Controversy over timeframe as Presidential Tribunal commences pre-hearing session - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Controversy over timeframe as Presidential Tribunal commences pre-hearing session

Published

on

Peter Obi, Bola Tinubu and Atiku Abubakar

Controversy over timeframe as Presidential Tribunal commences pre-hearing session

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) will today commence pre-hearing session in the five petitions challenging the declaration of Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), as the President- elect.

The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Mahmood Yakubu, had on March 1 declared Tinubu the president-elect on the grounds that his party scored the majority of votes cast in the polls.

Dissatisfied with the result, five political parties and their presidential candidates filed separate petitions seeking orders to annul the election and declared them as winners or alternatively an order directing the INEC to conduct a fresh election.

The petitioners are the opposition Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) and Atiku Abubakar, marked CA/PEPC/05/2023; the Labour Party (LP) and Peter Obi, marked: CA/PEPC/04/2023; the Action Alliance (AA) and its presidential candidate, Solomon Okangbuan; with No: CA/PEPC/01/2023; Allied Peoples Movement (APM) and its candidate, Chichi Ojei, with suit number: CA/PEPC/03/2023; and the Action Peoples Party (APP) in a petition with No CA/PEPC/02/2023.

READ ALSO:

The tribunal has fixed the pre-hearing session after it has stopped receiving replies to the various petitions on April 23.

Technically, today’s proceedings are specifically to sort preliminary applications before proceeding with the substantive petitions.

Regardless of the date fixed for the hearing of the petitions, there are calls by some legal experts, political analysts, Civil Society Organizations, religious leaders and other stakeholders for the amendment of the electoral process in a manner that every election petition case would be dispensed with before swearing in the declared winner.

In Nigeria, election petitions are governed by specific electoral law making them unique in nature. Section 288 of the constitution and the Electoral Act 2022 regulate elections, while petitions are also governed by the 1999 Constitution and the Electoral Act.

The call is necessitated by the fact that some provisions of the 1999 constitution and the Electoral Act erect legal roadblocks and difficult for petitioners challenging the conduct and outcome of elections to sail through to victory at the tribunals.

One of such notorious provisions is section 285 (6) which provides that “An election tribunal shall deliver judgment in writing within 180 days from the date of filing of the petition.”

Those advocating for the amendment of the electoral process are of the view that the Section 285 (6) is inimical to achieving fair hearing enshrined in the same Constitution. To them, setting 21-day time frame within which to file a petition challenging the conduct of elections in Nigeria is ridiculous.

READ ALSO:

They noted that challenging the conduct or outcome of a presidential election implies challenging the election conducted in 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). According to the legal experts, law that gives the petitioner 21 days to gather his materials and articulate his grievances in a form that can be presented before the tribunal within 21 days is not progressive, considering the fact that the same 21-day deadline was also given to opposition candidates to file their petitions for other categories of election held in smaller geographical areas like state, district and constituency.

It is therefore their opinion that these requirements of the laws do not provide a fair and level playing grounds for the parties involved in election petitions as swearing in those declared winners pending the determination of the tribunal cases has often given the defendants undue advantage to use the state resources to fight their opponents at the tribunal.

Since the return of the fourth republic, presidential election results have always been rejected and contested at the tribunal with exception to the 2015 presidential election won by President Muhammadu Buhari.

In 1999, the election of former President Olusegun Obasanjo was challenged at the tribunal by Chief Olu Falae. In 2003, Obasanjo’s re-election was challenged by Muhammadu Buhari.

In 2007, both Muhammadu Buhari and Atiku Abubakar challenged the victory of late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua who won a highly controversial election. Buhari returned to the tribunal in 2011 when he challenged the election of President Goodluck Jonathan.

There was no challenge of Buhari’s victory in 2015 as the then incumbent President, Jonathan conceded defeat and congratulated the winner. However, in 2019, Atiku Abubakar challenged the re-election of President Muhammadu Buhari.

READ ALSO:

It is interesting to know that historically,  no presidential election tribunal has upturned the election of the declared winner. The closest was in 2007 when the Supreme Court in a split decision of 4- 3 upheld the election of late President Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua.

The point to be considered is that, in all of the above situations, the presidential candidates so declared as winners by the electoral body, all took their oath of office on May 29,  while petitions against them were still pending at the tribunals.

Those advocating for the conclusion of election petitions before swearing in the declared winner are of the view that the fact that the constitution prescribed a time frame of about 180 days, doesn’t mean that it must run its course since the policy has been overheated.

However, in as much as it is true that justice delayed is justice denied, it is no less axiomatic that justice rushed is justice crushed.

Until and unless a major constitutional adjustment is carried out, to the effect that nobody must be sworn in as anything whether president or governor or lawmakers until the petition has been exhausted, the laws regulating the hearing and determination of election petitions remains sacrosanct.

Dayo Akinlaja (SAN) said it is not feasible to achieve because there are inbuilt procedures to ensure fair hearing and parties are given timelines for filing processes.

He explained that a party cannot be stampeded to file processes before the expiry of the timelines allowed under the law and each party may decide to hurry or speed up the process.

All parties are entitled to fair hearing and there is no way fair hearing would not be sacrificed where the procedure of adjudication is inordinately rushed.

READ ALSO:

To that extent, the agitation for the completion of election cases before May 29, 2023, cannot be effectuated within the prism or framework of the constitution and the Electoral Act, 2022, which provides for a decision or judgment to be delivered within 180 days of the filing of the petition against the return of a candidate in an election.

There are also the appeals arising therefrom to be completed within 60 days from the date of filing. To be achievable, both the Constitution and the Electoral Act will have to be amended to make such a provision.

In addition to the above, although the timeframe had been spelt out, parties still find ways to raise technical issues like failure to serve parties directly, failure to file within a certain time, failure to tender certain vital documents, objections and arguments over the admissibility of documents, lengthy cross-examination of witnesses etc.

Unfortunately, these are allowed by the (tribunal) courts which have stalled the process thus defeating the purpose of the legislative solutions or gains made.

Furthermore, all decisions must be within the law with judicial activism to restore confidence in the Nigerian election systems and to ensure no party is robbed as justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done.

In the future, it is possible to amend our laws and rules of court to accommodate such an idea, but it is clearly impossible under the nation’s present circumstances.

It is more arduous to prove an election petition than to defend it. That is why the petitioners need more time to prove their cases and not necessarily the defendants.

That is why the Petitioners are given 21 days to file and the defendants have 14 days to respond. And the Petitioners have a further 7 days to reply, making a total of 30 days as against the 14 days of the Respondents. It follows that in leading evidence in court/Tribunal in support of the petitions, the petitioners would also take more time.

Quote: “the agitation for the completion of election cases before May 29, 2023, cannot be effectuated within the prism or framework of the constitution and the Electoral Act, 2022, which provides for a decision or judgment to be delivered within 180 days of the filing of the petition against the return of a candidate in an election”

Controversy over timeframe as Presidential Tribunal commences pre-hearing session

SUN

Loading

News

BREAKING: FG Announces 30-Day Petrol Discount, Gives NNPCL Fresh Directive

Published

on

BREAKING: FG Announces 30-Day Petrol Discount, Gives NNPCL Fresh Directive

BREAKING: FG Announces 30-Day Petrol Discount, Gives NNPCL Fresh Directive

Public transporters to get priority as government moves to cushion impact of high fuel prices

The Federal Government has announced a 30-day discount on petrol sold through the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), with public transport operators to receive priority under the arrangement.

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, announced the measure on Thursday, October 8, 2026, during a press briefing in Abuja on petrol prices and subsidy-related issues.

Oyedele said the intervention should not be interpreted as a return to petrol subsidy, explaining that the government would instead allow petrol to be sold at cost during the period.

“We are offering a discount on petrol dispensed by NNPC Limited for the next 30 days in the first instance with priority for public transporters nationwide.”

The minister added: “It’s not a subsidy; government is just saying we sell to you at cost.”

FG targets N1,350 petrol landing-cost ceiling

The announcement forms part of a broader package of measures being introduced by the Federal Government to moderate the impact of rising petrol and transportation costs.

Oyedele also disclosed that the government was negotiating a ₦1,350-per-litre ceiling on the ex-gantry or landing cost of petrol.

According to him, the proposed price-modulation arrangement is intended to prevent pump prices from immediately following every fluctuation in international crude oil prices and foreign exchange rates.

READ ALSO:

He said the ceiling would be reviewed monthly, with adjustments made when necessary.

Public transporters given priority

Under the 30-day arrangement, public transport operators nationwide are expected to receive priority in accessing the discounted petrol.

The measure is significant because fuel costs have a direct impact on transport fares and, consequently, the prices of food and other essential commodities.

The government is therefore seeking to provide immediate relief while working on longer-term measures aimed at reducing volatility in petrol prices.

No exact discount amount announced yet

However, the Federal Government has not, as of the announcement, disclosed the exact amount of the 30-day discount or stated a new uniform pump price that all NNPCL stations will charge.

Vanguard reported that NNPCL had separately announced a ₦66-per-litre discount for customers using the NNPC Fuel App at its stations nationwide.

The latest announcement appears to be a broader government intervention, but details of its implementation, including how eligible public transporters will access the discount, are still expected.

FG unveils wider relief measures

Oyedele also disclosed other measures aimed at easing the pressure of high fuel and transportation costs.

These include efforts to moderate taxes and levies that increase logistics costs, forward crude sales to domestic refiners, increased funding for cash transfers to vulnerable households and subsidised credit for small businesses and consumers.

The government is also working with state governments to accelerate the rollout of compressed natural gas (CNG) as an alternative fuel for transportation.

What Nigerians should know

The latest announcement does not amount to a formal restoration of the petrol subsidy, according to the Finance Minister.

Rather, the government says it intends to temporarily sell petrol through NNPCL at cost, with public transporters prioritised, while pursuing mechanisms to make fuel prices less vulnerable to sudden international market and exchange-rate movements.

The 30-day period is expected to provide some relief to transport operators and commuters, although the impact on pump prices and transport fares will depend on the details of the implementation.

Newstrends.ng will continue to monitor the Federal Government and NNPCL for the exact discount amount, effective pump prices and implementation guidelines.

BREAKING: FG Announces 30-Day Petrol Discount, Gives NNPCL Fresh Directive

Loading

Continue Reading

News

World Bank Raises Nigeria Growth Forecast, Demands More Jobs, Poverty Reduction

Published

on

World Bank Raises Nigeria Growth Forecast, Demands More Jobs, Poverty Reduction

World Bank Raises Nigeria Growth Forecast, Demands More Jobs, Poverty Reduction

The World Bank has upgraded its economic growth forecast for Nigeria, citing improving macroeconomic stability, stronger investor confidence and a gradual recovery in private investment under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s reforms.

In its latest Africa Economic Update, the bank raised Nigeria’s 2026 growth forecast to 4.3 per cent, up from an estimated 4.0 per cent growth in 2025.

It also projected that the Nigerian economy would expand by 4.4 per cent annually in 2027 and 2028, reflecting expectations of continued improvement in economic activity.

The World Bank said Nigeria was among nearly three-quarters of sub-Saharan African countries whose growth outlooks were upgraded, attributing the broader improvement to years of economic reforms and better macroeconomic management.

For Nigeria, the bank pointed to progress in restoring macroeconomic stability, stronger external balances, improved fiscal revenues, increased investor confidence and a gradual recovery in private investment.

Nigeria’s economy expanded by 4.43 per cent year-on-year in the second quarter of 2026, according to official data, with agriculture and services recording stronger performances.

However, the World Bank cautioned that faster economic growth alone would not be enough to significantly improve living standards.

READ ALSO:

It said the country’s next major challenge was to translate economic growth into productive jobs, higher household incomes and lower poverty.

The bank estimates that about 3.5 million people enter Nigeria’s labour force every year, putting enormous pressure on the economy to generate sufficient and sustainable employment opportunities.

It warned that the significance of Nigeria’s improving growth outlook would increasingly depend on whether economic expansion results in increased investment, business growth, higher productivity and better-paying jobs.

The World Bank’s latest assessment also showed that poverty remains a major concern. It estimated that 69.6 per cent of Nigerians lived below the lower-middle-income poverty line of $4.20 a day in 2025, while about 123 million people, or 50.8 per cent of the population, lived in extreme poverty under the bank’s cited measure.

The lender said improving macroeconomic conditions had created an opportunity for Nigeria to move from economic stabilisation towards expanding productive capacity and improving living standards.

It, however, warned that rising government spending ahead of the 2027 elections could undermine the momentum of recent reforms if fiscal discipline weakens.

The bank also stressed the importance of greater private-sector investment, improved electricity supply, transport and logistics, digital infrastructure, access to finance, agricultural productivity and a better business environment.

It said investments in education, skills, healthcare and early-childhood development would also be critical to improving the productivity of Nigeria’s future workforce.

Beyond Nigeria, the World Bank raised its forecast for sub-Saharan Africa to 4.3 per cent growth in 2026, up from 4.1 per cent in 2025 and 0.3 percentage points above its April projection.

The bank said the region still faced significant risks from geopolitical tensions, climate shocks, tighter financial conditions, insecurity and declining development assistance.

It also urged African governments to invest in artificial intelligence and digital technologies, saying affordable AI applications in areas such as education, agriculture, healthcare, finance and small businesses could help boost productivity and create more jobs.

For Nigeria, the message is increasingly clear: maintaining macroeconomic stability is only the first stage of the recovery, while the bigger test will be whether the reforms deliver jobs, income growth and meaningful poverty reduction for households.

World Bank Raises Nigeria Growth Forecast, Demands More Jobs, Poverty Reduction

Loading

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: NLC Shuts Down Abuja Indefinitely Over FCT Teachers’ Promotion Dispute

Published

on

N500 Petrol, Wage Award: Public Sector Workers Begin Warning Strike

BREAKING: NLC Shuts Down Abuja Indefinitely Over FCT Teachers’ Promotion Dispute

 

The Federal Capital Territory was thrown into an indefinite industrial crisis on Wednesday as the Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC, ordered workers across Abuja to withdraw their services over unresolved disputes surrounding the promotion and career progression of teachers.

The strike, which took effect on Wednesday, October 7, 2026, followed the expiration of a seven-day ultimatum issued to the Federal Capital Territory Administration, FCTA, after months of disagreements over teachers’ welfare, promotion procedures and the treatment of senior education officials.

The NLC FCT Council said it was compelled to resort to industrial action after rejecting the response of the FCTA to its demands, describing the administration’s position as “ambiguous, dismissive and totally unacceptable.”

The directive, issued in a communique signed by the NLC FCT Council Chairman, Comrade Knabayi S. Adalo, directed the congress’s affiliate unions to mobilise their members for the indefinite action until the outstanding issues are resolved.

At the heart of the dispute is the controversial “vacancy clause”, which makes the promotion of teachers subject to the availability of vacant positions.

The labour movement argues that the condition has resulted in career stagnation for qualified teachers who have met the requirements for advancement but are unable to move to the next cadre because of the absence of vacancies.

The NLC maintains that teachers, recruited specifically to teach under the FCT Universal Basic Education Board and FCT Secondary Education Board, should not be subjected to a promotion arrangement designed for core civil servants or pool officers.

The dispute has been building for months. In September, the NLC gave the FCTA a seven-day ultimatum to resolve the grievances, following earlier protests by teachers over the vacancy requirement and concerns surrounding the 2025 promotion examination.

Among the union’s demands is the removal of the vacancy requirement from the promotion process for teachers. It is also demanding that teachers who were eligible for promotion in 2025 but were unable to take the examination be allowed to sit for the exercise before or alongside the 2026 candidates.

The NLC is further demanding the reversal of redeployment and demotion letters issued to some directors in the education sector, citing the Harmonised Retirement Age for Teachers in Nigeria Act, 2022.

The union has also called for changes involving the management of the FCT education agencies, including the FCT Universal Basic Education Board and FCT Secondary Education Board.

The FCTA, however, has previously defended its administrative decisions, saying its policies on promotion, redeployment and other personnel matters are guided by existing civil service regulations and ongoing reforms in the education sector.

An FCTA official also defended the redeployment of senior education administrators, citing relevant federal guidelines.

The labour dispute has also exposed divisions within the organised labour movement in the territory. The Academic Staff Union of Secondary Schools, ASUSS, FCT Chapter, an affiliate of the Trade Union Congress, has reportedly distanced itself from the strike, maintaining that the FCTA has the authority to deploy personnel and that promotion should take account of established vacancies and available resources.

With the NLC now declaring the action indefinite, the dispute threatens to disrupt schools, government offices and other public services across the nation’s capital.

The union has urged parents, residents, civil society organisations and other stakeholders to press the FCTA to resolve the issues, insisting that the industrial action will continue until its demands are satisfactorily addressed.

The NLC’s latest position is unequivocal: without a resolution of what it considers the fundamental grievances affecting teachers, the strike will continue indefinitely.

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending