Fuel Subsidy: Atiku's Third U-Turn in One Week Exposes Political Posturing, Presidency Says - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

Fuel Subsidy: Atiku’s Third U-Turn in One Week Exposes Political Posturing, Presidency Says

Published

on

Fuel Subsidy: Atiku's Third U-Turn in One Week Exposes Political Posturing, Presidency Says
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar

Fuel Subsidy: Atiku’s Third U-Turn in One Week Exposes Political Posturing, Presidency Says

The Presidency has again taken a swipe at former Vice President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, over what it describes as his third policy U-turn on petrol subsidy within one week, accusing him of political posturing and lacking understanding of petroleum economics. In a statement by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, the Presidency questioned whether Atiku was seriously proposing an economic policy or simply playing politics with the temporary discomfort Nigerians face.

The Presidency detailed what it described as three conflicting positions emerging from the Atiku camp within days. The first position came from Atiku’s spokesperson, Paul Ibe, who stated that the former vice president would restore petrol subsidy if elected and later phase it out, describing it as a temporary intervention to give Nigerians and businesses room to recover. The second position emerged when another senior aide, Phrank Shaibu, dismissed Ibe’s statement as an “unauthorised and misleading characterisation” of Atiku’s position. According to Shaibu, Atiku would not set a predetermined date for ending the subsidy, which would remain until domestic refining expanded, supply stabilised, competition deepened, and the market could deliver affordable prices without government support. The third position came when Atiku himself intervened hours later, insisting his position “has not changed” and that he would restore what he called a “targeted subsidy” if elected. He stated, “I will restore targeted subsidy and put purchasing power back in the hands of Nigerians.”

The Presidency argued the differing explanations amounted to more than semantics, describing it as “a serious policy contradiction.” Onanuga asked that if Atiku’s position has not changed, why did one of his principal aides say the subsidy would be temporary and phased out, why did another senior aide have to publicly disown that explanation and introduce a completely different framework based on market conditions, and why did Atiku then step in to reaffirm the original position? He added that Nigerians deserve clarity, not policy by trial and error.

READ ALSO:

The Presidency challenged Atiku to explain precisely what he means by “targeted subsidy,” including how much it will cost, who will benefit, how beneficiaries will be identified, how it will be funded, and what objective economic conditions will determine its eventual termination. The statement said that Nigerians cannot afford another opaque and potentially costly subsidy regime dressed up in new language.

Atiku has sought to draw a distinction between his proposal and the previous import-subsidy regime. According to his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the former vice president is proposing “a targeted, capped, transparently budgeted and independently audited intervention” to support domestic refining and production, with measurable performance-based exit conditions. Shaibu explained that you do not remove scaffolding because the calendar says so; you remove it when the building can stand securely on its own. Atiku himself stated on his X platform that he would not restore the import racket but would restore relief.

The Presidency also faulted Atiku’s argument that competition and subsidy would automatically reduce petrol prices, noting that several factors influence pump prices, including international crude oil prices, exchange rates, refining costs, transportation, and distribution. The statement said that competition can improve efficiency and margins, but it cannot magically insulate Nigeria from global crude oil prices or other input costs.

The Presidency also rejected what it described as an oversimplification of the relationship between petrol prices and food inflation. While acknowledging that energy and transportation costs affect food prices, it argued that petrol prices alone have never caused food inflation. Onanuga said that agricultural productivity, insecurity, exchange rates, logistics, storage, flooding, input costs, money supply and supply constraints also matter. He added that a serious economic programme must address these factors, as President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has been doing for the past three years, rather than reduce the entire cost-of-living crisis to petrol prices.

The Presidency further questioned Atiku’s suggestion that subsidy would “follow the barrel of crude,” pointing out that petrol accounts for only about 45 per cent of products from a refined barrel. According to the statement, diesel, which was deregulated in 2004 under the Obasanjo-Atiku administration, accounts for roughly 25 per cent of a barrel, while aviation fuel and kerosene make up about nine per cent. Onanuga asked whether Atiku would also subsidise these other products, since kerosene is used by the underprivileged to cook, and many homes and factories use diesel to power generators.

The subsidy debate has returned to the centre of the 2027 presidential contest, with Atiku seeking to position himself as the candidate who will make life more affordable for Nigerians. According to Shaibu, the choice is not removal of subsidy versus restoration of subsidy; it is Expensive Nigeria versus Affordable Nigeria. The Presidency, however, warned against what it called “policy somersaults, incoherence, destructive populism and election gimmicks,” saying the economy is too serious for such approaches.

Fuel Subsidy: Atiku’s Third U-Turn in One Week Exposes Political Posturing, Presidency Says

Loading

Politics

2027 Elections: FG Warns Hotel Owners Against Illegal Activities, Suspicious Funds

Published

on

2027 Elections: FG Warns Hotel Owners Against Illegal Activities, Suspicious Funds
Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi SAN
2027 Elections: FG Warns Hotel Owners Against Illegal Activities, Suspicious Funds

The Federal Government has warned hotel owners and managers across Nigeria against allowing their facilities to be used for illegal activities, including the movement of illicit funds, as political activities intensify ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, issued the warning while addressing the second edition of the JAGZ Hospitality Conference in Ibadan, Oyo State.

Fagbemi, who was represented by Fernandez Marcus-Obiene, Special Assistant to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Justice Sector Reform and ICT/Digital and Innovative Technology, said the hospitality industry had an important role to play in promoting security and peaceful elections.

The conference, themed “The Hotel at the Centre: Money, Elections, Security,” brought together government officials, security personnel, financial crime regulators and hospitality industry stakeholders to examine the responsibilities of hotel operators as the country approaches another election cycle.

Fagbemi urged hotel managers to strengthen their security arrangements, maintain accurate records of guests and cooperate with relevant authorities when legally required to provide information concerning individuals or groups using their facilities.

He stressed that hotels must not become channels for illicit financial transactions or provide cover for activities capable of undermining public security during the election period.

READ ALSO:

The Attorney-General’s warning comes as political parties, campaign organisations and political interest groups increase their activities ahead of the 2027 polls. Hotels and event centres are expected to host political meetings, campaign teams, journalists, business representatives and security personnel.

The government therefore wants hospitality operators to ensure that their businesses comply with relevant laws and financial regulations while maintaining professional standards and political neutrality.

Fagbemi’s warning also reflects growing concerns about the possible use of commercial establishments to facilitate suspicious financial transactions during election campaigns.

At the conference, stakeholders emphasised the need for stronger cooperation between hotel operators, law enforcement agencies and financial regulators to identify and address suspicious activities without disrupting legitimate hospitality services.

The convener of the conference and Group Managing Director of Charis Ultimo Hotels Limited, Lugard Agbomoagan, said the hospitality sector had evolved beyond providing accommodation to become an important part of international tourism, foreign investment, cross-border business and financial transactions.

He argued that hotel operators needed a clearer understanding of their legal obligations when dealing with customers, political organisations and transactions involving substantial sums of money.

Agbomoagan stressed that the objective was not to portray hotels as centres of criminal activity but to encourage preparedness, professionalism and compliance.

He also urged hotel managers to review their security arrangements ahead of the election period rather than wait until incidents occurred.

As an example of security preparedness, Agbomoagan said The JAGZ Hotel operated a dedicated surveillance unit that monitored closed-circuit television footage around the clock to observe activities within the premises and respond to potential security concerns.

The conference also highlighted the importance of maintaining reliable guest records and ensuring that suspicious transactions are handled in accordance with applicable anti-money laundering requirements.

The warning follows an earlier directive by the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) cautioning hotel and event-centre owners in Abuja against allowing their premises to be used by political organisations or factions whose leadership was not recognised by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

The FCTA had directed operators to verify the status of political groups seeking to use their facilities and maintain proper records of transactions. It warned that non-compliance could attract severe consequences, including the revocation of property title documents.

Although the FCTA directive applies specifically to the Federal Capital Territory, the latest comments by the Attorney-General underline the Federal Government’s broader concerns about election security, financial transparency and the responsibilities of businesses during the political season.

However, the warning does not mean that hotels are prohibited from accommodating politicians or hosting lawful political meetings. Rather, operators are being urged to ensure that their facilities are not used to facilitate criminal activities and that they comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

With the 2027 elections approaching, hotel owners and managers face increased pressure to strengthen internal controls, protect guests and employees, maintain accurate records and cooperate appropriately with law enforcement agencies.

The Federal Government’s message is that the hospitality industry must remain professional and politically neutral while ensuring that its facilities are not exploited for illegal financial activities or other offences during the electioneering period.

 

2027 Elections: FG Warns Hotel Owners Against Illegal Activities, Suspicious Funds

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

NDC Blames Computer Glitch as INEC Omits Kano Governorship Candidate From Final List

Published

on

NDC Blames Computer Glitch as INEC Omits Kano Governorship Candidate From Final List

NDC Blames Computer Glitch as INEC Omits Kano Governorship Candidate From Final List

The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has attributed the absence of its Kano State governorship candidate, Aminu Abdussalam-Gwarzo, from the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) final list of candidates for the 2027 election to an alleged computer glitch.

The party has urged its members and supporters to remain calm, insisting that it completed the necessary nomination procedures within the stipulated period and that the omission was not caused by any failure on its part.

The NDC’s Kano State Public Relations Officer, Yusif Fasaha, disclosed this in a statement made available to journalists in Kano following the publication of INEC’s final list on Saturday, October 10, 2026.

Fasaha said the party had contacted the electoral commission over the omission and was assured that the problem would be addressed.

“I want to assure you that, as the PRO of the party, the problem is not from us. We have consulted INEC, and they told us that the problem was from the computer and that they would rectify it,” he said.

The spokesperson expressed confidence that a corrected list containing Gwarzo’s name would be published by Monday, October 12, and appealed to party members not to panic over the development.

“So, everybody should remain calm. Between now and Monday, another list containing his name will be released,” Fasaha added.

He maintained that Gwarzo had fulfilled all the requirements for the governorship election and that the party had completed the relevant processes on time.

However, INEC has not publicly confirmed that a computer glitch caused the omission or independently explained why the candidate was left off the final list.

The commission’s published document contains 17 governorship candidates and their running mates from various political parties contesting the February 6, 2027 Kano governorship election. Neither Gwarzo nor his running mate, Mustapha Rabiu Kwankwaso, appears on the list.

READ ALSO:

Among the candidates included is incumbent Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, who is listed as the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), with Murtala Sule-Garo as his running mate.

Abacha Muhammad Sani is listed as the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), while other political parties also have candidates on the commission’s list.

The omission has raised questions about the NDC’s participation in the Kano governorship election, particularly because Gwarzo had emerged as the party’s candidate alongside Kwankwaso, a former Kano State commissioner for youth development and son of former governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso.

The development also comes amid wider scrutiny of INEC’s final lists for the 2027 governorship elections. In Gombe State, the commission omitted former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy Isa Ali Pantami, who had emerged as the PDP candidate following a fresh primary.

In Pantami’s case, the omission comes against the backdrop of legal disputes over the party’s nomination process and questions surrounding compliance with the Electoral Act 2026.

The Supreme Court’s September 24 judgment restored provisions of the Electoral Act governing political party membership registers and eligibility to participate in party primaries. The provisions require parties to comply with statutory deadlines for submitting their membership registers to INEC.

However, the electoral commission’s published Kano list does not establish whether the NDC’s omission is connected to the membership-register requirements, a documentation issue or another administrative matter.

The distinction is important because the NDC’s claim of a computer glitch remains unconfirmed by the commission.

If INEC issues a revised list, it would clarify whether Gwarzo and his running mate have been included among the candidates cleared to contest the election. Until then, uncertainty remains over the party’s representation in the Kano governorship race.

The NDC has maintained that it complied with the nomination requirements and is continuing consultations with the electoral commission to resolve the matter.

The immediate focus is now on whether INEC will publish a corrected list by the date indicated by the party and provide an official explanation for the omission.

For the NDC, the outcome will determine whether its preferred candidates appear on the final list for the Kano governorship election. For voters, the issue highlights the importance of transparent candidate-selection procedures and clear communication from electoral authorities ahead of the 2027 polls.

 

NDC Blames Computer Glitch as INEC Omits Kano Governorship Candidate From Final List

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Pantami Breaks Silence as INEC Excludes Him From Final Gombe Governorship List

Published

on

2027: Pantami Breaks Silence as INEC Excludes Him From Final Gombe Governorship List
Former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Isa Ali Pantami
2027: Pantami Breaks Silence as INEC Excludes Him From Final Gombe Governorship List

Former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Isa Ali Pantami, has reacted to the exclusion of his name from the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) final list of candidates for the 2027 Gombe State governorship election, urging supporters to remain calm as his political camp works to resolve the issue.

Pantami’s name was missing from the list released by INEC on Saturday, October 10, 2026, despite his emergence as the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate following a fresh primary election conducted on September 29.

In a statement shared on Pantami’s verified Facebook page, the Pantamiyya Movement’s spokesperson, Professor Suleiman Mohammed Gombe, described the development as a temporary setback and assured supporters that efforts were underway to address the omission.

“This is a temporary challenge and a normal part of the electoral process, not a final determination,” the statement said.

Mohammed disclosed that the movement’s legal and liaison teams were engaging with relevant PDP organs and INEC to secure what they described as a correction within the period permitted by law.

He also alleged that political opponents were working behind the scenes to frustrate Pantami’s governorship ambition, although the statement did not provide evidence identifying those allegedly involved.

The statement urged members of the PDP and the Pantamiyya Movement to remain united, continue their mobilisation and avoid being distracted by the development.

READ ALSO:

“We urge our supporters to continue their mobilisation and to remain focused on our collective ideology of service to humanity,” Mohammed said.

INEC’s published list contains 16 governorship candidates for Gombe State, but it does not include Pantami or a PDP candidate. Among those listed are Jamilu Gwamna of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Bala Tinka of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and Babayo Kumo of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC).

The omission comes after a series of legal disputes over the PDP’s nomination process in Gombe State.

Pantami initially emerged as the party’s governorship candidate in May 2026 after leaving the APC, where he had sought the party’s ticket. His initial nomination was subsequently challenged by fellow aspirants, including Khamisu Mailantarki and Usman Garry.

On September 24, the Federal High Court in Gombe nullified the original nomination and ordered the PDP to conduct a fresh governorship primary within 30 days. The court found that the earlier process did not comply with the party’s procedures and applicable electoral laws, including the exclusion of some aspirants who had been screened and cleared to participate.

The court did not grant a separate request seeking Pantami’s removal from the PDP.

Following the ruling, the PDP conducted a fresh primary on September 29, in which Pantami again emerged as the party’s candidate. However, the outcome continued to face objections from rival aspirants.

Mailantarki reportedly challenged Pantami’s eligibility, arguing that he had joined the PDP after the relevant party-register deadline. The dispute has added another layer of uncertainty to the party’s efforts to secure representation in the 2027 Gombe governorship election.

INEC has not publicly explained in the reports reviewed why Pantami’s name and the PDP’s nomination were absent from the final list.

The omission does not, on its own, establish the precise legal or administrative reason for the decision. The outcome will depend on the applicable electoral requirements and any further action by the commission, the party or the courts.

The 2027 Gombe governorship election is scheduled for February 6, 2027. With Pantami’s camp saying it is engaging the relevant institutions, attention will now focus on whether the omission can be resolved within the legally permitted period.

For the PDP, the development presents a challenge as it seeks to participate in the Gombe contest. For Pantami and his supporters, the immediate priority is to establish the reason for the omission and determine the available legal options.

 

2027: Pantami Breaks Silence as INEC Excludes Him From Final Gombe Governorship List

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending