Entertainment

Breach of contract: Pinnick sues Davido, demands N2.3b damages

Published

2 years ago

November 1, 2023

David Adeleke, popularly known as Davido, Amaju Pinnick

Breach of contract: Pinnick sues Davido, demands N2.3b damages

The organisers of the yearly ‘Warri Again Concert’, have filed N2.3 billion suit before the High Court of Delta State in Effurun against a Nigerian-American superstar singer, David Adeleke, popularly known as Davido over an alleged breach of agreement/contract between them.

Listed as defendants in the suit are Davido and his music label, Davido Music Worldwide Limited.

The claimant under the name, Brownhill Investments Company Limited, through its counsel, Kelechi Onwuegbuchulem in suit number EHC/183/2023, is asking the court to award N2billion as general damages against Davido.

Specifically, the claimant is praying the court for N150million as legal and professional fees, and additional sum N30million as cost of filing the suit.

The claimant is also seeking an order directing the defendants jointly and/or severally to tender a public apology on all the 1st defendant’s social media accounts/handles and in two national daily newspapers for four consecutive days, to the claimant and attendees.

The claimant, in its statement of claim, averred that sometimes in early 2023, the 1st defendant approached its chairman, Mr. Amaju Pinnick, when they met at the Abuja Airport, to engage his (1st defendant’s) services for the 19th edition of the “Warri Again” event held on October 6, 2023.

The claimant stated that its chairman was hesitant to engage the services of the 1st defendant for the event as the defendant had disappointed him on two previous occasions – the 2014 and 2019 editions of “Warri Again”, where he did not show up to perform after he had been paid for the events and he was compelled to make refunds thereafter.

READ ALSO:

The claimant believing that the 1st defendant had turned a new leaf, entered into a performance agreement with the defendants, for the 1st defendant to perform as the headline artiste at the 19th edition of Warri Again, slated to hold on October 6, 2023 in Warri, Delta State.

The claimant stated that in the Performance Agreement dated March 30, 2023, it was agreed that the 1st defendant’s performance fee was N70million, which the defendants insisted must be paid in full at the time, to secure the 1st defendant’s performance at the event.

It averred that thereafter, the sum of US$94,500.00 (an equivalent of N70million) was paid on April 6, 2023 and same was duly acknowledged by the defendants.

After payment was made and confirmed, the 1st defendant did a promotional video for the 19th edition of the event slated, wherein he confirmed his attendance and live performance in Warri on October 6, 2023.

Thereafter, the claimant set in motion, all promotional and advertorial machinery for the event, projecting the 1st defendant as the headline performer at the event.

The claimant stated that it expended humongous resources on print and social media adverts and promotion for the event.

It further averred that on September 29, 2023, precisely a week to the slated date of the event, a formal letter of reminder was sent to the 1st defendant in respect of the event, which contained flight itinerary of the private jet chartered to personally convey the 1st defendant and his team to and from Warri, Delta State for the event.

It stated that it incurred additional expenses of $18,000 to secure the private jet chartered to convey the Davido (1st defendant) and his team.

It stated that on October 6, 2023, the claimant tried to reach the defendants severally but all attempts proved futile.

Regardless, the claimant kept the private jet, it chartered to convey the 1st defendant and his team to Warri, at the Airport in Lagos on standby, waiting for the 1st defendant and his team.

The claimant added that it released a public notice that it had met all necessary performance agreements in respect of securing the performance of the 1st defendant at Warri Again and had not received any communication from the defendants, relating to his attendance at the event.

READ ALSO:

It stated that in the course of the event, its chairman, Pinnick, was compelled to address and apologise to the event attendees for the nonappearance and performance of the 1st defendant as the attendees expressed disappointment upon learning that the 1st defendant was not in attendance to perform.

He explained to the disappointed attendees that the claimant met all its contractual obligations to secure the attendance and performance of the 1st defendant but he deliberately refused to show up and perform.

Pinnick further revealed on stage to the unhappy attendees, that the claimant had taken steps to secure the performance of another raving artist known as Crown Uzama aka Shallipopi, at an extra and unbudgeted cost to make up for the absence and non performance of the 1st defendant.

The claimant added that the 1st defendant, not long after, resorted to bullying Pinnick, with his large social media influence and following by posting all manner of insults, defamatory remarks, threats and unprintable things on the accounts/handies of his Instagram, Snapchat and X (formerly known as Twitter], at its chairman.

The 1st defendant made a false post on his Instagram story, stating that he had informed the claimant months ago of his inability to attend and perform at the event.

It averred that at no point in time did the defendants communicate or relate to the claimant that the 1st defendant would not attend and no longer perform at the “Warri Again” event.

It added that other show promoters and persons have been victims of the 1st defendant’s penchant for reneging on contracts and engagements after collecting payments.

Consequently, it is asking for the payment of $94,500 as full payment for engaging the services of the 1st defendant.

It is also demand an order directing the defendants jointly to tender a public apology on their social media accounts/handles and in two national daily newspapers for four consecutive days.

It further asked the court for an order of injunction restraining the 1st defendant from performing as a musical artiste at any show/event in Nigeria until he refunds the sum of $94,500.

Breach of contract: Pinnick sues Davido, demands N2.3b damages

Entertainment

Nollywood Actress Laide Bakare Sets Strict Dating Rules: No Men in Her Home

Published

16 hours ago

April 4, 2026

Trends Admin

Nollywood actress Laide Bakare

Nollywood Actress Laide Bakare Sets Strict Dating Rules: No Men in Her Home

Nollywood actress Laide Bakare has opened up about her approach to dating, relationships, and personal boundaries, revealing why she does not allow men she is seeing to visit her home unless there is a serious commitment such as marriage.

Speaking during an interview with fellow actress Ayo Adesanya, Bakare emphasized the importance of self-respect, responsibility, and clear boundaries in relationships. She expressed that while she can like, appreciate, and respect a partner, she does not subscribe to being “in love” lightly.

“I do not love, I like. I appreciate. I respect,” Bakare said, explaining that liking someone allows her to value companionship without blurring emotional boundaries or creating unrealistic expectations.

On the subject of dating logistics, she stated firmly that a man should not have free access to her home. “How will that work? You people are dating and the man will be coming to your house without marriage? It has never happened,” she questioned. She stressed that personal space is sacred and should be shared only when trust and commitment are established.

READ ALSO:

Bakare further noted that she expects a partner to take responsibility in the relationship by hosting her in his own space, even if it is rented or modest. “In his house, he’s the man. You should be responsible. You should carry me to your house,” she said, underscoring that a man’s ability to provide and host reflects maturity and seriousness.

The actress clarified that these rules are not about rejecting companionship but about protecting her peace and emotional well-being. By setting boundaries, she believes that relationships are built on respect, accountability, and clarity of intentions.

Social media reactions to Bakare’s remarks were mixed. While many fans praised her for championing self-respect and healthy dating standards, others debated whether her approach was too traditional for modern relationships. Entertainment commentators have noted that her statements contribute to a broader discussion on privacy, dignity, and emotional safety in dating, particularly in the context of celebrity culture.

Bakare’s comments have sparked conversations about the need for personal boundaries and deliberate choices in romantic engagements, highlighting that true respect and commitment should precede access to intimate spaces.

Nollywood Actress Laide Bakare Sets Strict Dating Rules: No Men in Her Home

Entertainment

Blessing CEO Defends Breast Cancer Fundraiser Amid Backlash

Published

16 hours ago

April 4, 2026

Trends Admin

Nigerian social media influencer Blessing CEO

Blessing CEO Defends Breast Cancer Fundraiser Amid Backlash

Nigerian social media influencer Blessing CEO has addressed critics demanding refunds from her breast cancer fundraising campaign, insisting that donations were voluntary and defending her decision not to share her medical test results publicly.

Blessing first disclosed her breast cancer diagnosis in January and appealed to the public for financial support to cover her surgery and treatment. While many supporters contributed, some critics accused her of faking her illness to solicit funds, and a few have demanded refunds online.

In a viral video posted on Thursday, Blessing explained that the planned surgery has been delayed due to backlash. She said additional medical tests and post-surgery care have increased the overall cost, and that seeking financial support early was a precaution to avoid delays at a more critical stage of her condition.

READ ALSO:

The influencer emphasised that she cannot share her cancer test results online due to privacy regulations and patient confidentiality. She added that even if disclosed, most online critics would not be able to correctly interpret the medical information.

“If I show you the result, can you interpret it? Show me one cancer patient who came to the internet to show their results. Because I came out and said lovers help me,” she said, highlighting the voluntary nature of donations.

Blessing also stressed that many critics commenting on her fundraising lack knowledge about cancer and patient privacy, and reiterated that supporters who understand the situation have contributed willingly. “If you do not trust me, do not give me your money. If you do not want to give, keep your money. I do not put a gun to your head to give me your one naira,” she added.

Supporters have defended her approach, noting that medical crowdfunding is a common practice in Nigeria, where high treatment costs and limited insurance coverage make financial assistance necessary for many patients. Experts also emphasise that sharing medical results publicly is not recommended, and privacy and transparency must be balanced carefully when fundraising online.

The controversy has sparked a broader discussion on digital fundraising for medical treatment, patient privacy, and the responsibilities of influencers in sharing personal health journeys online. Blessing CEO maintains that her decision is aimed at protecting her privacy while ensuring she can access necessary care.

Blessing CEO Defends Breast Cancer Fundraiser Amid Backlash

Entertainment

Madam Saje brokers peace in Akindele–Abraham feud

Published

3 days ago

April 2, 2026

Trends Admin

Madam Saje brokers peace in Akindele–Abraham feud

Veteran Nollywood actress Fausat Balogun has intervened to settle a brewing rift involving leading actresses Funke Akindele, Toyin Abraham and Iyabo Ojo, bringing a swift resolution to a controversy that had stirred conversations across the entertainment space.

The disagreement, which recently played out in the public eye, was triggered by an incident at a movie premiere hosted by Iyabo Ojo.

During the event, Akindele was perceived to have ignored a greeting from Abraham — a moment that quickly went viral and fuelled speculation of a deepening divide among some of Nollywood’s most influential figures.

The situation gained further traction after Iyabo Ojo weighed in, hinting that underlying tensions may have stemmed from earlier remarks by Abraham about feeling sidelined in the industry — comments believed to have conflicted with a prior understanding between her and Akindele.

READ ALSO:

The development reignited discussions about rivalry, recognition and unspoken competition within the Yoruba film circle.

Such disputes are not entirely new in Nollywood, where collaborations, endorsements and box office rivalry often place top actors under intense public scrutiny.

Social media has also amplified minor misunderstandings, frequently turning them into major talking points that shape public perception of celebrities and their relationships.

Amid the growing buzz, Madam Saje stepped in, leveraging her status as a respected industry figure to de-escalate tensions.

In a video shared on Instagram, she confirmed that she had engaged all parties involved and successfully mediated peace among them.

“I have taken up the matter since yesterday. I’ve resolved it and ordered them to take it off social media. I made them realise that their matter should no longer be discussed on social media again,” she said.

Her intervention appears to have restored calm, reinforcing calls within the industry for unity and discretion, especially among high-profile actors whose influence extends beyond the screen.