International

Outrage as Israeli Settlers Torch Mosque, Burn Vehicle in Occupied West Bank

Published

28 seconds ago

October 14, 2026

Outrage as Israeli Settlers Torch Mosque, Burn Vehicle in Occupied West Bank

Israeli settlers have reportedly set fire to a mosque, a vehicle and an olive tree in a Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank, in an attack that has renewed concerns about violence against Palestinian communities and religious sites.

The incident occurred in the early hours of Wednesday, October 14, 2026, when a group of settlers raided Mikhmas, also spelt Mukhmas, northeast of occupied Jerusalem.

According to the Palestinian news agency WAFA, the Jerusalem Governorate reported that dozens of settlers entered the village shortly after midnight and set fire to a mosque and a nearby olive tree. A vehicle was also completely burned during the attack.

Reports from the scene showed damage to the mosque’s entrance. No injuries were reported in the initial accounts of the incident.

Mohammed Kanaan, a member of Mikhmas’ municipal council, told Anadolu Agency that the attackers set fire to a prayer room and a vehicle at about 2 a.m. local time. He said residents alerted the relevant authorities and requested the intervention of firefighting crews.

Reports also indicated that nationalist and racist slogans were spray-painted on the mosque and other buildings in the village. The extent of the damage and whether anyone had been arrested in connection with the attack were not immediately clear.

READ ALSO:

The attack adds to continuing concerns over Israeli settler violence in the occupied West Bank, where Palestinian residents have reported assaults, intimidation, property destruction and attacks on farmland.

The incident is particularly sensitive because it involved a Muslim place of worship. Religious sites and civilian property are protected under international humanitarian law, and deliberate attacks against them raise serious legal concerns.

The latest incident also comes amid the annual olive harvest, an important source of income for many Palestinian farming families. The Palestinian Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission said on Monday that it had documented 136 attacks linked to the olive harvest since the beginning of October. The reported incidents included beatings, intimidation, gunfire, theft of olives and farming equipment, and damage to trees.

The burning of the mosque in Mikhmas follows other reported arson attacks on mosques in the West Bank in recent months. In July, two mosques in the Palestinian villages of Qusra and Kour were set on fire following deadly clashes in the territory.

Reuters reported at the time that the Israeli military had confirmed evidence of arson and graffiti at the affected mosque sites and condemned attacks on religious places. The incidents prompted renewed calls for measures to prevent further attacks and hold those responsible accountable.

The wider situation in the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territory remains tense, with attacks by settlers and Israeli military operations contributing to insecurity for residents. Palestinian officials have repeatedly called for stronger protection of communities and accountability for attacks on civilians and their property.

The circumstances surrounding Wednesday’s mosque attack remain under investigation, and it was not immediately clear whether Israeli authorities had announced arrests or opened a formal inquiry.

The incident has once again highlighted concerns over the safety of Palestinian religious sites, homes and agricultural land, as calls grow for effective action against violence in the occupied West Bank.

Outrage as Israeli Settlers Torch Mosque, Burn Vehicle in Occupied West Bank

Related Topics:Israeli settlers mosque West Bank

Don't Miss

Press Freedom: Judge Blocks Trump’s Ban on Three Major US Media Outlets

International

Press Freedom: Judge Blocks Trump’s Ban on Three Major US Media Outlets

Published

31 minutes ago

October 14, 2026

Trends Admin

US President Donald Trump

Press Freedom: Judge Blocks Trump’s Ban on Three Major US Media Outlets

A federal judge in the United States has blocked President Donald Trump’s attempt to bar journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico from accessing the White House, ruling that the news organisations are likely to succeed in their legal challenge against the administration.

US District Judge Timothy Kelly, who was appointed by Trump during his first presidential term, issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday, October 13, extending protections that allow reporters from the three media organisations to cover the president and his administration while the lawsuit continues.

The ruling found that the administration’s decision to revoke the journalists’ White House press credentials likely violated their constitutional rights to freedom of the press, free speech and due process.

The decision extends an earlier temporary court order issued on September 24, which required the administration to restore the reporters’ access after the media organisations challenged the ban.

Trump announced the ban on September 18, accusing the three outlets of publishing what he described as false and unfair reports about him and his administration. Journalists who attempted to enter the White House the following day were reportedly turned away, with their press credentials revoked.

CNN, MS NOW and Politico subsequently filed a lawsuit, arguing that the administration had targeted them because of their reporting and had unlawfully restricted their ability to cover the government.

The organisations maintained that the decision amounted to unconstitutional retaliation against journalists whose coverage displeased the president.

In his ruling, Kelly said the plaintiffs were likely to succeed not only on their due-process claim but also on their two First Amendment claims. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the press, while the Fifth Amendment provides due-process protections against arbitrary government action.

