US Counterterrorism Chief Resigns Over Opposition to Trump’s Iran War

The Director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent, has resigned from his position, citing strong opposition to Donald Trump’s administration’s war stance on Iran.

Kent announced his resignation on Tuesday, saying he could no longer align himself with the government’s approach to the escalating conflict.

“I cannot in good conscience back this war,” Kent said, underscoring deep divisions within national security circles over U.S. policy toward Iran.

In a statement shared on social media, Kent argued that the justification for the conflict was flawed and warned that continued military engagement could have serious global consequences. He emphasized the need for diplomatic solutions rather than prolonged warfare.

His departure marks a significant development within the U.S. intelligence and security community, where internal disagreements over foreign policy decisions—particularly regarding Iran—have increasingly come into focus.

Kent’s resignation is expected to intensify debate in Washington over the administration’s handling of the crisis, as critics continue to question both the strategy and potential long-term implications of the conflict.

US Counterterrorism Chief Resigns Over Opposition to Trump’s Iran War

EU, UK Reject Trump’s Call for Military Action to Secure Strait of Hormuz

European and NATO allies have firmly rebuffed U.S. President Donald Trump’s demand for military assistance to secure the Strait of Hormuz, even as the strategic waterway remains effectively blocked amid the U.S.–Israeli war on Iran and global oil prices surge above $100 per barrel. The standoff highlights deep divisions among Western allies over how to respond to the crisis and underscores the challenges of securing international cooperation in the face of intensified regional tensions.

In a series of statements by European defence and foreign ministers, leaders made clear that military involvement in the Strait of Hormuz is not an option for most EU states, pointing instead to diplomatic engagement, strategic clarity, and wider de‑escalation as necessary prerequisites before any coordinated action can be considered.

“What does … Trump expect a handful or two handfuls of European frigates to do in the Strait of Hormuz that the powerful U.S. Navy cannot do?” German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said in Berlin. “This is not our war. We have not started it.”

Similarly, Greek government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis stated that Greece would not participate in any military operations in the Strait of Hormuz, while Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani confirmed that Italy would not extend its naval missions into the contentious waterway.

READ ALSO:

• Dangote, China’s GCL Sign $4.2bn Gas Deal to Power Ethiopia Fertiliser Megaproject
• Trump’s Claim of Former President Regret Over Iran Denied by Aides
• Oil Prices Jump as Strait of Hormuz Crisis Intensifies

Other European foreign ministers emphasised the need for more strategic clarity from Washington before any allied military support could be considered. Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said US allies wanted to understand Trump’s overall “strategic goals” and his plan for the wider conflict, while Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski said that a formal NATO request would be required for his country’s participation.

“If there is a request via NATO, we will, of course, out of respect and sympathy for our American allies consider it very carefully,” Sikorski said, indicating that any European involvement would likely need to follow collective defence protocols.

In contrast, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen urged EU member states to keep an open mind about helping ensure freedom of navigation through the strait, even if Europe does not endorse the US‑Israeli military campaign. “We must face the world as it is, not as we want it to be,” Rasmussen said, stressing that any engagement should prioritise de‑escalation.

The United Kingdom reiterated its commitment to working with allies to devise a collective strategy to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restore freedom of navigation, but made clear it would not be drawn into a wider war. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain was coordinating with partners on a plan aimed at securing maritime routes while avoiding expansion of the conflict.

Meanwhile, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas told reporters in Brussels that EU leaders would focus on what member states are willing and able to contribute to efforts aimed at reopening the strait. “Of course, the need to open the Strait of Hormuz is there right now,” she said, noting that the closure — which has propelled oil prices above $100 per barrel — was inadvertently benefiting Russia’s war on Ukraine by boosting Moscow’s energy revenues.

Energy Market Response and IEA Actions

Amid political stalemate and pressure on oil markets, the International Energy Agency said it stands ready to release additional strategic oil reserves if needed, describing the current situation as “the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.”

Last week, the IEA authorised a record release of 400 million barrels of oil to help cushion the immediate impact of the strait’s effective blockade. IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol noted that while recent decline in oil prices showed some relief, the release of reserves is not a lasting solution without assured access through the strait.

“The volume of oil supply offline is already higher than any previous disruption, including the oil crisis of 1973,” Birol said, while confirming that the agency still holds over 1.4 billion barrels in reserve, which could be deployed in future if necessary.

EU, UK Reject Trump’s Call for Military Action to Secure Strait of Hormuz

Israel to Extend Military Strikes on Iran for At Least Three More Weeks

Israel has officially announced plans to continue its military campaign against Iran for at least three more weeks, as its forces sustain strikes on strategic Iranian targets. The announcement comes amid escalating tensions in the Middle East following Iranian drone attacks that temporarily shut Dubai International Airport and hit major oil facilities in the UAE, highlighting the conflict’s wider regional impact.

Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani, spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), confirmed that detailed operational plans have been drawn for the coming weeks, along with contingency strategies extending beyond that timeframe. The campaign is aimed at weakening Iran’s ability to threaten Israel, focusing on ballistic missile systems, nuclear infrastructure, and security apparatus, with thousands of targets reportedly still on the list.

Over 110,000 Israeli reservists have been mobilized to support the operations. The military emphasizes that its objectives are strictly defensive and strategic, targeting only facilities tied to Iran’s military and security network. Shoshani said, “We want to make sure that they are as weak as possible, this regime, and that we degrade all their capabilities, all parts and all wings of their security establishment.”

READ ALSO:

• Tinubu Swears in Taiwo Oyedele as Minister of State for Finance
• Nursery Worker Jailed 24 Years for Raping, Abusing Toddlers
• Court Screens Video Showing NDLEA Allegedly Helping Cocaine Smugglers at Enugu Airport

The conflict’s escalation has had serious repercussions for global energy markets, particularly at the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas passes. The Iranian strikes have disrupted key infrastructure, prompting fears of prolonged supply shortages and rising energy prices worldwide.

This ongoing crisis stems from a joint U.S.–Israel military operation launched on February 28, 2026, in response to Iran’s regional activities, including ballistic missile development and support for proxy groups. Airstrikes have targeted cities including Tehran, Shiraz, and Tabriz, while limited ground operations in southern Lebanon have also been reported, targeting Iran-backed Hezbollah positions.

Iran has retaliated with missile and drone attacks against U.S. and Israeli positions, with civilian infrastructure in Gulf countries affected. International observers warn that unless diplomatic measures are taken, regional instability may worsen, further impacting energy markets and global security.

Global responses remain mixed. The United States and allied nations have urged de-escalation and efforts to secure critical maritime routes. Meanwhile, humanitarian concerns rise as civilian casualties and infrastructure damage continue. Analysts say the ongoing military campaign could have lasting implications for Middle East stability, global energy security, and international relations.

Israel to Extend Military Strikes on Iran for At Least Three More Weeks