Alleged fraud: Court rejects ex-Minister Agunloye’s preliminary objection - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Alleged fraud: Court rejects ex-Minister Agunloye’s preliminary objection

Published

on

Former Power and Steel Minister Olu Agunloye
Former Power and Steel Minister Olu Agunloye

Alleged fraud: Court rejects ex-Minister Agunloye’s preliminary objection

Former Power and Steel Minister Olu Agunloye has questioned the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) legal power to prosecute him for alleged illegal activity in the $6 billion Mambilla Hydroelectric Power Project.

In a notice of preliminary objection filed before a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Apo, Agunloye sought an injunction barring the EFCC from prosecuting or continuing to prosecute the seven-count indictment on which he was arraigned on January 10.

In his objection submitted through his counsel, Adeola Adedipe (SAN), the ex-minister highlighted that the charges listed in the allegation pertained to his activities as a public officer when he was said to have granted the contract without budgetary provision, consent, and cash backing.

Agunloye also claimed that another offence alleged in the charge bordered on his purported disobedience to the directives of the President and forgery of a letter, dated: May 22, 2003.

He contended that the EFCC lacks investigative and prosecutorial powers on the offences alleged in the charge, under sections 6, 7, and 46 of the EFCC Act, 2004.

Agunloye added: “These allegations do not constitute financial crimes, which can be lawfully investigated and prosecuted by the EFCC, pursuant to its powers under sections 6, 7, and 46 of the EFCC (Establishment) Act and in consonance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Nwobike v. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2022) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1826) 293.

READ ALSO:

“Not having the mandatory/statutory powers to investigate the allegations against the defendant, ab initio, the purported investigation of the defendant and current prosecution of the charge by the EFCC is ultra vires its powers and thereby a nullity.”

“This is a threshold issue in which the court must first satisfy itself that there is requisite statutory powers for the EFCC to prosecute the charge and competent jurisdiction in the court to entertain same.”

The former minister also filed a separate application, seeking an order of the court to restrain the EFCC from inviting, intimidating or harassing his sureties.

He also prayed for an order to vary the conditions attached to the bail granted him on January 11, one of which required that his sureties must provide evidence of their ownership of a property worth N300 million.

In the application, he claimed that the EFCC had “repeatedly harassed, threatened, and invited his sureties for investigation,” an action he said was “actuated by bad faith, for the sureties to withdraw their suretyship and thereby create an uneven playing field in the prosecution of the case”.

At the resumed hearing in the case yesterday, Adedipe told the court about the fresh applications his client had filed.

The trial judge, Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie, held that they were not ripe for hearing.

Justice Onwuegbuzie adjourned till February 26 for the hearing of the applications.

Alleged fraud: Court rejects ex-Minister Agunloye’s preliminary objection

News

Group Accuses Ogun Govt of Plot to Transfer Public Schools to Political Allies

Published

on

Rights and Freedom Advocates (RIFA)

Group Accuses Ogun Govt of Plot to Transfer Public Schools to Political Allies

A civic group, Rights and Freedom Advocates (RIFA), has accused the Ogun State Government of planning to unlawfully transfer ownership of public schools to private individuals and political associates, describing the alleged move as “unconstitutional” and “a form of stealing by proxy.”

The allegation was contained in a press statement issued by the group’s president, Luqman Soliu, on April 13, 2026, in response to reports that the state government had decided to “return” some public schools to former owners or affiliated organisations.

RIFA, however, dismissed the claim of “returning” schools, insisting that the policy under consideration amounts to the “donation of public schools to cronies of government officials.”

According to the group, such a move would amount to abuse of public trust and a violation of constitutional provisions guiding the management of state assets.

“What Ogun State government plans to do is not return of public schools but donation or stealing by proxy of public schools,” the statement said, adding that the alleged plan is “dubious and fraudulent.”

READ ALSO:

The organisation argued that the schools in question have undergone significant public investment over the years and should remain fully under government ownership, warning that any attempt to transfer them outside public control would amount to mismanagement of state resources.

RIFA further contended that some of the schools had previously been acquired by the government from private owners who were compensated at the time of takeover, stressing that reopening ownership claims could set a “dangerous precedent.”

The group also criticised the justification for the alleged plan, suggesting it could be linked to political patronage. It alleged that government officials may be attempting to reward political allies with public assets instead of investing in new educational infrastructure.

It warned that such actions, if carried out, could undermine access to affordable education, particularly for students from low-income families who depend on public schools.

RIFA further referenced past transitions in the state’s education sector, recalling previous administrations that undertook reforms in public schools, and argued that the focus should be on improving infrastructure rather than altering ownership structures.

The group urged the state government to abandon any plan that could be interpreted as privatising or reallocating public educational assets without broad stakeholder consultation.

It also called on civil society organisations, education stakeholders, and the public to closely monitor developments to ensure accountability in the management of public property.

The Ogun State Government has not yet issued an official response to the allegations at the time of filing this report.

Group Accuses Ogun Govt of Plot to Transfer Public Schools to Political Allies

Continue Reading

News

Shari’ah Council Denies Viral Prayer Claim, Reiterates Call for INEC Chairman’s Removal

Published

on

Supreme Council for Sharia in Nigeria (SCAN)
Supreme Council for Sharia in Nigeria (SCAN)

Shari’ah Council Denies Viral Prayer Claim, Reiterates Call for INEC Chairman’s Removal

The Supreme Council for Shari’ah in Nigeria (SCSN) has distanced itself from viral social media reports alleging that it directed Muslims to embark on special prayers seeking the removal of the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), describing the claims as false, misleading, and politically motivated.

In a statement issued by its Secretary-General, Nafiu Baba Ahmed, the council said the reports circulating online did not originate from the organisation and should be disregarded by the public.

According to the SCSN, at no time did it instruct Muslims to organise prayers targeted at INEC or its leadership, stressing that the content being shared was fabricated with the intent to misinform Nigerians and create unnecessary tension.

“The fabrications are clearly intended to drag the Council into partisan political contestation and undermine national stability,” the statement said.

The council urged members of the public, especially the Muslim community and media organisations, to rely only on verified and official communication channels to avoid the spread of misinformation.

READ ALSO:

While firmly denying the prayer directive, the SCSN reaffirmed its earlier position that the INEC chairman should either resign or be relieved of his duties. It said its stance is based on concerns it has consistently raised about leadership conduct and institutional neutrality.

The council alleged that its position is informed by what it described as actions and dispositions that suggest prejudice against Islam and Muslims, referencing concerns it said were contained in a widely circulated legal brief.

It argued that leadership of a sensitive national institution such as INEC must uphold strict neutrality, fairness, and public trust, warning that any perceived bias could undermine national cohesion and electoral credibility.

Reiterating its non-partisan status, the SCSN stressed that it remains committed to promoting justice, equity, and peaceful coexistence across religious and ethnic lines in Nigeria.

The organisation further cautioned against attempts to politicise its activities, insisting it would not be drawn into partisan disputes or used as a tool for political agendas.

“The Council will not allow itself to be drawn into the murky waters of partisan politics,” it added.

The development comes amid rising online misinformation trends in Nigeria, where religious and political statements are frequently misrepresented on social media, prompting calls for greater public caution and responsible information sharing.

The SCSN concluded by reaffirming its commitment to a peaceful and inclusive society where all citizens can practice their faith freely without discrimination or fear.

Shari’ah Council Denies Viral Prayer Claim, Reiterates Call for INEC Chairman’s Removal

Continue Reading

News

Relief for Nigerian Doctors as FG Begins CONMESS Arrears Payment

Published

on

The-Nigerian-Association-of-Resident-Doctors-NARD
The-Nigerian-Association-of-Resident-Doctors-NARD

Relief for Nigerian Doctors as FG Begins CONMESS Arrears Payment

The Federal Government has commenced the payment of long-awaited doctors’ salary arrears in Nigeria, offering relief to members of the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors (NARD) after months of delays tied to the Consolidated Medical Salary Structure (CONMESS) review.

The association confirmed the development in an official communication signed by its Publicity and Social Secretary, Abdulmajid Ibrahim, noting that disbursement is already underway across various institutions.

According to NARD, the salary arrears payment covers between one and six months for affected doctors, with many members already confirming receipt. The association described the development as a significant step toward resolving lingering welfare concerns in Nigeria’s health sector.

“The leadership of NARD is pleased to inform all members that payment of the outstanding 25/35 CONMESS review arrears has commenced,” the statement read, highlighting progress on the implementation of the revised salary structure.

READ ALSO:

Despite the progress, NARD disclosed that the August component of the arrears is currently experiencing minor administrative delays. The association explained that the issue is being addressed and that payments for that period may take an additional one to two weeks to be completed.

Doctors who are yet to receive their payments have been urged to remain patient, as the Federal Government continues the phased disbursement nationwide.

The CONMESS review, which determines salary scales and allowances for medical and dental practitioners in public hospitals, has long been a source of tension between doctors and the government. Delays in implementing the structure and settling arrears have, in the past, triggered industrial actions by NARD, disrupting healthcare services across the country.

Resident doctors—who form a critical part of Nigeria’s tertiary healthcare system—have repeatedly raised concerns over poor welfare, unpaid salaries, and challenging working conditions. These issues have contributed significantly to the rising brain drain in Nigeria’s health sector, with many professionals relocating abroad in search of better opportunities.

Industry observers note that the loss of medical personnel has worsened Nigeria’s already strained doctor-to-patient ratio, placing additional pressure on healthcare facilities nationwide.

The commencement of the payment of doctors’ arrears is therefore seen as a strategic move by the Federal Government to stabilise the sector, improve morale among healthcare workers, and avert potential industrial unrest.

NARD further advised members who experience any discrepancies after the disbursement process to channel complaints through their respective institutions for prompt resolution.

Reaffirming its commitment, the association commended members for their patience and resilience, assuring them that efforts to improve welfare conditions will continue.

Relief for Nigerian Doctors as FG Begins CONMESS Arrears Payment

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending