News
Ex-Minister Diezani in court to recover seized assets
Former Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, has asked a Federal High Court, Abuja, to vacate an order granted to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for final forfeiture of her seized assets.
Alison-Madueke sought an order extending the time within which to seek leave to apply to the court for an order to set aside the EFCC’s public notice issued to conduct the public sale on her property.
The anti-corruption agency had planned to conduct a public sale of all assets seized from Alison-Madueke beginning from Jan. 9 as contained in its public notice following various court judgments/orders issued in favor of the commission as final forfeiture orders against property and personal effects of the former minister.
But in the motion marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/21/2023 dated and filed Jan. 6 by her lawyer, Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, before Justice Inyang Ekwo, the ex-minister sought five orders from the court.
While Alison-Madueke is the applicant, the EFCC is the sole respondent in the suit.
The former minister who argued that the various orders were made without jurisdiction, said these “ought to be set aside ex debito justitiae.”
She said she was not given fair hearing in all the proceedings leading to the orders.
“The various court orders issued in favor of the respondent and upon which the respondent issued the public notice to conduct a public sale of items contained in the public notice most of which court the interest of the applicant were issued in breach of the applicant’s right to fair hearing as guaranteed by Section 36 (1) of the 1999 Constitution, as altered, and other similar constitutional provisions,” she said.
She argued that she was neither served with the charge sheet and proof of evidence in any of the charges nor any other summons howsoever and whatsoever in respect of the criminal charges pending against her before the court.
She further argued that the courts were misled into making several of the final forfeiture orders against her assets through suppression or non-disclosure of material facts.
“The several applications upon which the courts made the final order of forfeiture against the applicant were obtained upon gross misstatements, misrepresentations, non-disclosure, concealment, and suppression of material facts and this honorable court has the power to set aside same ex debito justitiae, as a void order is as good as if it was never made at all.
“The orders were made without recourse to the constitutional right to fair hearing and right to property accorded the applicant by the constitution.
“The applicant was never served with the processes of court in all the proceedings that led to the order of final forfeiture,” she said, among other grounds given.
But the EFCC, in a counter affidavit deposed to by Rufai Zaki, a detective with the commission, urged the court to dismiss Alison-Madueke’s application.
Zaki, who was a member of the team that investigated a case of criminal conspiracy, official corruption and money laundering against the ex-minister and some other persons involved in the case, said investigation had clearly shown that she was involved in some acts of criminality.
He said Alison-Madueke was therefore charged before the court in charge no: FHC/ABJ/CR/208/2018.
“We hereby rely on the charge FHC/ABJ/CR/208/2018 dated 14th November 2018 filed before this honorable court and also attached as Exhibit C in the applicant’s affidavit,” he said.
The EFCC operative, who said he had seen the ex-ministers motion, said most of the depositions were untrue.
He said contrary to her deposition in the affidavit in support, most of the cases which led to the final forfeiture of the contested property “were action in rem, same were heard at various times and determined by this honorable court.”
He said the courts differently ordered the commission to do a newspaper publication inviting parties to show cause why the said property should not be forfeited to the Federal Government before final orders were made.
Zaki argued that one Nnamdi Awa Kalu represented the ex-minister in reaction to one of the forfeiture applications.
“We humbly rely on the judgment of Hon. Justice I.LN. Oweibo dated 10th September 2019 shown in Exhibit C of the applicant’s affidavit,” he said.
The officer said that contrary to her, the final forfeiture of the assets which were the subject of the present application was ordered by the court in 2017 and that this was not set aside or upturned on appeal.
According to him, the properties have been disposed of through due process of law.
Upon mentioning the matter on Monday, Alison-Madueke’s counsel, Oluchi Uche, told Justice Ekwo that they were just been served by the EFFC on Friday and they would need time to respond to the counter affidavit.
Farouk Abdullah, who appeared by the anti-graft agency, did not oppose and the judge adjourned the matter until May 8 for a hearing.
Alison-Madueke was Nigeria’s Petroleum Minister during President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration.(NAN)
![]()
News
Senate Erupts as Akpabio, Oshiomhole Clash Over Controversial Rule Amendments
Senate Erupts as Akpabio, Oshiomhole Clash Over Controversial Rule Amendments
The Nigerian Senate crisis deepened on Wednesday after a heated confrontation between Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Adams Oshiomhole disrupted plenary proceedings for over 15 minutes.
The tense exchange occurred during the routine consideration of the Votes and Proceedings from Tuesday’s sitting. Trouble began when Oshiomhole (APC, Edo North) abruptly raised a point of order while Akpabio was reading the official record.
Citing the Senate Standing Orders 2023 (as amended), Akpabio ruled him out of order, explaining that such interruptions are not permitted at that stage of proceedings. However, Oshiomhole insisted on being heard, challenging the interpretation of the rules and triggering a Senate plenary disruption.
In a bid to restore order, Akpabio called on former Chief Whip Orji Uzor Kalu to clarify the procedural position. Kalu backed the Senate President, stating that the rules clearly prohibit such interruptions.
The situation escalated further when Chief Whip Tahir Monguno warned that disciplinary measures could be invoked if the disruption continued. Despite this, Oshiomhole remained defiant, citing Order 20(f) and stressing that lawmakers must fully understand the rules guiding legislative business.
A visibly displeased Akpabio issued a stern warning, stating, “We should not just go home, buy forms and come here without knowing the rules,” before cautioning that the Senate would not hesitate to enforce discipline if necessary.
READ ALSO:
- BREAKING: Dangote Refinery Raises Petrol Price to ₦1,350 Per Litre
- FG Rules Out Return of Fuel Subsidy, Says Market Pricing Will Continue
- Federal Worker Arrested for Alleged Plot to Kill Donald Trump
Calm was eventually restored, allowing the Senate President to complete the reading. Senator Adamu Aliero subsequently moved a motion for adoption, seconded by Senate Minority Leader Abba Moro.
The confrontation is widely linked to the controversial Senate rule amendment adopted a day earlier, which has sparked intense debate within Nigeria’s political space ahead of the 2027 elections. During a closed-door session lasting nearly three hours, lawmakers amended key provisions—Orders 4 and 5—effectively tightening eligibility criteria for leadership positions in the National Assembly.
Under the revised rules, only senators who have served at least two consecutive terms immediately before nomination will be eligible to contest for positions such as Senate President and Deputy Senate President. This new Senate eligibility rule significantly narrows the pool of contenders.
The amendment also reinforces the principle of ranking, prioritising former presiding officers and experienced lawmakers over first-time entrants. Additionally, Order 5 now requires that any senator seeking a principal office must have completed two consecutive terms prior to nomination.
The implication is clear: only returning members of the current Senate who secure re-election into the next Assembly will qualify for top leadership roles, effectively excluding many new and returning political heavyweights.
The Nigeria Senate controversy has raised concerns about inclusiveness and internal democracy. While Senate leadership argues the changes will strengthen institutional memory and ensure stability, critics believe the move could consolidate power among a select group of ranking lawmakers.
Oshiomhole is reported to have been among the few senators who openly resisted the amendments, making Wednesday’s clash a continuation of deeper disagreements within the chamber.
Observers say the incident signals early 2027 election power struggle dynamics, with growing tensions over succession, leadership control, and legislative procedure already playing out in the Red Chamber. As debates continue, the episode underscores broader concerns about transparency, fairness, and the balance of power in Nigeria’s legislative process.
Senate Erupts as Akpabio, Oshiomhole Clash Over Controversial Rule Amendments
![]()
News
FG Moves to Reverse US ‘Country of Particular Concern’ Designation on Nigeria
FG Moves to Reverse US ‘Country of Particular Concern’ Designation on Nigeria
The Federal Government has intensified diplomatic engagements with the United States in a bid to secure the removal of Nigeria from the “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) list, citing ongoing security reforms and strengthened bilateral cooperation.
The designation, issued by the U.S. government in 2025 under its international religious freedom framework, was based on concerns over alleged violations of religious freedom in Nigeria, particularly linked to violence involving extremist groups and communal clashes in parts of the North-East and Middle Belt regions.
The classification followed concerns raised by Washington over attacks attributed to extremist organisations such as Boko Haram and armed groups operating in rural communities, which have contributed to insecurity, displacement, and heightened humanitarian challenges across affected regions.
Nigeria has consistently rejected the CPC designation, arguing that it does not fully reflect the country’s religious diversity or the ongoing efforts by security agencies to combat terrorism, banditry, and other forms of violent crime affecting both Christians and Muslims.
The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, confirmed that discussions on the CPC issue formed part of a recent diplomatic engagement in Abuja with U.S. Chargé d’Affaires, David Heffern.
In a post on her X handle, she said the meeting covered a broad range of bilateral issues including security and defence cooperation, border management, migration challenges, counter-terrorism efforts, intelligence sharing, visa matters, and other areas of mutual interest between both countries.
READ ALSO:
- Davido Suspends Music Activities to Mobilise Votes for Adeleke’s Re-election
- African Nations Threaten Retaliatory Action Over Xenophobic Attacks in South Africa
- Melaye: Obi Can’t Handle Nigeria If He Can’t Face Party Crises
Odumegwu-Ojukwu explained that both sides also reviewed ongoing collaboration under the Joint Working Group, which focuses on improving regional stability and addressing shared security concerns across West Africa.
A major point of discussion was Nigeria’s continued inclusion on the CPC list, which the government insists is being addressed through sustained reforms and diplomatic engagement with Washington.
She noted that Nigeria remains committed to working closely with the United States to address underlying concerns while strengthening long-standing bilateral relations.
The Federal Government has also highlighted ongoing improvements in counter-terrorism operations, inter-agency coordination, and community-based security initiatives aimed at reducing violence and protecting civilians across the country.
Officials say Nigeria is also deepening cooperation with international partners in intelligence sharing and regional peacebuilding efforts as part of its broader security strategy.
Authorities maintain that insecurity in Nigeria is driven by multiple factors, including terrorism, banditry, and communal conflicts, rather than targeted religious persecution alone.
The government has reiterated that it will continue diplomatic engagement with the United States and other partners in a bid to ensure that Nigeria’s security progress is properly reflected in international assessments.
Both countries are expected to maintain discussions in the coming months as Nigeria pushes for a review of its status on the CPC list and seeks to strengthen cooperation on security and governance issues.
FG Moves to Reverse US ‘Country of Particular Concern’ Designation on Nigeria
![]()
News
Senate Tightens Rules, Restricts Ex-Governors, New Entrants From Leadership Positions
Senate Tightens Rules, Restricts Ex-Governors, New Entrants From Leadership Positions
The Senate of Nigeria has adopted sweeping amendments to its Standing Orders, tightening eligibility requirements for principal leadership positions and limiting access for first-time senators, serving governors, and former lawmakers planning a return to the chamber.
The decision followed a closed-door session that lasted nearly three hours on Tuesday, after which lawmakers revised Orders 4 and 5 of the Senate rules. The amendments introduce stricter criteria for contesting top positions such as Senate President, Deputy Senate President, Majority Leader, and other principal offices.
Under the revised Order 4, the Senate introduced a structured ranking system to determine eligibility for presiding officers. Priority will now be given to former Senate Presidents, former Deputy Senate Presidents, former principal officers, senators who have served at least one full four-year term, and former members of the House of Representatives. First-time senators will only be considered where no qualified candidates exist within these categories.
Lawmakers backing the reform said the new hierarchy is designed to strengthen institutional memory and ensure that leadership roles are occupied by experienced legislators who are familiar with parliamentary procedures and responsibilities.
READ ALSO:
- FIFA President Defends High 2026 World Cup Ticket Prices
- Xenophobic Attacks: Oshiomhole Urges Tinubu to Revoke MTN, DStv Licences
- Enugu Islamic Centre Crisis: Muslim Leaders Clear Air on Ani Arrest
The Senate also strengthened Order 5 by introducing a clause requiring senators to have served at least two consecutive terms immediately before becoming eligible to contest for principal offices. This means that first-term senators and those with interrupted legislative careers will no longer be eligible to run for key leadership positions.
The amendment further affects senators-elect who have not served in both the 9th and 10th National Assemblies, effectively excluding them from leadership contests in the upcoming 11th Senate.
The reforms come amid rising political activity ahead of the 2027 general elections, as several state governors and political heavyweights prepare to move into the Senate after completing their tenure in executive office.
Analysts note that the changes appear targeted at a growing trend in which outgoing governors seek to immediately assume leadership positions upon entering the Senate, often based on political influence rather than legislative experience.
At least a dozen governors are expected to complete their second and final terms by 2027, while several former governors are also positioning themselves for Senate seats, increasing competition for future leadership roles.
The development is particularly significant as high-profile figures, including serving governors, are already engaging in early consultations and political alignments within their states, with party structures playing a decisive role in determining Senate nominations.
Although the rules do not mention specific individuals, political observers say the amendment could impact figures such as Hope Uzodimma, whose name has featured in discussions around possible Senate ambitions after his governorship tenure.
Other political actors with gubernatorial backgrounds are also expected to be affected by the new restrictions, especially those planning to enter the Senate for the first time after 2027.
Senate leadership maintains that the reforms are aimed at preserving institutional integrity and ensuring that leadership selection is guided by experience rather than external political influence.
However, critics argue that the changes could reduce opportunities for new entrants and concentrate leadership power among long-serving lawmakers.
The amendments also reflect broader political realignments within Nigeria’s political system, where party structures and executive influence continue to shape legislative dynamics ahead of the 2027 elections.
As preparations intensify for the next electoral cycle, the revised Senate rules are expected to significantly reshape leadership contests, narrowing eligibility to a smaller pool of experienced legislators.
Senate Tightens Rules, Restricts Ex-Governors, New Entrants From Leadership Positions
![]()
-
metro2 days agoThree Arrested Over Fake Divorce Story About Tony Elumelu – UBA
-
metro2 days agoTragedy in Minna as Choir Member Dies During Church Service
-
Health2 days ago5 Early Signs of Stomach Cancer You Should Not Ignore
-
Entertainment2 days agoFunke Akindele Explains Why She Stopped Attending Church
-
metro2 days agoUNICROSS Students Protest in Calabar Over Death of 3 Students, Driver
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Rufai Oseni Alleges Plot to Stop Peter Obi From Contesting Election
-
metro2 days agoDelta Shooting: Officers Dismissed as Police Expose Circumstances Behind Killing
-
metro1 day agoCultists Storm Lagos Wedding, Kill Bride’s Father, Hypeman
