Politics
Jonathan constitutionally eligible to contest in 2027, Onoh replies Onanuga
Jonathan constitutionally eligible to contest in 2027, Onoh replies Onanuga
President Bola Tinubu’s former southeast spokesman Denge Josef Onoh, has confirmed that former President Goodluck Jonathan is constitutionally qualified to run for Nigeria’s presidency in the 2027 election.
Onoh’s remark came after Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, cautioned on Monday that Jonathan’s eligibility for the 2027 fight could be resolved by the court.
However, Onoh disagreed with Onanuga, telling him that the subject had previously been settled in Jonathan’s favor and could not be revisited except for a wild legal pursuit trip.
Onoh stated that it is up to Nigerians to determine who leads them and that President Bola Tinubu’s administration will not infringe on any opponents’ right to contest.
Onoh, speaking to journalists in Yenegoa, Bayelsa State, on Tuesday after receiving a certified true copy of the judgment, stated that Jonathan’s eligibility under constitutional term limits is already a settled legal precedent established by unchallenged judicial rulings that confirmed Jonathan’s eligibility to contest future elections.
“Therefore, President Tinubu should not be deceived by anyone telling him otherwise. This was exactly how Jonathan’s inner cabal during the buildup to the 2015 elections deceived him into believing that he was invisible and that Nigerians loved him, to the extent that he was so carried away that he felt invisible and never saw Tinubu coming.
“Tinubu was the invisible magician that cast the spell that led to Jonathan’s loss at the polls. The president should not fall in the same trap by the voices that surround him now. The one major sincere voice he should listen to is his wife; many will betray him in the coming months,” said Onoh.
READ ALSO:
- Sacked workers: FG, PENGASSAN, Dangote finally reach agreement
- ‘We’re racing against time’: Full text of President Tinubu’s independence anniversary speech
- Nigeria easy to govern with honest leadership, says Obasanjo
Onoh further noted that in May 2022, a binding and unappealed judgment of the Federal High Court in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State (Suit No. FHC/YNG/CS/86/2022) issued a final finding in a lawsuit brought by APC members Andy Solomon and Ibidiye Abraham against Jonathan, the APC, and the INEC.
Justice Isa H. Dashen ruled that Goodluck Jonathan is constitutionally able to run for the presidency of Nigeria again.
The court reasoned that Jonathan’s assumption of office on May 6, 2010, following the death of President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, was not an election under Section 137(1)(b) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), but rather a succession to complete Yar’Adua’s unexpired term, invoking the doctrine of necessity and not counting against the two-term limit for elected mandates.
Onoh stated that Jonathan was elected only once, in the 2011 presidential election, and fulfilled a complete four-year term until 2015; his 2015 candidacy was a legal reelection attempt, although he was defeated at the polls, but he did not exhaust his constitutional allowance.
“The 2018 constitutional amendment (via the Fourth Alteration Act), which added Section 137(3) to bar anyone sworn in twice from further contests, does not apply retroactively to Jonathan. The amendment postdated his tenures (2010–2015). It cannot retroactively disqualify rights accrued under the pre-amendment framework.”
Onoh stated that ex-post facto laws are not permitted in Nigeria’s constitutional democracy, a principle supported by precedents such as the Court of Appeal’s 2015 ruling in Cyriacus Njoku v. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan (2015) LPELR-24496(CA), which similarly excluded his 2010 oath from term-counting calculations.
Despite the 90-day window provided by the Constitution and applicable election legislation, Onoh said that neither the plaintiffs nor any other party appealed the 2022 verdict. Over three years later (as of September 2025), the verdict remains final and binding under the doctrine of res judicata, preventing relitigation of the same problems between the same parties.
READ ALSO:
- Lagos opens recruitment portal for teaching job
- Mandy Kiss unveiled as ambassador for Lagos anti-drug campaign
- Atiku, El-Rufai, Ayu, others visit Olubadan days after missing coronation
“Hence, I urge Mr. President not to listen to anyone who comes to spin him with legal possibilities of Jonathan’s eligibility because Nigerian jurisprudence, including Supreme Court decisions like Marwa v. Nyako (2012) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1296) 200, upholds such precedents to ensure legal certainty and prevent endless challenges to settled rights.
“With due respect to Mr. Onanuga, his invocation of future court scrutiny, while respectful of judicial authority, ignores this finality due to the statute of limitations and finality; hence, any hypothetical challenger today would face dismissal for delay, as the core facts (Jonathan’s oaths and elections) are historical and were adjudicated in 2022.”
Onoh stated that the Supreme Court has frequently rejected “stale” cases that could have been appealed sooner (e.g., A.G. Federation v. A.G. Abia State (2001) 11 NWLR (Pt. 725) 689).
He also highlighted a 2013 Federal High Court verdict (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/231/2013, Justice Mudashiru Oniyangi) that cleared Jonathan to run in 2015 and was not appealed, which served as the foundation for the 2022 decision.
“This chain of unassailed judgments creates an impregnable legal shield. So, in my opinion, eligibility is a settled constitutional right, not open to political conjecture. I’m aware many critics in the past have framed opposition as a “risk” for parties fielding him, acknowledging the unresolved tension with the 2018 amendment, but the 2022 ruling resolves it in Jonathan’s favor.
“In essence, the matter is not pending a “jury” (or judiciary) trial; it was conclusively decided. Suggesting otherwise risks undermining judicial authority by implying courts must revisit final verdicts at political whim, eroding the stability essential to Nigeria’s electoral process.
“I owe Mr. President the truth before he’s betrayed again by politicians waving successful statistics around him without any knowledge of how Nigerians truly perceive your administration, which isn’t encouraging at the moment, but it’s within your powers to change the narratives to your favor.
“To honor the rule of law, if Jonathan enters the 2027 race, I advise President Tinubu to engage on visions for economic revival, security, and unity. This elevates the conversation, respecting Jonathan’s cleared path while focusing on voters’ priorities. Nigeria’s democracy thrives when legal finality frees space for ideas, not recycled litigation,” Onoh said.
Jonathan constitutionally eligible to contest in 2027, Onoh replies Onanuga
![]()
Politics
Ogun 2027: Group Rejects Yayi’s Governorship Bid, Endorses Adebutu
Ogun 2027: Group Rejects Yayi’s Governorship Bid, Endorses Adebutu
A political pressure group, Ogun West Concerned Stakeholders’ Conference, has rejected the governorship ambition of Senator Solomon Olamilekan Adeola (Yayi) ahead of the 2027 Ogun State governorship election, arguing that only aspirants with verifiable local roots and a longstanding commitment to the region should represent Ogun West.
The group, however, threw its weight behind the governorship aspiration of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) chieftain, Hon. Oladipupo Adebutu, describing him as a true son of Ogun State whose ancestry and political journey are closely tied to the state.
Addressing journalists in Ilaro on Thursday, the group’s spokesperson, Hakeem Adetunji, said the organisation, which he claimed has about 5,000 members across Ogun West, was compelled to respond to what it described as attempts to portray opponents of Senator Adeola’s ambition as enemies of the district.
According to Adetunji, the group’s opposition to Adeola is rooted in his alleged lack of historical involvement in the political struggles of Ogun West and what it described as his failure to support previous governorship aspirations from the senatorial district.

Ogun West Concerned Stakeholders’ Conference
“We are here to rewrite our story because, over time, people have called us bastards simply because we do not support Senator Olamilekan Adeola’s governorship ambition,” he said.
He argued that during the 2011 governorship election involving the late General Adetunji Olurin and the 2015 election in which Gboyega Isiaka (GNI) contested, Senator Adeola was not part of the political movement for Ogun West.
Adetunji further alleged that in 2019, Adeola worked against the region’s governorship interest and repeated the same pattern in 2023 by opposing the candidacy of Biyi Otegbeye, who emerged as the sole governorship candidate from Ogun West.
READ ALSO:
- Adeyemi Insists Gbajabiamila Approved His Appointment as Court Case Begins
- UK Plans £10,000 Repayment Rule for Asylum Seekers Before Permanent Settlement
- US Withdraws Majority of Troops from Nigeria After Counterterrorism Mission
According to him, the senator allegedly deployed his political influence, resources and network to frustrate Otegbeye’s ambition in pursuit of his own governorship aspiration.
He maintained that the issue extends beyond politics, insisting that Ogun West deserves a candidate who shares the history, identity and aspirations of its people.
“Today, some people expect us to forget where we are coming from and abandon our history. We cannot do that. Senator Adeola does not share our historical background or political journey. That is why some of us cannot align with his governorship ambition,” Adetunji stated.
The group consequently endorsed Hon. Oladipupo Adebutu, saying his family roots and connection with Ogun State make him a more suitable choice to lead the state.
“Some of us have identified with the aspiration of Honourable Oladipupo Adebutu because we see him as one of us,” he added.
Another member of the conference, Adeshola Hakeem, also questioned Senator Adeola’s claim to Ogun West, alleging that the lawmaker only identified with the district after relocating his political interest from Lagos State.
He argued that governorship representation should not be determined solely by political popularity but also by genuine community identity, historical contribution and consistent grassroots engagement.
The group’s position comes amid heightened political activities ahead of the 2027 governorship election, with Ogun West intensifying its longstanding campaign to produce the state’s next governor.
However, Kayode Odunaro, media adviser to Senator Adeola, dismissed the allegations, describing the conference as a faceless group pursuing a political agenda.
Odunaro maintained that the senator’s indigeneship is well established and no longer a matter for public debate, insisting that Adeola remains qualified to contest the governorship election under Nigeria’s constitutional provisions.
The latest criticism follows Governor Dapo Abiodun’s endorsement of Senator Adeola as the All Progressives Congress (APC) consensus governorship candidate for Ogun West after consultations with party leaders across the senatorial district.
Governor Abiodun had said the decision was aimed at ensuring Ogun West, which has never produced a democratically elected governor since the state’s creation in 1976, finally gets the opportunity to occupy the state’s highest political office.
As political alignments continue ahead of the 2027 election, debates over indigeneship, zoning, political loyalty and regional equity are expected to remain central issues in Ogun State’s governorship race.
Ogun 2027: Group Rejects Yayi’s Governorship Bid, Endorses Adebutu
![]()
Politics
Court Affirms David Mark-Led ADC Leadership, Dismisses Abejide’s Suit
Court Affirms David Mark-Led ADC Leadership, Dismisses Abejide’s Suit
The Federal High Court in Abuja has affirmed the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) under former Senate President David Mark, dismissing a suit that sought to nullify the appointments of Mark and former Osun State Governor, Rauf Aregbesola, as the party’s National Chairman and National Secretary, respectively.
In a judgment delivered on Thursday, Justice Musa Liman held that the suit filed by Leke Abejide, the lawmaker representing Yagba Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, lacked merit and was not justiciable because it bordered on the internal affairs of a political party. The court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to interfere in such matters except where there is a clear breach of the law or violation of a member’s legal rights.
Justice Liman upheld the preliminary objections raised by the ADC, its former National Chairman, Chief Ralph Nwosu, David Mark and Aregbesola, effectively dismissing Abejide’s claims.
The judge held that the plaintiff failed to establish that any of his legal rights had been infringed by the emergence of the current party leadership. He also ruled that Abejide did not exhaust the party’s internal dispute resolution mechanisms before instituting the suit, a requirement under the ADC Constitution and established legal principles governing disputes within political parties.
On the substantive issues, the court ruled that the transition of leadership from Ralph Nwosu to David Mark did not violate either the ADC Constitution or the Electoral Act, 2026.
Justice Liman explained that the July 2, 2025, gathering at the Shehu Musa Yar’Adua Centre in Abuja was merely a stakeholders’ meeting where Nwosu announced his intention to hand over the party’s leadership. According to the court, the formal emergence of David Mark and Aregbesola occurred during the National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting held on July 29, 2025, which was monitored by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The court held that the process complied with the party’s constitution and all applicable electoral laws.
READ ALSO:
- FG Explains Why NYSC Khaki Will Be Replaced With Adire Fabric
- Alleged Coup Plot: DSS Arraigns Five Over Concealment of Ex-Gov Timipre Sylva
- MURIC Commends NSCIA Over Appointment of Abbas Jimoh as Spokesperson
Justice Liman consequently declared that David Mark’s emergence as National Chairman and Aregbesola’s appointment as National Secretary were valid and lawful.
The court also imposed financial penalties on the plaintiff and his counsel. Abejide was ordered to pay ₦2 million in costs to each of the defendants, while his lawyer was directed to pay ₦10 million in costs pursuant to the provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026.
Abejide had instituted the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1637/2025, seeking to invalidate the leadership transition within the ADC. He argued that Nwosu’s handover of the party’s leadership to Mark and Aregbesola was unlawful and asked the court to nullify the process.
He also sought perpetual injunctions restraining David Mark and Aregbesola from presenting themselves as the party’s National Chairman and National Secretary and asked the court to prevent INEC from recognising them, alleging that their emergence failed to comply with the Electoral Act.
However, Justice Liman rejected all the reliefs sought by the plaintiff and affirmed the legality of the leadership change, leaving the David Mark-led National Working Committee firmly in charge of the party.
The judgment is regarded as a significant legal victory for the ADC leadership as the opposition party continues preparations for the 2027 general elections. It also comes weeks after INEC reinstated David Mark and other members of the party’s National Working Committee on its official portal following a Supreme Court decision that set aside an earlier Court of Appeal order affecting the party’s leadership recognition. Despite Thursday’s ruling, other suits challenging the ADC leadership remain pending before the courts.
Court Affirms David Mark-Led ADC Leadership, Dismisses Abejide’s Suit
![]()
Politics
2027: Atiku Names Kenneth Okonkwo New Spokesperson
2027: Atiku Names Kenneth Okonkwo New Spokesperson
Former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate for the 2027 presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, has appointed actor-turned-politician and lawyer Kenneth Okonkwo as his official spokesperson, in a move seen as strengthening the party’s communication strategy ahead of the next general election.
Okonkwo announced his appointment in a statement shared on his verified X account on Thursday, expressing gratitude to Atiku for the confidence reposed in him and pledging to discharge the responsibility with wisdom and dedication.
“I give God all the glory for being appointed by His Excellency Atiku Abubakar as his spokesperson. I thank His Excellency for the immense confidence reposed in me,” Okonkwo said.
The former Labour Party presidential campaign spokesperson described the appointment as evidence of Atiku’s leadership style, saying the former vice president prefers dialogue, consultation and compromise whenever disagreements arise within the party.
“Rather than take offence at associates for expressing genuine reservations about any action taken, His Excellency always opts for dialogue and compromise that engender solutions to problems,” he stated.
According to Okonkwo, his concerns over the political interests of the South-East were addressed during discussions with Atiku and other leaders of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
He explained that the consultations provided assurances that the interests of the South-East would be protected within the framework of the Electoral Act, 2026, and the prevailing political realities.
READ ALSO:
- NYSC Deployments to Insecure States Will Be Based on Risk Assessment — Tinubu
- Court Admits Diezani’s UK Acquittal as Evidence in Asset Forfeiture Suit Against EFCC
- Former Minister Uche Nnaji Arrested Over Alleged Certificate Forgery
“At a dialogue with His Excellency and other well-meaning members of the African Democratic Congress, the interests of the South-East were discussed and guaranteed within the existing challenges posed by the Electoral Act, 2026, and the realities on the ground,” he added.
Okonkwo also acknowledged the contributions of Dr. Kashim Imam, former ADC National Chairman Ralphs Nwosu, and Atiku’s Senior Special Assistant on Special Duties, Dr. Ekene Onwuka, for their roles in promoting reconciliation and strengthening the party ahead of the 2027 general election.
He further thanked his family, supporters and friends for their encouragement and prayers.
“I still covet your prayers for wisdom, courage, provision and protection needed to carry out this challenging responsibility, which will usher in a glorious and great Nigeria,” he said.
The appointment comes weeks after Okonkwo openly criticised the ADC’s vice-presidential selection process.
He had argued that choosing a running mate from the South-South would further deepen what he described as the political marginalisation of the South-East, the only geopolitical zone yet to produce either a President or Vice President since Nigeria’s return to democratic rule in 1999.
Despite his reservations, the ADC later announced former Rivers State Governor and former Minister of Transportation Rotimi Amaechi as Atiku’s running mate after the former vice president secured the party’s presidential ticket.
Okonkwo’s acceptance of the spokesperson role suggests that consultations within the party have helped bridge earlier differences over the composition of the presidential ticket.
A lawyer, actor and seasoned political communicator, Okonkwo previously served as a spokesperson for the Labour Party presidential campaign and has remained an influential voice in Nigeria’s opposition politics. His appointment is expected to bolster Atiku’s public engagement and media outreach as preparations for the 2027 presidential election gather momentum.
2027: Atiku Names Kenneth Okonkwo New Spokesperson
![]()
-
News2 days agoFG Explains Why NYSC Khaki Will Be Replaced With Adire Fabric
-
metro14 hours agoInside the Fake Agency Scandal: Staff Detail How Adeyemi’s ‘Presidential Council’ Operated Without Work or Direction
-
Entertainment1 day agoBaba Ijesha Receives Chieftaincy Title, Brand-New Car from Ooni of Ife
-
Education1 day agoAppeal Court Verdict: UI International School to Enforce Hijab Ban from Monday
-
Education1 day agoAppeal Court Overturns Hijab Verdict, Declares UI International School Can Enforce Dress Code
-
metro1 day agoISI Muslim Parents Reject Appeal Court Verdict, Head to Supreme Court Over Hijab Ban
-
metro2 days agoCourt of Appeal to Deliver Judgment Friday in UI-ISI Hijab Case
-
metro1 day agoDocuments Expose How Disputed Presidential Council Secured Approval to Recruit 300 Staff
