UK PM Burnham Duped By Impersonator Of Top Trump Aide

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham exchanged messages with an individual impersonating White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles before becoming suspicious—a major security lapse that prompted the UK embassy in Washington to raise the matter directly with the Trump administration .

Burnham, who took office on July 20, reportedly believed he was communicating with Wiles, one of US President Donald Trump‘s closest advisers and the first woman to serve as White House chief of staff. A person briefed on the matter told Politico that a “few messages” were exchanged before Burnham became suspicious, but insisted they were “of no significance.” Sources said the communication was through text messages only, with no telephone conversation taking place, and the suspicious activity was “quickly reported to the appropriate authorities” once concerns emerged.

READ ALSO:

• Customs Names Importers of 399 Pump-Action Rifles, Hands Over Weapons to NSA Office
• TCN Injects 220MVA Into Lagos Grid, Boosts Power Supply to 134,000 Residents
• Obasanjo Pays Surprise Visit to Adeleke, Tasks Him on Good Governance

International relations expert Professor Anthony Glees of the University of Buckingham suggested the incident was most likely the work of a foreign intelligence service—pointing to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, Russian, or Chinese intelligence as possible culprits. He noted that Wiles was among those targeted by an Iranian cyber espionage unit in 2024. Professor Glees also questioned why Burnham’s security team apparently failed to inform him that Wiles’ phone had been previously hacked, and that any messages purporting to come from her should have been treated with extreme caution. “My guess is that they would be about Burnham’s views on international affairs, particularly perhaps Trump and Netanyahu’s war on Iran, and Putin’s war on Ukraine,” he said. The incident follows an FBI investigation into an attempted hack of Wiles’ personal phone in May 2025. At that time, Wiles told associates her phone had been compromised after an impersonator used her contacts file to message other top US officials. Recipients included US senators, governors, and top business executives. The impersonation was targeted at her personal phone, not her government phone. The FBI director said at the time: “The FBI takes all threats against the President, his staff, and our cybersecurity with the utmost seriousness.”

Burnham, who became prime minister on July 20, has been working to establish a positive relationship with Trump. The pair have held a formal phone call, during which Burnham set out his vision for the UK and discussed UK security matters, the Middle East situation, and the upcoming World Cup. However, in his first major interview as Prime Minister, Burnham stated he would be prepared to call out Trump where necessary to defend Britain’s national interest. A Downing Street spokesperson declined to comment on the security breach, stating: “We do not comment on national security matters.” The White House has also declined to comment publicly. The incident is not the first time a senior British politician has been targeted by an impersonator.

UK PM Burnham Duped By Impersonator Of Top Trump Aide

US Teen Charged With Killing Mother, Brother After ChatGPT Searches

A 17-year-old Massachusetts boy, Arjun Aravind, has been charged with murdering his mother and 14-year-old brother after prosecutors said he used ChatGPT to search for “theoretical ideas or fantasy stories” about killing his family.

The tragic incident occurred on Tuesday, August 11, 2026, at the family’s home on Martha Lane in Acton, an affluent Boston suburb. Aravind, who is on summer break between his junior and senior years of high school, has been ordered held without bail after pleading not guilty to two counts of murder. He was also charged with assault and battery for allegedly using “a dangerous weapon, a Laptop,” to attack the two victims, according to a criminal complaint filed in Concord.

According to a criminal complaint, Aravind used ChatGPT hours before the killings to develop fictional scenarios involving characters murdering their parents. One of the prompts he allegedly typed at 7:53 a.m. on the day of the killings read: “wait when Adrian kills parents I could see him luring one to convo in basement as they have always forced him to do but what excuse would he use to take their phone.” Another prompt reportedly asked: “maybe before killing mom Adrian coldly reveals.” Middlesex County District Attorney Marian Ryan said the teenager had been demonstrating “concerning behavior” involving internet activity and ChatGPT searches related to violence against his family. She described the searches as resembling “Gothic novel kind of stories” – fictional scenarios that investigators believe related directly to threats against his family. “He was engaged in the use of ChatGPT in creating fantasy stories, kind of the gothic novel kind of stories, asking questions, creating characters, asking what about this if this happened to that, and they seem to appear to relate to threats to his family,” Ryan said.

READ ALSO:

• Davido Quietly Removes Tweet Cautioning Adeleke on Supporting Tinubu
• King’s College Concession: Parents Mobilise for Mass Protest as N100bn Takeover Plan Sparks Outrage
• Adeleke withdraws EFCC suit after Tinubu’s intervention

Police were called to the family home shortly after 6:30 p.m. after Aravind’s father, who was at work, requested a welfare check. The father became concerned when a tutor scheduled for a 4 p.m. appointment was unable to get inside and repeated calls to the family went unanswered. Officers who entered the home found Siddharth Aravind dead on the first floor with “massive trauma to the head” lying in a pool of blood. His mother, Sudha Venkatesan, 45, was found in the basement with “heavy trauma” to her head and face, along with a puncture wound to her stomach consistent with an object being used as a weapon. Prosecutors described “obvious signs of a physical and violent struggle” at the home, with both victims suffering blunt-force trauma. Investigators found a heavily damaged, bloodied laptop computer at the scene, which they believe was used during the attack. A bent utensil, possibly a knife with an orange handle, was also recovered. Prosecutors said it was “apparent that blunt force trauma was used on both individuals.”

Court documents indicate that Aravind had been experiencing “behavioral issues” and had been diagnosed with autism. His father had become so concerned about his son’s recent behavior and internet activity that the family had begun hiding knives in the house to prevent him from accessing them. His father also told police that Aravind was prohibited from having a cellphone “due to some prior behavior.” Authorities had previous contact with the family when Aravind was reported missing in 2025, though that incident was treated as a runaway case with no threats of violence. The family had recently moved to Acton partly because of its schools and support system for their children, according to Aravind’s lawyer.

After the killings, Aravind left the home in his mother’s 2014 green Honda Accord. Police located the vehicle at about 3:40 a.m. the following morning in a parking lot about 13 miles away in Wayland, Massachusetts. Aravind was found asleep inside the vehicle and was arrested without incident. Investigators found bedding, a laptop, a cellphone, his mother’s pocketbook, and large quantities of cereal and protein energy bars in the car. According to the complaint, a person whose name was redacted had purchased more than $2,000 worth of cereal and energy bars from a nearby supermarket at about 4 p.m. on the day of the killings, telling an employee the items were for resale. Aravind reportedly used a credit card believed to belong to his mother for the purchase. Aravind’s defense attorney, Debra DeWitt, told reporters that her client “did not even realize they were dead” when he left the house. She has requested a psychological evaluation for the teenager. DeWitt described the situation as tragic, saying the father “just wants help for his son.” Aravind is due back in court on September 11 for a probable cause hearing. OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, has not commented on the allegations. The charges against Aravind remain unproven in court.

US Teen Charged With Killing Mother, Brother After ChatGPT Searches

Iran’s Army Chief Offers $30,000 Reward for Capturing or Killing US Troops 

General Amir Hatami frames bounty as a “popular initiative” as 50,000 US troops remain deployed across the region and CENTCOM commander concludes strategic tour

Iran’s army commander-in-chief has announced a $30,000 reward for any Iranian who kills or captures a United States service member, according to Iranian news agency WANA, marking the latest escalation in the ongoing war of words and bounties between Tehran and Washington. General Amir Hatami said the money would be provided by “the Iranian people,” framing the bounty as a popular rather than a state initiative, in what appears to be a calculated effort to mobilize civilian support against American military personnel while maintaining plausible deniability for the Iranian government. The announcement, which follows a pattern of Iranian bounties targeting US personnel, comes as regional tensions continue to escalate and more than 50,000 American troops remain deployed across the Middle East in support of ongoing operations against Iran.

The latest bounty announcement is part of an escalating war of rewards between the United States and Iran that has intensified throughout 2026. In May, senior lawmaker and National Security Council chairman Ebrahim Azizi said Iran’s parliament was preparing to vote on a bill that would award €50 million to anyone who kills United States President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, or US Central Command commander Admiral Brad Cooper—signaling that the $30,000 figure may represent only the latest in a series of escalating bounty offers. Hatami’s framing of the reward as a “popular initiative” rather than a state program allows Iranian officials to deny that Tehran actively plots assassinations of foreign leaders, even as officials continue making threats against American and Israeli figures. This dual-track approach—public denials alongside escalating rhetoric—has become a hallmark of Iran’s messaging strategy amid the ongoing conflict.

READ ALSO:

• Arsenal thrash Man City 3-0 to win Community Shield
• Ataoja Congratulates Adeleke on Osun Governorship Election Victory
• Tinubu Congratulates Adeleke, Says Osun Victory Affirms Nigeria’s Democratic Progress

The United States has responded in kind with its own bounty programs targeting Iranian leadership. In March 2026, the US State Department’s “Reward for Justice” program issued $10 million bounties** for information on 15 senior Iranian military and political officials, including Iran’s newly appointed Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and nine other senior officials from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Iranian government security, intelligence, and interior departments. The US program offered informants “an opportunity to receive rewards and relocation opportunities,” according to published announcements. Washington has previously imposed sanctions and criminal charges in response to alleged Iranian assassination plots, including a **$20 million reward for information on an IRGC operative accused of plotting to kill former national security adviser John Bolton. President Trump has also previously warned Iran of devastating consequences should any American be harmed.

The latest bounty announcement came as CENTCOM Commander Admiral Brad Cooper wrapped up a 10-day trip to the Middle East on Saturday, visiting six countries and the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier in the Arabian Sea. More than 50,000 US troops are currently deployed across the region in support of ongoing operations against Iran, making them potential targets of the newly announced bounty. The strategic deployment represents a significant American military presence that Iranian officials have repeatedly warned they are prepared to confront. Iranian military advisor Mohsen Rezaei previously warned that Iran is prepared to capture “thousands of US soldiers” if Washington launches a ground offensive, and has discussed setting a $1 billion ransom price for each captive American soldier.

The $30,000 bounty represents a significant sum in Iran, where the average annual income is substantially lower, and analysts suggest the reward structure is designed to create a “people’s army” dynamic where economic necessity could drive civilians to target US military personnel. This strategy complicates conventional military responses and expands the threat landscape beyond formal military engagements, transforming ordinary Iranian citizens into potential combatants motivated by financial reward. For the United States, the bounty creates a difficult security calculus, as American military personnel operating in or near Iranian territory now face the additional threat of potential attacks from Iranian civilians, not just from formal military forces. The United States has not formally responded to the latest announcement, though previous US administrations have demonstrated a willingness to escalate military and economic pressure in response to Iranian threats.

Iran’s Army Chief Offers $30,000 Reward for Capturing or Killing US Troops