Politics
2027 election: APC confirms Tinubu, Shettima joint ticket as INEC nomination deadline closes
2027 election: APC confirms Tinubu, Shettima joint ticket as INEC nomination deadline closes
President Bola Tinubu will contest the 2027 presidential election with Vice President Kashim Shettima as his running mate after the All Progressives Congress (APC) confirmed the submission of their nomination documents ahead of the deadline set by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The development puts an end to months of intense speculation over the political future of Shettima, whose place on the APC ticket had been the subject of sustained public debate following reports that some influential figures within the ruling party wanted a different vice-presidential candidate for the 2027 election.
The confirmation came less than 24 hours before the close of INEC’s window for the submission of presidential and National Assembly candidates, as APC leaders received the completed nomination forms of President Tinubu and Vice President Shettima during a ceremony in Abuja attended by governors, federal lawmakers and senior party officials.
The nomination documents were presented on behalf of the Presidency by the President’s Special Adviser on Political and Other Matters, Ibrahim Masari, who submitted the forms to the APC National Working Committee.
Receiving the documents, APC National Chairman, Prof. Nentawe Goshwe Yilwatda, said the party was fully united behind President Tinubu’s re-election bid, describing the submission of the nomination forms as another important milestone in the APC’s preparations for the 2027 general election.
According to him, millions of APC members had overwhelmingly endorsed President Tinubu during the party’s presidential primary, expressing confidence that the ruling party would secure another electoral victory in 2027.
Yilwatda also urged APC governors, elected officials and party leaders to intensify public engagement by highlighting what he described as the achievements of the Tinubu administration across key sectors, including infrastructure, agriculture, security, education, healthcare, economic reforms and social investment.
READ ALSO:
- REVEALED: Inside the intelligence-led operation that forced Oyo kidnappers to flee
- Trump says US will ‘completely decimate’ Iran if he is assassinated
- Tinubu upgrades Federal Polytechnic to specialised university
The event attracted several APC governors, including Hope Uzodimma, Chairman of the Progressive Governors Forum (PGF) and Governor of Imo State, alongside Governors of Borno, Kano, Kebbi, Adamawa, Kaduna and Yobe states, deputy governors, members of the National Assembly and other senior party stakeholders.
The confirmation of the Tinubu-Shettima ticket follows months of political uncertainty fuelled by repeated endorsements of President Tinubu that omitted any reference to the Vice President, prompting speculation that the APC could replace Shettima before the 2027 election.
Political observers had linked the speculation to efforts by some party stakeholders to broaden the APC’s electoral appeal, while others argued that retaining the existing ticket would demonstrate continuity and internal stability within the ruling party.
However, senior Presidency and APC sources disclosed that Shettima had already completed the necessary nomination documentation required by the party, effectively confirming his status as the APC’s vice-presidential candidate for the election.
Under Nigeria’s electoral laws, a duly nominated vice-presidential candidate can only be substituted under conditions provided by the Electoral Act 2026, including voluntary withdrawal or other circumstances recognised by law.
The latest development is expected to strengthen confidence among APC supporters after months of uncertainty surrounding the composition of the party’s presidential ticket.
Meanwhile, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has continued to remind political parties to comply strictly with the timetable for submitting candidates through its electronic Candidate Nomination Portal (ICNP).
According to the commission, all political parties are required to upload the names and particulars of candidates who emerged from valid party primaries within the period stipulated by the Electoral Act 2026.
Section 29 of the Act provides that political parties must submit the names of their candidates not later than 120 days before the date fixed for a general election, while every nominated candidate must also submit an affidavit confirming that constitutional requirements for the office sought have been satisfied.
INEC’s timetable fixed June 27 to July 11, 2026, as the period for political parties to electronically submit the nomination forms of their presidential and National Assembly candidates.
The commission is expected to publish the final list of presidential and National Assembly candidates on August 25, 2026, while the deadline for the withdrawal or substitution of candidates is August 29, 2026, in line with the Electoral Act.
As of the time of filing this report, INEC had yet to publicly announce the complete list of successfully uploaded presidential nominations, although party officials expressed confidence that all statutory requirements would be met before the deadline expired.
The confirmation of the Tinubu-Shettima ticket signals the beginning of another major phase in Nigeria’s political calendar as parties prepare for campaigns ahead of the 2027 presidential election.
With the APC settling its presidential ticket, attention is expected to shift to opposition parties, many of which are still finalising their own nominations and campaign strategies before the election season gathers momentum.
2027 election: APC confirms Tinubu, Shettima joint ticket as INEC nomination deadline closes
![]()
Politics
2027: APC Denies Withdrawing Tinubu Campaign Council List Amid Controversy
Politics
“Close Your Mouth”: Amaechi, Sowore, Obi Clash Over Fuel Subsidy in Heated NBA Debate
Politics
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
The debate over Nigeria’s fuel subsidy removal has taken a new turn, with former Anambra State governor and 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi firmly restating his support for the policy. Speaking at the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Annual General Conference in Port Harcourt on Monday, Obi argued that mismanagement of subsidy proceeds should not be a reason to reverse the policy. Instead, he called for transparency and accountability in the use of the billions of naira saved from the reform. Obi, who now runs under the banner of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), made it clear that his opposition is not to the removal itself but to the lack of structured implementation and the failure to cushion the economic impact on ordinary Nigerians. His position puts him at odds with fellow opposition figure Atiku Abubakar, who has promised to bring back the subsidy if elected in 2027.
According to Obi, the removal of petrol subsidy was a necessary fiscal decision that his own 2023 presidential manifesto had already proposed. He maintained that keeping the subsidy would only perpetuate waste and delay critical national development. “I subscribe and I maintain that you need to remove subsidy. Mismanagement of the proceeds shouldn’t be the reason for not removing it,” Obi was quoted as saying during the panel session. He stressed that reversing the policy would be a backward step that treats the symptom rather than the disease. The real issue, he argued, is not the removal itself but the poor governance and lack of transparency that have characterised the handling of the funds generated from the policy.
READ ALSO:
- FG releases 2026/2027 Unity Schools admission list for JSS1 candidates
- LASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
- LASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
Obi expressed concern that the N16 trillion reportedly realised from the subsidy removal has not been visibly channelled into projects that improve the lives of Nigerians. He alleged that these resources are being mismanaged and, in some cases, stolen, while citizens bear the brunt of rising fuel prices, high transportation costs, and a general increase in the cost of living. “What we should have done is that when we removed the subsidy, we would have given the people alternative usage for the subsidy. What we have today is that that removal and the attendant resources being recovered is also being mismanaged and stolen,” Obi said. He argued that the government should have implemented the policy in a structured manner, with clear plans for reinvesting the savings into productive sectors such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and poverty alleviation.
To illustrate his point, Obi offered practical examples of how the funds could have been better utilised. He noted that just 5% of the N16 trillion savings—about N800 billion—would be enough to build primary healthcare centres in all 8,809 wards across Nigeria, with each facility costing an estimated N100 million. He also highlighted the acute shortage of kidney treatment facilities in the country, pointing out that Nigeria needs about 1,000 kidney centres and 5,000 dialysis machines, but currently has fewer than 200 centres and 800 machines. A kidney centre costs about N200 million, while a single dialysis machine goes for roughly N10 million. Beyond healthcare, Obi suggested that the government could have added the savings to Nigeria’s Sovereign Wealth Fund, which would have grown by an estimated $10 billion. This, he said, could generate monthly returns that could be used for national development.
The former governor also took a swipe at the luxurious lifestyle of public officials, contrasting it with the hardship faced by everyday Nigerians. “People in government have asked Nigerians to fast. Okay. They cannot be feasting when Nigerians are fasting,” Obi said. He urged the government to lead by example and ensure that the sacrifices made by citizens are matched by prudent management of public funds. According to him, the solution lies not in restoring the subsidy but in strengthening institutions, accountability, and governance to ensure that the benefits of the policy are felt by all.
Obi’s comments come at a time when the economic consequences of subsidy removal continue to dominate public discourse. While the Federal Government has defended the policy as fiscally unsustainable and necessary for long-term growth, critics have demanded greater transparency over the use of the savings, especially as inflation and living costs continue to rise. As Obi positions himself for the 2027 general elections, his messaging is increasingly centred on economic management, fiscal discipline, and the prudent use of public resources. His latest intervention reinforces his stance that Nigeria must move forward—not backward—by fixing governance failures rather than abandoning difficult but necessary reforms.
Peter Obi Backs Subsidy Removal, Blames Poor Governance for N16 Trillion Waste
![]()
-
metro2 days agoLagos Police arrest five suspected telecom vandals, recover truckload of iron rods
-
Entertainment2 days agoVeteran Nollywood Actor Taiwo Hassan ‘Ogogo’ Dies at 66 After Cancer Battle
-
metro1 day agoMUSCOYS Honours Pioneering Educationist with Commendation Award
-
Politics2 days agoOpposition Unity Cracks as Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso Diverge on 2027 Strategy Against Tinubu
-
metro2 days agoLagos Moves to Tackle Housing Deficit, Inaugurates 2026 World Habitat Day Committee
-
metro2 days ago2027: Over 500 Northern Muslim Clerics Endorse Tinubu for Second Term
-
metro8 hours agoLASG Moves to Fix Ikotun Junction, Seeks Community Support
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Alfindiki tackles Atiku over Tinubu’s FBI records