READ ALSO:

The judge also expressed concern that revoking the journalists’ credentials could discourage reporters and news organisations from publishing stories critical of the president.

Kelly noted that Trump’s public comments suggested the ban was intended, at least in part, to influence how the affected organisations reported on him.

The judge also questioned the administration’s reliance on national security as a justification for the restrictions, finding that the evidence presented did not adequately establish that security concerns motivated the president’s initial decision.

The White House had argued that reports published by the three organisations raised concerns about accuracy, professionalism and the disclosure of sensitive information. Government lawyers cited specific articles they said contained falsehoods or raised national security concerns.

However, the judge found that the administration had not sufficiently demonstrated that the initial revocation of the journalists’ credentials was based on national security grounds. He also raised concerns about the lack of advance notice before the journalists lost access.

The court’s decision does not amount to a final judgment on the entire lawsuit. Instead, the preliminary injunction preserves the journalists’ access while the case proceeds, unless an appellate court intervenes.

The ruling represents a setback for the administration’s effort to restrict access for the three news organisations. It also highlights the constitutional limits on the government’s ability to penalise media outlets over their editorial coverage.

The case has drawn wider attention to the relationship between the Trump administration and the US news media, particularly questions about whether government officials can restrict journalists’ access to official premises in response to unfavourable reporting.

Although presidents and news organisations have frequently clashed over coverage, the lawsuit raises a specific legal question: whether the government can revoke established press access because it objects to the content or viewpoint of a news organisation’s reporting.

Lawyers representing CNN, MS NOW and Politico welcomed the decision, arguing that the administration’s actions violated constitutional protections and threatened independent journalism.

The lawsuit will now continue as the parties pursue their respective legal arguments. The preliminary injunction allows the affected journalists to maintain White House access during that process, subject to any further court orders.

Press Freedom: Judge Blocks Trump’s Ban on Three Major US Media Outlets

International

French Students Return to Streets as Anger Over School Conditions Grows

Published

1 day ago

October 13, 2026

Trends Admin

French Students Return to Streets as Anger Over School Conditions Grows

Students across France are preparing for fresh nationwide demonstrations on Tuesday, October 13, as growing frustration over poor school conditions, teacher shortages and inadequate education resources continues to fuel unrest.

The planned protests come after weeks of demonstrations, school blockades and confrontations with police, putting further pressure on President Emmanuel Macron’s government to address concerns over the country’s education system.

The movement, which began in September, has spread from individual high schools to cities across the country, attracting university students, education workers and trade unions in support of demands for improved learning conditions.

Student organisers have urged more young people, parents and workers to participate in the latest demonstrations, insisting that previous government assurances have not adequately addressed their concerns.

The protests have focused on underfunded schools, overcrowded classrooms, teacher shortages, deteriorating school buildings and unequal access to educational opportunities.

Students have also criticised the government’s handling of their demands, arguing that announcements of future improvements must be accompanied by concrete measures.

READ ALSO:

The demonstrations have continued despite a government commitment to deploy 3,000 additional teachers to schools experiencing severe staffing shortages.

Education Minister Édouard Geffray announced the emergency recruitment and deployment plan last week, saying the additional teachers would be assigned to high-priority schools.

The government’s response followed discussions with student representatives, but protest leaders have maintained that the proposed measures do not go far enough to resolve the broader problems affecting schools.

The unrest intensified on October 8, when tens of thousands of people took to the streets across France. The Interior Ministry reported that approximately 71,500 people participated in demonstrations nationwide, including about 24,500 in Paris.

The protests were accompanied by clashes in several locations, with police using tear gas to disperse some gatherings. Authorities also reported arrests and injuries among demonstrators and security personnel.

On October 9, France’s Education Ministry said 141 high schools remained closed, either fully or partially, as a result of the movement.

The demonstrations have also drawn international attention. The United Nations human rights office expressed concern over incidents of violence linked to the protests and school blockades, calling attention to the need to protect the rights and safety of those involved.

Meanwhile, the French government has faced criticism over its handling of the unrest, including allegations of excessive force by security personnel. Authorities have defended the need to maintain public order while acknowledging the importance of addressing students’ concerns.

The crisis comes as France debates its public spending priorities and seeks to reduce its budget deficit. The government must balance calls for greater investment in education against pressure to control public debt.

The protests have therefore become part of a wider debate about public services, inequality and the opportunities available to young people.

With students preparing to return to the streets on Tuesday, the government faces renewed pressure to demonstrate that its promises will translate into meaningful improvements in classrooms across the country.

Student organisers have indicated that demonstrations could continue if their demands remain unresolved, leaving the authorities with the challenge of restoring normal school activities while addressing the concerns driving the movement.

French Students Return to Streets as Anger Over School Conditions Grows

International

Second Houthi Strike in Two Days Kills One at Riyadh Airport

Published

2 days ago

October 12, 2026

Trends Admin

Second Houthi Strike in Two Days Kills One at Riyadh Airport

Saudi Arabia is facing mounting security concerns after a second consecutive day of attacks on Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport left one person dead and 11 others injured, following an earlier strike that killed at least 13 people and wounded more than 300.

The latest attack occurred on Sunday, October 11, 2026, when a projectile struck Terminal 4 at the airport in the Saudi capital. The country’s General Authority of Civil Aviation confirmed that the person killed was a Pakistani resident, while the 11 injured people were taken to hospitals for treatment.

The incident came less than 24 hours after another deadly attack on the airport, prompting renewed fears about the safety of passengers, airport workers and other civilians as tensions involving Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Houthi movement intensified.

Saudi authorities began assessing the damage and inspecting airport facilities after the latest strike. Airport operations had already been disrupted following Saturday’s attack, with reports indicating that the closure was extended while officials reviewed security conditions and determined when flights could safely resume.

The attacks have raised serious concerns about the vulnerability of Saudi Arabia’s aviation infrastructure, particularly as the Houthis have threatened further strikes against airports and other strategic facilities in the kingdom.

The death toll from Saturday’s attack was initially reported at 12, with more than 300 people injured. India’s embassy in Saudi Arabia later confirmed that an Indian citizen had died from injuries sustained in the incident, bringing the reported toll to at least 13 deaths from that attack alone. The additional fatality reported on Sunday brings the combined reported death toll from the two incidents to at least 14.

READ ALSO:

The figures relate to separate attacks and should not be confused with the 11 people injured in Sunday’s incident.

The Houthi movement, which is aligned with Iran and controls large parts of northern Yemen, claimed responsibility for attacks on Saudi targets. Its military spokesperson, Yahya Saree, said the group had carried out operations involving missiles and drones against airports and facilities belonging to Saudi energy giant Aramco.

The Houthis identified King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh and King Fahd International Airport near Dammam among their targets. The group also warned airlines and passengers against using Saudi airports and airspace, threatening further operations as the confrontation escalated.

Saudi authorities reported additional security incidents during the same period. The Saudi-led coalition said air defences intercepted a cruise missile near King Khalid International Airport. A drone was also intercepted in the Eastern Province, while a ballistic missile reportedly launched towards Khamis Mushait was intercepted.

Emergency alerts were issued in Abha, southern Saudi Arabia, although civil defence authorities later said the immediate danger had passed.

Reports also indicated that King Fahd International Airport in Dammam came under attack on Sunday evening. Officials said damage assessments and safety inspections were under way, although the full extent of the damage was not immediately clear.

The incidents have heightened concerns that the attacks could extend beyond Riyadh to other parts of Saudi Arabia, threatening civilian infrastructure and complicating efforts to maintain normal aviation operations.

The repeated strikes are particularly alarming because Riyadh’s airport was reportedly targeted several times within a five-day period. The pattern has intensified pressure on Saudi authorities to strengthen air defences and protect critical infrastructure against further missile and drone attacks.

Saudi Arabia has long supported Yemen’s internationally recognised government in its conflict with the Houthis. The latest attacks have increased the risk of renewed confrontation between Riyadh and the armed group, potentially undermining efforts to contain the wider regional crisis.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, condemned the attack on Riyadh airport and expressed solidarity with Saudi Arabia. He called for an end to attacks on civilians and critical infrastructure, warning of the wider implications for regional security and stability.

The attacks have also raised concerns about international air travel, given Saudi Arabia’s importance as a regional aviation hub and a destination for millions of travellers, including religious pilgrims. Any prolonged closure of major airports could disrupt passenger movements, airline schedules and international connections.

Beyond aviation, the escalation could have implications for global energy markets and maritime trade. Saudi Arabia is a major oil producer, while the wider conflict has raised concerns about security along important shipping routes, including the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden.

Sustained attacks on transport and energy infrastructure could increase shipping risks, insurance costs and pressure on supply chains, although the extent of any economic impact would depend on the duration and scale of the escalation.

Saudi authorities now face the immediate challenge of assessing damage, restoring airport operations safely and protecting passengers and aviation facilities against further attacks. The Houthis’ warning of additional strikes has added uncertainty over when normal air travel can resume and whether other strategic locations could become targets.

The latest incidents underscore the growing threat to civilian infrastructure as regional tensions intensify, with potential consequences for Saudi Arabia’s security, international aviation, maritime trade and the wider Middle East.