Suspended Archbishop Ibezim Drags Anglican Primate to Court, Challenges Six-Month Leave

The suspended Archbishop of the Province of the Niger and Bishop of the Diocese of Awka, Most Reverend Alexander Chibuzo Ibezim, has sued the Primate of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), Most Reverend Henry C. Ndukuba, and the church’s Dean, Most Reverend Blessing Enyindah, seeking to stop further disciplinary action against him without compliance with the church’s constitution and canons.

Ibezim filed the suit at the Anambra State High Court in Awka, challenging the procedure adopted by the church leadership in investigating allegations involving his administration of the Diocese of Awka.

The case, marked A/371/2026, was instituted through an originating summons dated October 13, 2026, with a separate application seeking an interlocutory injunction against the defendants.

The Archbishop wants the court to determine the legal procedures governing disciplinary action against a serving bishop or archbishop under the Constitution and Canons of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion).

He is specifically asking the court to restrain Ndukuba and Enyindah from issuing or implementing measures to suspend, remove, retire or dismiss him from his ecclesiastical offices while the substantive suit is pending.

READ ALSO:

• DSS Arrests Maina’s Fugitive Son in Abuja After Six Years on the Run
• NAPTIP Raises Alarm as Parents Allegedly Trade Children for Sex, Arrests Woman in Abuja
• Tesla’s Flying Roadster Rekindles Race to Put Cars in the Sky

Ibezim also wants the court to prevent the two church leaders from further threatening his removal or interfering in the affairs of the Diocese of Awka without his written consent.

The legal action follows the Primate’s directive that Ibezim proceed on six months’ compulsory leave with immediate effect while investigations into developments in the diocese continue.

In a letter dated October 13, Ndukuba said the decision was intended to allow a fair investigation and create an opportunity for peace and reconciliation within the diocese. He cited Section 29(1) of Chapter V of the church’s 2020 Constitution and Canons as the basis for the administrative measure.

The directive also barred Ibezim from officiating at activities of the Church of Nigeria, the Province of the Niger and the Diocese of Awka during the period.

Ndukuba appointed the Bishop of Aguata Diocese, The Right Reverend Samuel Ezeofor, as Supervising Bishop of the Diocese of Awka and Coordinating Bishop of the Province of the Niger during Ibezim’s absence. The Archbishop was instructed to hand over his responsibilities to Ezeofor.

The Primate maintained that the compulsory leave was an administrative step rather than a disciplinary sanction.

However, Ibezim’s court action challenges the authority and procedure for imposing disciplinary measures on a serving bishop, arguing that the church’s governing provisions must be followed.

In his originating summons, he cited Sections 55, 75 and 76 of the church’s constitution, alongside relevant provisions of Canon XVI, as the legal framework governing disciplinary proceedings against bishops and archbishops.

He is asking the court to determine whether the Primate can unilaterally impose disciplinary sanctions without following the procedures prescribed by those provisions.

The Archbishop has also challenged the composition of a visitation team established to investigate developments in the Diocese of Awka. The team, chaired by Enyindah, was constituted through a letter dated June 17, 2026.

Ibezim described the team’s constitution as unlawful, a claim that remains for the court to determine.

The dispute has also been linked to allegations that church land valued at more than ₦2 billion was sold without proper authorisation. Reports said the matter prompted a petition to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

However, the Primate’s letter directing Ibezim to proceed on leave did not specify the precise allegations against him or detail the findings of the visitation team.

The Archbishop’s lawsuit therefore raises questions about both the investigation process and the extent of the church leadership’s authority to impose administrative restrictions or disciplinary measures on a serving bishop.

The case comes amid growing tensions over the administration of the Awka Diocese, including the reported removal of the diocese’s former chancellor, retired Justice O.J. Okeke, by Ibezim.

The court’s eventual decision could clarify the interpretation of the church’s internal disciplinary rules and determine whether the challenged procedures complied with its governing constitution and canons.

As of the latest reports, the court had yet to determine the substantive questions raised in the suit or grant the final reliefs sought by the Archbishop. The allegations concerning the church land and the legality of the visitation team also remain unresolved.

The legal proceedings will determine the parties’ respective rights and obligations under the church’s governing provisions and applicable law.