SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over each lawmaker's N21m running cost - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over each lawmaker’s N21m running cost

Published

on

Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Speaker of the House of Representatives Abbas Tajudeen

SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over each lawmaker’s N21m running cost

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against the Senate President, Mr Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of House of Representatives, Mr Tajudeen Abbas.

They are accused of failing “to end the apparently unlawful practice by the National Assembly of fixing its allowances and running costs, and the failure to account for the monthly running costs paid to members.”

The Senate recently came out to denied approving jumbo pay to the federal lawmakers, explaining that N21m considered as monthly salary a lawmaker was actually for running cost.

Akpabio and Abbas are sued for themselves and on behalf of all members of the National Assembly.

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo had alleged that the lawmakers fix their own salaries and allowances, contrary to the recommendations of the Revenue Mobilisation Fiscal Allocation Commission (RMAFC).

In the suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1289/2024 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, Abuja, SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to end the apparently unlawful practice of the National Assembly fixing its remuneration and allowances termed as ‘running cost’.”

SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to disclose the exact amount of the monthly running costs being paid to and received by the lawmakers, and the spending details of any such running costs.”

SERAP is also seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to end the alleged practice of paying remuneration and allowances termed as ‘running costs’ into the personal accounts of lawmakers.”

In the suit, SERAP is arguing that: “The provisions of paragraph N, section 32(d) of the Third Schedule to the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] clearly make it unlawful for the National Assembly to fix its salaries, allowances and running costs.”

SERAP is also arguing that, “the alleged practice of paying running costs into the personal accounts of lawmakers is a fundamental breach of Rule 713 of the Federal Government Financial Regulations, which provides that ‘public money shall not be paid into a private bank account.’”

READ ALSO:

According to SERAP, “‘Public function’ means activities in the public interest, not against it. The reports that lawmakers are fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs amount to private self-interest or self-dealing. It is also detrimental to the public interest.”

SERAP said, “The constitutional oath of office of lawmakers requires them to ensure transparency and accountability in the exact amounts of salaries, allowances and running costs they receive.”

SERAP is also arguing that, “The allegations that lawmakers are fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs are entirely inconsistent and incompatible with the constitutional oath of office and the object and purpose of the UN Convention against Corruption to which Nigeria is a state party.”

The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare, Andrew Nwankwo, and Ms Blessing Ogwuche, read in part: “Directing and compelling the lawmakers to account for and return any misused or mismanaged running costs they collected would build trust in democratic institutions and strengthen the rule of law.”

“SERAP is seeking: an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to refer the allegations on the misuse of the running costs received by members to appropriate anticorruption agencies for investigation and prosecution where there is relevant admissible evidence.”

“The country’s international legal obligations especially under the UN Convention against Corruption impose a legal commitment on public officials including lawmakers to discharge a public duty truthfully and faithfully.”

“The convention specifically in paragraph 1 of article 8 requires members to promote integrity, honesty and responsibility in the management of public resources.”

“Nigerians have a right to scrutinize how their lawmakers spend their tax money and the commonwealth. Nigerians also have a right to honest and faithful performance by their public officials including lawmakers.”

“Ending the reported practice by lawmakers of fixing their salaries, allowances and running costs would improve public confidence in the integrity and honesty of the National Assembly.”

READ ALSO:

“Constitutional oath of office requires public officials including lawmakers to abstain from all improper acts, such as fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs, that are inconsistent with the public trust.”

“It is a travesty and a fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties for members of the National Assembly to fix their own salaries, allowances and running costs.”

“Rule 713 of the Federal Government Financial Regulations provides: ‘Personal money shall in no circumstances be paid into a government bank account, nor shall any public money be paid into a private bank account.’”

“In the Seventh Schedule to the Nigerian Constitution, lawmakers commit to strive to ‘preserve the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy contained in the Constitution’, [and to] perform their ‘functions honestly, faithfully’, to act ‘always in the interest of the well-being and prosperity of Nigeria’.”

“Lawmakers also commit to ‘preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of Nigeria; and abide by the Code of Conduct contained in the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution.’”

“SERAP notes that Section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution requires public institutions to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power. Section 16(2) of the Nigerian Constitution further provides that, ‘the material resources of the nation are harnessed and distributed as best as possible to serve the common good.’”

“According to our information, members of the National Assembly are currently fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs. The running costs are reportedly paid directly into the personal accounts of members.”

