Atiku proposes six-year single tenure rotational presidency - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Atiku proposes six-year single tenure rotational presidency

Published

on

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar

Atiku proposes six-year single tenure rotational presidency

Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has recommended a single-term of six years for future Nigeria’s President, which should be rotational among the six geopolitical zones of the federation.

Atiku’s proposals, addressed to the Deputy President of the Senate and Chairman, Senate Committee on Constitution Review, Senator Barau Jibrin, and dated August 30, 2024, also contained recommendations such as procedures for the educational qualification of candidate(s) in elections, internal democracy in political parties and rotation of presidential position among the six geo-political zones of the country.

In a document obtained, the former vice president said Section 135(2) of the Nigerian Constitution should be amended to read: “Subject to the provisions of the subsection (1), the President shall vacate his office at the expiration of a period of six years commencing from the date.

READ ALSO:

In the explanatory note covering the proposals, Atiku said the amendments sought in the review of the constitution were aimed at seeking to raise the standard of the educational qualification of political office seekers, and an end to violent takeover of political parties, thereby strengthening the internal structure of political parties.

Others are to reduce the tendencies of political parties to breach the constitution, the Electoral Act, rules and guidelines made thereunder, and the constitution of the political party.

He said: “The implication of the above is that political parties are allowed very wide latitude to breach the perimeter of laws on elections.

“Such indiscipline by political parties and infidelity to the electoral parameters yield chaos in the system. The above amendments will enthrone the discipline that is needed in a democracy.”
He said that the recommendations he has put forth to the National Assembly for amendments in the country’s election laws were areas where there were pitfalls in the subsisting laws regulating elections in Nigeria.

Atiku proposes six-year single tenure rotational presidency

Loading

News

‘Dare to Call Tinubu Criminal in Ojota, Oshodi Parks’, Wike’s Aide Mocks Sowore After Ekiti Incident

Published

on

Lere Olayinka, Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media to Wike
Lere Olayinka, Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media to Wike

‘Dare to Call Tinubu Criminal in Ojota, Oshodi Parks’, Wike’s Aide Mocks Sowore After Ekiti Incident

A media aide to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, Lere Olayinka, has taken a swipe at African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore following the reported attack on the activist and members of his team in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State.

Olayinka, Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media to Wike, reportedly challenged Sowore to demonstrate his willingness to criticise President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in Lagos motor parks, particularly Ojota, Obalende and Oshodi, which he associated with the President’s political influence.

In a headline published by Daily Post on Sunday, November 1, Olayinka was quoted as daring the activist to call Tinubu a criminal in the three locations.

The reported remarks came amid controversy over the incident involving Sowore and his associates at Tawakalitu Restaurant in the Dalimore area of Ado-Ekiti on Friday, October 30.

Sowore had raised the alarm on social media, alleging that armed men attacked him and members of his team shortly after he participated in a radio interview in the state capital. He also accused operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) of providing the attackers with information about his location and alleged that the assailants had links to the Ekiti State Government.

The activist initially reported that he had been kidnapped and that his whereabouts were unknown, prompting concerns among his supporters and members of the public.

However, the Ekiti State Police Command disputed the kidnapping claim, saying preliminary information indicated that Sowore and some individuals had been involved in an altercation at a restaurant. The command said its operatives responded to a distress call, rescued those involved and took Sowore to the Police Hospital in Ado-Ekiti for treatment after he sustained an injury.

READ ALSO:

Sowore rejected the police description of the incident as an altercation, insisting that he and his associates were attacked by armed men. He also accused the police of downplaying the seriousness of the incident.

The controversy took another turn on Saturday when the police announced the arrest of 11 suspects in connection with the incident. According to the command, operatives of its Rapid Response Squad arrested the suspects at their hideout in the Atikankan area of Ado-Ekiti at about 10pm on Friday.

The police said items recovered during the operation included two walkie-talkies, 13 mobile phones, seven ATM cards, two vehicle keys, a flash drive, a mobile internet device and substances suspected to be illicit drugs.

The suspects were taken into custody as investigations continued to establish their individual roles, determine their possible connections with the incident and identify other persons who might have been involved.

The Ekiti State Government also denied allegations linking it to the incident. In a statement issued by the Governor’s Chief Press Secretary, Olayinka Oyebode, the government said it had no involvement and urged the police to conduct a thorough investigation and ensure that anyone found culpable was brought to justice.

Sowore has continued to demand accountability, arguing that the arrest of suspected participants would not be sufficient if those who allegedly planned, financed or coordinated the attack were not identified.

Against this background, Olayinka’s reported comments have added a political dimension to the controversy, drawing attention to the longstanding exchanges between supporters of the Tinubu administration and critics of the President.

Sowore has remained an outspoken critic of the Federal Government, frequently challenging its policies and demanding accountability from public officials. His criticism of the administration has also attracted sharp reactions from political figures and government supporters.

The reported reference to Ojota, Obalende and Oshodi is particularly significant because the locations are associated with prominent transport and commercial activities in Lagos. Olayinka’s reported challenge appeared to question whether Sowore would make similar remarks about Tinubu in those public spaces.

The development has renewed discussions about political tolerance, freedom of expression and the safety of opposition figures and activists who openly criticise government officials.

While political disagreements and sharp exchanges are part of democratic engagement, concerns remain over the use of intimidation, threats or violence against people expressing dissenting views.

The investigation into the Ado-Ekiti incident is ongoing, and the allegations against the arrested suspects have yet to be established in court.

‘Dare to Call Tinubu Criminal in Ojota, Oshodi Parks’, Wike’s Aide Mocks Sowore After Ekiti Incident

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu Gets Court Relief as US Judge Rejects Fresh Move in FBI, DEA Case

Published

on

Tinubu Gets Court Relief as US Judge Rejects Fresh Move in FBI, DEA Case
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu
Tinubu Gets Court Relief as US Judge Rejects Fresh Move in FBI, DEA Case

A United States federal court has rejected a fresh attempt by Aaron Greenspan to obtain additional information directly from President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and a Washington-based lobbying firm, DCI Group, in an ongoing legal battle over historical FBI and DEA records.

The ruling, delivered on Friday, October 30, 2026, by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, dismissed Greenspan’s application to serve additional discovery requests on Tinubu and subpoena documents from DCI Group AZ LLC and/or its parent company.

However, the decision was not an outright victory for the Nigerian President or the American federal agencies, as the court also directed the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to provide further explanations for withholding certain historical records.

Judge Beryl Howell ruled that Greenspan’s proposed discovery requests were not sufficiently relevant to the central issues in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit.

The judge emphasised that the application concerned the legal process for obtaining government records and did not establish that Tinubu committed any drug-related offence.

Greenspan, who is representing himself in the lawsuit, had asked the court for permission to serve six interrogatories, four requests for admission and one request for production on Tinubu.

He also sought permission to subpoena documents from DCI Group AZ LLC and/or its parent company.

The proposed discovery was connected to allegations of repeated, large-scale distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks on Greenspan’s website, PlainSite.

Greenspan claimed the alleged cyberattacks disrupted his ability to publish materials relating to the litigation.

He argued that the attacks suggested that some individuals were closely monitoring the case and might have an interest in preventing public access to documents.

However, he did not accuse Tinubu of organising or carrying out the alleged cyberattacks.

In rejecting the application, Judge Howell held that investigating the source of the alleged attacks would not help determine whether the FBI and DEA had conducted adequate searches or lawfully withheld information.

The court consequently found that the proposed discovery failed to meet the relevance and proportionality requirements under American civil procedure rules.

The decision represents another development in the lengthy legal dispute over access to historical American investigative records concerning Tinubu.

