Russia, China Lead Global Calls for U.S. to Free Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Russia, China Lead Global Calls for U.S. to Free Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro

Published

on

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro

Russia, China Lead Global Calls for U.S. to Free Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro

Venezuela, Russia, China and lawmakers in the United Kingdom have intensified calls on the United States to release Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, following their capture during a controversial U.S. military operation at the weekend.

At an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council in New York on Monday, Russia and China, both permanent members of the council, strongly condemned the U.S. attack on Venezuela, describing it as a grave violation of international law and the UN Charter.

Russia warned that Washington’s action signalled a dangerous return to what it called an era of “lawlessness and domination by force,” accusing the U.S. of acting as a self-appointed global judge driven by political and economic interests. Moscow cautioned that silence by the Security Council would further erode the international order.

China echoed the criticism, stating that “no country can act as the world’s police”, and stressing that military force was not a solution to political disputes. Beijing warned that the arbitrary use of force would only deepen global instability.

READ ALSO:

Cuba, Iran, Colombia and the Non-Aligned Movement also denounced the U.S. action, describing Maduro’s arrest as a “kidnapping” and insisting that the immunity of a sitting head of state had been violated. They warned that the incident could set a dangerous precedent for global diplomacy.

However, divisions emerged within the Security Council. The United Kingdom, EU-aligned states, Panama and Chile said they did not recognise Maduro as Venezuela’s legitimate president, while also questioning the legality of the U.S. military action. They jointly called for a peaceful, Venezuelan-led transition to democracy.

In London, hundreds of protesters gathered outside Downing Street, chanting “Free Maduro” and urging Prime Minister Keir Starmer to challenge U.S. President Donald Trump over the operation. Several UK lawmakers, including Jeremy Corbyn and Richard Burgon, addressed the rally, as pressure mounted on the Labour government to condemn the U.S. action.

The United States has defended the operation, describing it as a “surgical law-enforcement action” against a “narco-terrorist” it does not recognise as Venezuela’s legitimate leader. U.S. officials said Maduro and Flores were flown to the United States, where they now face drug-related charges.

On Monday, Maduro and his wife pleaded not guilty during their initial court appearance in New York.

The special Security Council session was convened at the request of the Venezuelan government, with the backing of Russia and China, who argued that the U.S. action threatens peace in Latin America and beyond. The council remains deeply divided, with its five permanent members — Russia, China, the United States, France and the UK — holding veto power over any resolution.

Russia, China Lead Global Calls for U.S. to Free Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro

International

Pope Leo XIV Rejects Trump Criticism, Says “I Am Not Afraid of the US President”

Published

on

US President Donald Trump and Pope Leo XIV
US President Donald Trump and Pope Leo XIV

Pope Leo XIV Rejects Trump Criticism, Says “I Am Not Afraid of the US President”

Pope Leo XIV has pushed back against criticism from U.S. President Donald Trump, insisting he will not be intimidated and reaffirming his global calls for peace amid rising international tensions.

The pontiff made the remarks on Monday while speaking to journalists aboard a papal aircraft en route to Algiers, the first stop on his Africa diplomatic tour, where he is expected to hold meetings focused on interfaith dialogue, migration, and conflict resolution across the continent.

Responding to Trump’s recent comments, Pope Leo said his appeals for peace were not political attacks but part of his spiritual mission.

“The things I say are not meant as attacks on anyone,” he said. “I am not a politician. I am inviting all people to look for ways of building bridges of peace and reconciliation, of looking for ways to avoid war any time that’s possible.”

He added firmly: “I am not afraid of the Trump administration.”

The comments come after Trump, speaking on his Truth Social platform, criticised the Pope’s foreign policy stance, accusing him of being overly critical of U.S. positions on global security issues. Trump also suggested that Leo’s election as pope was influenced by expectations that a U.S.-born pontiff would handle relations with him more effectively.

READ ALSO:

“If I wasn’t in the White House, Leo would not be in the Vatican,” Trump wrote, also arguing that he does not support any global leadership approach that would tolerate Iran acquiring nuclear weapons.

During the in-flight press briefing, Pope Leo reaffirmed that his role is guided by the teachings of the Gospel, not political alignment.

“The message of the Gospel is very clear: ‘Blessed are the peacemakers,’” he said. “I will not shy away from announcing the message of the Gospel.”

He rejected attempts to frame his remarks as political confrontation with the U.S. administration, stressing that the Church’s mission is centered on peacebuilding, reconciliation, and humanitarian concerns.

“To put my message on the same plane as what the president has attempted to do here is not understanding what the message of the Gospel is,” he added. “I am sorry to hear that, but I will continue with what I believe is the mission of the Church in the world today.”

The exchange has drawn global attention, highlighting growing tensions between religious leadership and political rhetoric amid ongoing conflicts in several regions worldwide. Vatican officials have not issued any additional statement beyond the Pope’s in-flight remarks, while the White House has also not released an official response.

The Pope’s Africa visit is expected to continue with engagements focused on peace advocacy, religious cooperation, and discussions on global stability.

Pope Leo XIV Rejects Trump Criticism, Says “I Am Not Afraid of the US President”

Continue Reading

International

Trump Claims 158 Iranian Ships Destroyed as US Enforces Naval Blockade in Gulf Region

Published

on

US President Donald Trump
US President Donald Trump

Trump Claims 158 Iranian Ships Destroyed as US Enforces Naval Blockade in Gulf Region

U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that Iran’s naval forces have been “completely obliterated,” alleging that 158 Iranian naval vessels have been destroyed, while issuing a fresh warning that any remaining ships approaching the U.S.-enforced blockade will be “immediately eliminated.”

Trump made the remarks in a post on Truth Social, where he stated that Iran’s navy had been “laid at the bottom of the sea,” adding that only a small number of fast-attack boats remain operational. He warned that any such vessels nearing the blockade zone would face an “immediate” and decisive military response.

The statement comes as the United States begins full enforcement of a naval blockade on Iran, confirmed by the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), covering key maritime zones including the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and approaches to the Strait of Hormuz.

According to CENTCOM, the operation—activated at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time—is aimed at restricting all maritime traffic in and out of Iranian ports and coastal waters. Officials said the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on Tehran over its nuclear programme and regional activities.

READ ALSO:

The U.S. military further stated that the blockade applies to all vessels attempting to access Iranian ports regardless of nationality, while allowing monitored passage through international shipping lanes such as the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategic oil routes.

The escalation reportedly follows the collapse of weekend diplomatic negotiations held in Pakistan, where U.S. and Iranian representatives failed to reach a de-escalation agreement.

Trump’s latest comments combined updated claims of Iranian naval losses with a renewed warning that any surviving fast-attack craft would be “immediately eliminated” if they challenge U.S. forces enforcing the blockade.

Global oil markets reacted sharply to the developments, with reports indicating that crude prices surged above $100 per barrel amid fears of disruption to global energy supplies passing through the Middle East.

The Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly 20% of global oil trade flows, remains the central flashpoint in the crisis, with analysts warning that any sustained disruption could trigger a wider global energy shock.

Iran has not yet issued an official response to the blockade or Trump’s latest claims. However, Iranian authorities have previously warned that any attempt to restrict its maritime access would be considered a violation of sovereignty and could provoke retaliation.

International observers have expressed concern over the rapid escalation, warning that heightened naval deployments by both sides could increase the risk of direct confrontation in the Gulf region.

Military activity in the area remains ongoing, and officials say the situation is still evolving with further developments expected.

Trump Claims 158 Iranian Ships Destroyed as US Enforces Naval Blockade in Gulf Region

Continue Reading

International

Judge Dismisses Trump’s $10bn Defamation Suit Against WSJ Over Epstein Report

Published

on

Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein

Judge Dismisses Trump’s $10bn Defamation Suit Against WSJ Over Epstein Report

A U.S. federal judge has dismissed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit filed by Donald Trump against The Wall Street Journal, its parent company Dow Jones, and media executive Rupert Murdoch, ruling that the president failed to meet the strict legal threshold required for public figures to prove defamation.

Delivering the ruling in Miami, U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles dismissed the case without prejudice, giving Trump’s legal team until April 27 to file an amended complaint if they choose to continue the legal battle.

The lawsuit, filed in 2025, stemmed from a report by The Wall Street Journal linking Trump to late financier Jeffrey Epstein. The article referenced a “bawdy” birthday message allegedly bearing Trump’s name, which was included in a commemorative album compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday in the early 2000s.

Trump’s lawyers argued that the report was false, defamatory, and caused significant reputational and financial damage. The suit named Dow Jones, Murdoch, and two reporters involved in the publication, accusing them of acting with malice.

READ ALSO:

However, in his ruling, Judge Gayles held that Trump did not sufficiently demonstrate “actual malice”—a key legal standard in U.S. defamation law requiring public figures to prove that a statement was published either with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.

“Because President Trump has not plausibly alleged that Defendants published the Article with actual malice, both counts must be dismissed,” the judge wrote.

Court filings and legal analysis indicate that the newspaper had taken standard journalistic steps before publication, including seeking comment from Trump and incorporating his denial into the story—factors that weighed against claims of reckless or malicious intent.

In response to the ruling, The Wall Street Journal welcomed the court’s decision, maintaining that its reporting met established editorial and legal standards.

The dismissal marks another chapter in Trump’s ongoing legal confrontations with major media organisations over coverage of his past associations, particularly those connected to Epstein. The original report was published in July 2025, shortly after U.S. lawmakers released documents related to Epstein’s network and contacts.

Legal experts say the ruling reinforces the high bar for defamation claims involving public figures in the United States, where courts consistently require clear evidence of intentional wrongdoing or reckless journalism.

Although the case has been dismissed, Trump retains the option to amend and refile his complaint, leaving open the possibility of further legal proceedings.

Judge Dismisses Trump’s $10bn Defamation Suit Against WSJ Over Epstein Report

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending