rules.

The decision followed growing debate within the Red Chamber over amendments that sought to restrict eligibility for principal leadership positions to senators serving at least a second term in office.

Under the now-reversed amendment, only lawmakers currently serving in the 10th Senate and re-elected in the 2027 elections would have been qualified to contest for principal officer positions in the upper chamber.

The controversial changes had triggered criticism from some senators who argued that the amendment could unfairly exclude first-term lawmakers and limit internal democratic competition within the Senate leadership structure.

The motion for rescission and recommittal of the affected rules was moved during plenary by Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele (Ekiti Central), and seconded by Minority Leader, Senator Abba Moro (Benue South).

Bamidele explained that further legislative and constitutional reviews revealed that aspects of the amendment could conflict with provisions of the 1999 Constitution, particularly Section 52, making immediate correction necessary.

According to him, the Senate retains the constitutional authority to revisit and rescind previous decisions in order to safeguard legislative integrity and parliamentary convention.

He stressed that the upper chamber must ensure that all internal procedures remain consistent with constitutional provisions and democratic legislative practice.

Following deliberations, the Senate formally rescinded the amendments and restored the earlier standing rules governing eligibility for leadership positions.

READ ALSO:

• ‘Nigeria Is Working Again’ — Shettima Defends Tinubu at APC Event
• ADC Alleges Plot to Remove Justice Nwite from Nafiu Gombe Case
• 2027: Obi’s Treatment of Northerners as Anambra Governor Will Be Scrutinised — Ex-NHIS Boss

Deputy Senate President, Senator Jibrin Barau, who presided over the plenary session, described the motion as straightforward and essential for maintaining constitutional compliance.

“This is a very straightforward motion; it’s just for us to go in conformity with the constitution,” Barau said.

He commended Bamidele for identifying the constitutional issues surrounding the amendment and moving swiftly to correct them.

According to Barau, the matter was clear enough not to require prolonged debate on the Senate floor.

Former Edo State Governor and Senator representing Edo North, Adams Oshiomhole, however, criticised the manner in which the original amendments were passed earlier in the week.

According to him, the Senate leadership rushed the process without allowing sufficient debate among lawmakers.

“The way we rushed the rules, because certain people wanted certain things concluded, is one flaw to this process,” Oshiomhole stated.

“Next time, we should allow for robust debates,” he added.

His comments reflected concerns among some lawmakers over transparency and inclusiveness in handling major procedural decisions within the Senate.

Responding to Oshiomhole’s remarks, Bamidele raised a point of order under Rule 52(6), cautioning senators against reopening concluded matters without first presenting substantive rescission motions.

According to him, lawmakers dissatisfied with previous decisions should follow established parliamentary procedures rather than creating avoidable tension during plenary.

“If Distinguished Senator Oshiomhole had any problem with the decisions that were taken with respect to the amendment two days ago, what he was expected to do was to bring a substantive motion for rescission,” Bamidele said.

He also lamented that events during the previous plenary session had diverted public attention away from substantive legislative work.

“What became the news out of this hallowed chamber was that unnecessary drama, and we are not going to allow this to continue,” he added.

In a related development, the Senate also rescinded its earlier decision on the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) Establishment Bill, 2026, and recommitted the bill to the Committee of the Whole for reconsideration.

Bamidele explained that a further review of the legislation revealed drafting inconsistencies and substantive issues affecting several clauses of the bill.

He specifically cited concerns relating to clauses 4(6), 8(j), 35–40, as well as portions of the explanatory memorandum accompanying the legislation.

After reconsideration, the Senate subsequently passed the revised bill.

Political analysts say the Senate’s reversal of the controversial standing rules highlights growing sensitivity around internal leadership arrangements ahead of the 2027 elections.

Observers also note that the swift reversal demonstrates increasing caution within the National Assembly over actions that could trigger constitutional disputes or internal division within the ruling political establishment.

The latest development further underscores ongoing power dynamics within the Senate, especially as lawmakers begin positioning for future leadership contests and political realignments ahead of the next electoral cycle.

Senate Reverses Controversial Standing Rules Amendment