The lawsuit, filed on June 12, 2023, followed a series of FOIA requests submitted by Greenspan between 2022 and 2023 to six American government agencies.

The agencies included the FBI, DEA, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Executive Office for US Attorneys and Department of State.

Greenspan sought investigative records relating to an alleged Chicago-based heroin trafficking and money-laundering operation investigated by American law enforcement agencies in the early 1990s.

Tinubu and another Nigerian, Abiodun Agbele, were among the individuals identified in the requests.

The case took a significant turn in April 2025 when Judge Howell ruled that the FBI and DEA could no longer rely on their earlier refusal to confirm or deny whether the requested records existed.

The judge noted that previous public court documents had already acknowledged aspects of the investigations involving the individuals named in the requests.

The agencies were subsequently required to search for the records and justify any information withheld under applicable FOIA exemptions.

According to the latest court proceedings, the FBI processed 399 pages, releasing 30 pages in full while withholding others entirely or partially. The agency also identified 59 duplicate pages.

The DEA processed 240 pages but did not release any of them in full.

Significantly, Judge Howell observed that none of the records released by either agency contained Tinubu’s name, despite his inclusion in the original requests.

Tinubu had earlier intervened in the proceedings to protect his privacy interests, particularly concerning personal information contained in the historical investigative records.

His legal team argued that sensitive personal information should not be disclosed, maintaining that the President’s privacy interests deserved protection.

However, Judge Howell questioned some of the agencies’ reliance on privacy exemptions, noting that Tinubu was already a public official during the period covered by the records, having been a candidate for and subsequently a member of the Nigerian Senate.

The court also recognised the public interest in understanding how American law enforcement agencies investigated the historical case and handled the records.

Beyond rejecting Greenspan’s discovery application, the judge delivered a mixed decision on the substantive FOIA dispute.

Judge Howell granted the FBI summary judgment concerning the adequacy of its search and its reliance on one statutory exemption but rejected the broader summary judgment applications by both sides on the remaining issues.

The judge particularly questioned some of the FBI and DEA’s explanations for withholding information under statutory exemptions relating to personal privacy, confidential sources and potential harm to individuals.

One issue concerned the FBI’s continued redaction of information from an affidavit by an IRS special agent, Kevin Moss, which had previously appeared in public court records.

The court questioned why some information already available in public documents remained withheld in the agencies’ disclosures.

Judge Howell also found that some of the agencies’ explanations did not adequately demonstrate the foreseeable harm that could result from releasing the disputed information.

Consequently, the FBI and DEA were directed to prepare supplementary declarations explaining their continued withholding of certain records.

The agencies were also ordered to confer with Greenspan and propose an expedited schedule for further proceedings.

The October 30 ruling did not order the immediate release of additional records. Any further disclosure will depend on whether the agencies can provide sufficient legal justification for their withholding decisions and satisfy the court’s requirements.

For Tinubu, the decision means Greenspan cannot use the proposed discovery process to obtain additional information directly from him or DCI Group in the manner requested.

However, the wider legal battle over access to the historical investigative records remains unresolved.

Importantly, the lawsuit is a Freedom of Information Act dispute, not a criminal trial against the Nigerian President. The latest ruling does not establish that Tinubu committed any drug-related offence, nor does it amount to a judicial determination of his guilt or innocence regarding the historical allegations.

The next stage of the proceedings will focus on the supplementary explanations from the FBI and DEA and whether the agencies can justify continuing to withhold the disputed records.

 

Tinubu Gets Court Relief as US Judge Rejects Fresh Move in FBI, DEA Case

Loading

Continue Reading

News

2027 Presidency: Allah’s Will Must Prevail, Tinubu Declares in Makkah

Published

on

2027 Presidency: Allah’s Will Must Prevail, Tinubu Declares in Makkah
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu
2027 Presidency: Allah’s Will Must Prevail, Tinubu Declares in Makkah

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has declared that the will of Almighty Allah must prevail in determining who leads Nigeria after the 2027 presidential election, saying his political future ultimately rests in God’s hands.

Tinubu made the declaration in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, shortly after performing the lesser Hajj, known as Umrah, at the Grand Mosque, Masjid al-Haram, on Friday.

The President spoke while responding to journalists who asked about the significance of his return to the holy city after visiting Makkah ahead of the 2023 presidential election, which he won.

Tinubu described the visit as significant, expressing confidence in divine guidance and acknowledging that the outcome of the forthcoming political contest was beyond human control.

“I believe the love of the people, the commitment to the job, and the physical commitment to it. I believe that Allah’s wish in His court must prevail. And there’s no other God but Allah,” he said.

He added that Allah alone determines what a person becomes in life, stressing the importance of faith and prayer as Nigeria approaches another electoral cycle.

The President also described the pilgrimage as a spiritual experience for him and the country, saying he felt fulfilled after completing the religious rites.

“It’s a spiritual thing for me and the country, Nigeria. I’m grateful to Allah for this opportunity,” he said.

READ ALSO:

Tinubu said he and members of his delegation had prayed for Nigeria, particularly for peace, unity, harmony and happiness among citizens.

“We just prayed for our nation. We prayed for everyone to live in harmony, happiness, and faith in God Almighty,” he added.

The President’s comments come as political activities gather momentum ahead of the 2027 general election, in which he is seeking another presidential mandate under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Tinubu formally launched his re-election campaign at a rally in Kaduna on October 24, urging supporters to give him another term in office.

His major challengers include former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, who is associated with the African Democratic Congress, and Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, among other political contenders.

The President’s Makkah visit also provided an opportunity for members of his delegation to seek divine intervention for Nigeria, particularly over insecurity, national unity and the conduct of the forthcoming elections.

Chairman of BUA Group, Abdul Samad Rabiu, who accompanied Tinubu, said the delegation had prayed for lasting peace, national unity and a successful electoral process.

Rabiu described the visit as an opportunity to seek God’s intervention at a critical period in the country’s political development.

He said the delegation would continue praying for peaceful, free and fair elections, expressing hope that Nigeria would overcome its challenges.

Governor Babagana Zulum of Borno State also emphasised the need for lasting peace and stability, saying security remained essential to the country’s future and the success of the electoral process.

Zulum said Nigerians needed to work towards national unity and peaceful coexistence, adding that the delegation had prayed for an end to insecurity.

Governor Ahmadu Fintiri of Adamawa State described the pilgrimage as part of a collective effort to seek divine guidance for the country and its electoral process.

He said the delegation had prayed for God to grant Nigerians the leadership and future that would serve their interests.

Governor Ahmad Aliyu of Sokoto State also said the visit provided an opportunity for the country’s leaders to pray for peace, stability and progress.

Meanwhile, Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Media and Special Duties, Tunde Rahman, said the President had maintained a longstanding practice of undertaking spiritual visits to seek divine guidance.

Rahman said he had accompanied Tinubu on such visits since around 2016, adding that the President regularly used the opportunity to pray for himself and the country.

He described the current pilgrimage as particularly important because Nigeria was approaching another general election.

In a separate statement, the President’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, said Tinubu performed the Umrah in the early hours of Friday and offered prayers of gratitude to Allah for Nigeria and its people.

According to the statement, the President prayed for sustainable peace, national unity, harmony and stability, while asking God to guide the country’s leaders and grant Nigeria lasting relief from insecurity and other challenges.

Tinubu also reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to building a peaceful and prosperous country where Nigerians, irrespective of their religious or social backgrounds, could live in safety and dignity.

The President departed Abuja for Saudi Arabia on Thursday, October 29, and is expected to return to Nigeria next week after completing the spiritual exercise.

2027 Presidency: Allah’s Will Must Prevail, Tinubu Declares in Makkah

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending