Third Toxic Odour Incident Hits Ijebu-Ode in 3 Months as Ogun Traces Source to Methane Leak

IJEBU-ODE, Ogun State – Panic and anxiety swept through the ancient town of Ijebu-Ode on Wednesday, June 3, 2026, when a toxic odour once again polluted the air around Our Lady of Apostles Secondary School in the Epe Garage area, forcing students and teachers to scramble for safety. This marks the third recorded incident in three months, following similar outbreaks in April and May that led to multiple hospitalisations across government and private medical facilities in the town.

Multiple eyewitness accounts confirmed that students and their teachers began experiencing sudden discomfort, breathing difficulties, dizziness, and weakness shortly after a pungent, unfamiliar smell was detected on the school premises. Affected individuals were quickly rushed to the General Hospital, Ijebu-Ode, as well as other nearby hospitals, for urgent medical attention. As of press time, no fatalities had been reported, and most affected persons were said to be in stable condition. One teacher, who pleaded anonymity, told reporters: “It was like the air suddenly became heavy and poisonous. Within minutes, students were coughing, gasping, and some even collapsed. We had to act fast.”

Unlike the previous two incidents where official responses were delayed, the Ogun State Government has now provided a specific update on the origin of the leak. The State Commissioner for Environment, Ola Oresanya, confirmed the incident and revealed that government-installed air quality monitoring devices had successfully detected the emission source. The Commissioner stated, “Yes, I am aware of the incident. Through our installed monitoring devices, we have detected the source of the gas emission. The leakage is coming from behind Our Lady of Apostles School, Ijebu-Ode.” He added that appropriate technical steps are being taken to contain the leak and prevent a fourth occurrence.

READ ALSO:

• Four NYSC Members, Soldier, Passenger Killed in Adamawa Road Crash
• Major Blow to ISWAP as Troops Neutralise Over 50 Terrorists in North-East
• [UPDATED] JUST IN: Gunmen Abduct Adelabu’s Sister, Twin Sons in Ibadan (VIDEO)

Following the second incident in May 2026, which affected over 100 students and teachers across multiple schools including Anglican Girls Grammar School, Ijebu-Ode Grammar School, Adeola Odutola Secondary School, and St. Anthony Esure School, state environmental officials installed real-time air quality monitors. According to official data, those monitors recorded methane gas (CH₄) concentrations ranging from 13,500 to 14,900 parts per million (ppm) in the affected areas. While officials clarified that this level remained below the lower explosive limit, they described it as environmentally significant and capable of causing acute respiratory distress, nausea, and dizziness in humans upon inhalation.

The recurring pattern of gas leaks has raised serious public health concerns in Ijebu-Ode. In the first incident on April 1, 2026, over 30 students and teachers from Our Lady of Apostles Secondary School were hospitalised. Then, in the second incident occurring between May 14 and 15, 2026, more than 100 students from five public schools including OLA, Anglican Girls Grammar School, and Ijebu-Ode Grammar School were hospitalised with nausea, weakness, and breathing issues. The latest incident on June 3, 2026, saw several students from Our Lady of Apostles Secondary School treated for respiratory distress. Parents and residents have expressed growing frustration, noting that private schools in the same locality were reportedly unaffected during past incidents — a pattern that has fuelled speculation about the leak’s specific origin.

The National Coordinator of the Food and Farmers Rights Campaign, John Eko, has appealed to Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun to ensure a permanent solution. Eko warned that repeated exposure to methane and associated gases can cause long-term health damage, especially in children, and insisted that this situation cannot continue. He also called for full public disclosure of the responsible entity behind the gas leak, as well as compensation for affected families.

The Ogun State Environmental Protection Agency (OGEPA) has once again advised residents in Ijebu-Ode and surrounding areas to avoid open flames, sparks, or any ignition sources where a gas odour is perceived. Residents are urged to evacuate the area immediately if a strong chemical or rotten-egg smell is noticed and to seek immediate medical attention if symptoms such as dizziness, headache, nausea, chest tightness, or breathing difficulty develop. It is also advisable to keep windows closed during suspected gas events to reduce inhalation risk.

At the time of filing this report, no formal press release or detailed action plan had been issued by the Ogun State Government regarding sanctions, long-term remediation, or health monitoring for affected students. However, the Commissioner for Environment assured that technical teams remain on the ground and that further updates would be provided as investigations continue.

