“Simply put, it is akin to the President assigning responsibilities to the office of the Vice-President and re-designating that office as “Deputy President” under our present Constitution. That is clearly impossible. Why then should that of the Ministers be different?’’
metro
It’s unconstitutional to appoint Minister of State, Keyamo tells Buhari
It’s unconstitutional to appoint Minister of State, Keyamo tells Buhari
The outgoing Minister of State for Labour and Employment, Festus Keyamo, SAN, yesterday told President Muhammadu Buhari that it was an aberration to appoint a minister of state.
Keyamo stated this in his speech at the valedictory session presided over by President Buhari to mark the end of the Federal Executive Council, FEC, under his (Buhari) administration, at the Council Chamber, Presidential Villa, Abuja.
The Minister of State, who thanked President Buhari for enriching his curriculum vitae, through the appointment, noted that some other ministers of state had been grumbling and unable to be bold and speak out.
He said it would be difficult to assess the individual performances of the ministers of state since their discretion was shackled under that of the ministers as any original ideas developed by the minister of state was subject to clearance by another colleague in the cabinet before they could sail through for consideration by the council.
His prepared speech read: “Mr President, you first appointed me as Minister of State in the Ministry Niger Delta Affairs in August 2019 and you later redeployed me as Minister of State in the Ministry of Labour and Employment.
“Today, I cannot find the words to express the depth of my gratitude to you for finding me worthy, out of over two hundred million Nigerians, to be nominated and subsequently appointed to serve as a Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. My curriculum vitae has been greatly enhanced – forever.
READ ALSO:
- Ilaro Polytechnic student kills self after losing school fees to gambling
- 19 students killed as teenage girl sets school on fire over seized phone
- NURTW South-West leaders meet in Lagos, present Baruwa as national president sole candidate
“From my very humble beginnings in a small dusty town in Delta State where I was born and raised by my struggling parents, all the way to the Council Chambers at the Presidential Villa where I had the honour and privilege to participate weekly in decision-making for my country in the last four years, it has been like a fairy tale. I give God all the glory.
“What I am about to say, therefore, is not and should not be construed as an indication of ingratitude. Far from it. What I am about to say is just my own little contribution to our constitutional development as a relatively young democracy and to aid future governments to optimize the performance of those they appoint as Ministers.
“Mr. President, the concept or designation of “Minister of State” is a constitutional aberration and is practically not working for many so appointed. Successive governments have come and gone and many who were appointed as Ministers of State have not spoken out at a forum such as this because of the risk of sounding ungrateful to the Presidents who appointed them. However, like I said earlier, this is not ingratitude.
“As a private citizen, I am on record to have gone to court a number of times to challenge unconstitutional acts of governments for the sake of advancing our constitutional democracy, so it will be out of character for me to have gone through government and be carried away by the pomp of public office and forget my role as a member of the inner bar and my self-imposed role over the years as a crusader for democracy and constitutionalism.”
Supporting his position with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), Keyamo said: “Mr. President, I crave your indulgence to explain this constitutional conundrum of “Minister of State”. Sections 147 and 148 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), deal with the appointments and responsibilities of Ministers of the Federation. The said sections state as follows:
Section 147
“(1) There shall be such offices of Ministers of the Government of the Federation as may be established by the President.
(2) Any appointment to the office of Minister of the Government of the Federation shall, if the nomination of any person to such office is confirmed by the Senate, be made by the President.
READ ALSO:
- Court refuses application for Seun Kuti’s arraignment
- BREAKING: Gbajabiamila, Wase clash at plenary
- Bus conveying intending Hajj Pilgrims to Abuja crashes
(3) Any appointment under subsection (2) of this section by the President shall be in conformity with the provisions of section 14(3) of this Constitution:- provided that in giving effect to the provisions aforesaid the President shall appoint at least one Minister from each State, who shall be an indigene of such State.”
Section 148
“(1) The President may, in his discretion, assign to the Vice-President or any Minister of the Government of the Federation responsibility for any business of the Government of the Federation, including the administration of any department of government.”
“Furthermore, the 7th Schedule to the 1999 Constitution provides for the Oath of Office to which each Minister must subscribe. There are no different Oaths for “Minister” and “Ministers of State”. They all take the same Oath of Office.”
“In addition to the above, the Ministers-designate appear before the Senate and are grilled and cleared as ministers, not as ministers in some instances and Ministers of State in some other instances. It is at the point of assignment of portfolios that successive Presidents then reclassified some as “Ministers of State.”
