International
Trump considering supplying Ukraine with long-range missiles, Vance says
Trump considering supplying Ukraine with long-range missiles, Vance says
The US is considering a request by Ukraine for long-range Tomahawk missiles, US Vice-President JD Vance has said.
However, Vance added President Donald Trump would be making “the final determination” on the matter.
Kyiv has long been calling for its Western partners to provide it with weapons that could hit major Russian cities far from the front line, arguing that they would help Ukraine seriously weaken Russia’s military industry and bring the war to an end.
“If the cost of continuing the war for Moscow is too high, it will be forced to start peace talks,” deputy defence minister Ivan Havryliuk told the BBC.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov played down Vance’s suggestion, saying there was “no panacea that can change the situation on the front for the Kyiv regime.”
“Whether it’s Tomahawks or other missiles, they won’t be able to change the dynamic,” he added.
Tomahawk missiles have a range of 2,500 km (1,500 miles), which would put Moscow within reach for Ukraine.
While Vance remained ambivalent about Ukraine’s request for Tomahawks in his remarks on Sunday, the US special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, seemed to suggest Trump had already authorised strikes deep into Russian territory.
Asked on Fox News whether Washington had allowed Kyiv to carry out long-range strikes within Russia in specific instances, Kellogg said: “The answer is yes, use the ability to hit deep, there are no such things as sanctuaries.”
READ ALSO:
- Why FG cancels Independence Day parade
- Jonathan free to run in 2027, but Nigerians remember his record – Presidency
- FG, Dangote Refinery, PENGASSAN peace talk end in deadlock
Vance and Kellogg’s comments match the US administration’s recent change of tone in regard to the war.
After repeatedly expressing scepticism that Ukraine could continue to hold its own against Russia, last week Trump said Kyiv could “win all of Ukraine back in its original form” – a shift that reportedly even surprised Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky.
Trump is known to have been irritated by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s surface willingness to discuss ending the war versus the reality of Moscow’s persistent bombardments of Ukraine’s cities.
On Sunday, a massive 12-hour strike involving hundreds of drones and nearly 50 missiles left four people dead in Kyiv and at least 70 injured.
Ukraine’s Havryliuk told the BBC Russia was only going to further increase the intensity and severity of its aerial attacks.
To protect its skies from ballistic missiles, Kyiv has asked its Western partners for at least 10 units of Patriot surface-to-air defence systems which can detect and intercept oncoming missiles.
Asked whether the Patriot systems Trump promised over the summer were forthcoming, Havryliuk declined to be drawn into specifics but said there was “some movement in this direction”.
The more drones and missiles are fired by Russia, the harder it is for Ukraine to intercept them.
Earlier this month Moscow fired a record number of more than 800 drones and missiles – the highest since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Inevitably, during such large-scale attacks the interception rate drops.
Out of the hundreds of drones used in Sunday’s attack, 31 managed to hit their targets. According to President Zelensky, the majority were residential buildings and civilian facilities such as a cardiology centre in Kyiv.
As well as being more frequent and intense, aerial attacks are also becoming more dangerous as Moscow is using new and more advanced drones to break through Ukraine’s air defence systems, Havryliuk said.
READ ALSO:
- South Africa’s points deduction not major boost for S’Eagles – Mutiu Adepoju
- Troops foil bandit attacks, recover weapons in Benue
- Saudi Arabia, other Arab and Muslim nations back Trump’s Gaza peace plan
When Iranian-made Shahed drones were used for the first time in 2023, “they were easy to jam using our electronic warfare systems”, he explained.
“Today, they use 16-channel antennas in order to pass through our jamming zones.”
Havryliuk also believes they would be a way for Ukraine to stop Russian drones before they reach EU countries.
“Strengthening our air defence system is an investment into security of the entire Europe,” he said, referring to the recent incursion of Russian drones into Polish airspace.
He added that it would disrupt “Putin’s plans to constantly scare Europe”.
Earlier this year the Trump administration approved a new mechanism which sees European allies purchase US-made weapons for Ukraine. So far, several European countries and Canada have collectively pledged $2bn (£1.5bn).
While some of the weapons bought under the scheme have already arrived in Ukraine, Havryliuk said, the process is slower than before.
Time is a precious commodity in Ukraine, and in the last three and a half years of war Kyiv has developed a thriving defence industry, significantly increasing its production of drones, artillery shells, artillery systems and armoured vehicles.
Ukraine now produces almost 100% of First Person View (FPV) drones it needs and up to 40% of the front line’s demand for other weapons, Havryliuk said.
On Monday Zelensky said Ukraine would continue to focus on domestically produced drones and missiles with long-range capabilities.
But until it can step up production of weapons Kyiv will remain largely dependent on its allies to provide the air defence systems it needs.
Ukraine is hoping that better protection of its cities with air defence systems combined with long-range weapons able to hit Russian targets will help bring Moscow to the negotiating table.
“Only together with our partners can we stop the Russian terror in the sky,” Havryliuk said.
Trump considering supplying Ukraine with long-range missiles, Vance says
International
Iran Threatens US-Linked Universities in Middle East Amid Escalating Tensions
Iran Threatens US-Linked Universities in Middle East Amid Escalating Tensions
March 29, 2026
Iran has issued a stark warning that American-affiliated universities operating in the Middle East could become potential targets, as tensions between Iran and the United States continue to rise.
The threat, attributed to Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), follows allegations that Iranian universities were damaged in recent strikes linked to the ongoing conflict. Iranian officials have not publicly provided detailed evidence of the alleged attacks but have condemned what they describe as violations of sovereignty and international norms.
In statements carried by international media, the IRGC warned that institutions with ties to the United States in the region could be considered “legitimate targets” if hostilities persist. Authorities also advised civilians to avoid such facilities, raising concerns about the safety of students, faculty, and staff across several countries in the Middle East.
While the rhetoric signals a dangerous expansion of potential targets beyond military installations, there has been no widely verified confirmation from major global outlets of a specific ultimatum or deadline tied to the warning. Analysts say the language used reflects an escalation in tone but stops short of confirming imminent attacks.
The development comes amid an increasingly volatile regional environment, with both nations exchanging accusations over recent incidents tied to the broader conflict. Diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions have so far yielded little progress, as global powers call for restraint.
Security experts warn that any attack on educational institutions would mark a significant shift in the conflict, potentially drawing widespread international condemnation and increasing the risk of further escalation.
Governments in the region are said to be reviewing security arrangements around foreign-linked institutions, while universities are reportedly monitoring the situation closely.
As of press time, officials from the United States had not issued a formal response specifically addressing the threat to universities, though Washington has repeatedly condemned attacks on civilian infrastructure and reiterated its commitment to protecting American interests abroad.
Iran Threatens US-Linked Universities in Middle East Amid Escalating Tensions
International
Trump Claims Iran Sent Oil Shipments Amid Backchannel Talks
Trump Claims Iran Sent Oil Shipments Amid Backchannel Talks
U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that Iran dispatched ten oil tankers to the United States as part of indirect negotiations aimed at easing ongoing tensions between the two nations.
According to a report by Sky News on Friday, March 27, 2026, Trump made the assertion while speaking at the Future Investment Initiative in Miami. He suggested that the shipments were a gesture of goodwill, possibly intended as an acknowledgment of ongoing diplomatic engagements.
“It turned out I was right,” Trump said, referring to earlier claims that talks were underway between Washington and Tehran—claims initially denied by Iranian authorities. “They were negotiating, which they admitted two days later.”
Providing further details, Trump stated that Iran had first proposed sending eight oil ships before increasing the number to ten. “They said, ‘we’re going to send you eight ships of oil.’ They actually said, ‘we’re going to add an extra two,’ and they added an extra two,” he said. “So we had ten ships, and then people realized we were actually negotiating.”
Trump also struck a confident tone regarding developments in the Middle East, declaring that the region was “closer than ever” to being free from what he described as Iranian “terror, aggression and nuclear blackmail.”
However, Iranian officials have firmly rejected the claims of formal negotiations. Authorities in Iran insist that no direct talks are taking place with the United States, maintaining that any communication occurs strictly through third-party intermediaries, including Pakistan.
Tehran’s continued denial underscores the sensitive nature of any potential engagement with Washington, particularly amid domestic political pressures and broader regional dynamics.
The contrasting narratives highlight the uncertainty surrounding U.S.-Iran relations, with both sides presenting differing accounts of ongoing diplomatic efforts.
Trump Claims Iran Sent Oil Shipments Amid Backchannel Talks
International
Iranian Strike on Saudi Base Damages US Spy Plane, Injures 12 Troops
Iranian Strike on Saudi Base Damages US Spy Plane, Injures 12 Troops
Tensions in the Middle East have intensified following a major strike by Iranian forces on a United States military installation in Saudi Arabia, leaving several American personnel injured and damaging high-value military assets.
Iran reportedly launched a coordinated attack involving ballistic missiles and drones on the Prince Sultan Air Base on Saturday, targeting U.S. Air Force equipment stationed at the facility.
Initial reports from outlets including Daily Post Nigeria and Fox News indicated that a U.S. E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft—estimated to be worth about $700 million—was destroyed in the strike. The aircraft serves as a critical airborne radar and command center, capable of detecting threats and coordinating air operations over vast distances.
However, more recent and verified accounts suggest that the aircraft, identified as the Boeing E-3 Sentry, was damaged but not confirmed destroyed, raising questions about the accuracy of early claims surrounding the extent of the losses.
In addition to the AWACS aircraft, at least one KC-135 Stratotanker was reportedly struck during the ആക്രമation and caught fire, further compounding the scale of the incident.
U.S. officials confirmed that 12 American service members were injured in the attack. According to Fox News, two of the wounded personnel were listed in serious condition, while the remaining casualties sustained lighter injuries.
Military analysts note that the strike demonstrates Iran’s growing capability to conduct coordinated long-range attacks using a combination of drones and precision-guided missiles, posing a significant threat to U.S. assets in the region.
The latest escalation comes amid an ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran, which has persisted for approximately one month. The war has already led to significant casualties and heightened geopolitical tensions across the Middle East, particularly following reports of high-profile killings involving senior Iranian figures.
As of press time, there has been no official confirmation from the U.S. Department of Defense regarding the total extent of damage to the aircraft or whether any assets were completely destroyed.
Security experts warn that the attack could trigger further retaliation, raising fears of a broader regional confrontation involving key global powers and strategic allies in the Gulf.
Iranian Strike on Saudi Base Damages US Spy Plane, Injures 12 Troops
-
metro2 days agoTragedy in Aramoko: Trailer Rams Residential Building, Kills 300‑Level Student
-
News2 days agoFinal Notice: FG Orders Civil Servants to Complete PASGA Verification by March 31
-
metro3 days agoEl-Rufai’s Mother, Hajiya Umma, Dies Amid Son’s Legal Battle
-
Entertainment2 days agoNollywood Actress Declares Love for Ibrahim Chatta, Offers to Pay Her Own Dowry
-
Entertainment3 days agoGospel Singer Onos Brisibi Dies at 55 After Prolonged Illness
-
metro3 days agoReport Reveals Late Herbert Wigwe Owned 106 Prime London Properties
-
Entertainment2 days agoStreamer Peller Escorted Out of Alake of Egbaland’s Palace in Abeokuta
-
International2 days agoIranian Missiles, Drones Strike US Air Base in Saudi Arabia