Third Toxic Odour Incident Hits Ijebu-Ode in 3 Months as Ogun Traces Source to Methane Leak

Nigeria Boosts Health Surveillance as Ebola Risk Prompts Border Checks

The Federal Government has intensified health screening at airports, seaports, and land borders across Nigeria following renewed concerns over the spread of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in parts of East and Central Africa.

Authorities say the strengthened measures are part of a national public health emergency preparedness plan designed to prevent the importation of the virus into Nigeria. Travellers identified as high-risk or showing symptoms consistent with Ebola or other viral haemorrhagic fevers will now undergo secondary screening, isolation, and referral for further medical assessment. The development comes amid reports of a fresh outbreak of the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola virus in parts of Africa, prompting increased surveillance across countries with high travel connectivity.

In a statement issued on Tuesday by the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare through its Assistant Director of Press and Public Relations, Ado Bako, the government confirmed that there is currently no confirmed Ebola case in Nigeria. However, the ministry said Nigeria has activated enhanced nationwide preparedness systems to strengthen disease surveillance, early warning detection, and emergency response capacity in line with global health security standards. It added that all points of entry have been placed under stricter monitoring, with health officials directed to intensify screening and risk assessment for incoming travellers.

As part of the new protocols, authorities have introduced mandatory temperature checks using infrared thermal scanners and handheld devices, completion of health declaration forms, and detailed travel history assessments for passengers arriving in Nigeria. Officials also confirmed the activation of enhanced risk profiling systems at designated entry points to identify passengers coming from affected regions or presenting potential symptoms of infection. The ministry said these steps include strengthened secondary screening procedures, as well as isolation and referral mechanisms for suspected cases of viral haemorrhagic fevers.

READ ALSO:

• Poor Nigerians Are Primary Beneficiaries of Tinubu’s Reforms — Presidential Aide
• Portable Rejects EFCC Invitation Over Alleged Naira Abuse at Son’s Naming Ceremony
• Nnamdi Kanu: US Congress Calls for Diplomatic Engagement with Nigeria

Nigeria’s Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) system has also been reinforced, with expanded community-based surveillance networks and improved event-based reporting across the country. The Federal Government further disclosed that Public Health Emergency Operations Centres have been activated, while Rapid Response Teams at national and sub-national levels have been placed on standby to respond to any suspected outbreak. Hospitals and health facilities nationwide have been directed to strengthen infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, improve triage systems, and ensure immediate reporting of suspected cases.

The Ministry of Health urged Nigerians not to panic, stressing that all measures are preventive and aimed at safeguarding national health security. Citizens were advised to maintain good hygiene practices such as regular handwashing, avoid contact with bodily fluids of sick individuals, and refrain from handling bushmeat from unknown sources. The public was also encouraged to report unusual illnesses or deaths to health authorities promptly.

The renewed alert follows reports of an Ebola outbreak linked to the Bundibugyo strain in parts of East and Central Africa. Health officials say the outbreak has triggered heightened vigilance across the continent due to the risk of cross-border transmission. Nigeria, which successfully contained the 2014 Ebola outbreak, continues to rely on strengthened emergency preparedness systems built from that experience.

Meanwhile, the House of Representatives has raised concerns over what it described as a critical funding crisis affecting the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC). Lawmakers warned that inadequate funding and delayed budget releases could weaken Nigeria’s ability to respond effectively to outbreaks such as Ebola and other infectious diseases. They said key areas including laboratory services, surveillance systems, logistics, and emergency response operations are already under pressure due to financial constraints. The House also called for urgent release of appropriated funds, intensified cross-border surveillance, and strict monitoring of NCDC resource utilisation to strengthen national health preparedness.

Nigeria previously earned global recognition for its swift containment of the 2014 Ebola outbreak, a success experts say must be sustained through consistent investment in public health surveillance and emergency response systems.

Nigeria Boosts Health Surveillance as Ebola Risk Prompts Border Checks

No Safe Level: Study Links Even Low Alcohol Intake to Higher Cancer Risk

Seattle, Washington – Even a single daily drink could be enough to raise the risk of cancer, according to a major global study that delivers one of the strongest warnings yet about alcohol’s impact on human health. The massive analysis, covering 843 scientific studies and millions of people worldwide, found that alcohol is linked to a wide range of serious diseases, with cancer risks increasing even at low levels of drinking. Researchers declared that the findings reinforce a blunt scientific reality: alcohol is a known cause of cancer, officially classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) — the same category as tobacco, asbestos, and ionising radiation. And crucially, they warn there may be no completely safe level of consumption when it comes to cancer.

