News
SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over each lawmaker’s N21m running cost
SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over each lawmaker’s N21m running cost
Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against the Senate President, Mr Godswill Akpabio, and Speaker of House of Representatives, Mr Tajudeen Abbas.
They are accused of failing “to end the apparently unlawful practice by the National Assembly of fixing its allowances and running costs, and the failure to account for the monthly running costs paid to members.”
The Senate recently came out to denied approving jumbo pay to the federal lawmakers, explaining that N21m considered as monthly salary a lawmaker was actually for running cost.
Akpabio and Abbas are sued for themselves and on behalf of all members of the National Assembly.
Former President Olusegun Obasanjo had alleged that the lawmakers fix their own salaries and allowances, contrary to the recommendations of the Revenue Mobilisation Fiscal Allocation Commission (RMAFC).
In the suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1289/2024 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, Abuja, SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to end the apparently unlawful practice of the National Assembly fixing its remuneration and allowances termed as ‘running cost’.”
SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to disclose the exact amount of the monthly running costs being paid to and received by the lawmakers, and the spending details of any such running costs.”
SERAP is also seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to end the alleged practice of paying remuneration and allowances termed as ‘running costs’ into the personal accounts of lawmakers.”
In the suit, SERAP is arguing that: “The provisions of paragraph N, section 32(d) of the Third Schedule to the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] clearly make it unlawful for the National Assembly to fix its salaries, allowances and running costs.”
SERAP is also arguing that, “the alleged practice of paying running costs into the personal accounts of lawmakers is a fundamental breach of Rule 713 of the Federal Government Financial Regulations, which provides that ‘public money shall not be paid into a private bank account.’”
READ ALSO:
- VIDEO: China holds colourful reception for Tinubu
- Russia pushes on key Ukraine city while Kyiv’s Kursk incursion slows
- Reactions as singer Timaya accuses apostle Suleman of lying
According to SERAP, “‘Public function’ means activities in the public interest, not against it. The reports that lawmakers are fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs amount to private self-interest or self-dealing. It is also detrimental to the public interest.”
SERAP said, “The constitutional oath of office of lawmakers requires them to ensure transparency and accountability in the exact amounts of salaries, allowances and running costs they receive.”
SERAP is also arguing that, “The allegations that lawmakers are fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs are entirely inconsistent and incompatible with the constitutional oath of office and the object and purpose of the UN Convention against Corruption to which Nigeria is a state party.”
The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare, Andrew Nwankwo, and Ms Blessing Ogwuche, read in part: “Directing and compelling the lawmakers to account for and return any misused or mismanaged running costs they collected would build trust in democratic institutions and strengthen the rule of law.”
“SERAP is seeking: an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Akpabio and Mr Abbas to refer the allegations on the misuse of the running costs received by members to appropriate anticorruption agencies for investigation and prosecution where there is relevant admissible evidence.”
“The country’s international legal obligations especially under the UN Convention against Corruption impose a legal commitment on public officials including lawmakers to discharge a public duty truthfully and faithfully.”
“The convention specifically in paragraph 1 of article 8 requires members to promote integrity, honesty and responsibility in the management of public resources.”
“Nigerians have a right to scrutinize how their lawmakers spend their tax money and the commonwealth. Nigerians also have a right to honest and faithful performance by their public officials including lawmakers.”
“Ending the reported practice by lawmakers of fixing their salaries, allowances and running costs would improve public confidence in the integrity and honesty of the National Assembly.”
READ ALSO:
- Wike threatens PDP govs backing Fubara, says ‘I’ll put fire in your states’
- Napoli in U-turn withdraw Osimhen number 9 jersey from Lukaku
- Double promotion, cash reward for cleaner who returned $10,000 found in aircraft
“Constitutional oath of office requires public officials including lawmakers to abstain from all improper acts, such as fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs, that are inconsistent with the public trust.”
“It is a travesty and a fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties for members of the National Assembly to fix their own salaries, allowances and running costs.”
“Rule 713 of the Federal Government Financial Regulations provides: ‘Personal money shall in no circumstances be paid into a government bank account, nor shall any public money be paid into a private bank account.’”
“In the Seventh Schedule to the Nigerian Constitution, lawmakers commit to strive to ‘preserve the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy contained in the Constitution’, [and to] perform their ‘functions honestly, faithfully’, to act ‘always in the interest of the well-being and prosperity of Nigeria’.”
“Lawmakers also commit to ‘preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of Nigeria; and abide by the Code of Conduct contained in the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution.’”
“SERAP notes that Section 15(5) of the Nigerian Constitution requires public institutions to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power. Section 16(2) of the Nigerian Constitution further provides that, ‘the material resources of the nation are harnessed and distributed as best as possible to serve the common good.’”
“According to our information, members of the National Assembly are currently fixing their own salaries, allowances and running costs. The running costs are reportedly paid directly into the personal accounts of members.”
“Senator Kawu Sumaila, representing Kano South Senatorial District, recently disclosed in an interview with BBC Hausa that each Nigerian senator earns at least N21 million monthly in running costs, salaries, and allowances.”
“Mr Sumaila reportedly said, ‘My monthly salary is less than N1 million. After deductions, the figure comes down to a little over N600,000. Given the increase effected in the Senate, each senator gets N21 million every month as running cost.’”
No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.
SERAP sues Akpabio, Abbas over each lawmaker’s N21m running cost
![]()
News
Just in: Supreme Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Emefiele’s Assets, Ends Legal Battle
Just in: Supreme Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Emefiele’s Assets, Ends Legal Battle
The Supreme Court has brought an end to the legal battle over the assets linked to former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Godwin Emefiele, affirming their final forfeiture to the Federal Government.
In a unanimous judgment delivered by a five-member panel led by Justice Ibrahim Saulawa, the apex court overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lagos, which had earlier nullified the forfeiture order and directed that the case be retried.
The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal erred in setting aside the judgment of the Federal High Court in Lagos, thereby restoring the lower court’s order for the final forfeiture of the properties.
The ruling effectively ends Emefiele’s challenge against the forfeiture order and marks another significant legal victory for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in its ongoing prosecution of high-profile corruption and financial crime cases.
The properties were among assets the EFCC alleged were acquired through proceeds of unlawful activities during Emefiele’s tenure as governor of the apex bank.
READ ALSO:
- All We Want Is Her Body – Mary Habila’s Father Pleads with IGP for Daughter’s Release
- Just in: Supreme Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Emefiele’s Assets, Ends Legal Battle
- All We Want Is Her Body – Mary Habila’s Father Pleads with IGP for Daughter’s Release
Following its investigation, the anti-graft agency had approached the Federal High Court for their permanent forfeiture, a request the court granted.
However, Emefiele challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal, which set aside the forfeiture order and directed that the matter be heard afresh. Dissatisfied with that judgment, the EFCC appealed to the Supreme Court.
With Friday’s verdict, the apex court has reinstated the Federal High Court’s decision, bringing the protracted dispute over the ownership of the properties to a close.
Emefiele, who served as CBN Governor from 2014 until his suspension by President Bola Tinubu in June 2023, has since been facing multiple criminal charges bordering on alleged abuse of office, procurement fraud and financial misconduct.
He has consistently denied all the allegations against him. The Supreme Court’s latest decision is one of several legal developments arising from the investigations into his stewardship at the nation’s apex bank.
Just in: Supreme Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Emefiele’s Assets, Ends Legal Battle
![]()
News
US House approves bill proposing 50% cut in aid to Nigeria over alleged Christian persecution
US House approves bill proposing 50% cut in aid to Nigeria over alleged Christian persecution
The United States House of Representatives has approved a key appropriations bill that proposes withholding 50% of certain U.S. assistance to Nigeria until the Nigerian government demonstrates measurable progress in protecting Christian communities from religiously motivated violence.
The provision is contained in the Fiscal Year 2027 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs (NSRP) Appropriations Bill, which was passed by the House on Wednesday. The legislation allocates $47.32 billion in discretionary funding for diplomacy, national security and related programmes, representing a reduction of about $2.69 billion, or six per cent, from the FY2026 enacted level.
However, the proposal has not yet become U.S. law. It must still pass the remaining stages of the legislative process, including consideration by the Senate and presidential approval, before the aid restrictions can take effect.
Under the House-approved bill, 50% of eligible U.S. assistance to Nigeria would be withheld until the U.S. Secretary of State certifies that the Nigerian government has taken measurable steps to protect Christians affected by religiously motivated attacks and improve security in vulnerable communities.
The accompanying House Appropriations Committee report expressed concern over persistent violence in parts of Nigeria, particularly in the Middle Belt, and referenced the Palm Sunday massacre as one of the incidents highlighting the need for stronger government action against perpetrators of violence.
READ ALSO:
- Wilfred Ndidi dismisses ‘juju cream’ rumours, says it was shea butter
- Army arrests 24 foreign nationals in Lagos hideout raid, hands suspects to Immigration
- Shettima’s final test, by Azu Ishiekwene
- Four kidnapped during NECO exams regain freedom in Kogi
The committee also urged Nigerian authorities to ensure accountability for those responsible for attacks on civilians and improve measures to safeguard communities affected by insecurity.
The provision was championed by Congressman Riley M. Moore, who argued that the measure is intended to pressure the Nigerian government to strengthen protection for Christian communities and improve its response to religious violence.
According to Moore, the legislation sends a clear message that the United States expects greater accountability while continuing to support victims of religious persecution around the world.
Beyond the proposed aid restrictions, the bill directs that funding under the Security Sector Programme/National Security Account be used to support efforts aimed at tackling insecurity in Nigeria’s Middle Belt, including attacks attributed in the committee report to Fulani militias.
The legislation also instructs the U.S. State Department to assess whether the Nigerian government is facilitating the safe return of internally displaced persons (IDPs) to their ancestral communities. The findings will form part of the certification process required before the withheld assistance can be released.
In addition, the State Department would be required to submit reports to Congress within 45 to 60 days detailing efforts to address violence against Christian communities, improve accountability for violations of religious freedom, and evaluate progress made by Nigerian authorities.
To reinforce these objectives, lawmakers proposed an additional $2 million under the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account to support atrocity prevention initiatives, with part of the funding earmarked for programmes addressing violence in Nigeria’s Middle Belt.
The committee also encouraged stronger partnerships with Nigerian security agencies to improve professionalism, operational capacity and accountability in law enforcement as part of broader efforts to reduce insecurity.
Another provision directs the Secretary of State to assess the impact of Nigeria’s blasphemy laws in the annual International Religious Freedom Report, reflecting growing congressional interest in issues relating to religious liberty.
The broader appropriations package also includes provisions affecting global health funding, migration policy, foreign military financing and international broadcasting, in line with the United States’ evolving foreign policy priorities.
Supporters of the proposal argue that conditioning foreign assistance on measurable improvements in security and human rights will encourage stronger government action against violence.
However, analysts note that the proposal is likely to generate diplomatic discussions between Nigeria and the United States, with debates expected over its potential impact on humanitarian programmes, security cooperation and bilateral relations.
If eventually enacted, the measure could reshape aspects of U.S.-Nigeria relations, particularly in the areas of security assistance, religious freedom, human rights and counterterrorism cooperation.
US House approves bill proposing 50% cut in aid to Nigeria over alleged Christian persecution
![]()
News
Senate passes Bill proposing N50,000 fine for preaching, hawking in commercial buses
Senate passes Bill proposing N50,000 fine for preaching, hawking in commercial buses
The Nigerian Senate has passed the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) Amendment Bill, 2026, proposing significantly tougher penalties for traffic offences, including a N50,000 fine for individuals who preach, hawk or engage in trading inside commercial buses.
The landmark legislation, approved during plenary on Thursday, is part of ongoing efforts to strengthen road safety in Nigeria, improve compliance with traffic regulations and reduce the rising number of road crashes across the country.
However, the bill has not yet become law. It will only take legal effect after receiving presidential assent from President Bola Tinubu.
One of the most notable provisions of the proposed amendment is the introduction of a N50,000 fine for anyone found preaching, hawking or carrying out commercial activities inside commercial vehicles.
Lawmakers explained that such activities often distract drivers, obstruct passengers and increase the likelihood of road accidents, particularly in densely populated urban areas where commercial buses serve thousands of commuters daily.
The bill also introduces stricter sanctions for motorists who refuse to cooperate with Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) officials during roadside enforcement exercises.
Under the proposed law, any driver who declines to undergo a breathalyser test when reasonably suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs would face a N50,000 fine, six months’ imprisonment, or both upon conviction.
READ ALSO:
- Shettima’s final test, by Azu Ishiekwene
- Four kidnapped during NECO exams regain freedom in Kogi
- Petrol importers set to raise depot price to N1,350 per litre as fresh fuel price hike looms
- Police foil N22m kidnap plot in Kwara, arrest two Togolese suspects
The Senate further approved a substantial increase in penalties for driving under the influence of alcohol or intoxicating substances. If the bill receives presidential assent, offenders would be liable to a N100,000 fine, replacing the current N5,000 penalty, in addition to a possible two-year prison sentence or both.
The amendment also raises the punishment for violating traffic lights, road signs, pavement markings and other traffic control devices to N100,000, reflecting the government’s determination to improve discipline on Nigerian roads.
Motorists caught exceeding speed limits would equally face a N100,000 fine, replacing the existing N5,000 sanction.
Similarly, reckless driving would attract a N100,000 fine, imprisonment for up to two years, or both, depending on the severity of the offence.
According to the revised schedule attached to the legislation, the Senate reviewed 52 traffic offences, increasing penalties across most categories to reflect present-day economic realities and strengthen deterrence against dangerous road behaviour.
The amendment seeks to modernise the FRSC Act by expanding the enforcement powers of the corps, strengthening compliance with traffic regulations and improving public safety through stricter enforcement measures.
Road safety experts have repeatedly argued that many penalties under the existing law had become obsolete due to inflation and no longer served as effective deterrents against traffic violations.
Data from the Federal Road Safety Corps consistently identifies speeding, dangerous driving, drunk driving, driver distraction, overloading and disregard for traffic signs among the leading causes of road crashes in Nigeria, resulting in thousands of deaths and injuries every year.
Supporters of the amendment believe the proposed stiffer penalties will encourage greater compliance with traffic laws and ultimately reduce road accidents. However, some stakeholders have called for sustained public awareness campaigns, improved road infrastructure and fair enforcement to ensure the new penalties achieve their intended objectives without imposing undue hardship on road users.
The bill will now be transmitted to President Bola Tinubu for assent. If signed into law, it will introduce one of the most comprehensive overhauls of Nigeria’s traffic regulations in recent years, significantly increasing penalties for dozens of traffic-related offences while reinforcing the FRSC’s mandate to promote safer roads nationwide.
Senate passes Bill proposing N50,000 fine for preaching, hawking in commercial buses
![]()
-
metro2 days agoOluwo of Iwoland Confers ‘Atayese of Yorubaland’ Chieftaincy Title on VeryDarkMan
-
metro3 days agoHow police tracked, arrested alleged PFIPC DG in Osun village
-
metro9 hours agoFG Arraigns Three Suspects Over Abduction of Oyo Schoolchildren, Teachers
-
metro2 days agoMary Habila: NYCN gives David Umahi seven days to resign, threatens nationwide protest
-
metro2 days agoAPC Guber Candidate Sharafadeen Alli Gifts Brand-New Toyota Camry to Rescued Oyo Principal
-
metro3 days agoUK-based Nigerian caregiver dies by suicide as coroner cites prolonged mental health struggles
-
News10 hours agoJust in: Supreme Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Emefiele’s Assets, Ends Legal Battle
-
metro1 day agoCAC Commences Deregistration of 100,000 Companies Over Unfiled Annual Returns
