International
US Senate Passes Historic War Powers Resolution Rebuking Trump Over Iran Conflict
US Senate Passes Historic War Powers Resolution Rebuking Trump Over Iran Conflict
Bipartisan vote marks first time both chambers have approved measure directing president to end military action since 1973
The Republican-controlled US Senate has approved a war powers resolution demanding that President Donald Trump halt military action against Iran or seek congressional authorization to continue hostilities, delivering the most significant bipartisan rebuke of the president since his return to office. The resolution passed by a 50-48 vote on Tuesday, with four Republicans joining Democrats in support of the measure. The same measure was passed by the US House of Representatives earlier this month by a 215-208 vote, with four Republicans crossing party lines.
However, the resolution is largely symbolic—it is a concurrent resolution expressing the sentiment of Congress rather than legislation that carries the full force of law, and it will not be sent to the president for his signature or veto. Middle East analyst Laura Blumenfeld described it as “more of a slap on a wrist than a handcuff” because it has no legal binding effect. In practice, the vote is unlikely to have much impact on the currently frozen conflict with Iran. Experts believe Trump is likely to ignore it—as has every US president since the War Powers Resolution was enacted—and any legal challenges would likely produce no result. Scott Anderson, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, noted: “The executive branch will likely ignore it on constitutional grounds, and it’s not clear who might have standing to sue to enforce it.”
The vote marks the first time since the War Powers Resolution of 1973 that both chambers of Congress have approved a concurrent resolution instructing a president to end a military action. The law was born out of a clash between Congress and President Richard Nixon over the Vietnam War, with lawmakers overriding his veto in an effort to reclaim authority over decisions of war. Michael Glennon, a professor of international law at Tufts University, called the vote “almost unprecedented,” noting that “You have both houses of Congress, which are under the control of the Republican Party, standing up to the president and saying no.” He added that Trump has been “very effective” in exacting retribution against dissident Republicans who oppose him, making this “a watershed event.”
READ ALSO:
- Tinubu Seeks Senate Confirmation of Ex-FUOYE VC as Ambassador
- Sai Mallam Sect: Kebbi Authorities Confirm Presence of New Terror Group in Argungu
- Kwara OPC Leader Abducted During N30m Ransom Delivery Mission
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer blasted the war on the Senate floor, declaring: “Time after time, the vast majority of Senate Republicans sided with Trump and his war instead of the American people. The American people have paid the price for Trump’s historic blunder in Iran. It’ll go down in the history books as one of the worst foreign policy forays America has ever made.” The vote reflects growing unease among Republicans over both the war and the ceasefire deal Trump struck with Iran. The conflict has become deeply unpopular with the American public amid skyrocketing petrol prices and enormous financial costs, with the Pentagon seeking approximately $80 billion from Congress to pay for the war.
The four Republican senators who voted with Democrats were Rand Paul of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the only Democrat to vote against the measure. The vote was aided by the absence of two Republican senators who have consistently opposed such efforts: former Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who was recently hospitalized for an undisclosed matter, and Senator Dave McCormick of Pennsylvania. A White House official told the BBC that the measure only passed because of these absences, and noted that with the ceasefire agreed on 7 April, there are “no hostilities from which to withdraw American forces.”
President Trump sharply criticized the resolution on his Truth Social platform, calling it “poorly timed and meaningless.” “So, I have Iran on the ‘ropes,’ ready to go down for the fall, willing to give us practically anything, and for the first time in decades, respecting the hell out of the United States and its President, ME, and the U.S. Senate decides to have a poorly timed and meaningless War Powers Act Vote,” Trump wrote. He added: “These Senators have just made my job more difficult, but I will get it done, one way or the other, because I always get it done!” Trump also labeled the four Republican senators who voted in favor as “Republican Losers.”
Federal law requires congressional approval to continue military actions for more than 60 days. The US-Israel strikes on Iran began on 28 February, although the Trump administration has argued April’s ceasefire reset the clock. The White House can also extend the deadline for another 30 days, citing national security. Currently, the US and Iran have agreed to continue a ceasefire and are working towards an end of hostilities under a memorandum of understanding signed by both presidents last week. Under that memo, Washington and Tehran have 60 days to negotiate a broader agreement on ending Iran’s nuclear programme, with Vice President JD Vance leading the American delegation in talks in Switzerland.
Whether the vote represents a harbinger of more opposition to the president remains unclear. Jonathan Entin, a constitutional law professor at Case Western Reserve University, cautioned: “I wouldn’t overreact to the significance of this vote. It’s important… but I’m not sure that we should view it as a sign of consistent conflict, or additional conflict, with the president.” According to Entin, the upcoming November midterm elections in the US mean that while a handful of Republicans may wish to signal independence from Trump to bring in independent voters, many others will be hoping to avoid drawing his ire. “There are constraints,” he said. “The president has overwhelming support among Republicans. A candidate who pushes back too much might risk alienating strong Republican voters who think they aren’t committed enough.”
The vote exposes deepening divisions among Republicans ahead of November’s midterm elections, where control of both chambers of Congress hangs in the balance. It was the latest sign of division among Trump’s fellow Republicans, who have recently resisted the president on other fronts, including by rejecting his plans to create a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponisation” fund and approving Ukraine aid. The Tuesday vote was the 10th time Senate Democrats have forced a war powers vote since the start of the conflict.
US Senate Passes Historic War Powers Resolution Rebuking Trump Over Iran Conflict
![]()
International
Job Seeker Steals Bugatti CEO’s £2m Car After Finding Keys Inside
A man who reportedly visited the headquarters of luxury car manufacturer Bugatti in search of employment allegedly drove away in the company chief executive’s £2 million sports car after discovering that its keys had been left inside.
The incident involved Mate Rimac, the Croatian businessman and chief executive of Bugatti, whose personal Bugatti Chiron was stolen from the company’s production and technology campus near Zagreb, Croatia.
The suspect, a Croatian man in his mid-30s, reportedly entered the facility looking for a job before spotting the high-performance vehicle with its keys inside and driving away.
Rimac disclosed the incident in a series of posts on Instagram, explaining that he had routinely left the keys inside his vehicles because he considered Croatia a safe place.
He admitted that the habit had continued for years without any incident until the Chiron disappeared.
The theft was discovered after an employee alerted colleagues that an unfamiliar person had driven away in the expensive vehicle.
Rimac immediately contacted the police and used the car’s built-in tracking and telemetry system to monitor its movements.
The tracking technology provided information about the vehicle’s location, speed and fuel level, allowing the Bugatti team to follow its journey and share updates with law enforcement officers.
READ ALSO:
- Netanyahu Faces Political Setback as Israeli President Picks Rival to Form Government
- 2027: Tinubu Challenges Atiku to Explain How He Financed University
- Afenifere Crisis: ‘There Is Only One Afenifere’, Secretary Insists Amid Breakup Allegations
After discovering that the stolen vehicle was heading towards Slovenia, Rimac jumped into a Porsche 911 and pursued it.
The pursuit continued across borders, with the Chiron eventually reaching Austria. Rimac and his team maintained communication with the police through a group chat, providing updates that helped Austrian officers locate and intercept the vehicle.
The suspect was subsequently arrested in Austria, where Rimac later met him at a police station.
According to the Bugatti boss, the man explained that he had initially visited the company’s premises to seek employment but decided to take the car after noticing that its keys were inside.
Rimac said he was not planning to press charges against the suspect. However, he acknowledged that the man could still face prosecution because of the high value of the stolen vehicle.
The CEO also revealed that he had considered giving the suspect a lift home to his family but police officers did not allow him to do so.
The recovered Chiron sustained some damage during the incident, although Rimac said it could be repaired.
The businessman thanked the Austrian police for their intervention, saying he was relieved that nobody was injured during the incident.
He also admitted that the experience had taught him an expensive lesson, promising never again to leave the keys inside his vehicles.
The Bugatti Chiron, unveiled in 2016, is one of the world’s most powerful luxury hypercars. The model has a starting price of about €2.4 million, equivalent to approximately £2 million, and a manufacturer-limited top speed of 420 kilometres per hour.
Bugatti operates under Bugatti Rimac, a joint venture in which Rimac Group holds a majority stake.
The unusual theft has attracted international attention because of the vehicle’s value, the suspect’s reported reason for visiting the facility and the extraordinary cross-border pursuit involving the Bugatti chief executive.
Job Seeker Steals Bugatti CEO’s £2m Car After Finding Keys Inside
![]()
International
Netanyahu Faces Political Setback as Israeli President Picks Rival to Form Government
Netanyahu Faces Political Setback as Israeli President Picks Rival to Form Government
Israeli President Isaac Herzog has given opposition leader and former military chief Gadi Eisenkot the first opportunity to form the country’s next government, dealing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a major political setback after a closely contested general election.
Herzog announced his decision on Saturday, November 7, 2026, following consultations with political parties elected to the 26th Knesset, Israel’s parliament.
Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party, emerged with the highest number of recommendations from lawmakers, receiving the backing of representatives from factions controlling 67 seats, compared with 46 seats for Netanyahu. Representatives of another faction controlling seven seats did not recommend either candidate.
The decision followed the October 27 general election, which left neither Netanyahu’s governing bloc nor the opposition grouping with the 61 seats required for a parliamentary majority in the 120-member Knesset.
Netanyahu’s religious-nationalist coalition secured 53 seats, while the four-party opposition alliance led by Eisenkot won 48. The two Arab-led parties made significant gains, securing a combined 19 seats, placing them in a potentially decisive position in negotiations over the next government.
Eisenkot is expected to receive the formal mandate from Herzog at a ceremony at the President’s Residence in Jerusalem on Sunday, November 8.
READ ALSO:
- 2027: Tinubu Challenges Atiku to Explain How He Financed University
- Afenifere Crisis: ‘There Is Only One Afenifere’, Secretary Insists Amid Breakup Allegations
- Illicit Donations: Adeboye Orders RCCG to Refund Billions Traced to Church Projects
Under the Israeli government-formation process, he will have 28 days to negotiate a coalition, with the possibility of a further 14-day extension.
The former military chief will face difficult negotiations because his opposition alliance does not have enough seats to govern independently. Although the Arab-led parties have endorsed him, Eisenkot has previously expressed reservations about forming a coalition with them.
One possible route is to establish a minority government with support from Arab-led lawmakers on confidence votes and key legislation. Another option would involve reaching an agreement with ultra-Orthodox parties that have traditionally aligned with Netanyahu.
However, both options could create tensions within Eisenkot’s own political alliance, particularly among members who oppose relying on Arab parties or making concessions to religious parties.
A broader national unity government involving Netanyahu’s Likud party is another possibility, although the two leaders have significant disagreements over key political and security issues.
Eisenkot has previously ruled out serving in a government alongside Netanyahu, while criticising the prime minister’s handling of the war in Gaza and his reliance on far-right political partners.
Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, had sought to prevent an opposition-led government from emerging with the support of Arab-led parties.
Shortly before Herzog announced his decision, Netanyahu called for a national unity government and warned against the formation of an administration dependent on what he described as supporters of terrorism, referring to the Arab-led parties.
His comments drew criticism from Eisenkot’s political camp, which accused the prime minister of using divisive language to undermine the opposition’s efforts to form a government.
The Arab-led parties, which represent a significant section of Israel’s Palestinian citizens, have indicated their willingness to support efforts to end Netanyahu’s long tenure in office.
Their combined 19 seats could provide Eisenkot with the parliamentary backing needed to overcome the deadlock, although securing a workable arrangement remains uncertain.
Eisenkot, 66, served as chief of staff of the Israel Defence Forces from 2015 to 2019 before entering politics in 2022. He later served as an observer in Netanyahu’s wartime cabinet following the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023.
He subsequently became one of Netanyahu’s most prominent critics, particularly over the conduct of the war in Gaza, the government’s security decisions and the influence of far-right politicians.
If Eisenkot fails to form a government within the stipulated period, Herzog may give another candidate the opportunity to try. If the process remains unsuccessful, Israel could be forced into another general election.
Netanyahu will remain prime minister in a caretaker capacity until a new government is sworn in.
Herzog’s decision therefore represents an important development in Israel’s political transition, but the final outcome will depend on whether Eisenkot can overcome divisions among opposition parties and secure sufficient parliamentary support.
Netanyahu Faces Political Setback as Israeli President Picks Rival to Form Government
![]()
International
White House Reaffirms US Policy Recognising Only Two Genders
The White House has reaffirmed the United States government’s policy recognising only two sexes, male and female, under President Donald Trump’s administration.
The administration restated its position in a message published on its official X account on Friday, November 6, 2026, declaring that the United States government officially recognises only two genders.
“It is the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male & female,” the White House stated.
The latest declaration reinforces Trump’s position on gender identity and his administration’s efforts to make biological sex the basis for federal government policies, official documents and administrative procedures.
Trump formally established the policy on January 20, 2025, through an executive order titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.
Under Section Two of the executive order, the President declared that it was the policy of the United States to recognise two sexes, male and female.
The directive defined sex as an individual’s unchangeable biological classification as either male or female, distinguishing it from gender identity.
READ ALSO:
- ‘Stop Blaming Us’, APC Tells Atiku, ADC Over Court Judgment
- Atiku to Tinubu: You Cannot Use Courts to Escape Nigerians’ Verdict
- University Funding Crisis: States Beg FG to Take Over Cash-Strapped Institutions
It also instructed federal agencies to adopt the definitions when interpreting and implementing federal laws, regulations and government policies.
Among other measures, the executive order directed government agencies to review and remove official statements, policies, regulations and communications considered inconsistent with the administration’s position.
It further required federal agencies to ensure that official forms requesting information about an individual’s sex provided only male and female options.
The policy marked a significant departure from measures introduced under former President Joe Biden, whose administration expanded federal recognition of gender identity in several areas of government operations.
In 2022, the Biden administration introduced an X gender marker option on US passports, allowing applicants who did not identify as male or female to select the alternative designation.
Trump’s executive order sought to reverse such measures and restore biological sex as the basis for federal government recognition.
The administration has maintained that the policy is intended to protect sex-based rights and ensure consistency in the interpretation of federal laws.
However, the policy has generated considerable debate over transgender rights, gender identity, discrimination and the legal recognition of transgender and non-binary people in the United States.
The White House’s latest declaration did not announce a new executive order or additional regulatory measures but reaffirmed the administration’s existing position on an issue that continues to attract political, legal and social debate.
White House Reaffirms US Policy Recognising Only Two Genders
![]()
-
metro2 days agoNNPCL Slashes Petrol Price By Up To ₦80, Sells At ₦1,325 Per Litre In Abuja
-
News2 days agoADC Heads to Appeal, Insists Mark, Aregbesola Remain Party Leaders Despite Court Ruling
-
News2 days agoTinubu’s Visit: One Feared Dead, Several Injured as APC Women’s Bus Collides With Security Vehicle in Uyo
-
Sports16 hours agoBREAKING: Flamingos Make History, Defeat Japan 2–1 to Win First FIFA U-17 Women’s World Cup
-
metro2 days agoNiger Police Arrest Five Over Alleged Plot to Sacrifice Biological Children for Wealth
-
metro3 days agoDogo Gide Throws Spanner in Islamic State’s Expansion Plans, Forces Terrorists to Retreat in North-West Nigeria
-
Politics2 days agoAisha Yesufu Fires Warning At INEC After Rufai Oseni Hails Americans For Voting Out Tyranny
-
News2 days agoSex Trafficking: ‘They Took Us To Native Doctor, Shaved Our Private Parts Before Leaving Edo’ – Survivor