The study, published in Nature Health on June 1, 2026, examined alcohol’s effects on 20 major diseases, including multiple cancers, liver failure, heart disease, infections, and brain disorders. Across almost every category, the risks rose as drinking increased, but in several cancers, damage began at surprisingly low intake levels. The research applied the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s Burden of Proof (BoP) meta-analytic framework to carefully account for differences across studies and determine the most conservative estimate supported by the data.

One of the most alarming findings involved cancers of the throat and upper airways. The study found that pharyngeal cancer (excluding nasopharyngeal cancer) showed the strongest association, with at least a 105% increase in risk at average consumption levels — earning the highest five-star rating in the study’s evidence grading system. At around two alcoholic drinks per day (20g of alcohol), researchers found a 56% higher risk of certain pharyngeal cancers compared with non-drinkers. At higher levels, the danger escalated sharply, with risk more than tripling in some cases. At 40 grams per day (approximately four standard drinks), the mean relative risk reached 2.73 (230-323% increase), and at 76 grams per day (about 7.5 drinks), risk soared to 4.24 times higher than non-drinkers. The dose-response relationship for pharyngeal cancer was found to be non-linear, with risk increasing steeply at lower intake levels before levelling off at higher exposures. This means the greatest proportional increase in risk occurs at relatively low levels of drinking.

READ ALSO:

• Power Outage Hits Five States, Niger Republic as TCN Begins Transmission Line Repairs
• Toyota Motor Show Roars into Lagos Tomorrow with Test Drives, Debates, Free Diagnostics, Others
• Oyo Boils as Teachers Strike, Protesters Demand Freedom for Abducted Pupils

The study found harmful associations between alcohol use and all ten cancers examined, with risk increasing progressively as intake rose. Even consumption below one standard drink per day (less than 10 grams of pure alcohol) was associated with elevated risk for cancers of the pharynx, colorectum, esophagus, breast, liver, pancreas, and prostate. Laryngeal cancer, colorectal cancer, and lip and oral cavity cancer showed moderate evidence of harm, with the analysis indicating risk increases of at least 22% to 49% (three-star associations). Cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases showed at least a 40% increase in risk, while pancreatitis showed at least a 22% increase (three-star associations). Esophageal cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer showed weaker but consistent evidence of harm, with risks rising steadily as consumption increased (two-star associations). Of all cancers studied, stomach cancer was the one health outcome needing additional evidence to better understand the strength of the relationship.

The study’s findings challenge the widespread belief that moderate drinking is harmless. While some earlier research has suggested that small amounts of alcohol might offer limited protection against conditions such as heart disease, dementia, and diabetes, the authors of the new study explained that these findings are uncertain and likely influenced by differences in lifestyle, diet, and health status between drinkers and non-drinkers. For several non-cancer outcomes, the dose-response relationship was J- or U-shaped. Type 2 diabetes showed a small reduction in risk of at least 4.5% at low-to-moderate intake levels. Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias showed a reduction of at least 6.4% at low-to-moderate intake levels. For ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, and haemorrhagic stroke, evidence of lower risk at low-to-moderate intake was inconsistent. However, importantly, any possible protective effects disappeared as alcohol intake increased, while cancer risks continued to rise. At higher levels of consumption, the evidence points to increased risk across every outcome examined. Atrial fibrillation and flutter showed increased risk, with the analysis indicating at least a 6% increase.

The mechanisms through which alcohol increases cancer risk are well-established. According to health authorities, ethanol and its main metabolite acetaldehyde can damage DNA in cells, leading to mutations that can trigger cancer development. Alcohol also increases oestrogen levels, which is particularly important for breast carcinogenesis. It can act as a solvent for tobacco carcinogens, enhancing their cancer-causing effects, and produce reactive oxygen species and nitrogen species that can damage cellular components. Additionally, alcohol can alter folate metabolism, affecting DNA synthesis and repair. Crucially, alcohol’s carcinogenic effect is independent of the type of alcoholic beverage. The risk is the same whether the drink is beer, wine, or spirits. It is the ethanol itself — and its metabolite acetaldehyde — that causes the damage.

The researchers warned of a major public awareness gap. While most people understand the link between smoking and cancer, far fewer realise that alcohol is also a direct carcinogen. “This is not just a lifestyle issue; it is a cancer risk issue,” the study implies through its findings, highlighting alcohol as one of the most widespread avoidable causes of disease globally. According to a February 2026 survey by the Annenberg Public Policy Center, only 53% of American adults say that regularly consuming alcohol increases cancer risk — statistically unchanged from the previous year. More than a quarter (29%) remain unsure how alcohol consumption affects cancer risk. The survey noted that public awareness had improved following the U.S. Surgeon General’s January 2025 advisory on alcohol and cancer risk, which called for updated warning labels on alcoholic beverage containers. However, when the U.S. Department of Agriculture later removed the warning linking alcohol consumption to cancer from the Dietary Guidelines, it “turned its back on a substantial body of research,” according to APPC Director Kathleen Hall Jamieson.

READ ALSO:

• ‘No Evidence’: Atiku Camp Fires Back at Babachir Lawal Over ADC Rigging Claims
• Police Warn Nigerians Against Reprisal Over Fresh South Africa Xenophobic Attacks
• Breaking: CBN Redeploys All Four Deputy Governors in Major Leadership Shake-Up

Alcohol consumption accounts for an estimated 741,300 new cases of cancer worldwide annually (about 4% of all new cancer cases) and contributes to nearly 400,000 deaths due to cancer every year. Half of all alcohol-attributable cancers in the WHO European Region are caused by “light” and “moderate” alcohol consumption — defined as less than 1.5 litres of wine, less than 3.5 litres of beer, or less than 450 millilitres of spirits per week. The World Health Organization’s Regional Office for Europe and IARC launched a new volume of the IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention in October 2025, focusing specifically on the impact on cancer of reduction or cessation of alcohol consumption and the effectiveness of alcohol policies.

The authors called for stronger public warnings, clearer labelling, and updated health guidance that reflects alcohol’s cancer risk more directly. The UK Government’s National Cancer Plan for England, published in February 2026, acknowledges this need, committing to mandatory requirements for alcoholic drinks to display consistent nutritional information and health warning messages. Dr. Emmanuela Gakidou, senior author and Professor at IHME, explained the complexity: “The science on alcohol and health is genuinely complex. For cancer, the evidence is consistent and unambiguous: risk rises with any level of alcohol intake. For some cardiometabolic and dementia outcomes, studies suggest small reduced risks at low-to-moderate consumption, but those associations became weaker and reversed at higher levels of drinking. Rather than interpreting these results as an endorsement of drinking, they lay out a complex map of where the evidence is strong, weak, or mixed.” Dr. Xiaochen Dai, lead author and research collaborator at IHME, added: “Our framework takes a cautious approach by accounting for differences across studies and reporting the smallest plausible effect supported by the data. For some cardiometabolic and dementia outcomes, the relationship is more complex, and the evidence is weaker, which is exactly what our star ratings are designed to make clear.”

For millions of people who see alcohol as a normal part of daily life, the message from this landmark study is stark: even “moderate” drinking may come with a hidden cost — and that cost could be cancer. The study’s findings suggest that drinking guidelines should be informed by up-to-date evidence across the full range of health outcomes, discourage heavy episodic drinking, and clearly communicate that even low-to-moderate intake is associated with elevated risk for several conditions, especially cancers. The researchers note that complete cessation of alcohol consumption is the only certain way to eliminate alcohol-related cancer risk entirely.

For quick reference, the cancer risk findings at average consumption levels are as follows: pharyngeal cancer shows at least a 105% increase with five-star evidence; laryngeal cancer shows at least a 49% increase with three-star evidence; cirrhosis and chronic liver disease show at least a 40% increase with three-star evidence; colorectal cancer shows at least a 22% increase with three-star evidence; lip and oral cavity cancer shows at least a 22% increase with three-star evidence; pancreatitis shows at least a 22% increase with three-star evidence; and esophageal, breast, liver, pancreatic, and prostate cancers show consistent evidence of harm with two-star evidence ratings.

No Safe Level: Study Links Even Low Alcohol Intake to Higher Cancer Risk