He contended that though the President had the constitutional powers to assign portfolios to his appointees, such appointments must be in line with constitutional provision.
He said, “Some may want to justify this by saying the President is given the discretion by the Constitution to assign whatever responsibility(ies) he likes to Ministers. Yes, I concede Mr President can do that, but not by a designation different from that prescribed by the Constitution.
metro
Bandits Abduct Seven Family Members, Three Neighbors in Kaduna
Bandits Abduct Seven Family Members, Three Neighbors in Kaduna
Suspected bandits have abducted ten people, including seven members of a single family, in a violent raid on Unguwar Sabon‑Titi, along Katari‑Hayin Dam in Kaduna State’s Kachia Local Government Area.
The attack occurred around 9:32 p.m. on Thursday, according to a local resident, Mr. Markus Yakubu, who described how the gunmen, armed with sophisticated weapons, quietly surrounded a family compound before whisking away the victims. The bandits then moved to a neighboring house and abducted three more residents.
Yakubu identified the abducted as Jummai Amos, Barnabas Amos, Iko Amos, Baby Amos, Eunice Amos, Eshiwan Amos, Godwin Amos, Bagudu Damisa, Evelyn Damisa, and Alfred Iriyo. He explained that the assailants refrained from firing inside the town, possibly because the attacked houses were close to the District Police Officer’s residence in Katari, only beginning to shoot after moving the victims away from the area.
READ ALSO:
- Festus Keyamo Urges ADC to Thank INEC Over Derecognition of Rival Factions
- INEC Warns ADC Against Holding Convention Without Supervision
- APC Rejects ADC Claims, Says Tinubu Not Responsible for Party’s Legal Troubles
A community leader, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed receiving distress calls about the raid but said security operatives’ contacts were unreachable, leaving locals to await intervention. Neighbors reportedly visited the homes of the abducted on Friday morning to offer support to the families.
A security source also confirmed that police and military personnel are combing forests and surrounding areas in search of the kidnappers and to rescue the victims alive. Efforts to reach the Kaduna State Police Command spokesman, DSP Hassan Mansur, for comment were unsuccessful.
The incident highlights the persistent insecurity in Kaduna State, where rural communities have frequently been targeted by armed bandits. Residents continue to demand urgent government action, improved security patrols, and rapid response teams to prevent further abductions and ensure the safe return of victims.
Bandits Abduct Seven Family Members, Three Neighbors in Kaduna
metro
Fani‑Kayode Fires Back at Peter Obi, Defends NADECO’s Legacy
Fani‑Kayode Fires Back at Peter Obi, Defends NADECO’s Legacy
Former Minister of Aviation Femi Fani‑Kayode has sharply criticised Peter Obi over remarks perceived to diminish the role of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) in Nigeria’s democratic history, thrusting the debate over the nation’s pro‑democracy legacy back into the spotlight.
In a lengthy post shared widely on social media, Fani‑Kayode labelled Obi’s alleged comments about NADECO as “a crying shame” and warned that they “shall not go unanswered.” He accused Obi of attempting to denigrate the sacrifices of NADECO leaders and activists who opposed military rule in the 1990s.
“Peter Obi’s attack on NADECO and his attempt to denigrate the leaders of that movement and its members — who single‑handedly fought military rule and made the ultimate sacrifice for democracy in our country — is a crying shame,” Fani‑Kayode wrote.
He recalled how Obi, in his early political life, had been associated with the administration of General Sani Abacha, one of Nigeria’s most oppressive military rulers. Fani‑Kayode contrasted this with the actions of NADECO figures and footsoldiers who resisted military oppression, endured persecution and brutality, and were driven into exile for their activism.
READ ALSO:
- Presidency Clarifies Why Tinubu Met Plateau Victims Only at Airport
- Iran’s IRGC Threatens Google, Microsoft, Apple as ‘Legitimate Military Targets’
- Nigeria Apologises Over ‘Igbo King’ Controversy in South Africa as Protests Turn Violent
Fani‑Kayode stressed the heavy cost paid by NADECO members during the struggle. “Many of us were in NADECO and are living witnesses to what happened. We spoke out, wrote articles, suffered persecution, were locked up, were tortured, were killed and were forced into exile,” he said. He argued that the sacrifices made between 1992 and 1999 should never be dismissed or belittled.
The former minister also took aim at politicians linked with the African Democratic Congress (ADC), including ex‑Senate President David Mark. Fani‑Kayode alleged that Mark had previously spoken against Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola, the presumed winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election whose annulment by the military regime of Ibrahim Babangida plunged the country into prolonged unrest.
He reiterated that NADECO activists faced brutal repression, including imprisonment, torture, and exile under successive military rulers, and warned that Nigeria’s current democratic freedoms and free speech are the results of those struggles.
“He (Obi) should enjoy the democracy and free speech that we have today which others fought and died for between 1992 and 1999,” Fani‑Kayode said, urging Obi and others to refrain from comments that appear to undermine the legacy of pro‑democracy figures.
Obi’s comments, though not publicly expanded in recent days, sparked discussions across political and historical circles, with analysts noting that the debate over Nigeria’s democratic heritage and the sacrifices of groups like NADECO remains politically sensitive, particularly as the country continues to grapple with governance, electoral reforms, and national identity.
Political commentators also highlighted how the exchange reflects broader tensions within Nigeria’s opposition and among public figures vying to define the narrative of the nation’s democratic journey.
As of now, Obi’s camp has not formally responded to Fani‑Kayode’s rebuttal, but the debate has garnered attention on social media and in political commentary platforms, underscoring the enduring significance of NADECO’s legacy in contemporary political discourse.
Fani‑Kayode Fires Back at Peter Obi, Defends NADECO’s Legacy
metro
Plateau Killings: Ezekwesili Blasts Tinubu, APC Over ‘Failure to Act’
Plateau Killings: Ezekwesili Blasts Tinubu, APC Over ‘Failure to Act’
Former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili, has strongly criticised President Bola Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) over the ongoing killings in Plateau State, accusing the government of inaction and failure to protect citizens.
In a sharply worded statement posted on her X account, Ezekwesili questioned the priorities of political leaders who continue with engagements while communities are under attack. She condemned what she described as a pattern where authorities respond to violence with statements, silence, and committee formations instead of decisive security action.
Reacting to disturbing images from recent attacks in Jos, she said the blood of innocent Nigerians rests on leaders who “knew, looked away, and chose a convention hall over a command centre,” warning that such conduct reflects a deeper governance failure.
The former minister also raised concerns about the normalisation of violence in Nigeria, stressing that citizens must reject any situation where human lives are treated as expendable. She urged Nigerians to transform grief into collective action, demanding accountability, justice, and urgent reforms to address insecurity.
READ ALSO:
- Lasaco Assurance Launches N18.47bn Rights Issue to Strengthen Capital Base
- ADC Crisis Deepens as Bala Denies Resignation, Insists on Chairmanship
- Ghana Sweeps Top Three Positions in 2025 WASSCE, Outshining Nigeria, Others
Her comments come amid renewed violence in Plateau State, particularly in Jos North and nearby communities, where recent attacks have reportedly left dozens dead and many injured. The persistent crisis has once again drawn attention to the fragile security situation in Nigeria’s north-central region.
Despite increased military presence and government assurances, Plateau has continued to experience recurring attacks linked to communal tensions, armed groups, and farmer-herder conflicts. Analysts say the repeated outbreaks highlight the limitations of current security strategies.
President Tinubu had earlier condemned the attacks and directed security agencies to bring perpetrators to justice, while promising that such incidents would not recur. Additional security deployments and restrictions have also been introduced in affected areas.
However, critics argue that these responses remain largely reactive, with little progress in addressing the underlying causes of the violence. Ezekwesili’s remarks add to growing public pressure on the federal government to adopt a more proactive and coordinated approach to national security.
As outrage continues to build, many Nigerians are calling for stronger leadership, improved intelligence gathering, and decisive action to end the cycle of killings and restore confidence in government.
Plateau Killings: Ezekwesili Blasts Tinubu, APC Over ‘Failure to Act’
-
Railway2 days agoEaster train: NRC increases Lagos-Ibadan trips, offers free Osun holiday transit
-
Education3 days agoJAMB Releases 2026 UTME Mock Results, Delists Over 20 CBT Centres
-
Entertainment3 days agoIyabo Ojo Quits Mediation Between Funke Akindele, Toyin Abraham
-
metro1 day agoVeryDarkMan Dares Sowore Over Blord’s Kuje Prison Remand
-
Business1 day agoNNPC Boosts Crude Supply to Dangote Refinery to Address Rising Fuel Prices
-
Politics3 days agoAdebayo Adelabu Resigns as Power Minister to Run for Oyo State Governorship
-
metro1 day agoNigerians to Enjoy Four-Day Break as FG Declares Easter Holidays
-
metro2 days agoPower Crisis Looms as NLC Shuts AEDC, Protests Sack of 900 Workers


