Politics
Adeleke Campaign Council Protests Release of APC Assembly Candidate Arrested with Gun in Osun
Adeleke Campaign Council Protests Release of APC Assembly Candidate Arrested with Gun in Osun
The Imole Campaign Council, the campaign organisation of Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke, has strongly condemned the controversial release of Babatunde Festus Komolafe, an All Progressives Congress (APC) House of Assembly candidate who was arrested by Nigerian Navy personnel after a gun was allegedly discovered in his vehicle — an incident that has heightened political tensions just two days before the state’s governorship election .
Komolafe, popularly known as BFK and the APC candidate for the Atakumosa East/West State Constituency, was apprehended on Thursday, August 13, 2026, in his hometown of Ifewara, Osun State . According to the campaign council, the arrest occurred during a routine search by naval personnel, who allegedly discovered an unauthorised firearm inside an APC campaign vehicle in which Komolafe and his supporters were travelling .
The arrest was no secret, as a video showing the suspects subsequently went viral on social media and attracted significant public outrage . However, the council alleged that Komolafe and his co-travellers were released shortly after their arrest due to pressure from senior APC figures .
“We gathered reliably that the arrested APC candidate and his co-perpetrators were immediately released following pressure from APC top goons,” the statement read . The council further claimed that a news outlet chronicled how the naval officer in charge “was forced to release the suspects and asked to step aside” .
READ ALSO:
- Omo-Agege Escapes Assassination Attempt in Usiefrun, Six NDC Members Injured
- From One Goat to a Global Empire: Dino Melaye’s Inspiring Journey to Financial Freedom
- 19-Year-Old Housewife Arrested for Allegedly Poisoning Husband 40 Days After Wedding
Despite its criticism of the release, the Imole Campaign Council commended the Nigerian Armed Forces, particularly the Nigerian Navy, for their professionalism and neutrality since the commencement of the governorship election campaigns . The council noted that security personnel have been proactive in arresting suspected troublemakers regardless of party affiliation .
The council, however, insisted that releasing a suspect allegedly found with an unauthorised firearm was dangerous and unacceptable . “It sends the wrong signal to political criminals whose pastime is killing and maiming,” the statement declared .
The group linked the incident to what it described as the APC’s antecedents in Osun State, alleging that just two weeks earlier, police had attacked military personnel to rescue five APC hoodlums, including the notorious APC thug Asiri Eniba, who had been arrested by the Nigerian Navy for shooting sporadically in Ile-Ife with pump-action guns .
The campaign council called on the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, to intervene in the matter, investigate what it described as a “grave injustice,” and ensure that the suspects face the law . “No politician is above the law, and no political thug should be released to keep fomenting trouble,” it concluded .
The incident comes just two days before the Osun State governorship election scheduled for Saturday, August 15, 2026, heightening political tensions in the state . The reported arrest of Komolafe and his subsequent release have raised concerns among political parties and civil society groups about security and political interference ahead of the crucial poll .
The Centre for Credible Leadership and Citizens Awareness had earlier raised the alarm over a deteriorating security situation in Osun, alleging that approximately 40 people had been killed in pre-election-related violence . The council also specifically accused some political actors of importing thugs and individuals impersonating security personnel into parts of Ijeshaland ahead of the election .
Additionally, the Council of the Wise of the Savannah Centre for Diplomacy, Democracy and Development, led by former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Olukayode Ariwoola, had warned against violence ahead of the election and called on security agencies to ensure a free, fair, transparent and credible election . The council expressed grave concern over reports of loss of human lives and urged thorough investigations and prosecution of perpetrators .
Adeleke Campaign Council Protests Release of APC Assembly Candidate Arrested with Gun in Osun
![]()
Politics
Adeleke Wins Polling Unit, Boasts of Wide Margin Victory as APC Trails
Politics
2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle
2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle
Former Vice President’s certificate forgery challenge may be “dead on arrival” due to choice of Originating Summons, legal experts say
The suit filed by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar seeking President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s disqualification from the 2027 presidential race met the constitutional deadline for pre-election matters, but the procedure used to bring the case may expose it to a strong legal challenge, according to a review of the filing and established case law. Atiku personally appeared at the Federal High Court registry in Abuja on Friday, August 14, 2026, to depose to an affidavit backing the suit, which he filed alongside his party, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) , against Tinubu, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) . The action rests on Sections 137(1)(j), 139(1)(a)(i) and 285(14)(c) of the 1999 Constitution as amended, along with relevant provisions of the Electoral Act 2026. At its core is an allegation that the NYSC discharge certificate Tinubu submitted to INEC bears a name that differs from his own—”Tinubu Bola Adekunle” rather than “Bola Ahmed Tinubu”.
Legal analyst Ekene Aninze, reviewing the timing of the filing, noted that Atiku fell squarely within the 14-day window set by Section 285(9) of the Constitution for pre-election matters. INEC had displayed the personal particulars of presidential candidates, including Tinubu’s, on Saturday, August 1, 2026, in line with its published election timetable. Counting from that date, Atiku’s filing on August 14 came on the 13th day, within the statutory limit. This timing is critical, as Nigerian courts have repeatedly dismissed pre-election cases filed outside the 14-day window. In the Edo State governorship dispute, the Court of Appeal held that a case challenging candidate credentials was statute-barred when filed beyond the stipulated period. Similarly, courts have affirmed that the reckoning date is the occurrence of the event complained of, not when the aggrieved person became aware of it.
READ ALSO:
- APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election
- Oyo Police Smash Human Parts Syndicate: 10 Arrested, Heart, Skull Recovered
- Heavy Security, Long Queues, Massive Turnout Mark Osun Governorship Election in Ede
Where the case may run into difficulty, according to Aninze, is the format in which it was brought. The suit was filed by way of Originating Summons, a procedure typically reserved for disputes over the interpretation of documents rather than contested facts. Nigerian courts have repeatedly held that allegations bordering on forgery cannot be resolved on affidavit evidence alone and require a Writ of Summons, which allows for oral testimony and cross-examination. That principle traces back to the Supreme Court’s handling of the Delta State PDP governorship tussle between Sheriff Oborevwori and David Edevbie, where the apex court held that Edevbie’s forgery allegations against Oborevwori could not be resolved through Originating Summons and ought to have been commenced by Writ of Summons, since only oral and documentary evidence tested in open court could settle such claims. Justice Tijani Abubakar, who delivered the judgment of the panel, held that the grievous allegations of supply of false information and certificate forgery brought against the Speaker cannot be proved beyond reasonable doubt with the use of Originating Summons. A similar reasoning shaped the Court of Appeal’s earlier intervention in the same dispute, which faulted Edevbie for not calling the institution alleged to have issued the disputed document as a witness. The same logic featured in the long-running feud between Godwin Obaseki and his APC rivals, where the University of Ibadan had to be drawn into proceedings to speak to the authenticity of a contested credential, and in Bashir Machina’s dispute with the APC over the Yobe North senatorial primaries, often cited as a cautionary tale on the risks of using Originating Summons for a contentious matter. Applying that pattern to the Atiku suit, Aninze argued that questions over the authenticity of the NYSC certificate would likely require testimony from the NYSC itself to confirm or deny that it issued the document, something an Originating Summons process, built on affidavits, is not designed to accommodate. Activist lawyer Maduabuchi Idam went further, describing the suit as “dead on arrival.” He explained that the judicial system lacks the courage to allow justice to be done in such a matter, adding that “whether the action succeeds or fails, it will continue to expose the weaknesses of our institutions, lampoon the system, and subject it to public scorn and ridicule.”
Atiku’s decision to personally appear at the court registry was deliberate, according to his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu. The former vice president stated: “I came here personally because the issues before the court go to the heart of our Constitution and the integrity of the office of President. I cannot ask Nigerians to respect the Constitution while treating a matter of this magnitude casually. I have therefore put my name, my signature and my oath behind the facts we are presenting to the court. Now it is President Tinubu’s turn to answer them.” Atiku emphasized that the matter should be settled through evidence rather than political arguments or social media exchanges. “We are not asking Nigerians to decide this matter on social media,” he said. “We are asking the institution holding the records to produce them and the judiciary to examine the evidence and pronounce on it.” He added: “If the certificate belongs to Bola Ahmed Tinubu, let that be established before the court. If ‘Tinubu Bola Adekunle’ and ‘Bola Ahmed Tinubu’ are one and the same person for the purpose of that certificate, let the evidence establish it. These are questions that deserve answers, not political insults or presidential silence.”
READ ALSO:
- Protest in Osogbo Over Ballot Paper Shortage, Missing Voter Names
- Osun Guber: APC Candidate Oyebamiji Casts Vote, Commends BVAS, Voter Turnout As Voting Continues
- Osun Guber 2026: Adeleke Alleges Police Aiding APC to Rig Election
Beyond the certificate dispute, Atiku and the ADC are also challenging provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 which, according to their written address, effectively restrict who may challenge the qualification of a candidate at pre-election stage and the removal of qualification as a ground for questioning an election as envisaged by Section 139(a)(i) of the Constitution. Their argument is that legislation cannot be used to shut the door against enforcement of an express constitutional provision. They contend that where an Act of the National Assembly conflicts with the Constitution, the Constitution must prevail. “This case therefore raises a fundamental question for our democracy,” Atiku said. “Can an Act of the National Assembly be used as a shield against an express provision of the Constitution? Can we write into ordinary legislation an escape route from a constitutional standard applicable to everyone seeking the Presidency? Our position is that the Constitution remains supreme.”
In a parallel development, a legal counsel and chieftain of the ADC, Kalu Agu, submitted a petition against Tinubu to the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium, for allegedly submitting a forged certificate to INEC. Agu was captured in a video shared on X by Paul Ibe, Atiku’s media aide, while submitting the petition. He alleged that Tinubu presented false academic credentials to INEC as part of the constitutional requirements for the 2027 election, asking the EU to intervene over what he described as the alleged subversion of constitutional order in Nigeria.
Reacting to the suit, the APC described it as an exercise in futility. The National Secretary of the APC, Ajibola Basiru, said: “Atiku should go and brace for another defeat in the general election. The President is qualified to contest the election; nothing is disqualifying him, and the matter has been settled by the Supreme Court.” Basiru added: “Atiku has nothing to offer Nigerians, and he knows that he will be rejected at the poll. That is why he is looking for a shortcut. But there’s no shortcut to power. He should go and mobilise for the poll, where he will be rejected by Nigerians as usual. That will end his political misadventure into the presidency.”
Neither Tinubu’s legal team nor the APC had filed a response to the suit as of the time of this report. The originating summons asks the Federal High Court to determine whether the statutory restrictions complained of can prevent the plaintiffs from invoking Section 137(1)(j), and ultimately whether Tinubu and the APC should be disqualified from participating in the 2027 presidential election if the plaintiffs’ case is established. Among the substantive reliefs sought is an order disqualifying Tinubu and the APC from participating in the 2027 presidential election on the grounds pleaded by the plaintiffs. Atiku has also placed INEC on notice to produce Tinubu’s Form CF001 submitted in connection with the 2023 and 2027 presidential elections. The affidavit states that Atiku had applied for certified true copies of the relevant form before filing the suit but had received no response at the time the processes were prepared. Atiku concluded: “Nobody should misunderstand what is at stake. Nigerian graduates cannot complete NYSC documentation with one identity and simply ask employers to ignore discrepancies. Young Nigerians seeking ordinary jobs are subjected to rigorous scrutiny of their certificates. The Presidency is not an immunity certificate against constitutional scrutiny.”
2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle
![]()
Politics
APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election
-
News2 days agoFG to Attach 300 NYSC Corps Members to CNG Workshops for Skills Training
-
metro2 days agoSeven Miners Killed in Plateau Mining Pit Collapse, Renewing Urgent Calls for Safety Reform
-
International2 days agoIran Had Detailed Intel on Trump’s Location Before Secret Turkey Escape
-
Politics2 days agoINEC reprints Osun ballot papers, result sheets, includes SDP candidate
-
Politics11 hours agoOsun Decides: Over 100 ‘Imported’ Voters Arrested With New PVCs
-
Education2 days agoJAMB Aggregate Score 2026/2027: How Nigerian Universities Calculate Your Admission Chances
-
News12 hours agoUK Opens 2026/27 Commonwealth Fellowship Applications for Nigerians – How to Apply
-
Sports2 days agoWAFCON: Chawinga sisters fire Malawi into historic final