“Senator Kawu Sumaila, representing Kano South Senatorial District, recently disclosed in an interview with BBC Hausa that each Nigerian senator earns at least N21 million monthly in running costs, salaries, and allowances.”

“Mr Sumaila reportedly said, ‘My monthly salary is less than N1 million. After deductions, the figure comes down to a little over N600,000. Given the increase effected in the Senate, each senator gets N21 million every month as running cost.’”

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over each lawmaker’s N21m running cost

Loading

News

State Police Bill to Reach National Assembly in Two Weeks – Presidency

Published

on

State Police Bill to Reach National Assembly in Two Weeks – Presidency
Chief of Staff to President, Femi Gbajabiamila and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu
State Police Bill to Reach National Assembly in Two Weeks – Presidency

The Federal Government has said the proposed National Policing Bill, which will provide the operational framework for establishing state police in Nigeria, is about 90 per cent ready and is expected to be transmitted to the National Assembly within two weeks.

Chief of Staff to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Femi Gbajabiamila, disclosed this on Thursday, October 15, 2026, after a meeting of the Presidential Working Group on the National Policing Bill at the State House in Abuja.

Gbajabiamila, who chairs the working group, said the committee was close to completing its assignment but needed to address a few outstanding issues, including observations submitted by state governors, before forwarding the proposed legislation to lawmakers.

“The National Policing Bill is more or less ready for transmission to the National Assembly. We will probably have one more meeting after this to cross the t’s and dot the i’s and make sure every area is covered. So, we are 90% ready,” he said.

He added that the committee expected to conclude the remaining work within approximately a week, although the Presidency said the bill would be transmitted within two weeks.

“The governors have one or two observations, and we should be ready in about a week or so,” Gbajabiamila stated.

The Chief of Staff described the proposed legislation as “the most consequential Bill of the administration so far”, noting that the working group had undertaken extensive deliberations since its steering committee began meeting on August 3.

The meeting brought together key government officials and security stakeholders, including Nigeria Governors’ Forum Chairman and Kwara State Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun, Kaduna State Governor Uba Sani and Inspector-General of Police Tunji Disu.

READ ALSO:

Representatives of the Federal Ministry of Justice, the Nigerian Bar Association and the Office of the National Security Adviser also participated in the deliberations.

The proposed law is intended to establish the legal and operational framework needed to implement state police, allowing state governments to establish their own police services alongside the existing federal police structure.

The move is part of the Tinubu administration’s efforts to reform Nigeria’s security architecture amid persistent challenges, including kidnapping, banditry, terrorism, communal violence and other violent crimes.

Supporters of decentralised policing argue that state police could improve local intelligence gathering, shorten emergency response times and enable officers to respond more effectively to security threats within their communities.

However, the proposal has also raised concerns about possible political interference, funding disparities between states, human rights safeguards and the risk that governors could misuse state police against political opponents.

The National Policing Bill is distinct from the constitutional amendment required to permit states to establish their own police forces. The proposed legislation is intended to provide the practical rules, standards and safeguards for operating the system, while the constitutional amendment must complete the required approval process.

Both chambers of the National Assembly have approved the constitutional amendment proposal, but it still requires ratification by at least 24 of Nigeria’s 36 State Houses of Assembly before the constitutional change can take effect.

Gbajabiamila acknowledged concerns about the pace of ratification by state legislatures, with reports indicating that only a limited number of states had approved the amendment at the time of the meeting.

He nevertheless expressed confidence that the process would continue, insisting that there was broad national support for the reform.

“I see no reason why anyone will want to have a rethink on it,” he said.

The committee is expected to use its remaining deliberations to address the governors’ observations and ensure that the proposed legislation provides a workable structure for cooperation between federal and state police services.

The framework is also expected to clarify operational standards, accountability requirements and the relationship between the different levels of policing once the constitutional process is completed.

The planned transmission of the bill marks another step in a reform effort that has featured prominently in Nigeria’s security debate. However, the announcement does not mean that state police can begin operating immediately. The necessary constitutional approvals and legislative processes must still be completed before the proposed system can be implemented.

If the timeline announced by the Presidency is met, lawmakers could begin considering the National Policing Bill in the coming weeks, bringing Nigeria closer to a decentralised policing structure intended to address the country’s diverse security challenges.

 

State Police Bill to Reach National Assembly in Two Weeks – Presidency

Loading

Continue Reading

News

IPOB Reaches Out to Hausa, Northern Groups in Fresh Push for Biafra Referendum

Published

on

IPOB Reaches Out to Hausa, Northern Groups in Fresh Push for Biafra Referendum
IPOB Reaches Out to Hausa, Northern Groups in Fresh Push for Biafra Referendum

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has declared solidarity with the Hausa people and other northern ethnic nationalities, insisting that their pursuit of political freedom and self-determination does not conflict with its campaign for an independent Biafran state.

The separatist group made its position known in a statement issued on Friday, October 16, 2026, by its Media and Publicity Secretary, Emma Powerful, on the directive of its Directorate of State.

IPOB said its declaration followed what it described as a solidarity statement by northern youths and the Northern Nigeria Rescue Movement (NNRM). It welcomed the reported development, arguing that communities across Nigeria could cooperate on shared concerns, including insecurity, poverty, political marginalisation and the need for accountable governance.

However, the extent of support for the reported declaration among northern youths and the wider Hausa population has not been independently established.

The group, whose leader Nnamdi Kanu remains in detention, maintained that the quest for Biafran independence should not be interpreted as hostility towards the Hausa people or other ethnic nationalities.

“Onyendu’s message is clear, consistent, and universal: the pursuit of freedom for one people must never be interpreted as hatred for another,” Powerful said.

IPOB argued that the political aspirations of the Biafran people and the Hausa nation could coexist, insisting that one community should not be expected to surrender its identity or political interests for another to achieve its objectives.

“The freedom of Biafrans and the emancipation of the Hausa nation are not mutually exclusive aspirations. No people should have to remain subordinate for another people to be free,” the statement added.

The organisation also rejected what it described as attempts to portray Kanu and the Biafran movement as enemies of northern communities. It alleged that ethnic and religious divisions had been used to prevent Nigerians from recognising shared concerns about governance and economic hardship.

READ ALSO:

According to IPOB, Kanu had repeatedly discussed the political aspirations of the Hausa people during broadcasts on Radio Biafra, including what the group described as the need for greater political agency, cultural confidence and historical dignity.

The organisation said ordinary Nigerians across different regions faced challenges that should not automatically be blamed on particular ethnic groups. It called for broader discussions about the political arrangements governing the country and whether they adequately reflect the interests of its diverse communities.

A central element of the statement was IPOB’s renewed demand for an internationally supervised referendum on self-determination. The group argued that ethnic nationalities should have a democratic opportunity to determine their political future, including consideration of regional autonomy, voluntary federations or other governance arrangements.

IPOB listed the Hausa, Kanuri, Tiv, Berom, Nupe, Igala, Jukun, Angas, Bachama, Idoma, Zuru, Ebira, Gbagyi, Tangale and Borgu communities among the groups whose aspirations it said deserved recognition.

The organisation maintained that the size of an ethnic group should not determine its political rights or its ability to influence decisions affecting its future.

“Population density does not dictate human dignity,” the statement said.

IPOB also cited the 2014 National Conference, convened under former President Goodluck Jonathan, arguing that its discussions on restructuring and regional autonomy could provide useful reference points for debates about Nigeria’s political future.

The group further invoked former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s criticism of governance structures inherited from colonial rule, saying African countries should develop political systems suited to their circumstances.

It urged other ethnic nationalities to participate in discussions about self-determination, political representation and constitutional restructuring, saying it was willing to work with communities pursuing what it described as freedom, peace and mutual respect.

“Freedom is the most precious gift Almighty God gave to humanity, and no human being or artificial colonial arrangement should deny any people that right,” the statement said.

The declaration comes amid continuing debate over Nigeria’s unity, separatist movements, regional autonomy and the country’s constitutional structure. IPOB has campaigned for the independence of Biafra, a proposed state associated principally with the South-East, while the Nigerian government has opposed the separatist campaign and proscribed the organisation.

Although IPOB has framed its latest statement as an appeal for solidarity among ethnic nationalities, its position does not establish that the Hausa people or other northern communities have collectively endorsed the group’s objectives. Further clarification from the NNRM and the northern groups reportedly involved would be needed to establish the precise terms of their declaration and whether any formal cooperation has been agreed.

For now, IPOB says its message is that the pursuit of Biafran independence should not be interpreted as opposition to the Hausa or other ethnic communities. It is calling for wider engagement on how Nigeria’s diverse nationalities can address their political concerns and determine their preferred future within or outside existing governance arrangements.

 

IPOB Reaches Out to Hausa, Northern Groups in Fresh Push for Biafra Referendum

Loading

Continue Reading

News

₦200m Fake Alcohol Packaging Uncovered as NAFDAC Raids Aba Market

Published

on

₦200m Fake Alcohol Packaging Uncovered as NAFDAC Raids Aba Market

₦200m Fake Alcohol Packaging Uncovered as NAFDAC Raids Aba Market

The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has uncovered counterfeit packaging materials bearing the names of popular alcoholic beverage brands, including Jameson and Glenfiddich, during a raid on five shops at Old Court Road Market in Aba, Abia State.

The agency said the seized materials were worth more than ₦200 million, raising concerns about the production and distribution of counterfeit packaging that could be used to make fake products appear genuine.

The operation targeted shops suspected of producing and supplying counterfeit packaging materials for alcoholic beverages and other consumer products. NAFDAC said its Investigation and Enforcement operatives carried out the raid following credible intelligence.

In a statement shared on Wednesday, October 14, the agency disclosed that the operation uncovered fake labels, corks, packs and outer packaging materials bearing the names of several well-known brands.

Apart from Jameson and Glenfiddich, the recovered materials reportedly carried the names of Four Cousins, Lord’s Dry Gin, Imperial Blue, Goya Oil, Chelsea, Squadron and Seaman’s Aromatic Schnapps.

The agency estimated the value of the counterfeit packaging materials at more than ₦200 million. However, its disclosure focused on packaging materials bearing the brands’ names and did not establish that finished bottles of all the affected brands were recovered during the operation.

NAFDAC said its enforcement team encountered threats and resistance from some traders during the raid, making it difficult to evacuate the seized materials. The owners of the five shops were reportedly absent when the operatives arrived.

READ ALSO:

To prevent interference with the materials left behind, the agency said the affected premises were placed on hold while steps were taken to secure them. NAFDAC subsequently invited the chairman of the market union, who reportedly pledged to ensure the security of the premises and assist in identifying and presenting the shop owners to the authorities.

The agency did not publicly identify the owners of the affected shops in its account of the operation. The identities of the individuals behind the suspected counterfeiting activity, the sources of the materials and their intended destinations remain unclear.

The seizure has renewed concerns about the risks posed by counterfeit packaging in Nigeria’s alcoholic beverage market. Fake labels, bottle closures and outer packaging can make it difficult for consumers to distinguish genuine products from counterfeit goods, particularly when imitation packaging closely resembles that of established brands.

Where such materials are used to package adulterated or unregulated drinks, consumers may have no reliable way of determining the contents or the conditions under which the products were manufactured. The consumption of counterfeit or adulterated alcoholic beverages can expose people to dangerous substances and serious health complications.

NAFDAC has previously conducted enforcement operations against suspected counterfeit beverage production in Aba. In December 2023, the agency announced a separate operation at Eziukwu Market, also known as Cemetery Market, targeting shops allegedly used to produce counterfeit and adulterated beverages and other consumer goods.

The agency reported that the earlier operation involved more than 240 shops and resulted in the destruction of over 1,500 cartons of fake and substandard products, with the confiscated and destroyed goods valued at approximately ₦750 million. That operation was separate from the latest raid at Old Court Road Market.

NAFDAC is responsible for regulating the manufacture, importation, exportation, distribution, advertisement and sale of regulated products in Nigeria, including food, medicines and beverages. Through its Investigation and Enforcement Directorate, the agency conducts operations against counterfeit, adulterated, substandard and unregistered products.

The latest seizure highlights the importance of enforcement efforts targeting not only fake finished products but also the packaging materials that can facilitate counterfeiting. Consumers are advised to purchase alcoholic beverages from reputable retailers and remain alert to suspicious packaging, broken seals, unusual product appearances and prices that are significantly lower than normal.

However, the presence of a familiar label alone does not establish that a drink is genuine. Effective regulatory oversight, supply-chain monitoring and product traceability remain important safeguards against counterfeit goods.

NAFDAC said steps were being taken to secure the affected premises and identify the shop owners. The full extent of the suspected counterfeiting operation, including whether the recovered materials had already been used to package fake products, has not been established in the information released by the agency.

₦200m Fake Alcohol Packaging Uncovered as NAFDAC Raids Aba Market

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending