Appeal Court rejects Kanu’s move to challenge IPOB’s proscription – Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Appeal Court rejects Kanu’s move to challenge IPOB’s proscription

Published

on

leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu with some of his lawyers

Appeal Court rejects Kanu’s move to challenge IPOB’s proscription

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has rejected an application by detained leader of the proscribed separatist group, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu seeking to be allowed to challenge the order proscribing the group.

In a judgment, the Court of Appeal upheld the argument by lawyer to the federal government, Oyin Koleosho, that the application filed for Kanu by his lawyer, Alloy Ejimakor, was inappropriate.

Kanu had, in the application, sought to be allowed to appeal, as an interested party, the January 18,  2018 ruling by Justice Abdu Kafarati of the Federal High Court, Abuja (now late) affirming his earlier ex-parte order of September 20, 2017 proscribing IPOB and designating it a terrorist group.

It was part of Kanu’s contention that, since the Fed Govt allegedly capitalised on the IPOB proscription order to charge him with belonging to, and leading a terrorist group, he was qualified as an interested party, who should be allowed to part of a pending appeal filed by IPOB against the order proscribing it.

In the judgment delivered on May 30, a certified true copy (CTC) of which The Nation saw on June 12, a three member panel of the Court of Appeal held that it was inappropriate for Kanu to have filed his application directly at the appellate court.

Justice Hamma Barka, in the lead judgment, held that, as an applicant seeking leave to appeal as an interested party, Kanu ought to first file his application before the Federal High Court, Abuja, whose decision he sought to appeal.

READ ALSO:

Justice Barka further held that Kanu’s failure to first file his application before the Federal High Court was a violation of Order 6 Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2021.

He said: “In the instant case, it is apparent that no such leave was sought from the court below, thus, an affront to the provisions of Order 6 Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2021.

“This knocks off the present application as being incompetent, not capable of being granted.

“The consideration of all other issues canvased to my mind will amount to an academic exercise for which courts are enjoined not to embark upon, and for this singular reason, the application being incompetent is accordingly struck out.”

Upon an ex-parte motion by the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), marked: FHC/AB)/CS/871/2017, Justice Kafarati had, in a ruling on September 20, 2017 ordered as follows:

*That an order declaring that the activities of the respondent (Indigenous People of Biafra) in any part of Nigeria, especially in the South east and South-South regions of Nigeria, either in groups or as individuals, amounts to acts of terrorism and illegality is granted.

*That an order proscribing the existence of the respondent (Indigenous People of Biafra) in any part of Nigeria, especially in the South east and South-South regions of Nigeria, either in groups or as individuals by whatever name they are called and publishing same in the official gazette and two national dailies, is granted.

*That an order restraining any person or group of persons from participating in any manner whatsoever in any form of activities involving or concerning the prosecution of the collective intention or otherwise of the respondent (Indigenous People of Biafra) under any other name or platform however called or described, is granted.

IPOB later applied to the court for it to set aside the orders, and in a ruling on January 18, 2018, Justice Kafarati dismissed IPOB’s application and affirmed his earlier orders proscribing the group and designating it a terrorist organisation.

IPOB subsequently lodged an appeal at the Court of Appeal, Abuja against the January 18, 2018 ruling.

It is the appeal, marked: CA/A/214/2018 that Kanu applied to be given permission to join as an interested party.

Appeal Court rejects Kanu’s move to challenge IPOB’s proscription

News

Nigeria, UAE meet over visa restrictions

Published

on

Nigeria, UAE meet over visa restrictions

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has announced that the Federal Government and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will resolve issues related to visa procurement for Nigerians seeking to travel to the UAE.

The Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Mrs Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, made this known in a statement following the visit of Amb. Salem Alshamsi, the UAE Ambassador to Nigeria.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu explained that the decision was made during a meeting with Alshamsi.

She acknowledged that Nigerians had faced difficulties in obtaining UAE visas, especially tourism visas.

This challenge, according to her, persisted in spite of the warm diplomatic relations and strategic partnerships between the two countries.

“Nigeria has remained committed to the relationship. The city of Dubai in the UAE has become a popular destination for many Nigerians.

“Officially, about 12,000 Nigerians live in the UAE, ranging from unskilled workers to professionals and students across various institutions,” she said.

She noted that in 2015, nearly a million Nigerians visited the UAE, particularly Dubai, spending between 100 million dollars to 150 million dollars on visas alone, and more than 1 billion dollars on shopping, school fees, tourism, and other activities.

READ ALSO:

Odumegwu-Ojukwu stressed the need for a more balanced economic relationship between both countries.

The minister further mentioned concerns regarding the current visa status for the UAE, noting that even some top Nigerian government officials had raised their concerns.

She also pointed out that a joint commission between the two countries was due after the one hosted by the UAE in 2022.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu expressed appreciation to the UAE government for their recent donation of relief materials to flood victims in Nigeria, as well as vaccines for chickenpox patients to support Nigeria’s health institutions.

“There is a need to communicate the new visa policy, if any, to Nigerians.

“We want to reciprocate by hosting the joint commission in Nigeria, where we will address various bilateral issues, including power, renewable energy, and more,” she said.

Alshamsi congratulated Odumegwu-Ojukwu on her appointment and lauded the progress made in the 50-year Nigeria-UAE relationship.

He acknowledged that visas for both government officials and private individuals had been issued over the past year and a half, with the process handled by an appointed agent.

He assured that the UAE was committed to resolving the visa challenges faced by Nigerians and emphasised that both countries would work together to foster stronger economic partnerships.

“We have issued more than 700 tourism visas since July 2024, and I have had zero visa rejections since I assumed office,” Alshamsi stated.

He also promised to continue signing agreements to further strengthen bilateral ties, with a major agreement expected to be signed ahead of the Nigerian president’s visit to the UAE in the second quarter of 2025.

Nigeria, UAE meet over visa restrictions

(NAN)

Continue Reading

News

Only Anambra rejected bad W”Bank loan, 35 states shared $438m – Soludo

Published

on

Anambra State Gov, Professor Charles Chukwuma Soludo

Only Anambra rejected bad W”Bank loan, 35 states shared $438m – Soludo

Governor of Anambra State, Prof. Charles Soludo, has stated that he pulled the state out of the World Bank loan arrangement because it is not of Anambra’s interest.

Soludo made this revelation over the weekend when the leadership of the late Ifeanyi Ubah political groups, along with some Nollywood actors and actresses, toured the ongoing construction of the Government House in Awka North Local Government Area.

Addressing the groups, the governor said Anambra is the only state in Nigeria that pulled out of the existing World Bank loan arrangement.

According to him, the terms and conditions of the loans were not favorable to the people of Anambra.

“When I came in as governor and looked at the terms and conditions of those loans, I said it was not favorable to our people. This is a bad deal for my people. However, one could say, ‘Let me collect the loans; after all, it is the next generation that will pay.’ I don’t have that kind of conscience. I felt the terms were a bad deal for Ndi Anambra, and I told them we don’t need it. Late last year, they shared 438 million dollars among 35 states in Nigeria, but Anambra State was the only state that did not collect. We don’t need to continue to mortgage the state with such loans,” he said.

READ ALSO:

Soludo emphasized that he needs money to fund government projects, but not the kind that mortgages the future of the state and its unborn children.

He also pointed out that Anambra State is the only state in Nigeria where the governor’s lodge is located outside the capital, and the government house has been in a makeshift building provided by a construction company for 34 years.

According to him, the present government house is owned by the company that constructed the Enugu-Onitsha expressway.

Soludo further stated that for 34 years, Anambra had no government house and no governor’s lodge.

However, the state is building one of the best government houses, with 34 buildings sitting on 23 heactres of land, noting that the building can last for 250 years.

He also disclosed that he has not borrowed any money to fund the construction of the ongoing government house and other projects in the state, adding that any money handed to him on behalf of the state must be judiciously utilized for the good of the people of Anambra State.

 

Only Anambra rejected bad W”Bank loan, 35 states shared $438m – Soludo

Continue Reading

News

No mercy abroad – Dele Momodu warns Nigerians planning to japa

Published

on

Dele Momodu

No mercy abroad – Dele Momodu warns Nigerians planning to japa

Media entrepreneur Dele Momodu has urged Nigerians living abroad to reconsider their priorities, emphasising that financial stability and opportunities exist in their home country.

Momodu argued in a recent interview with Teju Babyface that having ₦30-40 million in Nigeria can provide a comfortable life and enable entrepreneurship.

Encouraging Nigerians to explore opportunities back home, he suggested that they could establish their businesses, ranches or farms instead of struggling abroad.

Speaking about the harsh realities of life overseas, Momodu noted that while living abroad may seem glamorous at first, the burden of paying bills and financial independence can quickly become overwhelming.

READ ALSO:

The 64-year-old said that having ₦30-40 million in Nigeria should not make anyone feel poor, as that amount is enough to establish a proper business.

He emphasised that no place in the world offers perfect security, referencing the alleged killing of 3,000 people in New York on a single day. Despite such incidents, he pointed out, people do not abandon their country. In Nigeria, he added, individuals can even arrange their security if needed.

“If you had 30/40 million in Nigeria and you think you’re a poor man, I beg you, you’re a mad man. You have 30/40 million and you can’t set up a proper business in Nigeria. I beg you think again. There’s nowhere where there’s perfect security,” he said.

“On a single day, 3000 people got killed in New York. The people of New York have not abandoned their country because of that. In fact, you can set up your own security in Nigeria.”

Momodu also highlighted that for those concerned about food security, starting a ranch with cows and other resources in Nigeria is possible with ₦30 million.

 

No mercy abroad – Dele Momodu warns Nigerians planning to japa

Continue Reading

Trending